MEASUREMENT TEAM MUSC Excellence. Measurement Team Co-chairs – Lynn Shull (CON) and Becki Trickey (CHP) Members –  Wally Bonaparte (President’s Office)

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.

Advertisements

Cedarville University Accreditation Self-Study Plan Presented by Dr. Thomas Mach.

Assessing Student Learning Outcomes In the Context of SACS Re-accreditation Standards Presentation to the Dean’s Council September 2, 2004.

Transfer Success: Skills to Succeed in a Baccalaureate Program Charlene A. Stinard, Director Transfer and Transition Services University of Central Florida.

Using LibQUAL+ to Develop Accountability with Key Stakeholders Raynna Bowlby Based upon presentation made w/co-presenter Dan O’Mahony (Brown U. Library)

C3 Goals Students will: 1.acquire teamwork competencies 2.acquire knowledge, values and beliefs of health professions different from their own profession.

SCCP Excellence. TOP-10 Quality Blueprint for Excellence SCCP Excellence Key performance indicators Pillar Goals MUSC Excellence LDI.

University Regional Affairs: The Blueprint for Student Attainment Rebecca Torstrick Assistant Vice President for Regional Affairs and University Academic.

ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION Assessment, data analysis and evaluation of findings as essential components of the self study for determining if objectives.

Charting a New Course EDUCATION & STUDENT LIFE OPEN FORUM AUGUST 18, 2009 First Quarter Fiscal Year EDUCATION & STUDENT LIFE Open Forum October.

An Assessment Primer Fall 2007 Click here to begin.

OBR Update to OCTEO March 2015 Wendy Adams, MBA, MHRM – Director, Academic Quality Assurance Matt Exline – Assistant Director, Program Approval Operations.

Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Catalyst High School May 11,12,13, 2014.

2010 MUSC Excellence Faculty/Staff Survey Leadership Development Institute July 23, 2010.

Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.

Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.

A Comprehensive Approach to Budget Planning at a Major Research University David E. Hollowell, Executive Vice President and Treasurer Carol D. Rylee, Director.

Preparing for the Higher Learning Commission Richard Venneri, Associate Provost Self-Study Co-Chair.

The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.

SET UP SLIDE. Survey of Organizational Effectiveness Meeting July 13, 2001 Presentation by Dr. Karen Haynes, President University of Houston-Victoria.

 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.

NSF ADVANCE Program Academic Careers in Engineering & Science (ACES) Lynn T. Singer (Provost’s Office), PI John Angus (Chemical Engineering), co-PI Mary.

OFFICE OF DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION Climate Study Working Group Process February 3, 2012.

Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.

Purdue University Academic Advising Assessment Team CODO-IN Survey January 20, 2012.

Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.

NJAIS/Middle States Accreditation For Kent Place School Presented by: James Palmieri & Kathy Zagorski August 31, 2010.

November, 2012 TEAM T ufts E ffectiveness in A dministrative M anagement.

Provost’s IT Task Force January – March Objectives Assess the information technology organizational requirements to support cost effective infrastructure.

Assessment Cycle California Lutheran University Deans’ Council February 6, 2006.

Second Nature Strategic Framework Second Nature is the supporting organization of the American College & University Presidents’ Climate Commitment Board.

Improving recognition of teaching in academic promotion Prof Sandra Wills Executive Director Learning & Teaching University of Wollongong.

 How do we begin?  What are the different types of evaluation research?  How do these different types fit together?  What purpose do they serve?

January 18, 2012 Administrative Council Presentation.

Don Dodson, Senior Vice Provost Diane Jonte-Pace, Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies Carol Ann Gittens, Director, Office of Assessment Learning Assessment.

University Planning: Strategic Communication in Times of Change Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Texas State University-San Marcos Presented at the July.

University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.

System Update: Assessment AIRPO Conference: Albany, NY June 14, 2012 Nancy Willie-Schiff, Assistant Provost SUNY System Administration.

Ann Campion Riley University of Missouri

Introduced as part of FY 15 President’s Recommended Budget Purpose: To award Colleges for increasing Facilities and Administrative (F&A) cost recoveries.

Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.

What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.

Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.

2009 MUSC Excellence Faculty/Staff Survey Leadership Development Institute September 25, 2009.

MUSC Excellence University Excellence 101 Getting Connected.

What are Pillar Goals? What are the goals and metrics for the university? How do our unit level goals fit in? What happens next? 11/19/2015 University.

Assessment Liaisons Orientation Meeting October 8.

Institutional Effectiveness A set of ongoing and systematic actions, processes, steps and practices that include: Planning Assessment of programs and.

College of Charleston Presented by the Faculty Compensation Committee to the Faculty Senate April 7, 2015 Faculty Salary Resolution Update.

COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FACULTY COMPENSATION COMMITTEE Report to Faculty Senate November 5, 2013.

1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.

SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.

Survey Results and Pillar Goal Progress Leadership Development Institute June 3, 2011.

SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.

Report of Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE) Goals, Timelines and Requirements Catherine F. Andersen Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.

Evaluating Our Assessment Program Spring 2004 What is assessment? Assessment is the ongoing process of understanding and improving student learning.

Introduction to the UND’s New Budget Model. Existing Budget Model? UND’s budget approach has been historical and incremental Meaning: The next year’s.

Prepared by Lisa K. Saladin & Maralynne D. Mitcham July 2010.

Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.

Pillar Goal Progress Leadership Development Institute July 23, 2010.

Education 2018: Excellence for Every Student Presented to the Board of Education August 27,

Gifted & Talented Program Evaluation CCSD Board Meeting Monday, June 18, :30 PM.

IUP Middle States Accreditation and Self Study Process

Educational Excellence – Phase One Lisa Blazer & Dan Gelo Presenting.

Diane Mugford – Federal Accountability, ADAM Russ Keglovits – Measurement and Accountability, ADAM Renewing Nevada’s ESEA Waiver Flexibility Request.

Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.

Student Success Metrics

Meeting of the Finance Committee September 14, 2012

Associate Provost for Graduate and Professional Studies

Presentation transcript:

MEASUREMENT TEAM MUSC Excellence

Measurement Team Co-chairs – Lynn Shull (CON) and Becki Trickey (CHP) Members –  Wally Bonaparte (President’s Office)  Kathy Chessman (SCCP)  Philip Hall (Steering Committee Liaison)  Carol Lancaster (Provost’s Office)  Sandra Morris (OEM)  Betsy Pilcher (CDM)  Joann Sullivan (Research Development, CGS)  Bart Yancey (Steering Committee Liaison)  Jim Zoller (CHP)  David McNair (coach)

Measurement Team - Purpose Determine and/or develop Pillar Goal metrics Interpret and communicate progress toward goals Become the in-house experts Develop user-friendly, easy to read reports Identify trends, areas for improvements and ‘wins’!

Measurement Team - Assumptions Utilize current methods for measurement when available Minimize “survey fatigue” Recommend central office for collection and analysis of data, and reports Identify areas where confidentiality/security are an issue Determine appropriate timing for surveys Recommend methods to Steering committee

Year 1 Work Plan- People Pillar  Faculty made right choice in selecting MUSC at __% or higher  use baseline data if colleges/units already have  develop new survey based on CON survey  identify best timing for administration of survey  __% of Staff pleased to be working at MUSC  use baseline data if colleges/units already have  develop new survey based on CON survey  Identify best timing for administration of survey

Year 1 Work Plan – Service Pillar Graduating students believe they made the RIGHT choice in selecting MUSC at __% or higher or would choose this experience again  Gather from college exit interviews Summer 09  Identify standard wording Summer 09  Gather results Summer 09 Define stewardship to our respective communities and identify measures by Jan 2010  Gather educational outreach activities that are currently occurring

Year 1 Work Plan – Quality Pillar Achieve Pass Rate on licensure credentialing, or board exams of 96% -  Colleges report pass rates to Office of Integrated Planning and Assessment  Summer/Fall 09 Achieve 95% graduation rate within each program  OEM can generate reports  Summer/Fall 09 Achieve E-Value score of 4.2 or higher for students satisfied with faculty eff. as teacher  Use E-value to gather this information through provost’s office or colleges  Data to be available Summer 09 Achieve top 50% ranking for total funding of research as compared to peer institutions  Assoc Provost for Research  Colleges/units may identify specific peer institutions

Year 1 Work Plan – Growth Pillar Graduating Student perception of Interprofessional cooperation Increase 3%  Provost’s office (C3 initiative) has baseline  Data to be available Summer 09

Year 1 Work Plan – Finance Pillar Budget to actual – Actual expenses will not exceed any revised budgets for FY 2009  Occurs with budget cycle Confidentiality issue – Mteam should not receive information but should know it has occurred.

Measurement Team - Considerations Determine communication methods  Website  Liaisons  LDIs  Questions Determine best methods for coordination with colleges and units  Liaisons