NexSteppe Vision Be a leading provider of scalable, reliable and sustainable feedstock solutions for the biofuels, biopower and biobased product industries.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Institute of Local and Global Consequence Future of Biofuels in Alabama Larry Fillmer Auburn University.
Advertisements

Session 1. Gather practical experience gained with the cultivation of traditional bioenergy crops in the Mediterranean with respect to their environmental.
Climate Change and KS : Mitigation Charles W. Rice Soil Microbiologist Department of Agronomy Lead Author, IPCC AR4 WGIII K-State Research and Extension.
Opportunities and Challenges of Marketing FGD - Gypsum to Agriculture David Flack Marketing Director Ag Spectrum Company.
Evaluating eTuber and Energybeets as Feedstock for Biofuels and Biogas in South Florida Brian Boman 1, Edward Evans 2 and Ann C. Wilkie 3 1 Agricultural.
Prospects for 2 nd Generation Feedstock Technologies Biotechnology Options for Bioenergy Crops Richard Flavell Ceres, Inc. California, USA.
Opportunities for Growing, Utilizing & Marketing Bio-Fuel Pellets Roger Samson REAP-CANADA Resource Efficient Agricultural Production-Canada Box 125, Ste.
PM S2 K5 Identify that cellulose contains the basic carbon structures needed to build petrochemicals and discuss its potential as a raw material.
A Potentially Valuable Component of Texas Bioenergy Projects
Renewable Biomass Fuel As “Green Power” Alternative for Sugarcane Milling in the Philippines T.C. Mendoza, University of the Philippines at Los Baños,
1 Biomass to Energy Assessment St. Kitts & Nevis Mark Lambrides (OAS/DSD) Kevin de Cuba (OAS/DSD) Pre-conclusions December, 2006.
Arundo donax: A Great Bio-Energy Crop PRESENTED BY: Joseph J. James, President & CEO The Corporation for Economic Opportunity April 8, 2008 Corporation.
R.W. Heiniger Vernon G. James Center North Carolina State University.
Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energyeere.energy.gov 1 Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov The Future of Biomass-Based Energy: The DOE Perspective.
Producing “Eco-Paper” from Fast-Growing Warm- Season Grasses in China Roger Samson REAP-CANADA.
Balancing Biomass for Bioenergy and Conserving the Soil Resource Jane Johnson USDA-ARS- North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory.
Bioenergy Crops: the Good, the Bad & the Ugly Alternative Agricultural Enterprises for the Treasure Coast October 19, 2011 Tim Gaver, Extension Agent –
Agriculture and Greenhouse Gases Jill Heemstra, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Building Environmental Leaders in Animal Agriculture (BELAA)
Carbon Offsets – Agriculture & Forestry Neil Sampson June 25, 2004.
Environmental Sustainability of Biofuel Crops Bill Chism David Widawsky Office of Policy, Economics and Innovation.
APEC Biofuels Task Force Messages for Ministers Some Ideas for Discussion Sixth Meeting of the Biofuels Task Force Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 29 April 2010.
Biofuel Crop Production
Session 1. Gather practical experience gained with the cultivation of traditional bioenergy crops in the Mediterranean with respect to their environmental.
Ethanol Anthony Mirabile, Katelyn Snyder, John St. Fleur
Alternatives to Gasoline Possibilities and Capacities.
Economic Models of Biofuels and Policy Analysis John Miranowski,* Professor of Economics Iowa State University *With Alicia Rosburg, Research Assistant.
Alternatives to Gasoline Possibilities and Capacities.
The Value of Native Ecosystems
Ethanol. Conversion of sugars to ETOH The manufacture of alcoholic beverages originated over 5000 years ago –Water was generally impure and thus fermented.
Alternatives to Gasoline Possibilities and Capacities.
Comparative Regional Economic Advantages for Cellulosic Feedstocks for Bioenergy Production. Burton C. English.
Current Research and Emerging Economic and Environmental Issues on Biofuels Madhu Khanna University of Illinois.
Bioenergy and Land Use Issues in Asia N. H. Ravindranath Indian Institute of Science Bangalore.
NEW CROPS FOR BIOFUEL/BIOPRODUCT PRODUCTION AND THE FEEDSTOCK READINESS PROFILE ABFC, NEW ORLEANS,JUNE 2015 Processing Research since 1892.
By Dr Ku Syahidah Ku Ismail Adapted from Cheng, J. (2010) Biomass to Renewable Energy Processes.
ABFC2015 New Orleans, LA – June 9, 2015 Sorghum: An established crop for sustainable, global production.
Integrating Forages into Multi-Functional Landscapes: Enhanced Soil Health and Ecosystem Service Opportunities Douglas L. Karlen USDA-ARS Presented at.
1. State of Technology in Sorghum Tim Lust, CEO National Sorghum Producers 2.
Beyond Theory—Creating a New Biomass Energy Market in the Midwest Gary Radloff Midwest Energy Policy Director.
Overview The Vision Pipeline & Platform Brazil: Proof of Concept Going Global What’s Next 2.
Liberalization of Trade in Biofuels: Implications for GHG Emissions and Social Welfare Xiaoguang Chen Madhu Khanna Hayri Önal University of Illinois at.
Forest Biomass Sustainability: Policy Themes & Research Needs Alan A. Lucier, Ph.D. Senior Vice President, NCASI FIA User Group Meeting & Biomass / Bioenergy.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND ENERGY PRODUCTION: EVALUATION OF BIOCHAR APPLICATION ON TAIWANESE SET-ASIDE LAND Chih-Chun Kung November 2012 Austin, Texas.
AGGREGATE EFFECTS OF EXPANDED BIOFUEL PRODUCTION: Myth & Reality C. Robert Taylor Auburn Ronald D. Lacewell Texas A&M AgriLife.
In the Northwest Martin Tobias CEO & Chairman, Imperium Renewables Biofuels.
Office of the Chief Economist Office of Energy Policy and New Uses National Agricultural Credit Committee Harry S. Baumes Associate Director Office of.
Chapter 13 Food Resources Food supply and infrastructure Dust Bowl & Green Revolution Low input vs. high input (conventional) farming How we get our food.
After successful completion of this Lesson, you have learned to answer: 1.Why pearl millet cultivation is important? 2.Why pearl millet yields are low.
Ethanol and Sustainable Agriculture Mike Morris National Center for Appropriate Technology.
Turbo-charged biofuel output: Moving beyond the easy sugars to access the entire plant biomass The only way to produce biofuel economically is to convert.
Chapter 12 – Agricultural land, water and yields.
Bioenergy: Where We Are and Where We Should Be Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Chad M. Hellwinckel.
Virtual Academy for the Semi Arid Tropics Course on Pearl Millet Production Practices Module 1: About Pearl Millet After completing this Lesson, you have.
2005 OBP Biennial Peer Review Selective Harvest Kevin L. Kenney, Christopher T. Wright Biomass Feedstock Interface Platform November 14, 2005.
Agenda n Introduction to Biofuels n Biotechnology can help make Biofuels cheaper n The next generation of biofuels and the US economy n Israeli biotechnology.
April 8, 2009Forestry and Agriculture GHG Modeling Forum Land Use Change in Agriculture: Yield Growth as a Potential Driver Scott Malcolm USDA/ERS.
Biomass Energy By Jonathan Sharer, Brandon Deere,Eric Carpenter.
Ch 14: Agricultural Methods and Pest Management. Outline 14.1 The Development of Agriculture 14.2 Fertilizer and Agriculture 14.3 Agricultural Chemical.
Ethanol Fuel (Corn, Sugarcane, Switchgrass) Blake Liebling.
WGA TRANSPORTATION FUELS FOR THE FUTURE INITIATIVE Biofuel Report Summary Biofuels Team - David Terry Transportation Fuels for the Future Workshop Denver,
The Role of Transportation in the Competitive Advantage of Industrial Sugar David Ripplinger Transportation Research Forum Annual Forum March 21, 2013.
Biofuels CENV 110. Topics The Technology Current status around the world – Supply and trends in production Impact Benefits Costs – Carbon balance – Net.
Effect of Biomass as Energy By Zachary Smith. Table of Content  Issue  Target Audience  How to collect Energy from Biomass  Direct Burning for Domestic.
Logistical Efficiency with Dedicated Energy Crops
Chapter 1: BIOMASS RESOURCES & CHARACTERISTICS OF BIOFUELS
Process of conversion from inputs to outputs
Management and Life Cycle Assessment of Bioenergy Crop Production
DuPont Biofuels: Building a Sustainable Future
Sustainable BioEthanol
Variable Seeding Rate in Sweet Sorghum
Presentation transcript:

NexSteppe Vision Be a leading provider of scalable, reliable and sustainable feedstock solutions for the biofuels, biopower and biobased product industries 2

The Big Picture Biobased Products & Advanced Biofuels Sweet Sorghum Fermentable Sugars Biomass Sorghum Biomass Biopower & Cellulosic Biofuels

Commercial Seed Shipping to Customers 4

Palo Alto in Texas

6 Palo Alto in Brazil

2014 Field Day

8 Commercial Harvest

9 Loading

10 Transportation

NexSteppe Works Closely With Many of the Leading Companies in the Biobased Economy 11 Investors Customers

Demand from Around the World

Why Sorghum? For the grower… – High-yielding – Harvest in 3-4 months – Can be rotated with other crops – Established agronomic systems For the processor/project developer… – Drop-in – Broad geographic adaptation – Heat and drought tolerant For the seed company… – Huge genetic diversity – Rapid breeding and product development cycle – Fast scale-up – Established hybrid systems – Seed propagated 13

Key Attributes of Biomass Sorghum Equate to Lower GHG emissions High yields with short growth cycle, opportunities for inter-cropping and ability to grow on more marginal land lead to low, no or even positive indirect land use change Lower agricultural input requirements than for most traditional row crops and other dedicated energy crops Below-ground sequestration by extensive root systems provide rapid carbon sink Lower transportation inputs due to lower moisture at harvest and higher yields enabling smaller collection radius Optimized composition (through genetics and management practices) improving process yields for conversion technologies 14

Low, No or Even Positive Indirect Land Use Change Short cycle times allow biomass sorghum to be grown in rotation with food crops – Producing biofuel feedstocks through increased intensity of agricultural land utilization, using systems like crop rotation, significantly reduces actual indirect land use change – Crop rotation can lead to zero or even positive land use change as food crop yields are increased through the benefits of crop rotation Lower water needs and industrial end-use make biomass sorghum a compelling choice for marginal, degraded or contaminated land – Use of land that is uneconomic or unsafe to grow forage or food crops reduces or eliminates food crop displacement – Biomass sorghum used for biopower being considered for remediation of cropland with heavy metal contamination High yields mean biomass sorghum yields require less land to produce the same amount of end product – US EPA estimates that biomass sorghum will yield approximately 30 dry tons/hectare by 2022 compared to 16 dry tons/hectare for switchgrass – Compared to ~4500 liters per hectare of ethanol produced per year by corn, biomass sorghum can produce >6,000 per cycle, even at today’s field and process yields, with the potential for multiple cycles per year in many locations 15

Demonstrated Benefits to Food Crop Yields from Rotation with Sorghum Without rotationAfter Palo Alto (15% yield increase)

Lower Agricultural Inputs and Water Requirements Biomass sorghum has low fertilizer requirements compared to other feed crops and dedicated energy crops – US EPA estimates that biomass sorghum requires only 30% of the fertilizer of switchgrass Biomass sorghum has low water requirements and is resilient even during periods of drought. It… – Requires only 2/3 of the total water of maize, 1/2 that of sugarcane – Is less sensitive to the timing of water availability – Depletes soil water profiles less than many other row crops 17

Below-Ground Carbon Sequestration High biomass sorghum has a substantially larger root system than, e.g., corn, making it better at scavenging for water and preventing leaching of nutrients The annual nature of sorghum combined with appropriate management practices allows compounding accumulation of this root biomass Sorghum crops, both in continuous growth and in crop rotation patterns, significantly increase soil organic carbon 18

Reduced Fuel Use in Transport High yields significantly reduce collection radius required for a given facility – Yields per hectare of nearly 12X wastes and residues reduces collection area from 80,000 Ha to 20,000 Ha for a 300MGY 2G ethanol plant Low moisture of Palo Alto biomass sorghum at harvest reduces hauled weights lowering fuel requirements – Palo Alto biomass sorghums are typically 55-60% moisture at harvest as compared to 75-85% for traditional forage or silage crops 19

Improved Product Yields per Ton Increased levels of accessible cellulosic sugars in 2G ethanol feedstocks – Increases processing efficiency – Reduces capital costs (due to smaller front-end for same output) – Reduces gross feedstock requirements, and – Reduces the necessary footprint of the feedstock supply area NexSteppe Palo Alto biomass sorghum hybrids have been identified by the US EPA as having higher cellulosic content than other tested sorghums Reducing moisture at harvest from 80% to 55% results in a corresponding gain in energy content of approximately 125% (LHV of 8.07 MJ/Kg compared to 3.59 MJ/Kg). – Avoiding use of winrowing to dry sorghum also dramatically reduces deleterious components of ash picked up with soil (e.g. silica) 20