University of Central Florida S.O.S.: Student Outcomes Solutions for Program Assessment Paula S. Krist, Ph.D. Director, OEAS December 5, 2005 CS-55.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing Assessment Plans for Secondary Education / Foundations of Educations Department 9 th Annual Assessment Presentation December 3, 2013 Junko Yamamoto.
Advertisements

Standard 22A Curricular Structure HT Accredited Curriculum.
Keys to Success in Engineering Study
School of Nursing Reaccreditation November 9-11, 2009 Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) ensures the quality and integrity of baccalaureate,
Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.
Curriculum Maps Margaret Kasimatis, PhD VP for Academic Planning & Effectiveness.
ABET-ASAC Accreditation Workshop ABET Criteria and Outcomes Assessment
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
The Program Review Process: NCATE and the State of Indiana Richard Frisbie and T. J. Oakes March 8, 2007 (source:NCATE, February 2007)
Accreditation Strategy for the BYU CE En Dept. Presentation to External Review Board October 20, 2000.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
ABET Introduction of ABET to CE 203 Tim Ellis, Ph.D., P.E.
ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS FOR TSPC ACCREDITATION Assessment and Work Sample Conference January 13, 2012 Hilda Rosselli, Western Oregon University.
Outcomes-Based Accreditation: An Agent for Change and Quality Improvement in Higher Education Programs A. Erbil PAYZIN Founding Member and Past Chairman.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Assessment College of Engineering A Key for Accreditation February 11, 2009.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
Preparing for ABET Accreditation: Meeting Criteria 2, 3 & 4 October 12, 2006 Melissa Canady Wargo, Director Office of Assessment.
Essential Elements of a Workable Assessment Plan Pat Tinsley McGill, Ph.D. Professor, Strategic Management College of Business Faculty Lead, Assessment.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
Note: Because of slide animation, this ppt is intended to be viewed as a slide show.  While viewing the ppt, it may be helpful to obtain a sample Core.
NCATE STANDARD I REVIEW Hyacinth E. Findlay Carol Dawson Gwendolyn V. King.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
UCF University-wide System for Assessing Student Learning Outcomes Dr. Julia Pet-Armacost Assistant VP, Information, Planning, and Assessment University.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
AASCB The Assurance of Learning AASCB Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business Marta Colón de Toro, SPHR Assessment Coordinator College of.
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Assessing Your Assessments: The Authentic Assessment Challenge Dr. Diane King Director, Curriculum Development School of Computer & Engineering Technologies.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
ABET is Coming! What I need to know about ABET, but was afraid to ask.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Copyright © 2011 by ABET, Inc. and TMS 1 December 2, 2008 ABET Update UMC Meeting April 6, 2015 San Francisco, CA Chester J. Van Tyne
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
CEN Faculty MeetingMarch 31, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors January 9, 2007.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT PLAN/REPORT By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
ABET Accreditation Criterion 4: Continuous Improvement Direct Assessment of Learning Outcomes Dr. Abdel-Rahman Al-Qawasmi Associate Professor EE Department.
Stetson University welcomes: NCATE Board of Examiners.
University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.
Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have the following: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) ETP 2005.
Learning Goals Development & Assessment The Basics of Goals-Based Course Design.
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
QM and Accreditation—Sounds Boring but It’s BASIC
Development of ABET Syllabus
Assessment and Accreditation
Dr. Ron Atwell Ms. Kathleen Connelly
Association of Teacher Educators Jacsksonville, FL. February 18, 2003
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
Physical Therapist Assistant Program School of Science, Health, and Criminal Justice Fall 2016 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Deborah Molnar.
Presentation transcript:

University of Central Florida S.O.S.: Student Outcomes Solutions for Program Assessment Paula S. Krist, Ph.D. Director, OEAS December 5, 2005 CS-55

2 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 AGENDA  Overview and Purpose  Definitions:  program assessment  student learning outcomes  Assessment standards across agencies  Writing Student Learning Outcomes  mapping to accrediting agencies  You try it!  issues in measurement of SLO’s  Overview and Purpose  Definitions:  program assessment  student learning outcomes  Assessment standards across agencies  Writing Student Learning Outcomes  mapping to accrediting agencies  You try it!  issues in measurement of SLO’s

3 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 Definitions  Program Assessment: setting and assessing outcomes that will promote program improvement  Types of outcomes:  Program outcome: A specific, measurable statement that describes desired performance.  Student learning outcome: A specific type of program outcome that describes the intended learning outcomes that students must meet on the way to attaining a particular degree  Program Assessment: setting and assessing outcomes that will promote program improvement  Types of outcomes:  Program outcome: A specific, measurable statement that describes desired performance.  Student learning outcome: A specific type of program outcome that describes the intended learning outcomes that students must meet on the way to attaining a particular degree

4 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 SACS Principles of Accreditation  Institutional Effectiveness (IE)  “The institution engages in ongoing, integrated, and institution-wide research-based planning and evaluation processes that incorporate a systematic review of programs and services that (a) results in continuing improvement and (b) demonstrates that the institution is effectively accomplishing its mission.” (Core Requirement 2.5)  “The institution identifies expected outcomes for its educational programs and its administrative and educational support services; assesses whether it achieves these outcomes; and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis of those results.” (Comprehensive Standard 3.3.1)  Institutional Effectiveness (IE)  “The institution engages in ongoing, integrated, and institution-wide research-based planning and evaluation processes that incorporate a systematic review of programs and services that (a) results in continuing improvement and (b) demonstrates that the institution is effectively accomplishing its mission.” (Core Requirement 2.5)  “The institution identifies expected outcomes for its educational programs and its administrative and educational support services; assesses whether it achieves these outcomes; and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis of those results.” (Comprehensive Standard 3.3.1)

5 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 Program Specific Accrediting Bodies  ABET: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology  AACSB: Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business  NCATE: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education  CCNE: Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education  ABET: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology  AACSB: Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business  NCATE: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education  CCNE: Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education

6 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 ABET Criterion 3: Program Outcomes & Assessment Specifies a list of (a-k) of student learning outcomes for engineering programs: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs (d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. Specifies a list of (a-k) of student learning outcomes for engineering programs: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs (d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.

7 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 AACSB: Maintenance Report Performance Standards: The school must show that students reach the learning goals for their respective degree programs 4. Assessment Tools and Procedures …a brief statement of learning goals of each degree program, along with a list of assessment tools, procedures, and results used to demonstrate progress toward an achievement of the mission. Performance Standards: The school must show that students reach the learning goals for their respective degree programs 4. Assessment Tools and Procedures …a brief statement of learning goals of each degree program, along with a list of assessment tools, procedures, and results used to demonstrate progress toward an achievement of the mission.

8 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 AACSB: Performance Standards The school must show that students reach the learning goals for their respective degree programs. …an undergraduate degree program that includes learning experiences in such general knowledge and skills as:  communication abilities  ethical understanding and reasoning abilities  analytic skills  use of information technology  multicultural and diversity understanding  reflective thinking skills  management-specific knowledge and skills areas… The school must show that students reach the learning goals for their respective degree programs. …an undergraduate degree program that includes learning experiences in such general knowledge and skills as:  communication abilities  ethical understanding and reasoning abilities  analytic skills  use of information technology  multicultural and diversity understanding  reflective thinking skills  management-specific knowledge and skills areas…

9 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 NCATE’s Mission “Through standards that focus on systematic assessment and performance-based learning, NCATE encourages accredited institutions to engage in continuous improvement based on accurate and consistent data.”

10 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 NCATE: Specialized Program Associations Standards “All SPAS… must include required assessments that address the five following areas:… 5. An assessment that demonstrates candidate effect on student learning, or (for non-teaching fields) the ability to create supportive learning environments.” “All SPAS… must include required assessments that address the five following areas:… 5. An assessment that demonstrates candidate effect on student learning, or (for non-teaching fields) the ability to create supportive learning environments.”

11 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 NCATE: Specialized Program Associations Standards Student Learning for Teacher Candidates (Initial and Continuing Preparation for Teachers) Unacceptable Teacher candidates cannot accurately assess student learning or develop learning experiences based on students’ developmental levels or prior experience. Acceptable Teacher candidates focus on student learning as shown in their assessment of student learning, use of assessment in instruction, and development of meaningful learning experiences for students based on their developmental level and prior experience. Target Teacher candidates accurately assess and analyze student learning, make appropriate adjustments to instruction, monitor student learning, and have a positive effect on learning for all students.

12 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 CCNE STANDARD III. PROGRAM QUALITY: CURRICULUM AND TEACHING-LEARNING PRACTICES  The curriculum is developed in accordance with the mission, goals, and expected outcomes of the program and reflects professional nursing standards and guidelines and the needs and expectations of the community of interest. There is congruence between teaching-learning experiences and expected outcomes. The environment for teaching, learning and evaluation of student performance fosters achievement of the expected outcomes. STANDARD III. PROGRAM QUALITY: CURRICULUM AND TEACHING-LEARNING PRACTICES  The curriculum is developed in accordance with the mission, goals, and expected outcomes of the program and reflects professional nursing standards and guidelines and the needs and expectations of the community of interest. There is congruence between teaching-learning experiences and expected outcomes. The environment for teaching, learning and evaluation of student performance fosters achievement of the expected outcomes.

13 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 CCNE: Key elements, evidence III-A. The curriculum is developed, implemented, and revised to reflect clear statements of expected student learning outcomes that are consistent with professional nursing standards and guidelines and congruent with the program’s mission, goals, and expected outcomes.  Examples of Evidence: 1. Provide evidence that the curriculum reflects clear statements of expected student learning outcomes and contributes to the accomplishment of expected program outcomes. III-A. The curriculum is developed, implemented, and revised to reflect clear statements of expected student learning outcomes that are consistent with professional nursing standards and guidelines and congruent with the program’s mission, goals, and expected outcomes.  Examples of Evidence: 1. Provide evidence that the curriculum reflects clear statements of expected student learning outcomes and contributes to the accomplishment of expected program outcomes.

14 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 Student Learning Outcomes: Think SMART Specific  Clear and definite terms describing expected abilities, knowledge, values, attitudes, and performance Measurable  It is feasible to get the data, data are accurate and reliable; it can be assessed in more than one way Aggressive but Attainable  Consider stretch targets to improve the program Results-oriented  Describe what standards are expected of students Time-bound  Describe where you would like to be within a specified time period Specific  Clear and definite terms describing expected abilities, knowledge, values, attitudes, and performance Measurable  It is feasible to get the data, data are accurate and reliable; it can be assessed in more than one way Aggressive but Attainable  Consider stretch targets to improve the program Results-oriented  Describe what standards are expected of students Time-bound  Describe where you would like to be within a specified time period

15 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 Developing Student Learning Outcomes ABET Criterion 3:k  an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. Outcome: Aerospace engineering graduates will demonstrate the ability to use equipment to determine and control aircraft altitude. ABET Criterion 3:k  an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. Outcome: Aerospace engineering graduates will demonstrate the ability to use equipment to determine and control aircraft altitude.

16 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 Developing Student Learning Outcomes AACSB: Undergraduate Business “includes learning experiences in such general knowledge and skill areas as: Communication abilities… Outcome: Graduates of the BS program in Business Administration will demonstrate proficiency in oral communication of the kind expected in professional paper presentations. AACSB: Undergraduate Business “includes learning experiences in such general knowledge and skill areas as: Communication abilities… Outcome: Graduates of the BS program in Business Administration will demonstrate proficiency in oral communication of the kind expected in professional paper presentations.

17 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 Developing Student Learning Outcomes NCATE: Standard 1 “Candidates preparing to work in schools as teachers or other professional school personnel know and demonstrate the content, pedagogical, and professional knowledge, skills, and dispositions necessary to help all students learn.” Outcome: Teacher candidates accurately assess and analyze student learning. NCATE: Standard 1 “Candidates preparing to work in schools as teachers or other professional school personnel know and demonstrate the content, pedagogical, and professional knowledge, skills, and dispositions necessary to help all students learn.” Outcome: Teacher candidates accurately assess and analyze student learning.

18 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 Developing Student Learning Outcomes CCNE Examples of Evidence: 1. Provide evidence that the curriculum reflects clear statements of expected student learning outcomes and contributes to the accomplishment of expected program outcomes. Outcome: Nursing graduates will demonstrate high level proficiency in acute care assessment of patients. CCNE Examples of Evidence: 1. Provide evidence that the curriculum reflects clear statements of expected student learning outcomes and contributes to the accomplishment of expected program outcomes. Outcome: Nursing graduates will demonstrate high level proficiency in acute care assessment of patients.

19 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 MATURE: Measuring Student Learning Outcomes Matches  directly related to the outcome it is trying to measure Appropriate methods  uses appropriate direct and indirect measures Targets  indicates desired level of performance Useful  measures help identify what to improve Reliable  based on tested, known methods Effective and Efficient  characterize the outcome concisely Matches  directly related to the outcome it is trying to measure Appropriate methods  uses appropriate direct and indirect measures Targets  indicates desired level of performance Useful  measures help identify what to improve Reliable  based on tested, known methods Effective and Efficient  characterize the outcome concisely

20 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 Program Assessment Measures direct measures  standardized exams  locally developed exams  external examiner  oral exams  minute papers  portfolios (with rubrics)  behavioral observations  simulations  project evaluations  performance appraisals direct measures  standardized exams  locally developed exams  external examiner  oral exams  minute papers  portfolios (with rubrics)  behavioral observations  simulations  project evaluations  performance appraisals indirect measures  written surveys and questionnaires:  student perception  alumni perception  employer perception of program  exit and other interviews  focus groups  student records

21 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 Linking Learning Outcomes and Measures Outcome: Aerospace engineering graduates will demonstrate the ability to use equipment to determine and control aircraft altitude. Measure 1: Students will earn a 90% or higher on the questions embedded in the final exam in AER3221 dealing with correct use of equipment related to altitude. Outcome: Aerospace engineering graduates will demonstrate the ability to use equipment to determine and control aircraft altitude. Measure 1: Students will earn a 90% or higher on the questions embedded in the final exam in AER3221 dealing with correct use of equipment related to altitude.

22 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 Linking Learning Outcomes and Measures Outcome: Aerospace engineering graduates will demonstrate the ability to use equipment to determine and control aircraft altitude. Measure 2: Junior level students using a flight simulator will be rated at least satisfactory by a flight faculty member on the test of equipment that controls altitude. Outcome: Aerospace engineering graduates will demonstrate the ability to use equipment to determine and control aircraft altitude. Measure 2: Junior level students using a flight simulator will be rated at least satisfactory by a flight faculty member on the test of equipment that controls altitude.

23 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 Linking Learning Outcomes and Measures Outcome: Graduates of the BS program in Business Administration will demonstrate proficiency in oral communication of the kind expected in professional paper presentations. Measure 1: In the Capstone Course BA4321, each student will earn at least 90% on the oral presentation section of their capstone project. A scoring rubric will be used to assess elements of communication proficiency for specific skills. Outcome: Graduates of the BS program in Business Administration will demonstrate proficiency in oral communication of the kind expected in professional paper presentations. Measure 1: In the Capstone Course BA4321, each student will earn at least 90% on the oral presentation section of their capstone project. A scoring rubric will be used to assess elements of communication proficiency for specific skills.

24 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 Linking Learning Outcomes and Measures Outcome: Graduates of the BS program in Business Administration will demonstrate proficiency in oral communication of the kind expected in professional paper presentations. Measure 2: After viewing and analyzing videotapes of professional paper presentations, junior level BSBA students will achieve satisfactory or better on the presentation skills rubric assessing a 15 minute presentation in BS Outcome: Graduates of the BS program in Business Administration will demonstrate proficiency in oral communication of the kind expected in professional paper presentations. Measure 2: After viewing and analyzing videotapes of professional paper presentations, junior level BSBA students will achieve satisfactory or better on the presentation skills rubric assessing a 15 minute presentation in BS 3333.

25 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 Linking Learning Outcomes and Measures Outcome: Teacher candidates accurately assess and analyze student learning. Measure 1: Participants in Internship II will earn a “good” or “superior” rating in the analysis of student learning strengths and weaknesses in small group classroom situations. A scoring rubric will be used for assessment by the teacher evaluator and the internship supervisor. Outcome: Teacher candidates accurately assess and analyze student learning. Measure 1: Participants in Internship II will earn a “good” or “superior” rating in the analysis of student learning strengths and weaknesses in small group classroom situations. A scoring rubric will be used for assessment by the teacher evaluator and the internship supervisor.

26 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 Linking Learning Outcomes and Measures Outcome: Teacher candidates accurately assess and analyze student learning. Measure 2: All students will demonstrate a 90% accuracy on the hypothetical classroom situation responses that require accurate assessment and analysis of grade appropriate student learning. Outcome: Teacher candidates accurately assess and analyze student learning. Measure 2: All students will demonstrate a 90% accuracy on the hypothetical classroom situation responses that require accurate assessment and analysis of grade appropriate student learning.

27 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 Linking Learning Outcomes and Measures Outcome: Nursing graduates will demonstrate high level proficiency in acute care assessment of patients. Measure 1: All students will demonstrate a 90% accuracy on the hypothetical hospital situation responses that require accurate assessment of acute care responses. Outcome: Nursing graduates will demonstrate high level proficiency in acute care assessment of patients. Measure 1: All students will demonstrate a 90% accuracy on the hypothetical hospital situation responses that require accurate assessment of acute care responses.

28 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 Linking Learning Outcomes and Measures Outcome: Nursing graduates will demonstrate high level proficiency in acute care assessment of patients. Measure 2: All students will be rated high by their clinical preceptors in their patient assessment in the 3 acute care situations required in clinical practice. Outcome: Nursing graduates will demonstrate high level proficiency in acute care assessment of patients. Measure 2: All students will be rated high by their clinical preceptors in their patient assessment in the 3 acute care situations required in clinical practice.

29 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 Program Instruction/Assessment Mapping Program Goal A Program SLO A1 analyze Program SLO A2 estimate Program SLO A3 design Program SLO A4 appraise

30 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 Program Assessment Map SLO’sCourse ICourse IICourse III Course IV Capstone Course SLO A1 I classify E design R analyze SLO A2 I define E choose R design SLO B1 I predict E examine R evaluate R synthesize SLO B2 I translate E specify R plan R evaluate SLO B3

31 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 Your Turn 1. S elect:  ABET: Engineering  AACSB: Business  NCATE: Education  CCNE: Nursing  Other discipline without accrediting guidelines 2. Develop a student learning outcome that addresses one criterion and is S.M.A.R.T. 3. Develop one measure to assess that outcome. 1. S elect:  ABET: Engineering  AACSB: Business  NCATE: Education  CCNE: Nursing  Other discipline without accrediting guidelines 2. Develop a student learning outcome that addresses one criterion and is S.M.A.R.T. 3. Develop one measure to assess that outcome.

32 SACS-COC December 5, 2005 Contact Information Other assessment information is available at: Assessment plans: click Assessment Support Continue the conversation: Other assessment information is available at: Assessment plans: click Assessment Support Continue the conversation: