Navigation Data & Needs May 9, 2003 David A. Weekly Chief, LRD Navigation Planning Center 304 529-5635

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Congestion at Locks on Inland Waterways: An Experimental Testbed of a Policy of Tradable Priority Permits for Lock Access Joseph P. Cook, NERA Charles.
Advertisements

Overview of NETS Keith Hofseth May 9, NETS research guidelines Corps Planner have planning models which: Have field ownership, and are designed.
NETS Future Research By Wesley W. Wilson University of Oregon and IWR.
Navigation Economic Technologies Symposium 9-10 May 2003 Generic Characteristics of Corps Waterway Models.
US Army Corps of Engineers Institute For Water Resources - IWR Navigation Economic Technologies NETS 17-March-2005.
NETS REVIEW REGIONAL ROUTING MODEL Model Inputs December 12,2005 Chrisman A. Dager Tennessee Valley Authority.
Regional Routing Model Review: C) Model Formulation and Scenario Analysis Frank Southworth Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN NETS Program.
INP-MAY 03 Inland Navigation Planning Current Practice May 9, 2003 Paul J. Hanley Economist, CELRD-CM-P
1 Waterways Research Inland Waterway Lock/Vessel Optimization Study Upper Mississippi River Locks Center For Transportation Studies University Of.
Navigation Economic Technologies NETS Wesley W
US Army Corps of Engineers Institute For Water Resources - IWR Navigation Economic Technologies NETS Wesley W. Wilson University of Oregon and Institute.
Navigation Economic Technologies NETS 13 September, 2005
Data-Driven Monte Carlo Simulation Models for Engineering-Economic Analysis Dr. Richard Males RMM Technical Services, Inc. Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
1 Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses - PIANC July 15, 2008 RIS - RIVERS INFORMATION SYSTEM Our Invisible Transportation Network.
Modeling Airport Capacity
WCSC Mission U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Chapter 8 Lesson 1 Test – Monday, January 10, 2011.
Department of Industrial Engineering1 Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Waterways on the Port of Cincinnati-Tristate Heather Nachtmann, Ph.D. River.
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW)
Tonnage Reporting Susan Hassett, Director Dale Brown, Chief
Waterways 1 Water Transportation History. Water Transportation Propulsion History Human (oars, poles) - - 7,000-10,000 BC Wind (sails) - - 3,000 BC Steamboat.
US Army Corps of Engineers Institute For Water Resources - IWR Navigation Economic Technologies NETS Keith Hofseth 16-May-2006.
Channel Portfolio Tool (CPT)
Developing Navigation Performance Measures Barry Holliday Navigation Program Manager US Army Corps of Engineers Headquarters Washington, DC 14 December.
Inland Waterways: A Key Part of the U.S. Freight Transportation System
Transportation Seventh Edition Coyle, Novack, Gibson & Bardi © 2011 Cengage Learning Chapter 1 Transportation: Critical Link in the Supply Chain 1 © 2011.
USA Bodies of Water.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Tonnage Reporting: Getting It Right Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center Navigation and Civil Works Decision.
Steve Haynes Director – Commodity Marketing and Sales North Carolina State Ports Chairman – Domestic Waterways Committee National Industrial Transportation.
Texas Freight Forecasting Rob Bostrom Monisha Khurana Liza Amar Planning Applications Conference 2015.
Study conducted for the Coalition of Alabama Waterway Associations by Troy University Center for International Business and Economic Development.
A New Tool for Estimating and Simulating Economic Impacts of Dredging Activity New, Increased and Reduced Dredging Drs. Yue Cui and Ed Mahoney, Michigan.
U.S. Foreign Waterborne Commerce and Vessels. OMB Assigns Responsibility for the FWTSP to the Corps FWTSP -- Foreign Waterborne Transportation Statistics.
Florida Multimodal Statewide Freight Model
L&D Inspection and Emergency Repairs Workshop Mike Kidby Navigation and Operations CoP 18 April 2006.
BRIEFING FOR BG DUKE DELUCA COMMANDER, MISSISSIPPI VALLEY DIVISION PRESIDENT-DESIGNEE, MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION JANUARY 22, 2014 William B. Hobgood.
Huntington District Inland Navigation Mark Hammond Planning Center of Expertise for Inland Navigation Huntington District 25 March 2009.
Plan Formulation for Deep Draft Harbors Navigation Measures.
Inland River Vessel Movement Center Burt Lahn Waterways Management Directorate Coast Guard Headquarters nd St, SW Washington, DC.
“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions 1 What is Engineering Risk and Reliability? Why We Use It? Robert C.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
World Association for Waterborne Transport Infrastructure (PIANC) and the International Environmental Commission Technical Seminar October 28, 2009 Westin.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers USACE Navigation Data/Information Workshop July 7, 2005 Arlene L Dietz, Director, Navigation Data Center.
Opening of the Panama Canal in 2016 Its Anticipated Impact on Global Soy and Grain Transportation Ken Eriksen Senior Vice September.
The Value of IWW Tributaries Jim Kruse Center for Ports and Waterways September 25, 2003.
Exploring Cube Base and Cube Voyager. Exploring Cube Base and Cube Voyager Use Cube Base and Cube Voyager to develop data, run scenarios, and examine.
Harbors Module NH2: Problem Identification, Inventory and Forecast, and Determination of Objectives and Constraints.
Alabama Water Resources Assoc. * September 5-7, 2007 * CAWA Emerging Opportunities for Our Inland Waterways Alabama Water Resources Association September.
Research and Development Inland Waterways Conference 7 March 2007 Improved Hydrodynamic Design/Detection and Evaluation of Scour at Dams John E. Hite,
The Canadian Approach To Compiling Emission Projections Marc Deslauriers Environment Canada Pollution Data Division Science and Technology Branch Projections.
ROTARY/KIWANIS/LIONS CLUBS CAMDEN, AR AUGUST 13, 2013 Mike Dumas President Ouachita River Valley Association.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Canada/U.S. Transportation Border Working Group presented by Stephen Fitzroy & Brian Alstadt, Economic.
Risk Analysis for Major Rehabilitation. Major Rehabilitation Background  Prior to FY 1992  Funded under Operation and Maintenance, General, Appropriation.
An Evaluation of the Potential for Commercial Navigation to Further Facilitate Freight Transportation in the Tennessee River Valley Larry G. Bray, Ph.D.
Planning the Path Forward Institute for Water Resources Website Communications.
Generalized Model of Lockage Delay Based on Historic Data Michael R. Hilliard, Ph.D. Center for Transportation Analysis Oak Ridge National Laboratory Smart.
Mark R. Pointon Operations/Navigation COP U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Mark R. Pointon Operations/Navigation COP U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Presentation.
Stated Preference Modeling of the Demand for Ohio River Shipments By Nino Sitchinava & Wesley Wilson University of Oregon & Mark Burton University of Tennessee.
1 Smart Rivers Conference September 15, 2011 New Orleans, Louisiana “Status of Inland Waterways Infrastructure Funding”
Forecasting for Water Resources Planning. Learning Objective(s):  The student will:  Understand the need for forecasts.  Be able to describe what a.
David Moser USACE Chief Economist
BUILDING STRONG ® US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Systems-based Budgeting for Inland Navigation Operations and Maintenance Kenneth Ned Mitchell,
Census: official count of the population First census of U.S. (1791): 4 million people Second census (1820): 10 million people Major movement west of.
Inland Waterways Challenges 1. Campbell Transportation Company, Inc. and C & C Marine Maintenance Company.
Western Rivers/ Inland/ Great Lakes
Road Investment Decision Framework
445 mile navigation system Located in Ok & AR
Ohio River Basin Energy Commodity Trends
DOMESTIC WATER CARRIERS
Ouachita/Black Rivers Lock Operations
Presentation transcript:

Navigation Data & Needs May 9, 2003 David A. Weekly Chief, LRD Navigation Planning Center

Topics Introduction Available Data Data Applications Waterway Network What We Model What We Would Like to Model NAS Comments

Introduction What Does The Modeler Have To do? P & G Compliant Use Engineering Input Provide Environmental Inputs Determine Key Drivers

Introduction Ultimately, The Modeler Has To Provide Decision Makers Enough Information To Make a Decision, Given: Time Money Data

Most Originate From National Data Center (NDC) Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center (WCSC) Lock Performance Measurement System (LPMS) Cost Data Other

WCSC Data Point To Point Commodity Operator Registered Vessel Tons (or Other) Route

NY State Barge Canal Hudson Allegheny Monon- gahela Kanawha Big Sandy Ohio Mississippi Missouri Illinois Green Cumberland Tennessee Black Warrior Alabama Tom- bigbee Tenn Tom Atchafalaya Red Ouachita Arkansas Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway San Joaquin Sacramento Snake Columbia In 2001: Million Tons 4,000 Unique O-Ds 51,000 O-D-Commodity Triples

LPMS Availability Lockage Type Times - Delay and Processing Flotilla Vessel Types Commodity Tonnage

Use This Data WCSCLPMS Barge TypeXX Loaded BargesX LoadingX Empty BargesX CommodityX Powered VesselX FlotillaX

Vessel Operating Costs Planning Guidance Memoranda General Guidance Economic Guidance Memoranda –Interest Rates –Deep Draft Operating Costs –Shallow Draft Operating Costs Study Guidance Memoranda

Other Costs Inventory Holding Costs Is it Important ? –Most Inland Probably Not –Containers and Specialized – Yes Where do we get the Commodity Value ? In LRD – 1-2% of Delay Cost

Other Data OMBIL Port Series Navigation Charts Waterway Point Directory Vessel Master File Port Master File Lock Characteristics Passengers and Containers Dredging

Data Applications WCSC –Rate Analysis –Forecasts LPMS –Lock Performance Vessel Costs –Adjust Waterway Portion Of Rates

Water Routing Land Routing Metropolitan Statistical Area Rate Analysis

Forecasts WCSC gives : –History –Shippers and Carriers Identified What are the Drivers ? Why are They Here ? What Will They Do ? What are the Possible Futures? How Are They Affected by Congestion? Are There Alternative Sources?

Lock 101

FIGURE I-32-supplement CHICKAMAUGA – 360 x 60 TONNAGE-TRANSIT SIMULATION RESULTS Hyperbolic equation : y =

FIGURE I-34-supplement CHICKAMAUGA – 360 x 60 WITH HELPER BOATS TONNAGE-TRANSIT SIMULATION RESULTS Hyperbolic equation : y =

Vessel Cost Application Use LPMS Flotilla Data Apply IWR Costs to Equipment Types Yields Underway and Delay Costs ($/Hr or $/Ton-Hr)

Waterway Network

J = Junction L = Lock P = Port B = Bends / 1-way Network Elements

System Network (Cost Module) Add annual tonnage through each lock Determine delay at each lock using curves Compute travel costs for each annual shipment

Link To Structural Reliability Engineering Reliability Analysis –Detailed structural condition studies –Develop hazard functions & Probabilities of Unsatisfactory Performance (PUPs) for major lock components –Identify consequences of unsatisfactory performance (Repair costs & Closures) Economic Reliability Analysis –Simulate 50 year project-life –Evaluated alternatives

Are environmental values woven into the formulation and evaluation process to insure that we are practicing adaptive management? EOP - Environmental concerns are part and parcel of all USACE missions, decision-making, programs and projects Economic Outputs linked to NAVPAT Integration of Environment

What We Model Waterway Cost Changes That Arise From Changes: –Traffic Levels and Flow Patterns –Vessel Fleet –Lock Operation (Lockage Polices and Helper Boats, for Example) –Structural Reliability of Lock Facilities –Taxes and Fees

What We Model Demand - ARS Supply – ATC Cost Reduction for existing moves (yellow box) Cost savings for moves that shift to the waterway (yellow with hash marks)

What Wed Like to Model Benefits From Waterway System Improvements In So Doing, We Want the Model to be: –Realistic –Consistent With Theory –Consistent With State of Practitioners Art NAS Had Some Specific Comments

NAS Comments Systems Analysis Assessments of Nonstructural Alternatives Better Integration of ED, EC and EV Forecasts and Uncertainty Sensitivity of Barge Traffic to Rates Modeling Lock Congestion Transportation Rates Structural Reliability