Best Management Practices and the Chesapeake Bay Program Watershed Model Jeff Sweeney University of Maryland Chesapeake Bay Program Office

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
Advertisements

Pennsylvania Nonpoint Source BMP Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness and Potential for Reducing Loads Jeff Sweeney University of Maryland PA Chesapeake Bay.
Frank J. Coale Mark P. Dubin Chesapeake Bay Program Partnerships Agriculture Workgroup BMP Verification Review Panel Meeting Annapolis, Maryland December.
Major Sources of Nonpoint Source (NPS) Pollution and Best Management Practices (BMPs) By: David Wojnowski, Stream Watch/Project WET Coordinator Stream.
RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Economic Study of Nutrient Credit Trading for the Chesapeake.
RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Tradeoffs in Achieving TMDLs – Ecosystem Services and Cultural.
Howard County, MD Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan October 6, 2011 Howard Saltzman Howard County Department of Public Works.
Stormwater Retrofitting Demystified! A training for local governments to cost effectively implement retrofits to meet MS-4 permit and Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
The Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Watershed Model Gary Shenk Presentation to COG 10/4/2012.
Historic Record of Practice Implementation Jeff Sweeney Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office
Environmental Harm Urban stormwater frequently contains litter, oil, chemicals, toxic metals, bacteria, and excess nutrients, like nitrogen and phosphorous.
1 Expanding Crediting of Chesapeake Bay Program Conservation Practices Mark Dubin Chesapeake Bay Program Agricultural Technical Coordinator University.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
NPDES Phase II Storm Water Regulations: WHAT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS NEED TO KNOW.
& Community Design LSU Green Laws Research Project Green Laws Louisiana Department of Agriculture & Forestry EBR Parish Tree And Landscape Commission Louisiana.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Primer: Chesapeake Bay Watershed and Bay Water Quality Models The Economics of Water Quality Improvements in Chesapeake Bay Workshop.
Water Pollution. Watershed A watershed is an area of land from which all the water drains to the same location, such as a stream, pond, lake, river, wetland.
Mark Dubin Agricultural Technical Coordinator University of Maryland Extension-College Park Modeling Quarterly Review Meeting April 17, 2012.
Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Stephen.
Chesapeake Bay Program Modeling Chesapeake Bay Program Watershed Model 101.
Chesapeake Bay Program Model Update Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program.
Point Source POLLUTION: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
Project Sponsors: National Association of Conservation Districts in cooperation with USDA-NRCS Providing Farmers Full Credit for Conservation Practice.
Buyer Seller Nutrient Credits Compensation ($) Maryland’s Water Quality Trading Program Phase II – Agricultural Nutrient Trading in Maryland John Rhoderick.
Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.
 Jennifer Volk Environmental Quality Extension Specialist University of Delaware Cooperative Extension.
What is a Watershed? (or Drainage Basin)
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources Christopher Gale Bill Taft.
The Chesapeake Bay Program’s Scenario Builder Gary Shenk CCMP workshop 5/11/2010.
Stormwater 101 Ohio Lake Erie Commission Best Local Land Use Practices Kirby Date, AICP.
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
Chesapeake Assessment Scenario Tool CAST Olivia H. Devereux Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 12/13/2011.
Elaine Snouwaert – WA Department of Ecology Walt Edelen – Spokane Conservation District Spokane River DO Advisory Group Meeting January 19, 2012.
Update on the Development of EPA’s Chesapeake Bay TMDL and Virginia’s Watershed Implementation Plan Russ Perkinson Potomac Roundtable October 8, 2010.
Virginia Assessment Scenario Tool VAST Developed by: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin.
Review of Scenario Builder BMP crediting Christopher F. Brosch University of Maryland Extension Chesapeake Bay Program Office
1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.
1 Questions Addressed What are the options for reducing pollutant inputs to Lake Tahoe? Pollutant Reduction Opportunities.
Updating Background Conditions and BMP Efficiencies Jeff Sweeney Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office
Lessons Learned from BMP evaluation studies in the nontidal streams and river in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman University of Maryland Center.
Phase 6 Land Use Co-Chairs: Karl Berger, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Jennifer Tribo, Hampton Roads Planning District Commission Coordinator:
MDOT Storm Water Management Plan Module 2: Best Management Practices
Non-point Source Update Marc T. Aveni Regional Manager.
Redwood River TMDL Critique David De Paz, Alana Bartolai, Lydia Karlheim.
Price Creek Watershed Project A joint project of the Iowa & Benton County Soil and Water Conservation Districts IOWATER Meeting – November 13, 2007.
Chesapeake Bay Program Decision Support System Management Actions Watershed Model Bay Model Criteria Assessment Procedures Effects Allocations Airshed.
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
Clifton Bell, P.E., P.G. Chesapeake Bay Modeling Perspectives for the Regulated Community.
Lessons Learned from BMP evaluation studies in the nontidal streams and river in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman University of Maryland Center.
Water Resources Technical Committee Chesapeake Bay Program Overview & Updates July 10, 2008 Tanya T. Spano.
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources By Joan Schumaker Chadde, Western U.P. Center for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education. All photos by Chadde,
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
Precision Management beyond Fertilizer Application Hailin Zhang.
Integrated Approach for Assessing and Communicating Progress toward the Chesapeake Bay Water-Quality Standards Scott Phillips USGS, STAR May 14, 2012 PSC.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
Hydrosphere Notes Part 9-Land Use. What is land use? The way people use land.
Human Impacts Part 2- Watersheds. What’s a Watershed? An area of land that drains into a common body of water.
Milestones, Progress and the Mid-point Assessment APPROACHING 2017 James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager Department of Environmental Quality.
Hydrosphere Notes Part 9-Land Use.
WIP Regional Meetings Jason Keppler
Delaware Nutrient Load Reductions for Agricultural BMPs
GIS Data Management for SHA’s Bay Restoration Program
Jeff Sweeney Environmental Protection Agency
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Anne Arundel County Maryland
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
VIRGINIA’S Phase iii watershed implementation plan
Presentation transcript:

Best Management Practices and the Chesapeake Bay Program Watershed Model Jeff Sweeney University of Maryland Chesapeake Bay Program Office Potomac Watershed Forum IV George Mason University - Prince William Campus August 12, 2005

Chesapeake Bay Program Current Modeling Structure

Purposes of the Chesapeake Bay Program Watershed Model Measure the environmental effects of particular management schemes for planning purposes. oWhat’s the impact of BMP implementation on nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment loads? Results help direct tributary strategy development oWhat yields the biggest bang and the biggest bang for the buck? Load allocations oEquitably account for all load sources. Measure of loading cap maintenance Provide loads to the Estuary ModelProvide loads to the Estuary Model o What’s the impact of BMP implementation on living resources/water quality? o What yields the biggest bang and the biggest bang for the buck? o Remove impairments by 2010 Attainment of water quality standards in the Chesapeake Bay will be determined by tidal water monitoring data, not the models.

VA Lower Potomac Load and BMP Data

VA Lower Potomac Nitrogen Loads to the Chesapeake Bay 2003 – 2010 Strategy Load Reductions

VA Lower Potomac Phosphorus Loads to the Chesapeake Bay 2003 – 2010 Strategy Load Reductions

VA Lower Potomac Sediment Loads to the Chesapeake Bay 2003 – 2010 Strategy Load Reductions

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Tributary Strategy Agricultural BMPs Approved Agricultural BMPsAgricultural BMPs Requiring Peer Review Riparian Forest BuffersContinuous No-Till Riparian Grass BuffersDairy Precision Feeding /and Forage Management Wetland RestorationSwine Phytase Land RetirementAmmonia Emission Reductions Tree PlantingPrecision Agriculture Conservation-TillagePrecision Grazing Carbon Sequestration/Alternative CropsWater Control Structures Poultry PhytaseStream Restoration Poultry Litter Transport Nutrient Management Enhanced Nutrient Management Conservation Plans/SCWQP Cover Crops (Early- and Late-Planting) Small Grain Enhancement (Early- and Late-Planting) Off-Stream Watering w/ Fencing Off-Stream Watering w/o Fencing Off-Stream Watering w/ Fencing & Rotational Grazing Animal Waste Management Systems: Livestock Barnyard Runoff Control/Loafing Lot Management Animal Waste Management Systems: Poultry * BMPs in red are in VA Lower Potomac Tributary Strategy

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Tributary Strategy Urban and Mixed Open BMPs Approved Urban and Mixed Open BMPsBMPs Requiring Peer Review Riparian Forest BuffersRiparian Grass Buffers Wetland RestorationForest Conservation Tree PlantingHorse Pasture Management Urban Growth ReductionAbandoned Mine Reclamation Wet Ponds & WetlandsMixed Open Stream Restoration Dry Detention Ponds & Hydrodynamic StructuresDirt & Gravel Road Erosion & Sediment Control Dry Extended Detention PondsUrban Street Sweeping Urban Infiltration Practices Urban Filtering Practices Urban Stream Restoration Erosion & Sediment Control Urban and Mixed Open Nutrient Management * BMPs in red are in VA Lower Potomac Tributary Strategy

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Tributary Strategy Forest, Septic and Shoreline BMPs Approved Forest BMPsBMPs Requiring Peer Review Forest Harvesting PracticesStream Restoration Dirt & Gravel Road Erosion & Sediment Control Approved Septic BMPs Septic Connections Septic Pumping Septic Denitrification Approved Shoreline Erosion BMPs Structural Shoreline Erosion Control Non-Structural Shoreline Erosion Control * BMPs in red are in VA Lower Potomac Tributary Strategy

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model Opportunities for BMPs Input Data Land Simulation River Simulation Output Opportunities for BMPs

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model Opportunities for BMPs BMPs involving landuse conversions BMPs with nutrient and sediment reduction efficienciesBMPs with nutrient and sediment reduction efficiencies BMPs with both landuse conversions and reduction efficienciesBMPs with both landuse conversions and reduction efficiencies BMPs that alter nutrient applications to croplandBMPs that alter nutrient applications to cropland o Diet and feed changes o Manure transport o Nutrient management applications

BMPs Involving Landuse Conversions Atmosphere Fertilizer Manure Runoff

BMPs Involving Landuse Conversions Atmosphere Fertilizer Manure Runoff

Agricultural BMPs Involving Landuse Conversions Load reductions attributed to movement to lower-exporting landuses.

Urban, Mixed Open and Septic BMPs Involving Landuse and Source Conversions Load reductions attributed to movement to lower-exporting landuses. In the case of septic connections, it’s assumed in the hook-up of septic to sewer, load is now part of tracked point source discharge.

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model Opportunities for BMPs BMPs involving landuse conversionsBMPs involving landuse conversions BMPs with nutrient and sediment reduction efficiencies BMPs with both landuse conversions and reduction efficienciesBMPs with both landuse conversions and reduction efficiencies BMPs that alter nutrient applications to croplandBMPs that alter nutrient applications to cropland o Diet and feed changes o Manure transport o Nutrient management applications

BMPs With Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Efficiencies Atmosphere Fertilizer Manure Runoff

BMPs With Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Efficiencies Atmosphere Fertilizer Manure Runoff

BMPs With Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Efficiencies How Efficiency BMPs Are Credited In The Model: Reduction = acres treated by BMP * BMP efficiency total segment acres By Landuse and Model Segment

BMPs With Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Efficiencies How Efficiency BMPs Are Credited In The Model: BMPs That Cannot Be Applied To Same Landuse: Mutually Exclusive – Additive In Nutrient Reduction Capabilities Examples: Riparian forest and grass buffers Pasture grazing BMPs Urban stormwater BMPs Several BMPs On Same Landuse – Consecutive: One BMP Reduces The Nutrients Available For Subsequent BMPs – Multiplicative In Nutrient Reduction Examples: Conservation Plans Cover Crops

Agricultural BMPs With Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Efficiencies BMP efficiencies for removing TN, TP, and SED are collaboration of Bay Program Subcommittee and Workgroup participants (i.e., peer review) after appraisal of literature and/or best professional judgment.

Urban and Mixed Open BMPs With Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Efficiencies BMP efficiencies for removing TN, TP, and SED are collaboration of Bay Program Subcommittee and Workgroup participants (i.e., peer review) after appraisal of literature and/or best professional judgment.

Urban, Septic and Forestry BMPs With Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Efficiencies BMP efficiencies for removing TN, TP, and SED are collaboration of Bay Program Subcommittee and Workgroup participants (i.e., peer review) after appraisal of literature and/or best professional judgment.

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model Opportunities for BMPs BMPs involving landuse conversionsBMPs involving landuse conversions BMPs with nutrient and sediment reduction efficienciesBMPs with nutrient and sediment reduction efficiencies BMPs with both landuse conversions and reduction efficiencies BMPs that alter nutrient applications to croplandBMPs that alter nutrient applications to cropland o Diet and feed changes o Manure transport o Nutrient management applications

Agricultural BMPs With Both Landuse Conversions and Reduction Efficiencies Riparian buffer and wetland efficiencies vary by hydro-geomorphic region. Wetland restoration is treated the same as riparian forest buffers. Forest and grass buffers are “additive” between each other but “multiplicative” with other BMPs.

Urban and Mixed Open BMPs With Both Landuse Conversions and Reduction Efficiencies Riparian buffer and wetland efficiencies for mixed open vary by hydro- geomorphic region. Wetland restoration is treated the same as riparian forest buffers.

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model Opportunities for BMPs BMPs involving landuse conversionsBMPs involving landuse conversions BMPs with nutrient and sediment reduction efficienciesBMPs with nutrient and sediment reduction efficiencies BMPs with both landuse conversions and reduction efficienciesBMPs with both landuse conversions and reduction efficiencies BMPs that alter nutrient applications to cropland o Diet and feed changes o Manure transport o Nutrient management applications

BMPs that Alter Nutrient Applications to Cropland

BMPs that Alter Nutrient Applications to Cropland Nutrient Management Applications Phase 4 Watershed Model accounts for both N- and P-based nutrient management. Phase 4 fertilizer application data is from state agricultural agencies.

BMPs that Alter Nutrient Applications to Cropland Nutrient Management Applications Phase 4 Watershed Model accounts for both N- and P-based nutrient management. Phase 4 fertilizer application data is from state agricultural agencies.

BMPs that Alter Nutrient Applications to Cropland Nutrient Management Applications Atmosphere Fertilizer Manure Runoff

BMPs that Alter Nutrient Applications to Cropland Nutrient Management Applications Atmosphere Fertilizer Manure Runoff

BMPs that Alter Nutrient Applications to Cropland Nutrient Management Applications

Chesapeake Bay Program Phase 5 Watershed Model

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Modeled Landuses Phase 4.3 Watershed Model Landuses Agriculture: Conventional-Till Conservation-Tillage Hay Pasture Manure Acres Urban: Pervious Urban Impervious Urban Forest Mixed Open Non-Tidal Water Phase 5 Watershed Model Landuses Agriculture: Composite Crop with Manure Nutrients: Conventional-Till Conservation-Till Composite Crop without Manure Nutrients Hay with and without Manure Nutrients Alfalfa with Manure Nutrients Nursery with Manure Nutrients Pasture with Manure Nutrients Degraded Stream Corridor Animal Feeding Operations Urban: High- and Low-Density Pervious Urban High- and Low-Density Impervious Urban Extractive Construction Forest: Forest and Harvested Forest Natural Grass Inland Water All BMPs applied to Phase 4.3 model landuses must be accurately distributed to Phase 5 landuses

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model BMP Spatial Scale BMP implementation levels are known or have been submitted by jurisdictions in the following spatial scales: state state-segment tributary strategy basin TMDL basin county county-basin county-segment point (latitude-longitude) Phase 4 County-Segments

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model BMP Spatial Scale Phase 5 Land SegmentsPhase 5 River Segments

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model Extension for Phase 5 Phase 5 Watershed Model Extention

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model Calibration Phase 4.3 CalibrationPhase 5 Calibration Calibration sites = 26 Watersheds = 94 Land uses = 9 Simulation Years = 17 CB Watershed Calibration sites = 237 Watersheds = 684 Land uses = 24 Simulation Years = 20 Extended Network Calibration sites = 296 Watersheds = 899

Chesapeake Bay Program Models Attainment of water quality standards in the Chesapeake Bay will be determined by tidal water monitoring data, not the models.

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model Information Resources o Watershed Model Inputs and Outputs o Best Management Practices o Chesapeake Bay Program Technical Reports o Presentations o Cap Setting and Allocation o Chesapeake Bay Models o Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model Land Use and Model Linkages to the Airshed and Estuarine Models o Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model Applications & Calculation Of Nutrient & Sediment Loadings - Appendix H: Tracking Best Management Practice Nutrient Reductions in the Chesapeake Bay Program o Nutrient Subcommittee o Agricultural Nutrient Reduction Workgroup o Forestry Workgroup o Point Source Workgroup o Sediment Workgroup o Tributary Strategy Workgroup o Urban Stormwater Workgroup  Chesapeake Bay Program Data Submission Information for Urban Storm Water BMP Data  BMP Stream Restoration in Urban Areas Crediting Jurisdictions for Pollutant Load Reductions  BMP Guidance for the States and the District  BMP Pollutant Removal Efficiencies  BMP Definitions