AYP/SINA/DINA Iowa Statewide Data Conference Tom Deeter IDOE Bureau of Information & Analysis Geri McMahon IDOE Bureau of School Improvement August 10,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
No Child Left Behind Public School Choice. Federal/State Requirements Federal System No Child Left Behind (NCLB): Choice Supplemental Educational Services.
Advertisements

Illinois State Board of Education Implementation of School Choice and Supplemental Educational Services District Technical Assistance Workshop June 2007.
10 Components of School Improvement LEA School Support Team Technical Assistance Workshop Supplemental Information August 2010.
Title I: Supplemental Educational Services Regional Technical Assistance Sessions May,2009.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Information Session: Parent/Guardian Communications, NCLB School Choice and SES August 17, 2010.
Accountability Reporting Webinar: Parent/Guardian Communications, NCLB School Choice and SES August 23, :00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. Kenneth Klau.
Title I School Improvement in North Carolina. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) determines if a Title I school goes into Title I School Improvement.
Preparing for Cycle III School and District Accountability Ratings and AYP Determinations Information Sessions August 26 & 27, 2004 Juliane Dow, Associate.
Title I A Requirements under NCLB Public Law Office of Federal Programs September 2014 Oklahoma State Department of Education.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
IMPLICATIONS FOR KENTUCKY’S SCHOOLS AND DISTRICTS SUPERINTENDENTS’ WEBCAST MARCH 6, 2012 NCLB Waiver Flexibility 1.
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
SUPPLEMENTAL EDUCATIONAL SERVICES (SES) 1.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS October 5, 2011.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
AYP Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) NCESD Title I/LAP Co-Op Work Session August 26, 2014 Jody Hess, OSPI Title I:
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
WASHINGTON STATE PROVIDER APPLICATION Supplemental Educational Services.
The Basics of Title I Florida Public School Choice Consortium's Annual Conference (FPSCC) Anke Toth November 18, 2009.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
1 Title IA Online Coordinator Training School Improvement.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents
August Accountability Gateway Training. August Who we are Greg Marcus  MDE  (651) John Lindner  Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan 
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
1 Mercer County Community College West Windsor, New Jersey April 1 & 2, No Child Left Behind Technical Assistance Supplemental Educational Services.
NCLB Federal Funding Planning Meeting Private Non Profit Schools LEA Date.
Supplemental Educational Services. Determining Per Student SES Rate Section 1116(e)(6): each SES student must get lesser of: a.District’s total Title.
Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
SES Overview Supplemental Education Services. What is SES? Additional academic instruction that is provided outside of the regular school day Designed.
Title III, Part A: Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient (LEP) and Immigrant Students  The purpose of Title III, Part A is to help ensure.
Presented by: Dr. Jobi Lawrence Director, Title III Iowa Department of Education.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Annual Title I Meeting School Name. Why are we here? The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 requires that each Title I School hold an Annual Meeting.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) Elements School Improvement District.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
August 1, 2007 DELAWARE’S GROWTH MODEL FOR AYP DETERMINATIONS.
1 Title IA Online Coordinator Training Parent Involvement
MCKINNEY-VENTO HOMELESS EDUCATION GRANT AWARDEE TRAINING Division of Performance and Accountability September 30, :00AM(MDT)
1 No Child Left Behind: Identification of Program Improvement (PI) Schools and Districts July 2003.
Major Changes to Title I Regulations Public School Choice & Supplemental Educational Services Presented by: Karen Davies, Title I School Improvement Coordinator.
Priority & Focus School Title I, Part A, Set-Asides and Choice/Transfer Option Requirements Under ESEA Waiver District Coordinators/Administrators Priority.
GUIDANCE ON SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT Region VII Comprehensive Center The University of Oklahoma 555 Constitution Street Norman, OK David.
BAGGETT ELEMENTARY Annual Title I Parent Involvement Meeting Baggett Elementary September 16, 2015.
1 Choice Provisions in No Child Left Behind Cheri Pierson Yecke, Ph.D. Director of Teacher Quality and Public School Choice Laura O. Lazo Education Program.
Title I, Part A 1.
Adequate Yearly Progress DE/AEA Mini Summit.
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents Highland Renaissance Academy.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
Annual Title I Parent Involvement Meeting Panter Elementary School September 17, 1:30 p.m. Media Center.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents
Ellie Gearhart August Campus Improvement Plan Revise plan Parents School staff LEA Outside experts.
Transition to ESSA WVDE Office of Federal Programs March 8, 2016 Alternate Audio Access: #
OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT – FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY BECCA MARSH, DIVISION OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT AND SUPPORT TEA, CHARTER SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION ©2013.
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Illinois’ Accountability Workbook: Approved Changes in 2005
Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
Studio School Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved?
What Every Family Needs to Know! Date
Presentation transcript:

AYP/SINA/DINA Iowa Statewide Data Conference Tom Deeter IDOE Bureau of Information & Analysis Geri McMahon IDOE Bureau of School Improvement August 10, 2015

AYP Review Target – 100 %, since Reading Comprehension, Mathematics Participation, Performance Other Academic Indicators: Attendance, Graduation Rate Progression: Watch, SINA, Delay, Removed

Steps in Meeting AYP 1.Meet the Target (within Confidence Interval, CI) 2.Safe Harbor – reduce % of non-proficient students by 10% 3.Biennium Data – Uniform Averaging – data for past 2 years, CI 4.Triennium Data – Uniform Averaging – data for past 3 years, CI Add in the students meeting growth (approved growth model) Repeat Steps 1-4

Safe Harbor Given: 70% Proficient last year that means 30% are not proficient Reduction of non proficient by 10% = 30 x.10 = 3% Add the 3% to 70 To meet Safe Harbor, you have to reach 73% proficient this year

Exceptions to 2015 AYP Decisions Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Field Test schools. Used data as “prior year data” to evaluate Safe Harbor Dynamic Learning Maps alternate assessment consortium. Proficiency data not available Used DLM students for Participation only, not Proficiency

2015 AYP Determinations 338 Districts, 1336 Schools Met Participation Rates: 100% Districts, 99% schools Met Other Academic Indicators: 99.7% Districts, 98.5% Schools

2015 AYP Determinations Mathematics Proficiency Districts – 70.7 % Met, 29.3 % Missed, 9.2 % DINA Schools – 33.5 % Met, 66.5 % Missed, 40.9 % SINA Reading Proficiency Districts – 64.2 % Met, 35.8 % Missed, 11 % DINA Schools – 29.8 % Met, 70.2 % Missed, 48.2 % SINA

2015 AYP Determinations Summary DistrictsSchools Missed both R & M Proficiency (includes DINA/SINA, Watch) 19.5 %53.6 % Met both R & M Proficiency (includes Delay, Met, Removed) 54.4 %16.8 % Missed for R or M Proficiency 26.0 %29.6 % Total Missed for Something (includes one or both subjects) 45.6 %83.2 %

FY13 Actual - $83,471,134 FY14 Actual - $84,975,853 FY15 Actual - $91,258,673 The state can set aside up to 4% of the Title I allocation for SINA allocations District allocations – left-behind/2015/08/ title-i-allocations Title I Allocation

12-13 School year SINA set aside $3,369,881 Number of SINA schools188 Average SINA allocation$19, School year SINA set aside $3,338,845 Number of SINA schools251 Average SINA allocation$14, School year SINA set aside $3,399,034 Number of SINA schools310 Average SINA allocation$11, School year SINA set aside $3,650,347 Number of SINA schools? Average SINA allocation? SINA Allocations

ttps:// behind/schools-and-districts-need-assistance- sinadina/guidance-schools-and ttps:// behind/schools-and-districts-need-assistance- sinadina/guidance-schools-and SINA/DINA Timelines C-Plan link for Building SINA Plans Parent Notification Letters Corrective Action Guidance Restructuring Guidance School Choice and Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Information Guidance for SINA/DINA

Professional Developments Set Asides Requirements SINA 1 and 2- must set aside and spend 10% the building allocation for professional development DINA 1 and 2- must set aside and spend 10% of the district Title I allocation for professional development This set aside is budgeted in the Title I General Budget

SINA 1 -20% of the district allocation for Choice: ALL SINA 2 and above- 20% of the district allocation for Choice & Supplemental Education Services (SES) The Notification of Unexpended Funds form must be submitted to release the required 20% for use in other areas. This form is available after April 1 st. School Choice & SES Set-Aside (budgeted on the General Title I Budget)

Eligibility ALL students of SINA schools Priority is given to the lowest achieving, low income students Eligible Schools that can receive students Higher academic achievement No SINA Must offer more than one choice if available Choice: ALL SINA Schools

Length of Time for Choice Until graduated from choice school What if no schools are available? Parents must still be notified of SINA status Parents must be notified that no choices are available Choice: ALL SINA Schools

An LEA’s notice to parents: Available ONLY to “poverty children” Explain how parents can obtain SES for their child Include the SEA list of approved providers within the LEA or its geographical location, including on-line providers Describe briefly the services, qualifications and evidence of effectiveness for each provider SES Notification: SINA 2 +

Indicate providers that are able to serve students with disabilities or LEP students Include an explanation of the benefits of receiving SES Application procedures Explain how the LEA will notify parents about enrollment dates and start dates Fair and equitable procedures for serving students if not all students can be served Identify the District contact person Districts-Enter into agreement with provider NO District contract with only one provider District should not show preferential treatment for any one provider SES Notification: SINA 2 + cont’

SINA Plans and Budgets Both due November 1 Submit plan through C-Plan on the Iowa Education Portal: Submit each building’s SINA budget through the Title I Application

Upcoming technical assistance in regard to your SINA plan August 27 webinar3:00-4:30 September 16webinar9:00-10:30 and 3:00-4:30 October 13Symposium9:00-4:30

Accountability Amendments Submitted to USED 1.3 items on DLM (FAY definition, use in AYP, use in growth) 2.Definition of a “new school” for SINA purposes (consolidations) 3.6 and 7 year graduation rates 4.ADA fixed target at 95%.

Contact Information