Understanding the Technology INTELLIGENT COMPACTION Jimmy Si, Ph.D., P.E. Austin, TX, April 3, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oklahoma DOT Perpetual Pavement Test Sections at the NCAT Test Track
Advertisements

NDT Technologies for Pavement Evaluation: FHWA Directions and Initiatives H. Thomas Yu Office of Asset Management, Pavement, and Construction Federal Highway.
Sitka Airport IC Project Lessons-Learn By Amanda Gilliland Knik Construction Presented By Dr. George Chang Transtec Group.
Proposition 1 Formula Distribution Proposal for FY 2015 PRELIMINARY CONCEPT PROPOSITION 1 FORMULA DISTRIBUTION PROPOSAL FOR FY 2015 TxDOT/Stakeholder Working.
2014 AAPA Conference March 11-12, 2014 Curtis Vincent, P.E. Construction Engineer Lyndi Davis Blackburn, P.E. Assistant Materials and Tests Engineer Specification.
Recruitment of the New LTPP SPS-10: Warm Mix Asphalt Experiment Gabe Cimini LTPP NCRSC Project Manager.
Caltrans Changes SECTION 39 “Hot Mix Asphalt”
Asphalt Issues AASHTO SCOC Virginia Beach, Va. By Victor (Lee) Gallivan FHWA August 2, 2011.
International Compaction & Compaction Testing Update Feb 2010 Opportunity - Increase the life of infrastructure (some experts.
CCS900 for Asphalt Compactors
Intelligent Compaction for Hot Mix Asphalt Mike Arasteh, RC Baltimore.
Mark Lindemann NDOR Geotechnical Engineer.  Background on previous field testing  Research – Non-nuclear field testing  Cost Savings of Going Non-Nuclear.
AF2903 Road Construction and Maintenance Compaction of Hot Mix Asphalt
Intelligent Compaction (IC) Initiative “An Overview and Accomplishments” Michael M. Arasteh USDOT, FHWA, TST EDC Exchange for Local and Tribal Agencies.
PPTG Thin Overlays Task Group (TOADS) Team Overlay Asphalt Debaters Presented by Basem Muallem (CT) - Tony Limas (Industry) April 19, 2005.
Center for Earthworks Engineering Research A Comparison of Pavement Foundation Stabilization Technologies Peter J. Becker, M.S. Graduate Research Assistant.
Sulphur River Regional Mobility Authority (SuRRMA) E. Delbert Horton, Ph.D., P.E. Chairman.
Rick Collins (TxDOT).  Historically segregation thought of as mechanical (gradation) phenomenon  1996 – WSDOT discovered thermal imaging could detect.
Ranking System for Non- Destructive Testing Devices to Assess Quality of HMA during Construction Ahmed Faheem – Bloom Companies LLC Dr. Robert Schmitt.
Uniform Paving Platform A Contractor’s Perspective J. Brent Moore Regional Manager Branscome, Inc. - Richmond.
Intelligent Compaction Research & Development and QA Activities Richard B. Duval, P.E. Construction Research Engineer Infrastructure Research & Development.
SESSION 3 Subgrade This module presents the concepts and methods of characterizing the subgrade for the purpose of concrete pavement design. It also highlights.
In Place Nuclear Density Testing to Determine the % Compaction.
Got Density? Asphalt Pavement Assn. of Indiana Winter Conference December 2010.
Warm Mix for a Cold Climate Colorado DOT’s 2007 WMA Project.
COMPACTION Topic COMPACTION Presented to Dr. Ayub Elahi Presented by Group leader. M.Zeeshan haider yousaf Zia. # 14 Haider ayub # 13 Bilal ansari #35.
7. Soil Compaction (Das, chapter 6)
PERFORMANCE-BASED PROCEDURES FOR IN-PLACE SOIL TESTING 2013 LTAP-TTAP National Conference Boise, Idaho July 24, 2013.
Irene Rico Division Administrator Federal Highway Administration Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century ~ MAP-21.
Pavement Maintenance II
Texas Freight Forecasting Rob Bostrom Monisha Khurana Liza Amar Planning Applications Conference 2015.
Veda Software Antonio Nieves, HIF HQ. Data Management Tool – Intelligent Compaction Geospatial Analysis – View – Edit – Analyze Included in Generic Specifications.
Overview of the New Hot Mix Specifications Dale A. Rand, P.E. TxDOT Construction Division Flexible Pavements Branch TRB AFK10 Committee Meeting April 20-21,
Developing a Mixture-Based Specification for Flexible Base.
Trimble CCS900 Compaction Control System Overview
Why Intelligent Compaction?
Concrete Pavements The Right Tool for The Right Job.
1 Kh Training April Gudiance on the selection of Kh Soil Soil to Rock Rock Soil Soil to Rock Rock.
FHWA Highways For LIFE Technology Partnerships Program Intelligent Asphalt Compaction Analyzer October 01, 2007 – September 30, 2009 Haskell Lemon Construction.
Intelligent Compaction for Subgrades and Structural Layers AASHTO RAC High Value Research Workshop July 27, 2011.
Overview of French Research Project on Cold Mix Asphalt Recycling for Road Construction / Maintenance Vincent GAUDEFROY June 4, 2012.
1 Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in Arizona - Application and Verification October 3, 2008 Arizona Association of County Engineers.
Managing a Research Program from Various Funding Sources Sandra Larson, P.E. Research and Technology (R & T) Bureau Director Iowa Department of Transportation.
WORK ZONE DELAY ESTIMATION Work Zone Management, Accelerated Construction, and Smart Work Zones TEAM Monthly Meeting November 16, 2004 Luis Porrello, Ph.D.,

Clarifying Quality Control Bill Pine, Heritage Construction & Materials 56 th Illinois Bituminous Paving Conference.
STATE OF TEXAS BORDER PARTNERSHIP WORKING GROUP Kirk D. Fauver Statewide Planning Engineer FHWA TX Division (HPP-TX) June 30, 2004.
Midwest Geotechnical Conference Indianapolis, Indiana September 22, 2015 Bob Arndorfer.
Education Task Force Joe Jeffrey, Marty Weed, Mike Metzig, Rob Bushman Purpose: increase educational outreach for ITS Council Expo workshops / activities.
Presented to: FAA Airport Pavement Working Group Meeting By: David R. Brill, P.E., Ph.D. Date: April 24, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration Update on.
Extending Performance with Proper Asphalt Compaction
In Place Nuclear Density Testing to Determine the % Compaction
Office of Materials and Road Research
Uniform Paving Platform A Contractor’s Perspective
Presenters: Sumon Roy1 and Badrul Ahsan1
Water Balance Alternative Final Covers
Dedicated to Quality Partners In Quality
Barry Paye, PE Chief Materials & Pavement Engineer Wisconsin DOT
* Our Goal Obtain the best possible image * Best Possible Image? What is our goal?
Highways for LIFE – Technology Partnerships Program
Project Tracker, Reports, & Applications
Emphasis on Quality Rochester’s City Owner Contract Process
Longitudinal Joint Construction – Why Straightness Matters
SUBGRADE HOW TO DEAL WITH SOFT SPOTS
2018 Pavement Workshop May 23-24, 2018
How To Effectively Raise The Bar And Level The Playing Field
NCAT Pavement Test Track
Compaction Process in the Field
Real Estate Services - Austin, TX
Superpave5 Superpave Design at Five Percent Air Voids
Presentation transcript:

Understanding the Technology INTELLIGENT COMPACTION Jimmy Si, Ph.D., P.E. Austin, TX, April 3, 2014

Table of Contents Why Use Intelligent Compaction TXDOT IC Projects Benefits and Challenges Future Plans Summary

 Ordinary Compaction Ordinary Compaction  Density Control Compactive Energy Moisture Content Material Type Compact Lift Thickness Underlying Conditions Why Use IC? 3

 Not used in pavement design  A layer-specific spot test providing no info on the uniformity of compaction over the entire section  Only measured after compaction is complete providing no feedback in real time 4 Can We Do A Better Job?

Why Use IC?  Lose the track of rolling pass counts  Compaction job becomes guesswork  Inconsistent and non-uniform density  Under/over compaction  Premature pavement failure 5 Before After

TxDOT IC Projects Fort Worth (7) FM156 ; US287 ; FM1938 ; FM731 ; SH267 ; IH35W ; and IH30 El Paso (1) FM1281 Amarillo (1) LP335 Paris (2) US75 SH24 Atlanta (1) FM450 Houston (1) SH35 6

 FM156, Fort Worth, TX  FHWA/TPF IC Study  SG, Lime Stabilized SG, and Flex Base Ammann/Case padfoot drum IC roller Dynapac single smooth drum IC roller Ammann/Case smooth drum IC roller FM156 Project 7

Case/Ammann single-drum padfoot IC roller K s shows compaction progress and a soft spot FM156 Project – Identify Soft Spots Screen shots of k SΙPD maps for different passes on TB 1 8

FWD LWD FM156 Project – IC vs. Conventional Tests DCP 9

Benefits  Covers 100% of the area compacted  Monitors pass counts  Identifies areas of poor compaction  Intelligently picks areas to test for QC/QA  Improves productivity and minimizes cost  Improves safety in construction zones 10

 Extensive training for DOT and contractors  FHWA training workshops  Data management difficulties  VEDA  More expensive than ordinary  IC retrofit kit  High moisture variation  No strong correlation b/w stiffness and density Challenges 11

 Workshops/Webinars and pilot projects in districts  Revise IC specification –Short Term: density based on IC proof mapping –Long Term: stiffness based on IC proof mapping 12 Future Plans

Summary 1.IC is a continuous compaction control process. 2.IC is only for QC so far. 3.IC measures stiffness, not density. 4.IC reports both stiffness and pass count. 5.IC does not measure moisture. 6.IC measurements are sensitive to moisture. 7.IC improves safety in construction zones. 13

QUESTIONS ? Jimmy Si, Ph.D., P.E Thank You!