SACS Coordinators Meeting Non-Academic Units Wednesday, January 9, 2013 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
Advertisements

UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
East Campus Enrollment Management Retreat Wednesday, February 17, 2010.
Department of Continuous Improvement Initiatives School Advisory Council Training Dr. Terrie Mitev, Executive Director Mrs. Jodi Cronin, Coordinator.
AQIP Status Report An Overview and Discussion. Timeline for SJC’s AQIP Journey November 2000 AQIP admission 2002 First action projects submitted September.
PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.
Quality Enhancement Cell Dr. Dawar Hameed Mughal Director.
October Priority 8 Review Team 8: Planning Subcommittee M. DesVignes, D. Kinney, J. Moore, M. Siegel, R. Tillberg Collect and use data systematically.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
HELPFUL TIPS FOR UNIT PLANNING Office of Institutional Effectiveness.
Building a Strategic Plan Illinois School Leadership Advisory Council September 11, 2014.
Dr. Timothy S. Brophy Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida GRADUATE AND PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM ASSESSMENT PLANS.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
Timothy S. Brophy, Ph.D., Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of the Provost.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Departmental Assessment Process.  The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves these outcomes, and provides.
Periodic Program Review for Academics Affirming Excellence in Education LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Steps in the Accreditation Cycle A Collaboration Effort: The United Negro College Fund and The Commission on Colleges Steps in the Accreditation Cycle.
ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP FOR CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT IN SWHISA CONTEXT B.D June 2006 H.R.D I.D O.D.
SACS Reaffirmation Project Compliance Certification Team Orientation Compliance Certification Report Thursday, September 30, – 11:00AM 209 Main Building.
Undergraduate Academic Assessment Plans: What’s New for Timothy S. Brophy, Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of.
Program Review In Student Affairs Office of the Vice President Division of Student Affairs Virginia Tech
IMPROVE STUDENT LEARNING for Institutional Effectiveness THE REASON: Improvement of Student Learning and Institutional Support Services THE OCCASION: Regional.
Student Development The Gateway to … Opportunities Accomplishment Financial Solutions Student Success Achievement Student Life.
SACS-COC Reaffirmation of Accreditation Overview Plus Q & A CCPRO Conference, Greensboro, NC September 2011 Kimberly B. Lawing, Vice President of Institutional.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
A Multi-Campus Model for Program Review & Integrated Institutional Planning Raúl Rodriguez, Ph.D., Chancellor 1.
Institutional Effectiveness Documentation Cheryl Gater Director, SACS Accreditation Aw.
Jamestown Community College The Path to NACEP Accreditation.
NEASC FIVE YEAR REPORT FITCHBURG STATE COLLEGE JANUARY 2007.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
Student Administration Project Update December 2008.
A Perspective on Student Learning at ECU It’s working! Marilyn Sheerer Provost and Senior Vice Chancellor.
SACS Coordinators Meeting Academic Units Wednesday, October 31, 2012 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS.
By Monica Y. Peters, Ph.D. Coordinator of Institutional Effectiveness/QEP Office of Quality Enhancement.
2006 Fall Workshop PLANNING and ASSESSMENT: A TUTORIAL FOR NEW DEPARTMENT CHAIRS – A REFRESHER COURSE FOR OTHERS.
Program Review – Assessing the Health of Curriculum Programs Mark Lupton Director, Institutional Research, Planning and Effectiveness South Piedmont Community.
SACS Coordinators Meeting Wednesday, June 6, 2012 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS Accreditation.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
SACS : Introduction and Overview SACS Coordinators Meeting September 21, 2011 Timothy S. Brophy, Director of Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater,
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
SACS Coordinators Meeting Academic Units Wednesday, January 9, 2013 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS Accreditation.
1 Willa Spicer, Assistant Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
SACSCOC Coordinators Meeting Academic Units September 14, 2015 Timothy S. Brophy, Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater, Assistant Provost and.
Kimberlee Pottberg.  Part 1: Why we use WEAVEonline  Part 2: How to enter components.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
New Program Proposal Workflow Chart
NTNU’s quality system for education
Maine is IT! at SMCC Grant Playbook for
Curriculum Development Updates
How do we carry out the election process last year?
SCHOOL TRAINING District Contact Information Dr. Peter Straker: ext Rachelle Fougere:
The City University of New York Performance Management Process (PMP)
Substantive Change Full Category I Proposal Workflow
SACS Coordinators Meeting Academic Units
Fort Valley State University
Accreditation follow-up report
PRACTICAL COLLABORATION Fine-tuning Your Graduate Admissions Process
Presented By Claudette H. Williams
GC University Lahore Quality Enhancement Cell
Co-Curricular Assessment
Presentation transcript:

SACS Coordinators Meeting Non-Academic Units Wednesday, January 9, 2013 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS Accreditation

Today’s Agenda Writing Goals – Measureable, Targeting Outcomes Discussion/Reminders Questions and Other

Writing Goals A goal is a desired result a individual or unit envisions, plans and commits to achieve—a personal or organizational desired end-point in some sort of assumed development Goal-setting involves establishing specific, measurable, attainable, realistic and time-targeted objectives – in a group this is done collaboratively

Processes and Procedures A procedure is a way in which one works to accomplish a task. It can therefore be a sequence of steps that include preparation, conduct and completion of a task. Each step can be a sequence of activities and each activity a sequence of actions. Processes produce results by converting, transforming or simply using inputs to create outputs. An input could be material, information, people or a set of conditions and these are passed through a sequence of stages during which they are either used, transformed or their status changed to emerge as an output with different characteristics.

Goals, Processes, Procedures We tend to start and stop processes. We implement procedures and commence and complete them. We process information. For example, we do not procedure information but we may employ a procedure to process information. We set goals, and employ processes and procedures to accomplish them. Goals are often broken down into action items to accomplish the goals, measurement procedures, and a timeline – a finite period or deadline - in which to complete the action items.

Institutional Effectiveness Establish Goals Develop Action Items, Measures, Set Timelines Implement the Plan and Gather Data Analyze, Interpret and Evaluate results Modify and Improve Goals, Outcomes, and Processes The UF Institutional Effectiveness Process for Non- Academic Units Planning and Implementing UF MISSION

Institutional Effectiveness Goal 2: Develop administrative infrastructure to enhance and support innovative teaching and learning Action ItemMeasurementTimeline The Office of Admissions management team will review application workflow procedures and practices and update training manuals to increase application processing efficiency and improve the applicant experience. The Office of Admissions management team will update functional area manuals and will add workflow diagrams. The Office of Admissions management team will update functional area manuals and will add workflow diagrams by September Processes will be redesigned based on this analysis. Changes in processes will be completed by September 2013 for the fall 2014 recruitment and admissions cycle. Sample Goal set collaboratively by Enrollment Management. Goal: Statement of desired result Specific Action to be taken to reach the goal Procedure to measure the completion of the action Procedure to measure the completion of the action Deadlines for completing the action Deadlines for completing the action

Due Dates/Accelerated Schedule Annual Assessment Data Reporting Data entered into Compliance Assist! October 12, 2012 – Entered Goals May 17, 2013 Enter Goals, and if available Goal Implementation and Resource Strategy or other information available for both and October 11, 2013 (due in October annually) Enter Goal Implementation and Resource Strategy, Annual Progress on Goals, Evaluation, Actions for Improvement

Due Dates/Accelerated Schedule Annual Institutional Effectiveness Documentation Report Word document ed to Ashley Caspary Reports due May 17, 2013 Update of report

Evidence Provided Annual Assessment Data Reporting Reporting Results Be very specific with the results reported Include actual data results for each assessment that informs the evaluation of the goal

Evidence Provided Reporting Results Example “XYZ Report: Annual revenue for scholarship from traditional alumni reached $198,000 and funding from non-traditional alumni reached $15,000 in Although the goal of raising $250,000 was not met for , the increase was $18,000 over the prior years revenue.”

Evidence Provided Annual Assessment Data Reporting “Actions for Improvement” Provide documentation of improvements/changes made. Stating changes is not enough, we have to show SACS through documentation.

Evidence Provided Action for Improvement Reporting Example “The Advisory Council analyzed the results and recommended improvements to the vice president for advancement. After the vice president’s review and approval, [XYZ improvements] were implemented in the Spring 2012 semester.” Include evidence such as advisory council meeting minutes and the vice president’s approval.

Narratives Checklist Review Include required documentation Include required policies Avoid future tense and passive voice Spell out any acronyms, including UF – be specific! Format references as [1], [2], etc.

Narratives Checklist Review Avoid capitalizing nouns such as university, dean, department unless referring to a proper noun Include the way in which your requirement applies to off-campus or distance learning programs and students

Discussion and Questions Discussion Questions THANK YOU!