NM USER FORUM 2014 Brian Flynn Head Performance, Forecasts and Relations 30/01/2014 N etwork Performance: addressing more challenging targets

2 Single Sky Performance Pillar  SES I: Performance-based regulatory framework,  SES II: Performance Scheme RP  Performance scheme RP  SES II +:

3 Long term Delay and Traffic Evolution Clear evidence that the ATFM enroute delay situation has seen a sustained improvement Traffic trend ER DLA trend APT DLA trend

4 Environment Flight Efficiency progress has also been good. However additional progress to be achieved. Addressed in this User Forum

5 The Performance Puzzle Safety Capacity Environment Cost Competing or complementary targets?

6 RP to 2019 Performance targets being finalised Environment KPIs Continue improvement of FPL to reach 4.1% in 2019 Actual Trajectory to reach 2.6% in 2019 Enroute Delay KPIs Maintain at 0.5 minutes/flight Safety KPIs Level D maturity for Safety policy, risk management, assurance, promotion and level C for safety culture Risk Analysis tool applied to applicable safety occurrences Cost KPIs Further reduction in determined unit costs

7 RP to 2019 – Performance Indicators No targets Environment FUA bookings and Use Use of CDRs (planning and actual use) Taxi out time Additional time in terminal airspace Enroute Delay Arrival ATFM delays Adherence to ATFM slots Departure ATFM delays Safety Monitoring of separation infringements and runway incursions Cost EUROCONTROL costs

8 RP2 – Performance Targets - Discussion RP2 Performance targets: explanations NM Performance Reporting: Does it meet your needs Airspace User ATM Performance plans? NM Performance Plan: Suggestions

9 A Performance Partnership? Some ideas Avoiding traffic bunching Optimising RRP Slot swapping and reactionary delays Slot extensions and associated delay assignment