What Students Can Tell Us about the Quality of Teaching: Evidence from MET and Implications for Teacher Preparation Ronald F. Ferguson, PhD Harvard University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Advertisements

PORTFOLIO.
1 Literacy Leadership Teams December 2004 Common High-Quality Differentiated Instruction for Achievement for All within The Cleveland Literacy System Module.
Collaborative Evaluation Communities in Urban Schools.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Monica Osborne, presenter KDE Effectiveness Coach 1.
CareClarifyCaptivateConsolidate ControlChallengeConferMean
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
TRMS ACTION PLAN Goal #1 O Throughout the school year, core content teams will develop pedagogy and strategies to integrate Common.
TELL Colorado Post-Survey Webinar Andrew Sioberg New Teacher Center.
BEST Survey Results: Feeding Information Back to Institutions of Higher Education Scott W. Brown, Ph.D. Teachers for a New Era Project University of Connecticut.
Why Student Perceptions Matter Rob Ramsdell, Co-founder April 2015.
Tripod Student Surveys
The Research and Practice of Classroom Assessment Principles and Strategies of Formative Assessment.
MATHEMATICS Support for Single Plan for Student Achievement.
Facilitators: Teresa Roe English Language Arts Division Manager, TDS Latahshia Coleman English Language Arts Instructional Facilitator, TDS Session Outcomes.
THE TRIPOD PROJECT STUDENT SURVEYS. What is the Tripod Project? Student voice survey Measures student perceptions and perspectives Captures key dimensions.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Instruction aligned to Iowa Core: What does it look like? #CCSS.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
Colorado’s Student Perception Survey. Agenda Why use a Student Perception Survey? What the Research Says Survey Overview Survey Administration Use of.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Understanding our Results
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Trust Cooperation Ambitiousness Diligence Satisfaction Care Confer Captivate Clarify Consolidate Challenge Control 7Cs ComponentsEngagement Targets.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | The Next Horizon Incorporating Student Perception Surveys into the Continuous.
The Missouri Reading Initiative Spring 2008 Annual Participant Survey Results.
APPENDIX M1- Tripod Student and Teacher Surveys: The Seven C’s 1.Care pertains to teacher behaviors that help students to feel emotionally safe and to.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Final Reports from the Measures of Effective Teaching Project Tom Kane Harvard University Steve Cantrell, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Should Students Have A Voice?
Evaluation Results Missouri Reading Initiative.
Update on Teacher Effectiveness Presented to the Personnel Administrators of North Carolina (PANC) October 18, 2011 Eliz Colbert and Robert Sox Educator.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
1 Control Students in this class treat the teacher with respect. My classmates behave the way the teacher wants them to. Our class stays busy and doesn’t.
The Why (Waiver & Strategic Plan) Aligned to research: MET Study Components: Framework/Multiple Measures Pilot Requirements Timeline.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
On The Right Road Moving Forward From a Lowest Achieving School to a High Progress Rewards School Fitzgerald High School Ben Hill County.
Connecting Classroom Walkthrough to High Yield Strategies
ABC School Data Wall Our priorities for District Goals – 1) Ensure individual students continuously exhibit academic and personal.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
[School Name]’s Student Perception Survey Results This presentation is a template and should be customized to reflect the needs and context of your school.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Using Student Surveys: Implications for Leadership and School Improvement Initiatives January 31, #aypfevents.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
How Assessment Supports RTI2 and Closing the Achievement Gap
Elementary Action Plans
Southern Regional Education Board Annual Leadership Forum
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
Fall 2017 Data Summit Welcome!.
A Coherent Instructional Guidance
Principles and Strategies of Formative Assessment
Teacher SLTs
Who We Are For more than 20 years, we have believed the key to preparing student for a successful future is providing rigorous and relevant instruction.
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Presentation transcript:

What Students Can Tell Us about the Quality of Teaching: Evidence from MET and Implications for Teacher Preparation Ronald F. Ferguson, PhD Harvard University and the Tripod Project for School Improvement Spring Regional CAEP Conference, The Mirage, Las Vegas, Nevada, March 16, 2012

Student perspectives can help guide: teachers as they work to improve; leaders as they set professional development priorities for teachers; coaches and mentors in supporting teachers; higher education institutions as they develop teacher training programs.

The Seven C’s What Teachers Do (What Students Experience) 1.Caring about students (Encouragement and Support) 2.Captivating students (Learning seems Interesting and Relevant 3.Conferring with students (Students Sense their Ideas are Respected) 4.Controlling behavior (Culture of Cooperation and Peer Support) 5.Clarifying lessons (Success Seems Feasible) 6.Challenging students (Press for Effort, Perseverance and Rigor) 7.Consolidating knowledge (Ideas get Connected and Integrated)

Student Engagement Targets (Both Individual and Collective) 1.Trust Safety (vs. Mistrust) 2.Cooperation (vs. Resistance) 3.Ambitiousness (vs. Ambivalence) 4.Diligence (vs. Discouragement or Disengagement) 5.Satisfaction and Efficacy (vs. Disappointment and Failure) The Seven C’s What Teachers Do (What Students Experience) 1.Caring about students (Encouragement and Support) 2.Captivating students (Learning seems Interesting and Relevant 3.Conferring with students (Students Sense their Ideas are Respected) 4.Controlling behavior (Culture of Cooperation and Peer Support) 5.Clarifying lessons (Success Seems Feasible) 6.Challenging students (Press for Effort, Perseverance and Rigor) 7.Consolidating knowledge (Ideas get Connected and Integrated) Teacher Professional Learning (PLCs) Content Knowledge Pedagogic Skill Relationship-Building Skills The Tripod STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT OUTCOMES

Key Patterns to Note  Teaching in some classrooms is much more effective than in others at fostering Seven C’s learning conditions.  There tends to be much more Seven C’s variation within schools—from one classroom to another—than between them, from one school to another.  Generally, students are more engaged (happier, more hard working and more satisfied with their achievements) in classrooms that rate higher on the Seven C’s.

6 A composite 7C inter-classroom index can be formed by combining all seven of the indices— i.e., Cares, Controls, Clarifies, Challenges, Captivates, Confers and Consolidates—into one composite number. Then, the composite index can be used to rank classrooms into instructional quality deciles, quintiles or quartiles.

GRADE: K 1 ST Gr. 2 nd Gr. 3 rd Gr. 4 th Gr. 5 th Gr.

Developing healthy dispositions and experiencing a high quality of life in school: classrooms that rate higher on the Seven C’s also rate higher on:  Happiness in class  Good behavior in class  Healthy responses to social pressures (e.g., less holding back, hiding effort, help avoidance)  Academic engagement/effort  Satisfaction with performance and progress

Some findings from the Gates Foundation Measures of Effective Teaching Project

Predicted differences in months of learning for classrooms at the 25 th versus 75 th percentiles of the composite Seven C’s distribution for the MET sample. (Estimated using surveys from one class and gains from another class, taught by the same teacher.) Using student survey responses in one section to predict learning gains in another. Predicted difference per school year* On state math tests 4.8 months On the Balanced Assessment in Math 3.7 months On state English Language Arts (ELA) tests 2.3 months On the Stanford 9 Open Ended ELA 2.9 months *Based on Table 9, p. 26: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, “Learning about Teaching: Initial findings from the Measures of Effective Teaching Project.” December 2010.

The Point from MET: Student perceptions of classroom practice can help in predicting learning outcomes and should be taken seriously by policy makers and educators. But how can we use them?

Using the Seven C’s to develop profiles and identify priorities at multiple levels of drill down.

There are multiple embedded levels of possible “drill down” on any given issue, e.g., to address questions about: 1.The district 2.One or more schools or grade levels within the district 3.One or more grade levels within a school 4.One or more classrooms within a grade 5.One or more students within a classroom 6.One or more survey items from among an individual student’s responses

Use Case 1: Individual Teacher Analysis After being introduced to school-level results, teachers spend time reviewing their own results individually. Teachers identify and reflect on strengths and weaknesses and set goals for personal growth. Teachers include targets for improvement in professional growth plans. Teachers acquire knowledge, develop new skills, and implement new strategies.

Teacher A Teacher A Teacher B Teacher B Tripod Student Feedback Surveys and Assessments Tripod Student Feedback Surveys and Assessments Example: Actual Feedback for Two Very Different Classroom Teachers

Teacher A (Low) Teacher A (Low) Teacher B (High) Teacher B (High) Value student insight! Tripod Student Feedback Surveys and Assessments Tripod Student Feedback Surveys and Assessments

Value student insight! Teacher A Teacher A Teacher B Teacher B

Common Language and Frameworks for Evaluation and School Improvement

Teacher A Teacher A The benchmark in this example is the bottom classroom in the top third (i.e., the 67 th percentile) among all classrooms at this particular school.

Teacher A Teacher A

Teacher A Teacher A

Teacher B Teacher B

Teacher B Teacher B

Teacher B Teacher B

Teacher A Teacher A

Teacher A Teacher A

Teacher A Teacher A

Teacher B Teacher B

Teacher B Teacher B

Teacher B Teacher B

Teacher A Teacher A

Teacher A Teacher A

Teacher A Teacher A

Teacher A Teacher A

Teacher A Teacher A

Teacher B Teacher B

Teacher B Teacher B

Teacher B Teacher B

Teacher B Teacher B

School Norms – Based on all responses from the whole school. The benchmarks are averages from the whole district.

School Norms – Based on all responses from the whole school. The benchmarks are averages from the whole district.

Teacher A Teacher A Teacher B Teacher B Viewed side by side

Use Case 2: District and School Analysis District level leaders review results of the 7Cs analysis across all schools in the district School level leaders review results of the 7Cs analysis across classrooms in their schools District and school level leaders use these data to focus professional development strategies and to monitor the impact of school improvement efforts

CareClarifyCaptivateConsolidate ControlChallengeConferMean >= 75% 60 to 74% 50-59% 40-49% 25-39% < 25% District: Percent favorable, by school, for each Seven C’s category. (Each line is one of 48 secondary schools in one urban school district.)

CareClarifyCaptivateConsolidate ControlChallengeConferMean >= 75% 60 to 74% 50-59% 40-49% 25-39% < 25% Line 1 is for the lowest rated high school: See the next slide.

Each row shows the percent favorable responses for a classroom in the lowest rated high school. (Classes with at least 10 respondents) CareClarifyCaptivateConsolidate ControlChallengeConferMean >= 75% 60 to 74% 50-59% 40-49% 25-39% < 25%

CareClarifyCaptivateConsolidate ControlChallengeConferMean >= 75% 60 to 74% 50-59% 40-49% 25-39% < 25% Line 48 shows the highest rated high school: See the next slide.

>= 75% 60 to 74% 50-59% 40-49% 25-39% < 25% Each row shows the percent favorable responses for a classroom in the highest rated high school. (Classes with at least 10 respondents) CareClarifyCaptivateConsolidate ControlChallengeConferMean

Revisiting Key Points  Teaching in some classrooms is much more effective than in others at fostering Seven C’s learning conditions.  Student perceptions of classroom practice on Seven C’s dimensions can help in predicting learning outcomes and should be taken seriously by policy makers and educators.  There tends to be much more Seven C’s variation within schools—from one classroom to another—than between them, from one school to another.  Generally, students are happier, more hard working and more satisfied with their achievements in classrooms that rate higher on the Seven C’s.  There are many ways that student perspectives can be used to provide useful information about patterns of teaching effectiveness, ideally in combination with other measures: we need multiple measures multiple times.

Assistant: Andrew Volkert For more information about Tripod Surveys, Contact: Rob Ramsdell Web: Tel: