Timeline Changes and SPR&I Database Updates SPR&I Fall Training Day Two.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Disproportionality in Special Education
Advertisements

(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Addressing the Disproportionate Representation of Racially and Ethnically Diverse Students in Special Education SPR&I Regional Training.
Navigating the SPR&I Database Oregon Department of Education Fall
Angela Tanner-Dean Diana Chang OSEP October 14, 2010.
Welcome! Review of the National Part C APR Indicator 4 Family Data FFY 2011 ( ) Siobhan Colgan, ECTA, DaSy Melissa Raspa, ECTA.
Special Education Director’s Conference Sept. 29, 2006 Prepared by Sharon Schumacher.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
Disproportionality of Racial and Ethnic Groups in Special Education Significant Disproportionality and EIS versus Disproportionate Representation due to.
IDEA Reauthorization and Disproportionality Sammie Lambert, DECS KYCASE Summer Institute Lexington, Kentucky July 16, 2007.
Kathy T. Whaley, NECT AC Presentation for the Utah Special Education Law Conference August 2011 UPDATED January 2012.
Special Education Data In the Era of Accountability & District Improvement Steve Smith ODE IDEA Data Manager Fall 2007.
Chubaka Producciones Presenta :.
2012 JANUARY Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Systems Performance Review & Improvement (SPR&I) Training Oregon Department of Education Fall 2007.
Objectives: 1) Participants will become familiar with General Supervision Monitoring Plan Section of the Kansas Infant Toddler Services Procedural Manual.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction State Performance Plan (SPP) & Annual Performance Report.
Welcome to the Regional SPR&I trainings Be sure to sign in Be sure to sign in You should have one school age OR EI/ECSE packet of handouts You.
Monitoring Significant Disproportionality in Special Education Systems Performance Review & Improvement Fall Training 2011.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
SPR&I: Changes, New Measures/Targets, and Lessons Learned from Focused Monitoring Visits David Guardino, SPR&I Coordinator Fall 2009 COSA Conference.
ISES UPDATES April 16, Topics for Session Review of the Fall 2007 CD/YE Collection Changes in WSLS ISES Data CD/YE Element Changes October 1 Supplement.
Responding to Special Education Disproportionality Understanding your Data Presenters: Nancy Fuhrman & Dani Scott, DPI.
IDEA & Disproportionality Perry Williams, Ph.D. Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.
Letter of Explanation Copy of Data Disproportionality Initial Eligibility 60-day Timeline Early Childhood Transition Secondary Transition Corrected and.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
SPP/APR Updates June SPP – State Performance Plan –Establishes baseline data and sets targets through school year for 20 Indicators APR.
IDEA 2004 Part B Changes to the Indicator Measurement Table.
Navigating System Performance Review and Improvement (SPR&I) Oregon Department of Education Fall
Indicator 14 Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions Revised May 2010 (Revisions indicated in red font)
New Indicator 14 Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions 3 rd Annual Secondary Transition State Planning Institute Charlotte, NC May12-14,
Kentucky Continuous Monitoring Process Spring 2012.
2009 Post-school Survey Webinar #7 June 2, 2010 Presented by: Center for Change in Transition Services Cinda Johnson, Wendy Iwaszuk, Denny Hasko
Spring 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of Special Education 1 SPP/APR Update.
2011 Calendar Important Dates/Events/Homework. SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction State of California Annual Performance Report Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Improving Special Education Services November 2010 Sacramento, CA SPP/APR Update.
Understanding the Data on the Educational Settings for Children Ages 3-5 with Disabilities Annual Performance Report Indicator 6 January 12, 2016
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
Indicator B5: LRE Regional SPR&I Trainings.
SECC Feedback Session Presented by Trish Lutgen.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education State Performance Plan and Annual Performance.
October REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR PRESCHOOL EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENTS.
July 2007 SundayMondayTuesdayWednesdayThursdayFridaySaturday
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs General Supervision: Developing an Effective System Implications for States.
6/18/2016 DES / AzEIP 2011 Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
What is “Annual Determination?”
Disproportionality: Tier Two Monitoring Activities
Communications Timeline
TIMELINES PHOTOS This is an example text
TIMELINES PHOTOS This is an example text
G-CASE Fall Conference November 14, 2013 Savannah, Ga
SPR&I Regional Training
Due Dates subject to change. Watch for dashboard updates.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
Update on the TEA Sped corrective action plan
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
2015 January February March April May June July August September
Significant Disproportionality Fiscal Webinar
Significant Disproportionality Stakeholder Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Timeline Changes and SPR&I Database Updates SPR&I Fall Training Day Two

General Supervision Timeline Review February 2007: ODE submitted APR (05-06 data) to OSEP March 2007: ODE publicly reported special education report card April 2007: Districts/programs submitted PCR data on new files. Districts also submitted analysis worksheets on KPI August 2007: SPR&I team made final determinations February 2008: ODE will submit APR (06-07 data) to OSEP

Indicators B9 & B10 Indicator 9: Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. (20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(C)) Indicator 10: Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification. (20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(C))

Needed Timeline Changes for Indicators B9 & B10 (05-06 data) September 07: County contacts will follow up with districts whose worksheets were insufficient in explaining the data using a protocol to look at policies, procedures and practices October 07: SPR&I core team and county contacts will determine if district data is justified by unique circumstances or the district is disproportionate in representation due to inappropriate identification November 07: Districts informed of final status Districts identified through this process will receive focused monitoring

Needed Timeline Changes for Indicators B9 & B10 (06-07 data) September 07: SPR&I database will be populated with data and districts will be notified if they are over the threshold (flagged) November 30, 2007: flagged districts will need to submit worksheet analysis to ODE December 07: ODE reviews analysis and informs districts of final status January 08: Districts identified through this process will be scheduled for focused monitoring

SPR&I School-age Changes Primary Disability Distribution - no longer a KPI (will remove bulls eye & thresholds) –A red light appears in the Analysis Required signal to the left when the percentage of IDEA eligible students in the district differs from the State percentage in any high incidence disability category by +/-30%. A green light signifies your district is within expected thresholds. A topical Primary Disability Worksheet is provided to document district analysis, if required. See Text Description for further explanation and instructions.

SPR&I School-age Changes Primary Disability by Ethnicity - new KPI (add bulls eye and threshold) There will be revisions made to the text description and a worksheet developed (adapted from PDD & Ethnicity worksheets) –This report is provided to assist the district in identifying potential issues of disproportionality as part of Primary Disability analysis. Highlighting appears in the data tables below if the percentage of IDEA eligible students in the district differs from the State percentage in any high incidence disability category by +/-30%. A topical Primary Disability Worksheet is provided to document district analysis, if highlighting appears. See Text Description for further explanation and instructions.

SPR&I School-age Changes cont’d Federal Placement - new targets will be added to coincide with the FFY 2006 SPP targets for Indicator B5 (72.5% or greater; 10.1% or less; 2.3% or less) Ethnicity, Primary Disability Distribution, Primary Disability by Ethnicity, Federal Placement by Ethnicity and Federal Placement reports –SPP/APR and 618 data should be based only on 6-21 year olds –Data will be displayed with 6-21 year olds and a separate line for 5 year olds on 12/1. –5 year olds are not included in the numbers that trigger the reports. They are included for the benefit of the district and to aid in analysis.