OQN Seminar Quality Audit-Learning by Sharing Quality Audit-Learning by Sharing 11 th November 2009 Preparing the Stakeholders for the Audit Visit: The.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Advertisements

Starting Planning for the 2010 Policy Key Issues Notes for the TAC Executive Committee April 8, 2009 Phil Hattis, AIAA VP for Public Policy.
FCMAT Response & Preparation: Process Outline October 25, 2006.
Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit
Planning for Academic Program Review Site Visits
ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
Support Services Review Support Services Review (SSR) is a representative, responsive form of assessment and self-evaluation to ensure continuous quality.
Some first observations & lessons learned by Klaus Hüfner, Audit Coordinator of the IREG Ranking Audit and Carla van Cauwenberghe, Dutch Inspectorate of.
THE HLC SELF-STUDY PROCESS THE INFORMAL INTERVIEW: QUESTIONS FOR THE HALLWAY.
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
Evaluation Team Chair Training Presented By Dr. Tim Eaton TRACS Regional Representative.
SACS CASI Background Dedicated to advancing excellence in education worldwide, AdvancED provides accreditation, research, and professional services to.
Green Roof Action Project 綠頂行動 Our scheme is not just about physical implementation of green features on top of school buildings, it is about the knowledge.
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Preparation for Developmental Reviews.
Computer Science ABET Visit Update November 8, 2003.
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
“Advancing Knowledge. Improving Life.” Strategic Planning Workshop Dean Stanley Lemeshow Strategic Planning Process Dean Stanley Lemeshow October 2007.
HLC and Me What does HLC stand for? Hydrocarbolyte Liquid Crystal Holy Living in Communion Her Left Cheek Hysterical Laughing Clown Whatever it is I don’t.
Challenges Faced in Developing Audit Plans and Programs 21 st March, 2013.
PILOT PROJECT: External audit of quality assurance system on HEIs Agency for Science and Higher Education Zagreb, October 2007.
 Mission College Preparation of the Accreditation Self-Evaluation WVMCCD Board of Trustees November 19, 2013.
Atlanta Public Schools Principal Selection Process Human Resources, Center of Expertise Updated March 3, 2014.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
HLC STEERING TEAM RETREAT MAY 30, 31, AGENDA I.Welcome II.Refine and formalize timeline III.Stage 1 Awareness (Year 1) A. Examples of other college.
Quality in Higher Education: A Pragmatic approach King Saud University 2009 Professor Hilary Winchester.
Deconstructing Standard 2c Dr. Mike Mahan Gordon College 1.
Cathrine Harboe-ReeMarie Pernat University LibrarianSenior Policy and Planning Librarian March 2004 Fitness for purpose Monash University.
Campaign Readiness Assessment Prepared by N ETZEL A SSOCIATES, INC. December 7, 2007 Cal Poly Foundation Recreation, Parks and Tourism Administration Program.
MONASH UNIVERSITY LIBRARY’S QUALITY SELF REVIEW: INVOLVING ALL STAFF M. Pernat Monash University Library, Monash University, Victoria, 3800 QUALITY AT.
PERIODIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMS AT UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL Office of the Provost Hélène David, associate vice-rector academic affairs Claude Mailhot, Professor.
QAA Summative Review Staff Briefing Leeds College of Art 8 September 2010.
Davenport University Strategic Planning, Goal Development and Budget Process December 15, 2009.
How to Prepare for an Ohio Technical Assistance Visit.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
Middle States Accreditation – update at Town Hall, 2/19/2014 Middle States Accreditation: Update at Town Hall Meeting February 19, 2014.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Dr Saleh Mohamed Al Khusaiby Personal Reflection on the Interviews Dean, Oman Medical College Sohar Medical Campus Oman Accreditation Council meeting November.
QAAP Workshop (Basic). Conduct of the peer review * Commitment * Contribution to a smooth and effective process * The Developmental Engagement Report.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
Ensuring Success For Each Student AdvancED District Accreditation Process Five-Year External Review March 13 – 16, 2016 Produced by Mr. Tony Pickett, Assistant.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
THE SELF-STUDY “OUR EXPERIENCE” MAJAN COLLEGE (UNIVERSITY COLLEGE )
Academic Program Review Committee Report Faculty Senate meeting November 11, 2008.
“Developing an Exemplary Self-Study”.  1. Effective organization and implementation  2. Comprehensive Assessment  3. Documenting Compliance  4. Compilation.
Periodic Review Report Committee Summary: Amended Monthly Progress Report December 22, 2003.
 A formal update on Committee progress will be provided to the Provost, Executive VP for Finance, and other senior officials at UGA. This update will.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Involve internal and external stakeholders using various communications tools. Align and focus the entire school system with measurable outcomes. Excite.
IUP Middle States Accreditation and Self Study Process
KCTCS Branding Update KCTCS PR Retreat September 27 – 29, 2011.
Dr. Harini Methuku Scientific College of Design 1.
ELCA PROFESSIONAL LEARNING FEBRUARY 22, 2016 WHO MOVED MY CHEESE?
QAA COLLABORATIVE PROVISION AUDIT DRAFT REPORT. QAA CPA Process Submission by the University of Self Evaluation Document (SED) (December 2005) Selection.
Cornerstone Free Will Baptist Church TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLAN.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Reflection on OAC Manual Quality Audit- Learning By Sharing
STAFF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT IN-SERVICE
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Directions for this Template
Presentation transcript:

OQN Seminar Quality Audit-Learning by Sharing Quality Audit-Learning by Sharing 11 th November 2009 Preparing the Stakeholders for the Audit Visit: The Trial Audit Presenter: Ms. Annie Lajinian- Magarian, Director, Foundation Program

What is a Quality Audit Visit? It is the process that binds the self-study report with the actual visit of the Audit Panel. It is the process that binds the self-study report with the actual visit of the Audit Panel. It is a checking and verification process of what HEI has reported in the self- study. It is a checking and verification process of what HEI has reported in the self- study.

What is a Trial Audit? A “Mock Audit”: a process that simulates the Quality audit visit. A “Mock Audit”: a process that simulates the Quality audit visit. –Ensure comprehensiveness of the report and supporting materials. –Check for accuracy and reliability of reported data. –Assess the extent of readiness and awareness of all HEI’s stakeholders –Provide opportunity to test out DU’s logistical arrangements, in terms of room setup, catering, mobilizing groups of people (OAC Manual)

almost a year before the real thing Select team, TOR & Set dates Prepare for the Trial Audit Visit Get Written Report Conduct Trial Audit Visit Research a team of external trial audit panel Meet Trial Audit Panel for Feedback Self- Reflection Story of the Process

Research a team of external trial audit panel 1 AUB from the Start Reviewers criteria Experience in similar situations Started in early September

Began in November Began in November Check their availability Check their availability Team of two- a chair and a member Team of two- a chair and a member Secure their approval and send a draft portfolio for feedback Secure their approval and send a draft portfolio for feedback By the end of November, the team provides detailed feedback on the draft portfolio Trial Visit scheduled in February Select team, TOR & Set dates 2 Self-Study sent to OAC by late December

Team sends documents and interview list Team sends documents and interview list DU organizes Logistics- meeting rooms DU organizes Logistics- meeting rooms DU communicates Interviewee schedules to all concerned DU communicates Interviewee schedules to all concerned DU checks the supporting materials DU checks the supporting materials DU ensures that all concerned have access to the final version of the self- study portfolio. DU ensures that all concerned have access to the final version of the self- study portfolio. Prepare for the Trial Audit Visit 3

Treat the trial audit (3 days) as the real audit Treat the trial audit (3 days) as the real audit Meetings with representative sample of : Meetings with representative sample of : –BOT and BOD members –Senior Management –Old and new faculty –Old and new administrative staff –Old and new students –Community leaders –Employers of DU graduates Conduct Trial Audit Visit 4

Informal Meeting with senior management Informal Meeting with senior management Discuss strengths and areas in need of improvement Discuss strengths and areas in need of improvement Point out problems observed in interviews, logistics, etc. Point out problems observed in interviews, logistics, etc. Meet Trial Audit Panel for Feedback 5

In Early March, Trial Audit Panel sends: In Early March, Trial Audit Panel sends: 1. Formal written report 2. Thought provoking questions to be addressed by DU Get Written Report 6

Debrief Students Debrief Students Reconcile Action Plans Reconcile Action Plans Hold a Hold a One-day Retreat One-day Retreat Self -Reflection 7

One-day retreat with academic and non-academic staff (presentations by various committees, brainstorming on possible interview questions) One-day retreat with academic and non-academic staff (presentations by various committees, brainstorming on possible interview questions) Student Involvement (mission, vision, goals, self-study process) Student Involvement (mission, vision, goals, self-study process) Timeline of Action Plans (QAB and colleges and programs) Timeline of Action Plans (QAB and colleges and programs) 7

Academic Staff Non-Academic Staff Hold a Hold a One-day Retreat One-day Retreat

Hold meetings with students to update them. Hold meetings with students to update them. Answer their queries about their experience in the trial audit. Answer their queries about their experience in the trial audit. Address any misconceptions students may have had during the trial process. Address any misconceptions students may have had during the trial process. Debrief Students

Translate Areas of Improvement into action plans. This led to: Translate Areas of Improvement into action plans. This led to: 1. Active Role by the QAB 2. Action Plans for various administrative and academic support Units 3. Action Plans for Colleges and Programs Reconcile Action Plans

Lessons Learned The Trial Audit: Confirmed our strengths Confirmed our strengths Revealed areas that were overlooked or not addressed sufficiently Revealed areas that were overlooked or not addressed sufficiently Helped us identify key issues to reflect upon Helped us identify key issues to reflect upon Improved bonding among stakeholders Improved bonding among stakeholders Raised self-confidence & diminished anxiety Raised self-confidence & diminished anxiety