Measuring Student and Teacher Technology Literacy for NCLB Whats an LEA to do? 2004 National School Boards Association Conference Denver Carol D. Mosley.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
9/22/04 Texas Teacher STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness Chart A Tool for Planning and Self-Assessing
Advertisements

Goals of Workshop District Education Technology Plan Goals 8 goals aligned to State/National Education Technology Plans Strategies to meet challenges.
Essential Standards: Information and Technology Skills and Computer/Technology Skills SCOS Develop awareness and foundations of required technology standards.
They’re Computer Savvy, Right? Well, Maybe…
Enhancing Education Through Technology NCLB Title II Part D Cathy HigginsOffice of Educational Technology
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
Purpose of Instruction
Developed by ESC Region 12 in partnership with TEA. 9/16/04 Texas Teacher STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness
Goals of Title II, Part D of No Child Left Behind The primary goal of this part of NCLB is to improve student academic achievement through the use of technology.
8 th Grade Technology Literacy NCLB guidelines. Technology Literacy The portion of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act known as 'Enhancing Education Through.
Developed by ESC Region 12 in partnership with TEA. 9/01/04 Texas Teacher STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness
Developed by Peg Henson /SDDOE Technology Standards Deb Fredrickson Peg Henson Martin Sieverding
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Professional Teaching Portfolio
Queen Anne’s County: New Teacher Portfolio Prepared by: Hired: August, 2006.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
ETT 429 Spring 2007 Technology Standards. NETS-T Background International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) created National Educational Technology.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Why Educators need to be educated in technology By Diane Harris CEP 812 July
Presentation by D. McDonald. A Dose of Magic This resource for general education teachers describes 60 strategies for helping learners with special needs.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Technology Leadership
Intel ® Teach Program International Curriculum Roundtable Programs of the Intel ® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation.
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
Best Teaching Practices. Technology Important for success in education Kindergarten through high school Electronic tools to enhance learning Information.
Information Literacy Standards: Boosting Student Achievement.
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed Tech) Title IID Competitive Grants Michigan Department of Education Information Briefing July 17 and.
Cara Whitehead, NBCT Instructional Partner John S. Jones Elementary, Rainbow City, AL
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Asma Khalfan Al-Yahyai Mithaa Abdullah Al-Amri. NETS (NETSS) (NETST) (NETSA) (NETSC) (NETSCSE)
TECHNOLOGY USE PLAN INFORMATIONAL LETTER: 7 POLICY CODE: IJND Technology Planning Guidelines July 26, 2002.
Computers can raise student achievement and even improve school’s climate but they have to be placed in the right hands and used in the right way. Technology.
Summary of the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) and NCATE's Educational Computing and Technology facilitation Standards for K-12.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Put Your Classroom On A 21 st Century DI-IT Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated Classroom Environments Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated.
Welcome Alabama Course of Study Technology Education Workshop.
Contemporary Issues September 12, NJEA Today.
Texas STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
PrevNext | Slide 1 MANS 2006 Michigan Educational Technology Standards and Expectations METS - Students October 19, 2006 Ron Faulds Michigan Department.
Technology Standards Ashley Balasa. MTTS Standard I: Information Access, Evaluation, Processing and Application. Standard I: Information Access, Evaluation,
A portfolio by Jamie Andrews Created in ELD 325 Instructional Technology Spring 2010.
Government of Nepal Ministry of Education National Center for Educational Development.
Intel ® Teach Program Programs of the Intel ® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation. Copyright © 2007 Intel Corporation.
Title II, Part D Enhancing Education through Technology Equitable Services to Private Schools: Program Specifics.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Office of Service Quality
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Chapter 12 Technology, Teaching, and You Teaching and Learning With Technology, 3e.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
8 th Grade Technology Competency Test Michelle Obert Instructional Technology Specialist
DPI 10 Teaching Standards
TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS BONNIE SMITH MAY 2, 2011
Inclusion A school district shall use the term “inclusion” to mean that a student is receiving education in a general education regular class setting,
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Study Questions To what extent do English language learners have opportunity to learn the subject content specified in state academic standards and.
Insert your name and a picture. Change the Design Template.
Professional Teaching Portfolio
Presentation transcript:

Measuring Student and Teacher Technology Literacy for NCLB Whats an LEA to do? 2004 National School Boards Association Conference Denver Carol D. Mosley Louisiana State Department of Education Bill Morrison Rapides Parish School District

Why Measure? Meet agency requirements Meet agency requirements NCLB NCLB State State Local Local Funding sources Funding sources Measure success of programs Measure success of programs Enable informed decision-making Enable informed decision-making Formative and summative Formative and summative

Today Goals of NCLB Goals of NCLB Title IID technology goals Title IID technology goals State application requirements State application requirements Evaluation requirements of NCLB Evaluation requirements of NCLB What must be evaluated What must be evaluated Example indicators Example indicators Sample instruments Sample instruments

Technology Goals of NCLB Primary Goal Primary Goal To improve student academic achievement through the integration of technology in the classroom. To improve student academic achievement through the integration of technology in the classroom. Additional Goals Additional Goals To assist every student in crossing the digital divide by ensuring technological literacy by the eighth grade. To assist every student in crossing the digital divide by ensuring technological literacy by the eighth grade. To encourage the effective integration of technology resources. To encourage the effective integration of technology resources.

Each State Application Must Include (1) …..long-term strategies for improving student academic achievement, including technology literacy, through the effective use of technology……. including through improving the capacity of teachers to integrate technology effectively into curricula and instruction. (1) …..long-term strategies for improving student academic achievement, including technology literacy, through the effective use of technology……. including through improving the capacity of teachers to integrate technology effectively into curricula and instruction. (2) A description of the State educational agency's goals for using advanced technology to improve student academic achievement, ……... (2) A description of the State educational agency's goals for using advanced technology to improve student academic achievement, ……... (3) …… steps to ensure that all students and teachers in the State, ……. have increased access to technology. (3) …… steps to ensure that all students and teachers in the State, ……. have increased access to technology. (4) …….. measures that the State educational agency will use to evaluate the extent to which activities funded under this subpart are effective in integrating technology into curricula and instruction. (4) …….. measures that the State educational agency will use to evaluate the extent to which activities funded under this subpart are effective in integrating technology into curricula and instruction. (5) A description of how the State educational agency will encourage the development and utilization of innovative strategies for the delivery of specialized or rigorous academic courses and curricula through the use of technology, ……. (5) A description of how the State educational agency will encourage the development and utilization of innovative strategies for the delivery of specialized or rigorous academic courses and curricula through the use of technology, ……. (6) ….. supplement, and not supplant, State and local funds. (6) ….. supplement, and not supplant, State and local funds. (7) …… how the State educational agency will work to ensure that teachers and principals in a State receiving funds under this part are technologically literate. (7) …… how the State educational agency will work to ensure that teachers and principals in a State receiving funds under this part are technologically literate.

What Must Be Evaluated Title II Part D. 2145(5) Developing performance measurement systems to determine the effectiveness of educational technology programs funded under this subpart, particularly in determining the extent to which activities funded under this subpart are effective in Title II Part D. 2145(5) Developing performance measurement systems to determine the effectiveness of educational technology programs funded under this subpart, particularly in determining the extent to which activities funded under this subpart are effective in integrating technology into curricula and instruction, integrating technology into curricula and instruction, increasing the ability of teachers to teach, increasing the ability of teachers to teach, and enabling students to meet challenging State academic content and student academic achievement standards and enabling students to meet challenging State academic content and student academic achievement standards

What do we measure? Nobody knows……………….. Nobody knows……………….. What the feds are telling us What the feds are telling us Louisiana is measuring: Louisiana is measuring: Student Achievement/Proficiency Student Achievement/Proficiency Teacher Proficiency Teacher Proficiency Administrator Proficiency Administrator Proficiency Access to Technology Access to Technology Technology Integration Technology Integration

Federal Evaluation Goals Performance Goal 1: Student achievement, including technology literacy, of all students is improved through the use of technology Performance Goal 1: Student achievement, including technology literacy, of all students is improved through the use of technology Performance Indicator 1.1:The percentage of students by end of grade 8 that meet or exceed state standards for student literacy in technology.Performance Indicator 1.1:The percentage of students by end of grade 8 that meet or exceed state standards for student literacy in technology. Performance Goal 2: Teachers effectively use technology and research-based practices to support student learning Performance Goal 2: Teachers effectively use technology and research-based practices to support student learning Performance Indicator 2.1: The percentage of teachers qualified to use technology for instruction.Performance Indicator 2.1: The percentage of teachers qualified to use technology for instruction. Performance Goal 3: Technology is integrated throughout the curriculum Performance Goal 3: Technology is integrated throughout the curriculum Performance Indicator 3.1Performance Indicator 3.1 The number of schools in which all students are able to work from a networked computer.The number of schools in which all students are able to work from a networked computer.

Other Indicator Examples Student Literacy Student Literacy The percentage of students, who by the end of the 8th grade have used technology research tools to locate, evaluate, and collect information from a variety of source and to process that information and report results. The percentage of students, who by the end of the 8th grade have used technology research tools to locate, evaluate, and collect information from a variety of source and to process that information and report results. The percentage of students, who by the end of grade 8 have used technology to collaborate, publish products, and interact with peers, experts, and other audiences. The percentage of students, who by the end of grade 8 have used technology to collaborate, publish products, and interact with peers, experts, and other audiences.

Other Indicator Examples Teacher Literacy Teacher Literacy The percentage of teachers who designed, developed, and facilitate technology-enhanced lessons that address Louisiana Content Standards and K-12 Educational Technology Guidelines The percentage of teachers who designed, developed, and facilitate technology-enhanced lessons that address Louisiana Content Standards and K-12 Educational Technology Guidelines The percentage of teachers who use technology resources to engage in online, ongoing professional development and lifelong learning. The percentage of teachers who use technology resources to engage in online, ongoing professional development and lifelong learning.

Other Indicator Examples Technology Integration Technology Integration The percentage of schools that integrate the Louisiana K-12 Educational Technology Standards into the learning experiences of the students and school curricula in all core subject areas. The percentage of schools that integrate the Louisiana K-12 Educational Technology Standards into the learning experiences of the students and school curricula in all core subject areas. Teachers will use technology to communicate and collaborate with peers, parents, and the larger community in order to nurture student learning Teachers will use technology to communicate and collaborate with peers, parents, and the larger community in order to nurture student learning

Other Indicator Examples Student Access to Technology Student Access to Technology During the school year, did ALL students in your school have access to a networked computer and were ALL students in your school regularly given the opportunity to do meaningful work from these networked computers, beyond use for drill and practice? Note: For a school to answer YES to this question would mean that the school environment is such that all students have regular use of a networked computer for learning and research and that the use is across multiple disciplines and classrooms and is consistent with the Louisiana K-12 Educational Technology Standards. (Computer use for drill and practice activities in a lab or classroom environment alone would not meet this condition.) During the school year, did ALL students in your school have access to a networked computer and were ALL students in your school regularly given the opportunity to do meaningful work from these networked computers, beyond use for drill and practice? Note: For a school to answer YES to this question would mean that the school environment is such that all students have regular use of a networked computer for learning and research and that the use is across multiple disciplines and classrooms and is consistent with the Louisiana K-12 Educational Technology Standards. (Computer use for drill and practice activities in a lab or classroom environment alone would not meet this condition.)

Student Literacy Standards NETS-S NETS-S Basic operations and concepts Basic operations and concepts Social, ethical, and human issues Social, ethical, and human issues Technology productivity tools Technology productivity tools Technology communications tools Technology communications tools Technology research tools Technology research tools Technology problem-solving and decision- making tools Technology problem-solving and decision- making tools

Teacher Literacy Standards NETS-T NETS-T TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS AND CONCEPTS. TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS AND CONCEPTS. PLANNING AND DESIGNING LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS AND EXPERIENCES. PLANNING AND DESIGNING LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS AND EXPERIENCES. TEACHING, LEARNING, AND THE CURRICULUM. TEACHING, LEARNING, AND THE CURRICULUM. ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION. ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION. PRODUCTIVITY AND PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE. PRODUCTIVITY AND PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE. SOCIAL, ETHICAL, LEGAL, AND HUMAN ISSUES. SOCIAL, ETHICAL, LEGAL, AND HUMAN ISSUES.

Instruments Sabine Student Survey Sabine Student Survey Sabine Student Survey Sabine Student Survey Sabine Teacher Assessment Sabine Teacher Assessment Sabine Teacher Assessment Sabine Teacher Assessment Sabine Teacher Results Sabine Teacher Results Sabine Teacher Results Sabine Teacher Results Rapides Technology Questionnaire Rapides Technology Questionnaire Rapides Technology Questionnaire Rapides Technology Questionnaire LCET Student, Teacher, School-level Administrator & Central Office Level Administrator Self-Assessment Survey LCET Student, Teacher, School-level Administrator & Central Office Level Administrator Self-Assessment Survey LCET Student, Teacher, School-level Administrator & Central Office Level Administrator Self-Assessment Survey LCET Student, Teacher, School-level Administrator & Central Office Level Administrator Self-Assessment Survey LCET Student and Teacher Performance- Based Assessment LCET Student and Teacher Performance- Based Assessment

Copies of Instruments