Good Clinical Practice A Review for OCRA US RAC Study Group September 2005 Ginger Clasby, MS Promedica International 714-799-1617.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CMRSC Division of Hematology/Oncology
Advertisements

Investigator Responsibilities in Clinical Research
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit
Investigational Device Exemptions 21 CFR Part 812
The Principal Investigator’s Roles and Responsibilities Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator (May 2010)
Josip Arlica, MD Altiora Training Program “Train to Gain”
Research Coordination Guidance The Committees on Human Research Serving University of Vermont & Fletcher Allen Health Care
SOP Melody Lin, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Office for Human Research Protections Director, International Activities Santiago, Chile August.
Good Clinical Research Practice Guidelines For Informed Consent Presented by Catherine May Acting Research Practice Development Officer The Office of Research.
The Consent Process: It’s More Than Just a Form A “10 Minute Training” Brought to you by Cyndi Long, MS, RD, CCRC CU Sports Medicine.
Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), Informed Consent, and Responsibilities Requirement for IRBs -DHHS: 45 CFR Part 46 -FDA: 21 CFR 56 Requirement for and.
Good Clinical Practice in Research
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
GCP compliance for GenISIS  This presentation is intended for clinical staff involved in recruiting patients to the GenISIS (Genetics of Influenza Susceptibility.
John Naim, PhD Director Clinical Trials Research Unit
IRB-Investigator/ Research Coordinator Mtg. “CUMC’s New Progressive Policy For Adverse Event Reporting” April 13, 2004 George Gasparis Andrew Wit, Ph.D.
Clinical Pharmacy’s Role in Research Trials Sheree Miller Pharm.D. Investigational Drug Service University of Washington Medical Center.
Research Ethics & Governance
Good Clinical Practice GCP
Jennifer McCormick MA, CRC Karla Lichter RN CCRC.
Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCPs)
Accredited Member of the Association of Clinical Research Professionals, USA Tips on clinical trials Maha Al-Farhan B.Sc, M.Phil., M.B.A., D.I.C.
Monitoring and Special Considerations for Multi-Center Trials
PRESENTING A PROTOCOL AN IRB INFOSHORT FEBRUARY 2013.
Continuing Review VA Requirements Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst Program for Research Integrity Development and Education (PRIDE)
Who’s the Boss? Faculty Advisor or Principal Investigator Supervision versus Student Investigator or Study Coordinator Responsibilities Gwenn Snow, MS,
Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations & other Safety Information Which Form 4 to Use?
Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines Quality of BE Data Dr. Henrike Potthast Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable.
Recapture of Day 1 Suchart Chongprasert, Ph.D. Food and Drug Administration “Practical Aspects in Performing Clinical and Bioanalytical Parts in BA/BE.
Good Clinical Practice (GCP)- An introduction Dr Noor Ibrahim Mohamed Sakian.
Regulatory Authority Governing Clinical Trials Anthony J. Minisi, MD Director, Cardiology Fellowship Program.
Elements of Clinical Trial Quality Assurance Regulatory Coordinator –SCTR SUCCESS Center QA Monitor – NIDA Clinical Trials Network Stephanie Gentilin,
Good Laboratory Practice CFR 21 Part 58 A Review for OCRA US RAC Study Group September 2005 Ginger Clasby, MS Promedica International
Investigational New Drug Application (IND)
RESCUE: ACRIN 4701 Protocol Development & Regulatory Compliance (PDRC) Josephine Schloesser, ACRIN Monitor Chris Steward, ACRIN QC Auditor.
Joint Research & Enterprise Office Training The team, the procedures, the monitor and the Sponsor Lucy H H Parker Clinical Research Governance Manager.
University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.
Role of the Oncology Research Team Carmen B. Jacobs, BS, RN,OCN, CCRP U.T.M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas U.S.A.
GCP & ETHICS COMMITTEES Ravi Rengachari Vector Control Research Centre PONDICHERRY.
The Global Health Network Marijke Geldenhuys 19 September 2014 Adhering to the GCP Principles.. what does that even mean?
ANJALI JADHAV ANKITA SINGH ANUJA AHIRE ANURADHA PRASAD BEVIN D’SOUZA.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
Quality of Bioequivalence Data Alfredo García - Arieta Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Investigator and Study Team Responsibilities Miles McFann IRB Administration Training.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
HRPP Policies & Forms Chapter Two Created/Revised for AAHRPP June 1, 2007.
RIHES-II: H ANDLING A UDITS AND I NSPECTIONS E FFECTIVE D ATE 25 D ECEMBER 2006 V ERSION : 3.0 บุญเหลือ พรึงลำภู 15 มกราคม 2557.
Thierry Le Chevalier, MD Good Clinical Practice Compliance.
Welcome New IRB Member! This brief presentation covers: Your Role in the IRB: What to Know The IRB Review Process Resources Human Research Protections.
Quality Assurance & Quality Control in Pharmaceuticals & Healthcare Industries By- Dr. Sushrut Varun Satpathy MBBS, MD Assistant Professor Department of.
Good Clinical Practice (GCP) UKTMN 6 th June 2006.
PRIMER: Human Subjects, Past, Present, and Future Susan Metosky, Arizona State University Debra Murphy, Arizona State University.
ICH guidelines……….. INVESTIGATOR INVESTIGATOR Investigator's Qualifications and agreements The investigator(s) should be qualified by education, training,
Informed Consent Presented by Marian Serge, RN. Goals Informed consent process and form Title 38 CFR , Common Rule required elements and additional.
Session 2 IRB Training  What is the Principal Investigator’s role in Human Subject Research?  What is the role of the Investigator’s staff in Human Subject.
GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)
Slide 1 Standard Operating Procedures. Slide 2 Goal To review the standard operating procedures Creating the informed consent document Obtaining informed.
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and Monitoring Practices
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
ICH-GCP Avinash Kondawar M. Pharm Lead CRA
Enrolling in Clinical Trials
Good Clinical Practice
Good Clinical Practice in Research
Informed Consent in Clinical Trials
Protocol Approval Criteria
Good clinical practice
Presentation transcript:

Good Clinical Practice A Review for OCRA US RAC Study Group September 2005 Ginger Clasby, MS Promedica International x 25

GCP What It Is An international ethical & scientific quality standard for designing, conducting, recording & reporting human clinical studies – EU – Japan – US Applies to registration studies that may have an impact on safety & welfare of human subjects

GCP Participating Parties IRB/Ethics Committee Investigators Sponsor Regulatory Authorities

GCP Key Documents Investigator Brochure Study Protocol Informed Consent Document

GCP Principles 1.Studies in accordance with Declaration of Helsinki; consistent with GCP & applicable regulatory requirements 2.Studies initiated & continued only if anticipated benefits outweigh risks 3.Rights, safety & welfare of human subjects take priority over interests of science & society 4.Available non-clinical & clinical info on product adequate to support study

GCP Principles 5.Studies scientifically sound; described in clear, detailed protocol 6.Study in compliance with IRB/EC approved protocol 7.Medical care given to subjects is the responsibility of qualified medical professional(s) 8.Individuals conducting studies qualified by education, training & experience 9.Freely given informed consent obtained from every subject prior to study participation

GCP Principles 10.Study information recorded, handled & stored to allow accurate reporting, interpretation & verification 11.Confidentiality of subject records protected in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements 12.Investigational products manufactured, handled & stored in accordance with GCP & used in accordance with approved protocol 13.Systems/procedures implemented to assure quality of study

IRB/EC Roles & Responsibilities To safeguard study subjects’ rights & welfare by: Evaluation/disposition of study proposal Evaluation of proposed subject consent materials Evaluation of emergency use consent methodology Evaluation of investigator qualifications Ongoing review of study progress (at least yearly) Evaluation of proposed subject compensation plans

IRB/EC Composition & Operations Membership has qualifications & experience to evaluate science, medical aspects & ethics of proposed study – ≥ 5 members – ≥ 1 member whose primary interest in nonscientific – ≥ 1 member independent of institution or study site Written SOPs & records Decisions rendered at announced meetings with quorum in attendance

IRB/EC Composition & Operations Only members participating in review should vote Investigator may provide info on study, but should not be involved in review or vote Nonmembers with expertise in special areas may be invited to assist with review (but cannot vote)

IRB/EC Procedures Document group membership & qualifications Schedule meetings & notify members Conduct initial & ongoing review of studies Determine ongoing review frequency Provide expedited review of minor study changes, in accordance with regulatory requirements Specify that no subject should be enrolled in study prior to IRB/EC approval

IRB/EC Procedures Specify that no deviations from protocol should be initiated without prior IRB/EC approval – Emergency situations require immediate notification of IRB/EC after the fact Specify that Investigator should promptly report: – Protocol deviations – Changes increasing subject risk or study procedures – Serious and unexpected adverse events

IRB/EC Procedures Notify Investigator promptly of: – Study-related decisions – Reason for decisions – Procedures for appeal of decisions

IRB/EC Required Records Relevant records maintained ≥ 3 yr after study completion Records available for review by regulatory authorities

IRB/EC What is Reviewed Investigator Brochure or Report of Prior Investigations Study protocol & amendments Investigator qualifications Informed consent documents, including subject recruiting tools Other written information provided to subjects Subject compensation plans Adverse events Protocol deviations

IRB/EC When Reviews Occur Prior to study initiation at site At least yearly during study During study, as necessitated by: – Changes in protocol, consent documents, etc. – Changes in study investigator – Reports of serious or unanticipated device-related adverse events At study completion or termination

Investigator Roles & Responsibilities Qualified to conduct study Have adequate resources to conduct study Provide medical care to study subjects Regular communication with IRB/EC reviewing study Compliance with study protocol Maintenance of investigational product accountability Compliance with study randomization & unmasking procedures Provide informed consent to study subjects

Investigator Responsibilities Appropriate Qualifications Training & experience demonstrated via: – Medical license – CV – Specialized study training – GCP training If study responsibilities delegated, need a list of qualified persons to whom responsibilities are delegated

Investigator Responsibilities Adequate Resources Suitable staff & good methods for keeping them apprised Suitable facilities Appropriate patient population – Access to disease or condition – Volume of patients with disease or condition

Investigator Responsibilities Medical Care Make medical decisions regarding patient treatment Adequate care for study-related adverse events Diligence in ascertaining reason(s) for subject withdrawals from study

Investigator Responsibilities IRB/EC Communications IRB/EC approval prior to study initiation IRB/EC kept apprised of events & progress during study

Investigator Responsibilities Protocol Compliance Conduct study in accordance with protocol May not deviate from protocol without Sponsor/IRB approval Document deviations from protocol

Investigator Responsibilities Investigational Product Accountability Maintain accountability at study site Document product receipt & disposition Maintain product in a secure area Use product only in accordance with protocol Disallow use of product by anyone not registered with study

Investigator Responsibilities Randomization Procedures & Unmasking Follow study randomization procedures Unmask only in accordance with protocol Document noncompliance or premature unmasking

Investigator Responsibilities Subject Informed Consent Comply with regulatory requirements Update consent documents as necessary Inform subject that study involves “investigational” product May not coerce subject to participate May not waive subject’s legal rights Keep subject informed of new information regarding study

Investigator Responsibilities Subject Informed Consent Provide informed consent in understandable language Give subject the chance to ask questions If subject can’t read, need impartial witness If subject is “disadvantaged”, need legally authorized witness Get subject consent in writing prior to initiation of study procedures Give subject a copy of signed consent document

Investigator Responsibilities Required Records & Reports Essential regulatory document file(s) – Protocol & amendments – Approved informed consent documents – Product accountability documentation – Investigator qualifications & agreements – IRB correspondence – Study delegation list – Subject screening/enrollment logs – Study monitoring reports – Calibration/maintenance logs – Memos to file

Investigator Responsibilities Required Records & Reports Source documentation Data capture forms (study-specific) Data clarification forms Fully executed informed consent documents

Investigator Responsibilities Required Records & Reports Written periodic status reports to IRB/EC Written reports of protocol deviations to Sponsor & IRB/EC Serious or unanticipated product-related adverse events to Sponsor & IRB/EC Notification of study suspension or termination to IRB/EC Final study report to IRB/EC Retain ≥ 2 yr

Sponsor Roles & Responsibilities Study quality assurance Appropriately qualified medical personnel to advise on study Utilization of qualified personnel in study design & operations Study management, data handling & record keeping Investigator selection & training Definition/allocation of study responsibilities

Sponsor Roles & Responsibilities Facilitation of communications between Investigators Study compensation (investigators and/or subjects) & financing Regulatory authority notification/submission Confirmation of IRB/EC review/approval Investigational product information Investigational product manufacturing, packaging, labeling & coding Investigational product supply & handling

Sponsor Roles & Responsibilities Record access Ongoing safety evaluation & reporting Serious/unanticipated adverse event reporting Study monitoring Study noncompliance procedures Study termination or suspension notification Study reports

Sponsor Roles & Responsibilities Sponsor may transfer responsibilities to CRO – Transfer must be documented in writing – Sponsor still has ultimate responsibility for study quality and data integrity

Study Protocol Components General administrative info Background Study purpose & objectives Study design Subject eligibility requirements How subjects will be treated How safety & efficacy will be assessed Sample size justification & statistical analysis methods

Study Protocol Components How data will be captured & maintained Monitoring procedures Proposed informed consent document

Informed Consent Document Components Statement that study involves “research” & product “experimental” (if applicable) Study purpose Number of expected study subjects to be enrolled Study treatment(s) & probability for random assignment Study exams & procedures for duration of trial Subject’s responsibilities Foreseeable risks to subject (embryo, fetus, nursing infant)

Informed Consent Document Components Expected benefits Alternatives procedures or therapies & associated risk/benefit Compensation available in event of study-related injury or sickness Anticipated payments to subject for study participation Anticipated expenses to subject for study participation Statement that participation is voluntary

Informed Consent Document Components Description of extent to which confidentiality can be assured Commitment to keep subject apprised on new information that may affect subject’s willingness to participate in study Contact info for questions re: subject rights; trial- related adverse events Circumstances under which subject’s participation may be terminated

Investigator Brochure What It Is A compilation of clinical & non-clinical data on the product that is relevant to the product’s study in humans Necessary for Investigator & IRB/EC review to assess the risks/benefits associated with study

Investigator Brochure Components Product formulation summary Introduction/background info regarding product & investigational plan Investigational product physical, chemical & pharmaceutical properties & formulation Non-clinical studies Human clinical studies Summary of data & guidance for Investigator

Good Clinical Practice Reference Documents & Links ICH - E6: Guideline for Good Clinical Practice 21 CFR 50 - Informed Consent 21 CFR 56 - Institutional Review Board earch.cfm earch.cfm