Welcome. SAFETY FIRST Safety tip for the day BIG BEND STATION1900 MW 4 Coal fired steam units TAMPA ELECTRIC GENERATION BAYSIDE POWER STATION 1800 MW.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Orlando Gasification Project Demonstration of a 285 MW Coal-Based Transport Gasifier Managing Your Energy Portfolio in a Greener World The Institute for.
Advertisements

The second generation of IGCC Power Plants. Problems and solutions.
Joe Chaisson April 21, Integrated Coal Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Power Plants and Geologic Carbon Sequestration Joe Chaisson.
Presentation to the Florida Public Service Commission November 29, 2007.
Technologies for CCS on Natural Gas Power Systems Satish Reddy April 2104.
Nuon Future plan: Magnum Project
Prologue: What is Petroleum Coke? Petroleum coke is a carbonaceous solid-residual byproduct of the oil-refining coking process. Although petroleum coke.
A novel IGCC system with steam injected H2/O2 cycle and CO2 recovery P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Low Quality Fuel but High.
What’s the only thing that moves slower than the a glacier? An IOU Power Generation Technologies.
Lisa Sanzenbacher Illinois Institute of Technology Please look at the notes sections in the presentation in “Normal View” if there.
Particulate Matter Seminar John Kush Texas Genco Rice University Shell Center for Sustainability November 9, 2004.
IGCC for Power generation By Dr. D.N. Reddy, Director Er. K. Basu, Adviser Dr. V.K. Sethi, Research Adviser Centre for Energy Technology, University College.
Duke Energy Carolinas Dan River Combined Cycle Project 8/17/10 For Vogt Power, my best estimate is 214 shipments (rail, truck, LTL, and small parcel- UPS.
© 2003 Reliant Reliant Seward Station CFB: Successful Conversion of Waste Coal into Energy Energy from Biomass and Waste Symposium September 27, 2007.
Control of sulfur oxide. 低硫燃料 (low sulfur fuel) 燃料脫硫 (fuel desulfurization, removal of sulfur from fuel) 排煙脫硫 (flue gas desulfurization, FGD)
B9 Coal Deploying Fuel Cells to Generate Cheap, Clean Electricity from Fossil Fuels.
Cogeneration. Is the simultaneous production of electrical and thermal energy from a single fuel source.
Power Plant Construction and QA/QC Section 2.4– Boiler Auxiliaries
Jeopardy Final JeopardyFinal Jeopardy 200 pt 300 pt 400 pt 500 pt 100 pt 200 pt 300 pt 400 pt 500 pt 100 pt 200 pt 300 pt 400 pt 500 pt 100 pt 200 pt.
Boiler FGT HRSG Coal Air To CO 2 - extraction Ash Power.
Coal Gasification : A PRB Overview Mark Davies – Kennecott Energy Outline Background – Our Interest History – Development of IGCC Current status – Commercial.
Advanced Biomass-based Combined Heat and Power System Combined Heat & Power in the Pacific Northwest October 15, 2002 Nathan E. Carpenter Manager, Energy.
“Energy Efficiency Guide for Industry in Asia”
Shepard Energy Centre. Environmental Stewardship.
COGENERATION Allison M. Selk 12/8/04 CBE 562.
POWER PLANT.
POWER GENERATION TECHNOLOGIES
Combined_Cycle_Power_Plant Prepared by: Nimesh Gajjar.
SUPPLIES OF COAL UNITED STATES - 3 TRILLION TONS (50% IN WYOMING, MONTANA, NORTH DAKOTA) WESTERN COAL - 60% LOW SULFUR (0.7%S) - AT STRIP MINING DEPTH.
GAS POWER PLANT. Producing electrisity using gas Gas mixture ignited in a gas turbine Combined Cycle Gas Turbine Thermal power plant Fuel: coal, oil or.
© 2010 Invensys. All Rights Reserved. The names, logos, and taglines identifying the products and services of Invensys are proprietary marks of Invensys.
INTERGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE (IGCC) ANH PHUONG NGUYEN APN Nov 2008 CHE 384 ENERGY TECHNOLOGY & POLICY.
Coal Gasification Robert Nagai AP Environmental Science Period 3.
IGCC Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle. IGCC - Industry Coal based IGCC plants went through an important development stage during the 1990s Grew.
Engineering Technology Division
SynGas Gasifier ALTERNATIVE ENERGY Technology Presentation.
Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants National Energy Technology Laboratory May 15, 2007 Revised August 2007 Final Results.
New Generation Strategy
Presentation to APPA Climate Change Task Force Oct. 17, 2006 FutureGen and Technology Challenges for Climate Change Michael J. Mudd Chief Executive Officer.
Mississippi Power Kemper County IGCC Plant
TECHNOLOGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Dr. V. K. Sethi, Research Adviser CENTRE FOR ENERGY TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING OSMANIA UNIVERSITY.
OPTIMIZATION OF CONVENTIONAL THERMAL & IGCC POWER PLANT FOR GREEN MEGA POWER Dr. V K Sethi & J K Chandrashekar Director Adviser Director Adviser University.
Air Pollution Sources: Coal-Fired Power Plants April 13, 2011.
Plant Utility System (TKK-2210) 14/15 Semester 4 Instructor: Rama Oktavian Office Hr.: M-F
BPC is the nation’s first renewable fuels power generation company TREIA Presentation Texas Energy Independence Week March 5, 2009.
Energy Policy Act of 2005 Frank Prager Xcel Energy Inc. February 22, 2006.
Plot Summary Petroleum coke is a major byproduct that historically has been used as a substitute for coal in power production or as a fuel in cement manufacture.
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle
Generation Technologies in a Carbon-constrained World Steve Specker President & CEO October 2005.
Primenergy, L.L.C. Solids Gasification & Energy Generation.
STEAM POWER PLANTS.
July 17, GRAC 7/17/08 - Wrap-up I 1)Are the reference plant assumptions reasonable? More or less specificity? Important variations? 2)Should other.
PSC Case No Perryman 6 Constellation Power Source Generation (CPSG)
A natural and renewable resource
1 Tallahassee Plant Design Gasifier OLGA Prime movers.
Plot Summary Petroleum coke is a major byproduct that historically has been used as a substitute for coal in power production or as a fuel in cement manufacture.
Can Coal be used for Power Generation by an Environmentally Responsible Society? An Overview of “Clean Coal” Technologies Ben Bayer November 20, 2006 ChE.
Advancements in Coal Technology 2006 Mid-America Regulatory Conference Columbus Ohio Tom Hewson Energy Ventures Analysis Inc Arlington Virginia June 20.
Fossil Fuel Power Stations Stefan Suarez, Harrison Pearl, Will Engelhardt, and YOU!
__________________________ © Cactus Moon Education, LLC. CACTUS MOON EDUCATION, LLC ENERGY FROM PLANTS AND ANIMALS BIOMASS.
Optimization of IGCC power plant Samantha Chase David Granum Ming Chen Tang Irena Vankova Sung Yoon Five Gasifiers.
Abstract Petroleum coke is a major byproduct that historically has been used as a substitute for coal in power production or as a fuel in cement manufacture.
OPTIMIZATION OF CONVENTIONAL THERMAL & IGCC POWER PLANT FOR GREEN MEGA POWER OPTIMIZATION OF CONVENTIONAL THERMAL & IGCC POWER PLANT FOR GREEN MEGA POWER.
ADVANCED COAL-BURNING POWER PLANT TECHNOLOGY
First in Service First in Value
Tampa Electric Company’s Emission Reduction Program
Power Plant Technology Combined Cycle and Renewable Energy Power Systems (Lecture 1) by Mohamad Firdaus Basrawi, Dr. (Eng) Mechanical Engineering Faculty.
carbon capture and storage (CCS)
Energy Conservation CERD /12/2017
Michigan Air Quality Division
Presentation transcript:

Welcome

SAFETY FIRST Safety tip for the day

BIG BEND STATION1900 MW 4 Coal fired steam units TAMPA ELECTRIC GENERATION BAYSIDE POWER STATION 1800 MW Repowered NGCC One 3 on 1 One 4 on 1 POLK POWER STATION 650 MW One IGCC Two Peaking CTs PHILLIPS POWER STATION 36 MW Two slow speed diesels________ TOTAL CAPACITY(approx)4400 MW

UNIT 1 IGCC, Base load on syngas, intermediate on oil Combined cycle, GE 7F, MW GE D11, steam 120MW Dual fuel, Syngas/Distillate Oil DOE Clean Coal Technology co-funding $120M In service 1996 POLK POWER STATION UNIT 2, 3, 4 & 5 Simple Cycle CT, Peaking Simple cycle GE 7FA+E, MW each 2 & 3 Dual fuel, Nat gas/Distillate Oil; 4 & 5 Nat Gas only Unit 2 in service 2000, Unit , Units 4& Total site over 4000 acres (previously mined for phosphate) 750 acre cooling pond 80 Tampa Electric employees

Gasification technology originally developed by Texaco, now owned by General Electric Oxygen blown, slurry fed, entrained flow gasifier Operating pressure 400 psi nominal Gasifier vessel refractory lined (largest built) Radiant plus convective syngas coolers for heat recovery Single train configuration (one gasifier supplying one CT) CT is GE 7F w/ MNQC combusters, larger 1 st stage nozzle Diluent N2 plus syngas saturation for NOx control Modest air extraction rate from CT to ASU Feedstock is 2200 tons/day coal and petroleum coke blend ASU by Air Products, 2100 tons/day oxygen production Sulfuric acid plant by Monsanto, (unique to Florida) Acid gas removal via MDEA and COS hydrolysis POLK 1 – Technology Summary

AERIAL PHOTO ADMINISTRATION CONTROL YOU ARE HERE N OXYGEN PLANT GASIFIER STRUCTURE COAL SILOS SLURRY PREPARATION SULFURIC ACID PLANT HRSG UNIT 1 CT STEAM TURBINE UNIT 2 CT UNIT 3 CT UNDER CONSTRUCTION,

Overall Flowsheet

LOW EMISSIONS FROM LOW COST FEEDSTOCKS FOR LOW COST ELECTRICITY IGCC DRIVER

POLK 1 PERFORMANCE ENVIRONMENTAL Polk rated the Cleanest Coal Fired Power Plant in North America by the Energy Probe Research Foundation (total emissions from 2002 TRI data)

LOW EMISSIONS Typical Emissions (Lb/MMBTU) Polk Polk Expected (Permit) (Steady State) New IGCC SO NOx ( w/SCR ) Particulate0.007 < Mercury NA NA 90% removal (New IGCC values are basis 8,800 hhv btu/kwh net)

Beneficial Reuse of Sulfur – H 2 SO 4 at Polk Beneficial Reuse of Slag Low Water Use (2/3 that of PC unit) Minimal solid waste (no gypsum from FGD) Zero Process Water Discharge OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ADVANTAGES

ENVIRONMENTAL OPPORTUNITIES Mercury - Cost-Effective Removal on IGCC using small activated carbon bed ( $0.25/MWh vs. $3.10/MWh for PC) Testing done at Polk Commercially at Eastman to 95+% Other Volatile Metals – Will also be removed by carbon bed

ENVIRONMENTAL OPPORTUNITIES CO 2 Removal Solvents used for sulfur removal can also remove CO2 (more cost effective due to <1% volume) For New Solid Fuel Power Plants (EPRI estimates) 25% Higher COE with IGCC 50% + Higher COE with PC CO 2 Sequestration Saline aquifer injection – USF feasibility study

FUEL FLEXIBILITY Polk has operated on over 20 different fuels including:Coals Coal Blends Coal/Pet Coke Blends Coal/Coke/Biomass Blends Slagging gasifier requires somewhat higher fusion temps (Polk targets 2350 – 2700 F T-250 temps) Low rank fuels can be used in slurry fed gasifiers, but hurt efficiency Power block can operate on syngas or distillate oil

RELATIVE FUEL PRICES AT POLK 40% Coal/60% Pet Coke Blend1.0 Pet Coke0.7 Coal 1.5 Natural Gas 3.6 Low Sulfur Oil6.0 LOW COST FEEDSTOCKS

RENEWABLE FUELS BIOMASS CO-UTILIZATION TESTS Eucalyptus Biomass Test - December, 2001 Bahiagrass Biomass Test - April, 2004 (Bahiagrass Harvest and Storage Test started approximately one year prior) No impact on syngas quality or emissions Minor issues with material handling

REPRESENTATIVE COSTS Fuel processing costs per mmbtu fuel input (Excludes combined cycle costs) Fuel$1.62 O&M$0.96 Controllable Expense$2.58 A&G, Depreciation, Taxes, etc$1.06 Solid Fuel Processing Cost $3.64 For Natural Gas Comparison, Multiply by heat rate ratio: $3.64 X 9,500 / 7,000 = $4.93 Current Natural Gas Price: $8.00 +/-

KEY AVAILABILITY STATISTICS

TECs ADVANCMENTS of IGCC Refractory life extension to 3 years Successful integration of fines recycle NOx below 15ppm with diluent N2 and saturation Successful zero process water discharge system Air extraction/integration with GE 7F turbine IGCC use with sulfuric acid plant with variable % Leader in clean coal power production > 13M gwhrs IGCC ambassadors, visitors

HIGHER INSTALLED COST – TRUE Current estimates are 10 – 20% higher than SCPC unit with scrubber and SCR. This is offset by lower fuel cost and reduced emissions. NO SINGLE SUPPLIER OR OVERALL PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE – NO LONGER TRUE Alliances GE/Bechtel and Conoco/Phillips-Fluor are offering comprehensive EPC contracts with performance guarantees. NO FINANCIAL REWARD FOR SUPERIOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE – SOMEWHAT TRUE IGCC is capable of lower emissions than other coal based technologies and will be the most cost effective at mercury and CO 2 removal. Anticipated environmental regulations will define financial value. PERCEPTIONS AND MISPERCEPTIONS REGARDING IGCC

PERCEPTIONS AND MISPERCEPTIONS REGARDING IGCC (contd) IGCC HAS LOW AVAILABILITY – NOT TRUE Overall reliability of the power block is higher than other coal-fired units (95%). The dual fuel capability of IGCC adds significant value. Gasifier reliability (currently low 80%), will be higher for next generation, dual train plants. IGCC IS EXPERIMENTAL AND REQUIRES UNIQUE SKILLS – NOT TRUE Gasification has been used since the 1800s and there are hundreds of gasifiers operating worldwide. The first generation IGCC plants have now been in service for 10 years. Tampa Electric (a modest size electric utility) has successfully operated and maintained the Polk Unit 1 IGCC since 1996.

POLK UNIT 6 TEC is planning for the addition of a 630 MW IGCC unit in Preliminary engineering and preparations for permitting and regulatory approval are in progress. TEC has been awarded a $133.5M tax credit under the Energy Policy Act of 2005 for Polk 6. Expected configuration is two gasifiers feeding two CTs with one ST. Minimum scale up (same size gasifiers as Polk 1). Allowances made in design for addition of CO 2 capture and sequestration equipment.