ICAO FPL 2012 Implementation Workshop Lisbon 16 th February 2012 Kim Breivik Chairman EUR 2012 Task Force Operational Requirements, Network Management.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

Chapter 5 Transfer of Training
MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop MICS4 Technical Assistance.
Task Group Chairman and Technical Contact Responsibilities ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Scott Orthey and Steve Mawn 1.
Document #07-12G 1 RXQ Customer Enrollment Using a Registration Agent Process Flow Diagram (Switch) Customer Supplier Customer authorizes Enrollment.
Document #07-12G 1 RXQ Customer Enrollment Using a Registration Agent Process Flow Diagram (Switch) Customer Supplier Customer authorizes Enrollment.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Project Meeting Content Group Part 1: Usability Testing.
2-1-1 Disaster Data Management System AIRS Conference – New Orleans 2 nd Session May 23, 2012.
GSMP Local Community Network Enhanced Process Meeting Sept. 13, 2007.
1 MSRATF Update to TSS (Modeling SPS and RAS Ad Hoc Task Force) Scope of Work Approval January 25, 2013 Joe Seabrook Puget Sound Energy.
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
Federal Aviation Administration GOLD Amendment Program By:Tom Kraft Date:8 February 2012 Presented to:SOCM/2 Seminar.
Presentation to the ICAO IVATF Montréal, 27 th – 30 th July 2010 EUROCONTROL/CFMU VOLCANIC ASH CRISIS REPORT European Organisation for the Safety of Air.
FANS (Future Air Navigation System) Flight Crew Procedures
ICAO Safety Management Systems (SMS) Course
IVATF/2 Montreal, 11 th – 15 th July 2011 FOLLOW UP TO VOLCEX 11/01 AND GRIMSVÖTN European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Žarko SIVČEV EUROCONTROL.
1 CAATS Second Workshop Validation User Group VDR Survey - Results Ulrich Borkenhagen; EUROCONTROL HQ, Core Team Lanzarote, Thursday 16 th February 2006.
Click to edit Master title style Page - 1 OneSky Teams Step-by-Step Online Corporate Communication Support 2006.
1 PHARE Operational Scenarios J-P. Nicolaon, Operational Task Force Chairman EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
1 CARE-ASAS Action Plan Francis Casaux CARE-ASAS Action Manager on behalf of EUROCONTROL.
ETFMS - SYSTEM OVERVIEW
ENHANCED TACTICAL FLOW MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ETFMS)
ICAO FPL 2012 Implementation Workshop Lisbon 16 th February 2012 Kim Breivik Chairman EUR 2012 Task Force Operational Requirements, Network Management.
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Implementing DQR - A Practical View DAL/DQR Workshop Brussels, February 2013 Presented.
ICAO FPL 2012 Implementation Workshop Lisbon 16 th February 2012 Transition & Roll-Over Period Kim Breivik Chairman EUR 2012 Task Force Operational Requirements,
Hans Koolen NMOC/CFMU Network Operations Services
One Sky for Europe EUROCONTROL © 2002 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL) Page 1 FAA/Eurocontrol Technical Interchange.
Human Performance Improvement Process
May Welcome and Introductions Training Overview Evolution from CSRS to CEDARS (Fri) Submission and Editing Process (Tues) Course Catalog, Student.
Clinical Management for Behavioral Health Services (CMBHS) Mental Health Implementation Batch User Acceptance Testing Presented February 8, 2013.
Fall HSGQE Retest District Test Coordinator Training September 18-19, 2008.
0 - 0.
Addition Facts
Richmond House, Liverpool (1) 26 th January 2004.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop MICS Technical Assistance MICS Survey Design Workshop.
Law School 1 Using Blackboard Assignment tool for e-submission, e-marking, e-feedback Jane Daly 21 st March 2013.
31/03/2017 Moving towards an Integrated ASM/ATFCM/ATS Approach Brussels – September 2012 Cooperation in crisis and contingency situations Asli.
Configuration management
Software change management
Human Capital Investment Programme Disability Activation Project (DACT) WELCOME Support Workshop Thursday 7 th February
1 Contract Inactivation & Replacement Fly-in Action ( Continue to Page Down/Click on each page…) Electronic Document Access (EDA)
VOORBLAD.
Developing a Public Involvement Plan Why Develop a PI Plan? PI Plan Format Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental.
Ensuring a 'Flexible Use of Airspace'….
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
CMPT 275 Software Engineering
1 FL EDI R3 Test Requirements Rule 69L , F.A.C.
IAEA Training in Emergency Preparedness and Response Development of Simulation Exercise Work Session (Drill) Module WS-012.
LP Seminar – Madrid – 20 October 2008 EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND REPORTING & MONITORING PROCEDURES Lead Partner Seminar Madrid, 20 October 2008.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
System Testing 2  Effective March 3, 2014, new requirements for system testing were implemented  State Agencies are now required to provide to FNS:
Week 1.
20&27 May Agenda 1.Highlight the difference between system flow of e- Invoice and paper invoice – 15 minutes 2.Demonstrate the operation procedure.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
12 January 2009SDS batch generation, distribution and web interface 1 ExESS IT tool for SDS batch generation, distribution and web interface ExESS IT tool.
1 Ensuring a 'Flexible Use of Airspace'…. ICAO EANPG FUA Task Force Paris, May 2008 EUROCONTROL Airspace, Network Planning & Navigation Division.
African Aviation Training Organization
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Presentation to ICAO Workshop Kiev 28 July – 1 July 2010 EUR Regional Implementation of Flight Plan.
International Civil Aviation Organization European and North Atlantic Office Outcome of the ICAO EUR FPL2012 Workshop Kiev, Ukraine 29 June – 1 July 2010.
International Civil Aviation Organization European and North Atlantic Office CLARIFICATIONS FROM ICAO - ICAO EUR FPL2012 Workshop Kiev, Ukraine 29 June.
© FREQUENTIS 2010 Datum: Rev.1 Autor: ODOSeite: 1 FPL 2012 Kym Shenton Senior Technical Engineer/Safety Engineer Frequentis California, Inc.
International Civil Aviation Organization SAM Regional Seminar/Workshop Tom Brady ICAO Air Navigation Bureau May Flight Plan Implementation and.
FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment.
Vendors Conference Prestwick 2011 Customer Picture Implementation of Changes to ICAO FPL 2012 Christoph Kunze Lufthansa Systems 7th December 2011.
CLARIFICATIONS FROM ICAO - ICAO EUR FPL2012 Workshop
FILING OF VFR FLIGHT PLANS
ICAO 2012 Network Operations Update
Presentation transcript:

ICAO FPL 2012 Implementation Workshop Lisbon 16 th February 2012 Kim Breivik Chairman EUR 2012 Task Force Operational Requirements, Network Management EUROCONTROL Testing & Training Activities

Lisbon, 16 February Testing - General It is recognised that the best way to mitigate many concerns is to ensure adequate testing is performed in due time Note: there is no fallback procedure for 2012 ICAOs Programme Phases document recommends testing to have been performed by 2 nd quarter of 2012 Two main types of testing with external partners (interface/consistency testing) that can be considered Static – using data files to exchange test samples and results allowing batch processing off-line Dynamic – using normal communication medium (AFTN) and system processing in real time

Lisbon, 16 February IFPS Testing Three types of testing possibilities: IFPS Validation System (IFPUV) Static Testing Dynamic Operational Test sessions (OPT) Participation open to all, EUR and non-EUR

Lisbon, 16 February IFPUV [1] A tool to test the validity of FPL messages only Can be used by AOs, AROs or flight plan service providers (CFSPs) to validate New format FPLs Can be used by ANSPs in the creation of valid New format FPLs for testing purposes Can be used for almost all 2012 validation purposes regardless of departure, destination and route. It can therefore even be used by AOs that never normally fly within European airspace (A valid response will not ultimately be achieved if the route does not contain a portion within Europe. However, the 2012 changes are almost all syntax/semantic related and the IFPUV will always report syntax errors)

Lisbon, 16 February IFPUV [2] Is available today via AFTN (EUCHZMFV), SITA (BRUEY7X), B2B or Public Web:

Lisbon, 16 February Static Testing The exchange, preferably via , of files containing: example test messages (FPLs, CHG, DLA, CNL, ARR, etc.) processing results Can be used by: AOs, AROs or CFSPs to validate New format messages produced by their system with IFPS and/or relevant ANSPs ANSPs to ensure consistency with IFPS: A file(s) of New format flight data, considered valid by IFPS, is made available by CFMU for: IFPS States Non-IFPS States & other regions ANSPs to ensure consistency with other ANSPs Test data should be: consistent with currently applicable AIRAC data attention paid to DOF/ values

Lisbon, 16 February OPT Testing On-line, pre-determined test sessions Requires significant coordination effort by all concerned to ensure test addresses are configured, test data created and test scenario achieved Test Schedule OPT1: 30 January – 3 February 2012 OPT2: 20 – 24 February 2012 OPT3: 7 – 11 May 2012 OPT4: 11 – 15 June 2012 OPT5: 3 – 7 September 2012 OPT6: 24 – 28 September 2012

Lisbon, 16 February OPT - Participation Who can participate States receiving an IFPS service, inc. copy addressees Non-IFPS States via use of the AD line addressing mechanism Any other flight plan recipients e.g. Airports, strategic planning units, etc. Any AOs, AROs, CFSP – flight plan originators Prior registration required for each test session Registration form will be provided via Test Plan document

Lisbon, 16 February OPT – Registration Data Flight Plan originators are required to indicate: the address from which they will send messages to the IFPS test system willingness to receive ACK, MAN, REJ to the address provided ANSPs are required to indicate: the unit or entity for which messages are requested to be sent by the IFPS test system e.g. Kiev ACC, Yerevan TWR, etc. the test address to be used i.e. the test address to be assigned to the specified unit where messages from IFPS will be received; the same information as for flight plan originators in case the ATC unit also intends (or needs!) to send test flight plans

Lisbon, 16 February OPT – Test Scenario Each test session will simulate the following phases: Pre-15 Nov (Transition Phase) IFPS: Acceptance of both Old and New formats ANSP: Reception of both Old and New formats or, Old only (IFPS translation) Roll-over Period IFPS: Acceptance of Old + New Acceptance of New only ANSP: Reception of Old + New or Old only Reception of New only Post-15 Nov Acceptance of New only by IFPS New only received by ANSP

Lisbon, 16 February Standard Test Configuration – IFPS States 00:00 UTC 15 Nov IFPS Switch (S) Wed. 07:00 UTC 00:00 UTC 16 Nov 2012 Ready Date (R) Thur. 11:00 UTC Note: If a mixture of both Old + New is required by an ATCU then the 2012 Ready parameter must be set to an earlier date/time for that unit. To be requested via Registration Form. IFPS acceptance of Old + New IFPS acceptance of New only New only received by ATCUs 28 hrs Old only received by ATCUs reception of IFPS translation.

Lisbon, 16 February Mixed Scenario – IFPS States 00:00 UTC 15 Nov IFPS Switch (S) Wed. 07:00 UTC 2012 Ready Date (R) Tue. 15:00 UTC IFPS acceptance of Old + New IFPS acceptance of New only Old only received by ATCUs reception of IFPS translation New only received by ATCUs Old + New received by ATCUs +/- 36 hrs

Lisbon, 16 February Test Configuration – Non-IFPS States 00:00 UTC 15 Nov IFPS Switch (S) Wed. 07:00 UTC IFPS acceptance of Old + New IFPS acceptance of New only Old only received by non-IFPS ATCUs reception of IFPS translation. New + some Old received by non-IFPS ATCUs

Lisbon, 16 February OPT Basic Testing Syntax & Semantic Testing with Standard Scenario IFPS acceptance of New format messages can be tested throughout the complete session; IFPS refusal of Old content can only be tested after 07:00 UTC on Wednesday; Reception by ATC units within the IFPS area (and Copy addresses) of New format can only be achieved after 11:00 UTC on Thursday; Reception by ATC units outside the IFPS area of New format can only be achieved after 07:00 UTC on Wednesday; Reception by ATC units within the IFPS area (and Copy addresses) of Old format messages translated from New can only be achieved prior to 11:00 UTC on Thursday; Reception by ATC units outside the IFPS area of Old format messages translated from New can only be achieved prior to 07:00 UTC on Wednesday

Lisbon, 16 February Standard Test Scenario MON TUE WED THUR FRI Config. Test Phase 1 : Phase 2 Phase 3 Old + New accepted Old onlyOld only received Phase 2 : New only acceptedOld only Old + New received Phase 3 : New only accepted New only New only received Reception by Unknown AD Line addresses Reception by IFPS addressees IFPS behaviour Phase 1 15 Nov Switch (S) 0700 Z 1100 Z 2012_READY (R) Parameter (per Addressee)

Lisbon, 16 February Early Transition Test Scenario MON TUE WED THUR FRI Config. Test Phase 1 : Phase 2 Phase 3 Old + New accepted Old only Old only received Phase 2 : Old + New accepted Old + New Old only received Phase 3 : New only accepted New + reducing Old New + reducing Old Reception by Unknown AD Line addresses Reception by IFPS addressees IFPS behaviour Phase 1 15 Nov Switch (S) 0700 Z 2012_READY (R) Parameter 0900 Z

Lisbon, 16 February OPT – Advanced Testing Advanced Test Scenarios Translation IFPS acceptance of both Old and New formats IFPS translation ANSP reception of both Old and New formats, or, Old only (IFPS translation) Transition IFPS application of 2012_READY parameter ANSP reception of Old only or Old + New in accordance with parameter setting Roll-over IFPS: Acceptance of Old + New Acceptance of New only ANSP: Reception of Old + New or Old only Reception of New only

Lisbon, 16 February Translation Test Case (TO) ReferenceTRANS_OLD (TO) Objective1.Demonstrate the ability of IFPS to convert New format into Old format in accordance with ICAO_2012_READY_DATE parameter setting of the addressee 2. Demonstrate the ability of an ATC unit to process Old format converted from New format. Pre-requisites set to New only at time S set to time R (R = S + 28hr) set to 6hr set to 24hr (i.e. DOF limit) Test DataC1. Valid New format messages relevant to the ATC unit concerned and with an entry time into the ATC units airspace (EOBDT) before R Expected ResultC1. Old format messages provided by IFPS to the ATC unit

Lisbon, 16 February Translation Test Case (TO) – IFPS States 00:00UTC 15 Nov IFPS Switch (S) Wed. 07:00 UTC 00:00UTC 16 Nov 2012 Ready Date (R) Thur. 11:00 UTC = FPL submission time & format (N=New, O=Old) = FPL distribution time & format (N=New, O=Old) = EOBDT (Off Block Date & Time) <6 hrs O N TO_C1 = Test Case reference

Lisbon, 16 February Transition Test Cases (TN) – IFPS States ReferenceTRANS_NEW (TN) Objective1. Demonstrate the ability of IFPS to provide New format in accordance with ICAO_2012_READY_DATE parameter setting of the addressee. 2. Demonstrate the ability of an ATC unit to process New format. Pre- requisites set to New only at time S set to time R (R = S + 28hr) set to 6hr set to 24hr Test DataC1. Valid New format message sent to IFPS after R with an entry time into the ATC units airspace (EOBDT) less than 6hr in the future C2. Valid New format message sent to IFPS before R with an entry time into the ATC units airspace (EOBDT) less than 6hr in the future C3. Valid New format message sent to IFPS just before R with an entry time into the ATC units airspace (EOBDT) greater than 6hr in the future Expected Result C1. New format messages provided by IFPS to the ATC unit C2. Old format messages provided by IFPS to the ATC unit C3. New format message provided by IFPS to the ATC unit 6 hr before EOBDT

Lisbon, 16 February Translation (TO) + Transition (TN) – IFPS States 00:00UTC 15 Nov IFPS Switch (S) Wed. 07:00 UTC 00:00UTC 16 Nov 2012 Ready Date (R) Thur. 11:00 UTC = FPL submission time & format (N=New, O=Old) = FPL distribution time & format (N=New, O=Old) = EOBDT (Off Block Date & Time) <6 hrs O N TO_C1 = Test Case reference <6 hrs N N TN_C1 <6 hrs O N TN_C2 >6 hrs N N TN_C3 =6 hrs

Lisbon, 16 February Roll-Over Switch Test Cases (RS) – IFPS States ReferenceROLL_SWITCH (RS) Objective1. Demonstrate the ability of IFPS to switch from accepting both Old and New formats to accepting New format only 2. Demonstrate the ability of an ATC unit to achieve a clean switch from Old to New format. Pre- requisites As before Test DataC1. Valid Old format messages sent to IFPS before S with an entry time into the ATC units airspace (EOBDT) after S but before R C2. Valid New format messages sent to IFPS before S with an entry into the ATC units airspace (EOBDT) after S but before R C3. Valid Old format messages sent to IFPS before S with an entry into the ATC units airspace (EOBDT) after R C4. Valid Old format messages sent to IFPS after S Expected Result C1. Reception from IFPS in Old format, at EOBDT-6 hrs C2. Reception from IFPS in Old format, as translated by IFPS, at EOBDT -6hrs i.e. prior to time C3. Error – EOBDT outside acceptable range (<24hr in advance) C4. Error – Old format not accepted

Lisbon, 16 February All Test Cases – IFPS States IFPS Switch (S) Wed. 07:00 UTC 2012 Ready Date (R) Thur. 11:00 UTC <6 hrs O N TO_C1 <6 hrs N N TN_C1 <6 hrs O N TN_C2 >6 hrs N N TN_C3 =6 hrs >6 hrs O O RS_C1 =6 hrs >6 hrs O N RS_C2 =6 hrs <6 hrs REJ O RS_C4 >24 hrs O RS_C3 REJ 28 hrs

Lisbon, 16 February Test Cases (AD) – Non-IFPS States ReferenceAD-Line (AD) Objective1. Demonstrate IFPS switch from accepting both Old and New formats to accepting New only. 2. Demonstrate the ability of IFPS to distribute to AD line addressees in Old format only ahead of the IFPS Switch date/time. 3. Demonstrate the ability of IFPS to distribute in New format following the IFPS Switch date. Pre- requisites set to New only at time S set to 6hr set to 24hr Test DataC1. Valid New format message sent to IFPS before S with an entry time into the ATC units airspace (EOBDT) before S. C2. Valid Old format messages sent to IFPS before S with an entry time into the ATC units airspace (EOBDT) after S. C3. Valid New format messages sent to IFPS before S with an entry into the ATC units airspace (EOBDT) after S C4. Valid Old format messages sent to IFPS before S with an entry into the ATC units airspace (EOBDT) > 24hr in the future C5. Valid Old format messages sent to IFPS after S Expected Result C1. Reception from IFPS in Old format C2. Reception from IFPS in Old format, at EOBDT-6 hrs C3. Reception from IFPS in New format at EOBDT -6hrs C4. Error – EOBDT outside acceptable range (<24hr in advance) C5. Error – Old format not accepted

Lisbon, 16 February Transition + Rollover Test Cases – Non-IFPS States IFPS Switch (S) Wed. 07:00 UTC <6 hrs O N AD_C1 >6 hrs O O AD_C2 =6 hrs >6 hrs N N AD_C3 =6 hrs <6 hrs REJ O AD_C5 >24 hrs O AD_C4 REJ

Lisbon, 16 February OPT – Test Data Test Data Creation of New format FPLs necessary Participation of ANSP + local AOs in the same session is encouraged Compatibility with AIRAC Callsigns which: are easily recognised as test messages will not be confused with the operational messages, which are copied to the test systems from the operational system Eg. DLH01XX1st test FPL from Lufthansa DDW14XX14th test FPL from ARO Bremen

Lisbon, 16 February Documentation - Test Plan All 2012 testing related information (inc. Test Registration form) is published via the EUR 2012 Test Plan, available via the web siteEUR 2012 Test Plan Contact:

Lisbon, 16 February Training

Lisbon, 16 February Training Computer Based Training (CBT) to be made available via Network Operations web pages Aimed primarily at flight plan originators Provides guidance concerning 2012 flight planning changes and how they impact EUR and IFPS operations To be available March 2012