Design of electrostatic septum for slow extraction from J-PARC main ring 2005, March 2nd ICFA septa workshop 2005 Acc. Lab., KEK M. Tomizawa, Y. Arakaki,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Matt Rooney RAL The T2K Beam Window Matt Rooney Rutherford Appleton Laboratory BENE November 2006.
Advertisements

HISTORY, EVOLUTION AND DESIGN OF THIN SEPTUM MAGNETS AT BNL Michael Mapes The 14 th ICFA mini-workshop on septa devices.
The Current T2K Beam Window Design and Upgrade Potential Oxford-Princeton Targetry Workshop Princeton, Nov 2008 Matt Rooney.
Internal H0/H- dump Cesare Maglioni, Melanie Delonca Thanks to: R. Chamizo, R. Versaci, O. Aberle, J. Borburgh.
The FAIR Antiproton Target B. Franzke, V. Gostishchev, K. Knie, U. Kopf, P. Sievers, M. Steck Production Target Magnetic Horn (Collector Lens) CR and RESR.
Masahito TOMIZAWA and Satoshi MIHARA Accelerator and proton beam.
Design and Technical Challenges of the ILC Small Angle Interaction Regions October 20 th, 2006J. Borburgh, CERN, AB/BT Electrostatic separator limits and.
Technical studies for the HIE- ISOLDE Frontend upgrade Jacobo Montaño Marie Curie Fellow; CATHI Project * The research project has been supported by a.
Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura On behalf of PRISM Target Group Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,
Electrostatic Septum For AGS C. Pai Brookhaven National Laboratory Collider-Accelerator Department
Apex Target Marco Oriunno, April 23, Design and fabrication by: Marco Oriunno, Dieter Walz, Jim McDonald, Clive Field, Douglas Higginbotham, and.
Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK)
Design and Technical Challenges of the ILC Small Angle Interaction Regions October 19 th, 2006J. Borburgh, CERN, AB/BT Electrostatic separator limits With.
09/13/20111 Status of high intensity polarized electron gun project at MIT-Bates Evgeni Tsentalovich MIT.
Study of Pion Capture Solenoids for PRISM H.Ohnishi AB M. Aoki C, Y. Ajima A, N. Fukasawa AD, K. Ishibashi B, Y. Kuno C, T. Miura A, K. Nakahara C, T.
HPS Collaboration Meeting JLAB, May Tracker Design Status M.Oriunno, SLAC.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
1 Flux concentrator for SuperKEKB Kamitani Takuya IWLC October.20.
Current Status and Possible Items around ‘neutrino beam’ Horn Target Remote maintenance tools Decay volume window and collimator muon monitor Many items.
14th ICFA Mini-Workshop on Septa Devices in Accelerators
Calculation of Beam loss on foil septa C. Pai Brookhaven National Laboratory Collider-Accelerator Department
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
Beam line Experiment area SC magnet Pion production target
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy SNS Injection and Extraction Systems Issues and Solutions by M. Plum for the SNS team and our BNL collaborators.
Study Plan of Clearing Electrode at KEKB Y. Suetsugu, H. Fukuma (KEK), M. Pivi, W. Lanfa (SLAC) 2007/12/191 ILC DR Mini Work Shop (KEK) Dec.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
J-PARC Accelerator and Beam Simulations Sep. 7th, SAD2006 Masahito Tomizawa J-PARC Main Ring G., KEK Outline of J-PARC Accelerator Characteristics of High.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Recent Electron-Cloud Mitigation Studies at KEK E-cloud mitigation mini-workshop on November at CERN Kyo Shibata (for KEKB Group)
SKEKB Mini Work SKEKB Vacuum System – Arc Section – Contents Y.Suetsugu KEKB Vacuum Group 1.Beam Chambers 2.Pumps: Pump, Pressure,
Status of ATF Fast Kicker Experiment
Shock Tests on Tantalum and Tungsten J. R. J. Bennett, S. Brooks, R. Brownsword, C. Densham, R. Edgecock, S. Gray, A. McFarland, G. Skoro and D. Wilkins.
Outline Injection septum SMH42 Injection bumper Resources Conclusion LIU-ABT review 20/11/2015 Status PS injection septa2.
1 Fast kicker study Machine Time 2011/10/18~10/29(2 weeks) TB meeting 2011/01/14 T.Naito.
If information seems to be missing, make any reasonable assumptions. 1.A target has an areal density of 2.3 g/cm 2 and a thickness of 0.8 inch. What is.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Principals of fast injection and extraction R. Apsimon.
Capture and Transport Simulations of Positrons in a Compton Scheme Positron Source A. VIVOLI*, A. VARIOLA (LAL / IN2P3-CNRS), R. CHEHAB (IPNL & LAL / IN2P3-CNRS)
FLS2010 Workshop, Stanford, March 1-5, 2010 Florian Loehl (Cornell University) Commissioning of the High Current ERL Injector at Cornell Florian Loehl.
2016/3/31 Fast kicker Experiment at ATF ATF2 - 40nm beam production, measurement Extraction kicker The difficulty of the beam extraction is that the kick.
TPSG4 validation at HighRadMat #6 Cedric Baud, B. Balhan, Jan Borburgh, Brennan Goddard, Wim Weterings.
Beam absorbers for Machine Protection at LHC and SPS
Design Concepts of the Mu2e Electrostatic Septa - Large Scale Prototype David Tinsley Mu2e Resonant Extraction Technical Review August 25, 2015.
Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.
Ma zhongjian Ding yadong Wang qingbin Wu qingbiao Radiation Protection Group/IHEP.
Design for a 2 MW graphite target for a neutrino beam Jim Hylen Accelerator Physics and Technology Workshop for Project X November 12-13, 2007.
Acceleration of 1 MeV H - ion beams at ITER NB relevant high current density Takashi INOUE M. Taniguchi, M. Kashiwagi, N. Umeda, H. Tobari, M. Dairaku,
-200kV -400kV -600kV -800kV -1MV Acceleration of 1 MeV H - ion beams at ITER NB relevant high current density Takashi INOUE, M. Taniguchi, M. Kashiwagi,
Halo Collimation of Protons and Heavy Ions in SIS-100.
Baseline Injection/Extraction Configuration Aimin Xiao and Louis Emery, September 12th 2006.
Irradiated T2K Ti alloy materials test plans
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
Positron production rate vs incident electron beam energy for a tungsten target
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
LINAC4 ADVISORY COMMITTEE
(Beam) Impact of MTE on the PS septa
Vacuum System Failures at HERA
Possible causes for SPS ZS2 misalignment
Junji Urakawa (KEK) for ATF International Collaboration
The Quench Detection-Wire-Feedthrough Plug-In of W7-X

Beam Injection and Extraction Scheme
Strip-line Kicker R&D at KEK-ATF
Fast Kicker R&D at ATF T.Naito(KEK) TILC09 18/April/ /11/27.
Magnetized Electron Beam for Ion Cooling at JLEIC
Cui Xiaohao, Bian Tianjian, Zhang Chuang 2017/11/07
GROUP 12 CAS – Erice - March 2017 Andrea DE FRANCO
Specifications for the XFEL Beam Switchyard Kickers
Presentation transcript:

Design of electrostatic septum for slow extraction from J-PARC main ring 2005, March 2nd ICFA septa workshop 2005 Acc. Lab., KEK M. Tomizawa, Y. Arakaki, N. Tokuda and H. Sato T. Yokoi, Y. Yuasa 1.Introduction 2.Status of ESS R&D High voltage test Alignment measurement 3. Radiation and Residual Activity 4. Temperature rise by heat deposit 5. Two other types of ESS

J-PARC Main Ring 3.3x10 14 protons per pulse(15  A) full beam power :  beam loss: as possible as small <1% (7.5kW) level radiation safety problem

psext4_007.dat mad332.mad env4.com

Parameters of Electrostatic septa (reference design) thickness voltage(kV) L kick angle (  m) /gap(mm) (m) (mrad) ESS1:W/Re(3%) wires /  -0.2 ESS2:W/Re(3%) wires  170/  -0.2

dynamic bump 50GeV primary beam hit rate on ESS wires Circulating Beam Parameters ε x =6.1π mm  mrad ε y =6.1π mm  mrad  p/p=±0.25% Qv= min. hit rate  m min. hit rate  m beam hit rate on ESS wires tri0103_095 tri0103_090 (sca0122_2_044) before 3turns extraction w=100  m, L=1.5m

Hit rate 0.01 (1%), full beam 750kW “ real loss rate” = [N(hit)-N(scatt.)]/N(hit) real loss 750kW x0.01 x 0.077=0.58kW Protons scattered on the ESS wires (MARS) 40cm downstream from ESS1 exit Scattered to circulating side Scattered to extracted side sadin_foilsct_case1.dat r12_case1.com (Reference ESS design) Low Density Bulk Model

R&D electrostatic septum 80  m W/Re(3%) wires, 1.25mm space, h=80mm

GOAL: 170kV/25mm gap, 6.8MV/m SUS cathode: small --> conditioning at higher voltage ceramic feedthrough was Ceramic A-479(99%)->KP-999(99.9%) alumina content Still small --> conditioning at higher voltage A wire was cut by damage due to high dark current(~200  A) conditioning at 235kV without wires --> very stable Ti electrode(10nm oxidized film on surface----suppress e emission) wires were replaced to new ones -->170kV/25mm operation is stable!! High Voltage Test of R&D electrostatic septum

careful conditioning not to makes any serious damage Automatic high voltage conditioning by PC 0.12kV/5min

Alignment Errors of Wires Laser focus displacement meter

Short Test Piece Damage of wires Guide groove Prototype

Residual Activity of Ti ESS chamber 13-> > > > > > >1.021->2.7 up down left right wires 1day cooling30days cooling upstream downstream 30days irradiation Unit mSv/h 1 -> 30 day cooling Ti Flange 59.9->7.5 Ti Duct 94.8->11.9 ESS chamber side ESS chamber end ESS downstream

Polimid ~400MGy ---> Life >10 years Absorbed dose of QFP coil insulation (polymid) 1 year operation (5000h) wires hit rate: 1% of 750kW

11-> >1.915-> > > >1.5 QFP upstreamQFP side view Residual Activity of Quadrupole (QFP) 30days irradiation Unit mSv/h 1 -> 30 day cooling

Temperature rise by energy deposition in Tungsten wires E=  T 4  Stefan Constant  : emissivity Initial temperature: 30 o C repetition period: 3.6s Flat top time: 0.7s proton number : 3.3x10 14 ppp x 0.01 proton dE/dx: 5.72x J/cm Next Step dE/dx by MARS Measurement of  by heat load in the vacuum Cooled by thermal radiation (Cooling by conduction can be neglected)  

Ribbon foils (AGS type) ESS1: W, 30  m+20  m, 1mm, 4mm spacing, L=1.5m, 0.2mrad ESS2 :W, 30  m+20  m, 1mm, 4mm spacing, L=1.5m, 0.2mrad ESS2ESS1 Thinner: reduce hit rate Mechanically stronger: reliable Smaller deviation due to electric filed

Tension 2kg Alignment Errors of Ribbon Foils

Scatterer+ribbon ESS Scatterer: 30  m+20  m, 1mm, 40mm spacing, L=0.5m, 0mrad ESS1: W, 30  m+20  m, 1mm, 4mm spacing, L=1.0m, 0.133mrad ESS2: W, 30  m+20  m, 1mm, 4mm spacing, L=2.0m, 0.267mrad ESS2ESS1scatterer Scatterer: low average mass density, no electric field Beam hits scatterer Multiple scattering is dominant process --> radiation is reduced Beam hit rate on downstream ESS foils is small Needs more space to get same kick angle

real loss extraction in the whole ringefficiency  m wires 1.88kW99.75%  m ribbons 1.05kW99.86% scatterer+ribbons 0.71kW99.91% hit rate at wires or ribbons Scattering process by MARS (low density bulk model) Track scattered protons check apertures of other all septa and ducts circulated protons survived protons at exit of the ring Beam Loss Performance of three types Low density bulk model is realistic ?

Production of Slow Extraction Devices will start from spring We have one more year to fix ESS scheme! Scattering simulations R&D ESS (alignment and high voltage test) establish maintenance scenario under high residual activity high voltage cable vacuum flange ESS chamber install/uninstall by Air palette fluorinert exchange/circulation