1 New Governance Arrangements Presented by the Director General European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Provisional Council Agenda item.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMPL Committee 15 July 2010 The ESF Committee Opinion on the future of the ESF and the 23/24 June conference Thomas Bender Employment, Social Affairs and.
Advertisements

Mutual accountability and aid transparency Mutual accountability and aid transparency Republic of Moldova 1IATI meeting, OECD Conference center.
Ministry of Public Sector Development Public Sector Development Program Better Government Delivering Better Result.
The Agency for Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – UK Government views Sue Harrison Head of European Energy Markets 13 February 2008 EPP-ED Public.
Implications for the Regions EU-Regional Policy 1 Governance White Paper Introduction Adoption of White Paper on European Governance, July 25, 2001 Aim:
Audit Committees/ Audit Boards/ External Audit Presented by John Martin EUROCONTROL 9 June 2009 see general disclaimer – next.
Cooperative Network Design EUROCONTROL - New horizons for aviation.
1 Presented by the Chairman of the CMIC, Group Captain John CLARK, RAF European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Provisional Council Agenda.
Marc Deboeck ADQ Implementation Workshop 29 May 2013 Directorate Single Sky (SES) Support to CAA-NSA Single Sky Implementation Support to NSAs.
17th February 2004: Slide 1 DG Transport and Energy OATA Workshop 17th February 2004 European Commission OATA and the Single European Sky.
Traffic and Capacity Performance Summer 2008 Outlook PC/29 – 9 May 2008 Item 3.
Performance Review Commission PRC report 29th Session of the Provisional Council Brussels, 9 May 2008 Jean-François VIVIER Chairman PRC.
1 Provisional Council Agenda item May 2008 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Management Improvements Presented by the Director.
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation ITEM 7 AGENCY BUSINESS PLANNING: Budget Process and Functional Budget Presented by the SCF Chairman.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Session II: The Policy Framework Manase Peter Salema, Director Division for Europe, Department of Technical Cooperation.
Single European Sky 1 CAeM Technical Conference Single European Sky and the Impacts for Aeronautical Met Services Geneva 21 November 2006.
Impact of the Lisbon Treaty on the Common Security and Defence Policy of the European Union 24 February 2013 Joël Schuyer.
Bente Danielsen, ERGEG Transparency Project Team leader Alain Taccoen, ENTSO-E WG Market Information and Transparency, convenor Florence Forum June 2010.
Energy Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2009/71/EURATOM establishing a Community framework for the nuclear safety of nuclear installations.
FP7 Preparations ISTC meeting 31 March Content FP7 preparation approach and timetable Context for FP7 and for ICT in FP7 Research in New Financial.
Independence of the Mechanism: Critical Success Factors beyond the Paris Principles Rachel Murray University of Bristol.
Health & Consumer Protection Directorate General The EU Health Strategy and the new Health and Consumer Protection Programme Bernard Merkel Paula.
Jose Braz, ERGEG Conference on Implementing the 3rd Package 11th December 2008 The Agency for the Cooperation of European Energy Regulators.
The Treaties, Institutions and Policies of the EU
EUA Convention of European Higher Education Institutions Graz, May 2003 Theme III Consolidating a Quality Culture in Europe’s Universities.
Australia’s Experience in Utilising Performance Information in Budget and Management Processes Mathew Fox Assistant Secretary, Budget Coordination Branch.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS AND PROGRAMMES presented by Faizal Parish Regional/Central Focal Point GEF NGO.
David Halldearn, ERGEG Conference on Implementing the 3 rd Package 11 th December 2008 Implementating the 3rd Package: An ERGEG Consultation paper.
INTEGRITY. Principle 2: Defining and Evaluating the Role of the Board The board needs to understand and evaluate the role it plays and the way it contributes.
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
European Economic and Social Committee EUROPEAN INDUSTRY AND MONETARY POLICY The role of the European Investment Bank MAIN PROVISIONAL CONCLUSIONS (To.
Towards Greater Accountability: Challenges and Policy Recommendations presented by: Harry Anthony Patrinos Lead Education Economist World Bank Round-table.
The Global Centre for Information and Communication Technologies in Parliament 14 June 2006 V Legislative XML Workshop Towards European Standards for Legislative.
WORKSHOP, Nicosia 2-3rd July 2008 “Extension of SAFETY & QUALITY Common Requirements to the EMAC States” Item 3 : Regulatory Context Peter Stastny EUROCONTROL.
A New Start for EUTO Redruth, 29 September 2012 Henk Schüller.
European Ombudsman The role of the European Ombudsman Presentation to the CEE Bankwatch conference on accountability mechanisms for environmental protection.
Name Position Organisation Date. What is data integration? Dataset A Dataset B Integrated dataset Education data + EMPLOYMENT data = understanding education.
Report about activities of ENSREG Andrej Stritar Chairman of ENSREG Director of the Slovenian Nuclear Safety Administration 12. October 2009.
Promotion of an ICT dialogue between Europe and Latin America Horizon 2020 Dr. Margaretha Mazura, EMF Project Angels Webinar, 13 December 2012.
Vito Cistulli - FAO -1 Damascus, 2 July 2008 FAO Assistance to Member Countries and the Changing Aid Environment.
THE SECURITY SECTOR REVIEW PROCESS. ISSUES Understanding: -Scope: What are the elements of a SS Review? -Need: Why review the Security Sector? -Process:
Madrid Forum 6-7 November 2008 Implementating the 3rd Energy Package: An ERGEG Consultation paper Lord Mogg, ERGEG chairman.
Implementation of Insurance Core Principles and FSAP Evaluations The Portuguese FSAP experience Gabriel Bernardino Instituto de Seguros de Portugal.
Technical Assistance for Civil Society Organisations Regional Office This project is funded by the European Union. Regional Training on Citizen’s Participation.
European Commission DEVELOPMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN STANDARDISATION POLICY Norbert ANSELMANN Head of Unit, ENTR G2, Standardisation.
Economic and Monetary Union The EU has as an objective the establishment of the EMU.
COG/TNG contribution to LPR Implementation Language Proficiency: a safety issue St. Petersburg May 24th 2011.
1. Consumers, Health And Food Executive Agency European and international stakeholders Codex Alimentarius EU National implementations 2.
European Commission 1 Interoperability of Air Traffic Management systems for the Single European Sky.
Civil Society Participation and Contribution to the UNCAC Review Process Towards Transparency – TI National Contact Vietnam UNCAC Self Assessment Process:
Embedding the golden threads that lead to quality care every time……
Joint Seminar Brussels 2017.
Chapter 1 Corporate Governance
Agency Performance: A New Agenda
FlorenceForum November 2008
Local Government in Jamaica
EU-level issues and initiatives affecting CSOs
Co-operating with the European Aviation safety Agency
Secretariat Proposal Update
The Instrument for Pre–accession Assistance
Corporate Restructuring And Workers' involvement
Institutional changes The role of Bilateral Oversight Boards
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
European Economic and Social Committee
ETS WG role and working methods
EU-level issues and initiatives affecting CSOs
Scouting Ireland Corporate Governance
Language Proficiency: a safety issue
The ATM Standardisation Coordination Group
European Marine Monitoring and Assessment
Presentation transcript:

1 New Governance Arrangements Presented by the Director General European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Provisional Council Agenda item May 2008

2 Reinforced EUROCONTROL governance arrangements New role and involvement for the ANSB Supervisory/Management boards with external (non-executive) participation Streamlined stakeholder consultation mechanism, increased transparency Enhancement of existing civil-military cooperation & coordination Common design & management of the European ATM Network New Governance Objectives

3 Good governance vis-a-vis legal and institutional constraints Under the present legal framework, short-term institutional change not possible So we should agree what improvements we want and find pragmatic ways on how to implement them in the short term. Stakeholders (ANSB) need to be more closely involved in the strategic direction and business priorities of the Agencys Pan-European functions and CND. Member States continue to supervise policy issues and to provide direction. Responsibilities and reporting lines in the new governance structure should be clear and transparent. Pragmatic solutions can be implemented quickly provided that all parties agree!

44 Proposed Changed Governance (1) CND Agency Directorates involved in CND are currently subject of a re- organisation implementation of the resulting new governance structure can be expected in early 2009 Discussions should meanwhile start to enhance and clarify the involvement of the present SCG and ANSB in the new CND governance process Supervision of CND through a Management Charter possible

55 Proposed Changed Governance (2) CFMU and CRCO DG could allocate responsibilities to a Management/Supervisory Board, composed of directly involved Agency Directors and (non-executive) external Directors, through a Management Charter Management/Supervisory Boards (M/SB) report to DG, perhaps through the reformed ANSB acting as either the M/SB itself or as the arbiter between M/SBs Roles of the enlarged Committee & Consultative Groups to be clarified In principle DG accepts M/SB reports, but free to seek advice from the PC

66 Proposed Changed Governance (3) Maastricht UAC Maastricht Coordination Group (MCG) was created in 1986, but its TOR fully cover the majority of issues a future M/SB should address. Pursuant to Article 3 of the Statute of the Agency and Article 6 of the Maastricht Agreement DG could exercise his wide management independence vis-à-vis the MUAC through the MCG, but with further instructions and guidelines to be agreed with the 4 States. DG plans to coordinate with the 4 States (at DGCA level) on how the MCG could evolve