SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 1 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review TA Activation Flight.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Certification Program Exclusively for those in Public Safety Certified Rider Class.
Advertisements

Presented by: Piston Pumps PVplus. Model max. Displacement [cm³/U] Speed [min-1] PV PV PV PV PV PV
Air Flow Bench Presented By: Saket Karajgikar & Nikhil Lakhkar Advisor: Prof. Dereje Agonafer.
Love the One You’re With Tom Bell Go Home with the One That Brought You or.
Optical Astronomy Imaging Chain: Telescopes & CCDs.
NW 40 th Terrace, Suite 1 Gainesville, Florida USA MillSlicer PMC Phalaborwa AG Mill Initial Installation Trends and.
Takanori Sekiguchi Italy-Japan Workshop (19 April, 2013) Inverted Pendulum Control for KAGRA Seismic Attenuation System 1 D2, Institute for Cosmic Ray.
April 27th, 2006 Paola Puppo – INFN Roma ILIAS Cryogenic payloads and cooling systems (towards a third generation interferometer) part II: the Vibration.
1 Laser Beam Coherence Purpose: To determine the frequency separation between the axial modes of a He-Ne Laser All sources of light, including lasers,
Ian Bailey Cockcroft Institute/ Lancaster University October 30 th, 2009 Baseline Positron Source Target Experiment Update.
Development of a mover having one nanometer precision and 4mm moving range Y. Morita, S. Yamashita ICEPP, University of Tokyo Y. Higashi, M. Masuzawa,
Chandra X-Ray Observatory CXC Paul Plucinsky CUC September Overall Status of the Instrument 2.Update on Controlling the FP Temperature ACIS Ops.
Teamo Supremo Critical Design Review Ahna Issak Wes Roos Kristen Brenner Kimberley Fornall Barton Tofany Nick Martinez Ahna Issak Wes Roos Kristen Brenner.
Chandra X-Ray Observatory CXC Paul Plucinsky EPIC Cal Nov ACIS Calibration: Planned Updates & Future Issues 2.ACIS Operations: Controlling the.
Flight Instruments Which way’s up?
PLATO kick-off meeting 09-Nov-2010 PLATO Payload overall architecture.
1 Universities Space Research Association SOFIA Program Options SSSC 18 February 2010 Mina Cappuccio SOFIA Science Project Manager NASA Ames Research Center.
Warning! In this unit, we switch from thinking in 1-D to 3-D on a rotating sphere Intuition from daily life doesn’t work nearly as well for this material!
SOFIA — The Observatory open cavity (door not shown) TELESCOPE pressure bulkhead scientific instrument (1 of 7) Scientist work stations, telescope and.
2-Stage Heat Pump Defrost Options Defrost options: –30, 60, 90, 120 or Auto (Infinity/Evolution only) Defrost initiate temp: 32° F Defrost terminate temp:
Vibration measurements on the final doublets and the Shintake Monitor Benoît BOLZON7th ATF2 project meeting, 16/12/08.
Yuji Otake, Akito Araya and Kazuo Hidano
B757 Review Questions.
SAM PDR1 SAM LGS Mechanical Design A. Montane, A. Tokovinin, H. Ochoa SAM LGS Preliminary Design Review September 2007, La Serena.
MCCS Status Update SOFIA SITR Kendall Mauldin SOFIA Platform Project Flight Systems Lead SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy.
TA Testing Plans Walter E. Miller OSC/ARC SSSC 29 September 2009.
Printed by ACS 2 Gyro Mode Data Analysis Cheryl Pavlovsky, Marco Sirianni, Ken Sembach, ACS Instrument Team and the 2 Gyro Mode Team.
CCDs in space: the effects of radiation on Hubble’s Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) Max Mutchler, David Golimowski (Space Telescope Science Institute),
Power Control System for a Concrete Durability Test Cabinet – Phase 2 Jacob Jameson Madhav Kothapalli Thomas Persinger Andrew Versluys.
Deutsches SOFIA Institut Universität Stuttgart Second Gyro System for the SOFIA Telescope J.F. Wagner Deutsches SOFIA Institut, Universität Stuttgart,
Bronze C Theory The Principles of Flight. Terms Wing Section Chord line Mean Camber line Airflow Relative Airflow Boundary layer Stagnation point Angle.
1 of 28 A design study of a Cryogenic High Accurate Derotator.
NIRSpec Operations Concept Michael Regan(STScI), Jeff Valenti (STScI) Wolfram Freduling(ECF), Harald Kuntschner(ECF), Robert Fosbury (ECF)
An Approach to Stabilizing Large Telescopes for Stellar Interferometry It shakes like a…. [G. Vasisht, 31 March 2006] N. Di Lieto J. Sahlmann, G. Vasisht,
ASTR 3010 Lecture 18 Textbook N/A
1 R. D. Gehrz 64th International Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy, Columbus, OH, June 23, 2009 The Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy.
ECG Monitor Objective o Provide users an economical ECG monitoring device o Raise awareness to the importance of a healthy heart and living o Allow doctors.
1 Virgo Commissioning progress ILIAS, Nov 13 th 2006 Matteo Barsuglia on behalf of the Commissioning Team.
CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Cryogenic Piping in the Module Eric Smith External Review of MLC October 03, October 2012Cryogenics for MLC1.
Chapter Twenty-Three: Waves 23.1 Harmonic Motion 23.2 Properties of Waves 23.3 Wave Motion 1.
Air Pressure and Winds. Atmospheric Pressure  What causes air pressure to change in the horizontal?  Why does the air pressure change at the surface?
Apr 17-22, NAOJ SOT optical performance Focus stability in orbit Y. Katsukawa (NAOJ) and SOT team.
MODEL : EDF-102 SERIES 1. APPLICATION The EDF-102 thermostat is designed to provide temperature control of heating or cooling systems in villas, hotels.
Astronomical Seeing. The Project Students will be introduced to the concept of astronomical seeing and how it affects the quality of astronomical images.
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
Aura Science Team Meeting Mission Operations Working Group HIRDLS – Jim Craft, Chris Hepplewhite Oct 1 - 5, 2007 JPL, Pasadena, Ca.
START NICMOS COOLING SYSTEM ACTIVITY SUMMARY. 1/25/01Ken Pulkkinen2 START NCS ACTIVITY Applicable SMOV Requirements: J NICMOS Cooling System.
TIPS - Oct 13, 2005 M. Sirianni Temperature change for ACS CCDs: initial study on scientific performance M. Sirianni, T. Wheeler, C.Cox, M. Mutchler, A.
Surface Layer SLODAR J. Osborn, R. Wilson and T. Butterley A prototype of a new SLODAR instrument has been developed at Durham CfAI and tested at the Paranal.
“Deep Impact” onto Comet 9P/Tempel 1 July 3 rd, 2005 Images and show created at the Dark Ridge Observatory (DRO) by Thomas C. Smith, Director.
Control Loops Tune a Fish. Control Loops Tuning of a control loop involves selecting loop parameters to ensure stable control under all operating conditions.
IPBSM Operation 11th ATF2 Project Meeting Jan. 14, 2011 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Menlo Park, California Y. Yamaguchi, M.Oroku, Jacqueline Yan.
January 6, 2005 URSI Nation Radio Science Meeting, Boulder, CO. Pointing and Focusing the GBT K. T. Constantikes NRAO Green Bank.
The VIRGO detection system
BOWSER 1 COSGC Space Research Symposium 2010 BOWSER Balloon Observatory for Wavelength and Spectral Emission Readings.
Roberto Silva #65330 February 13,2016 Prof. Eduardo Cabrera.
FLASH RF gun developments. Sven Pfeiffer for the LLRF team FEL Seminar Hamburg,
Flight Instrumentation
SPM Users Basic Training August 2010 Lecture VIII – AC Imaging Modes: ACAFM and MAC Imaging methods using oscillating cantilevers.
Air condition installation
Incorporating Hubble Servicing with NASA’s Long-Term Vision
Digital Light Sources First introduced in 2001.
SOFIA — The Observatory
SOFIA Pointing and Optimization Team (SPOT): Recent Results and Plans
SPARTAN-V Selective Pointing Apparatus for Research of Turbulence and Atmospheric Noise Variation Brian Ibeling and Christopher Nie.
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
NanoBPM Status and Multibunch Mark Slater, Cambridge University
Launch and On-orbit Checkout
Instrument Commissioning SDO SOWG - January 18-19, 2007 Purpose/Goal:
CHEOPS - CHaracterizing ExOPlanet Satellite
Presentation transcript:

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 1 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review TA Activation Flight #2 (took place on Jan 15, 2010) “Quick Look” Data Review Thomas Keilig, , Holger Jakob, ,

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 2 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Card 9: VIS Uncaging and Caging in 15kft adjustment of axial position worked very well (although some overshooting) axial uncaging 7min:40sec (pressure working point not optimized for 6 psid) identified points for further performance improvements a)  p 6psi

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 3 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Card 9: VIS Uncaging and Caging in 35kft at 8 psid time for axial uncaging improved to 4min:30sec working pressure was better adjusted, no overshooting the VIS stayed at this axial position until the end of TA Activation b)  p 8psi

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 4 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Successful in flight demonstration of improved VIS performance since 1st TA Activation Flight in December 2007: VIS caging, uncaging and centering at different altitudes a) Uncaging and Adjust (x-centering): time needed improved from 9m:10s (2007) to 4m:30s air consumption improved from 100 psi (2007) to 50 psi (caused by x-centering, not by uncaging) b) Caging: time needed improved from 3m:20s (2007) to 2m:20s air consumption improved from 200 psi (2007) to 140 psi VIS Auto Center Mode handles cabin pressure changes and TA movements during turns, gusts etc. (see next slide) VIS was operated in auto center mode for nearly 4 hours TA will be re-centered with the axial air springs in x-direction when out of range (cabin pressure change) TA will be re-centered with the tangential air springs in y-z-direction when out of range (turns or gusts) average air consumption determined ~70 psi per hour air consumption for science missions ~30 psi per hour Card 9: VIS Uncaging and Caging in 15 and 35kft

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 5 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review VIS Auto Center Mode handled cabin pressure changes very well VIS was operated in auto mode for 3:57 hours (also during turns) air consumption from the bottles determined ~70 psi per hour air consumption for science missions ~30 psi per hour Card 9: Air Bottle Use

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 6 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review TA stayed in its centered x-position (within ±3mm) until the end of the TA activation (for 3:57 hours) If x-position >±3mm TA starts to re-center (never happened during that flight)  no risk of x-hardstop contact during star observations y-z-centering performance improved and tested on ground before flight Card 9: VIS Uncaging and Caging in 15k and 35k ±3 mm Telescope x-position (translational fwd/bwd movement) Hardstop contact with VIS brackets would occure at ± 18 mm

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 7 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Card 9 VIS: ATAC Accelerometers PSD Plots Filtering of aircraft loads >6Hz by VIS VIS Modes

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 8 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Card 15, 16, 17: Control Raps for Airframe/TA dynamics characterization Gyro-Performance: no performance degradation in Gyros observed during these Control Raps degradation bit send caused the “image jump” issue during HIPO Line Ops valid for all the flight, but mentioned here The purpose of these 3 Test Cards was the Airframe / TA dynamics characterization with TA uncaged / unbraked / inertial. The fall back from INERTIAL to LOCAL during these excitations was expected and is a safety feature of the TA controls (velocity limit error). No further analysis of this maneuvers were performed by the TA Team.

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 9 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Card 10: Filter Fan Unit (FFU) activation Successful activation of FFU (located in the cavity): was running for 5 minutes, no EMI effects observed no notable temperature change inside WFI and FFI housings observed FFU is able to exchange the air volume inside WFI and FFI housing every ~10 minutes FFU is intended as a Ground System active after Cavity Drying and before Cavity Pre-Cooling

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 10 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Card 11: Gate Valve activation Cross section through Flange Assembly (FLA): SI Flange with SI Mass Dummy installed Nasmyth Tube (cavity pressure) Bypass valve INF tub

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 11 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Card 11: Gate Valve activation Operated via TA pass-through command Bypass Valve was auto-cycled 7 times before pressure between INF tub and TA Cavity was < 30 mbar (precondition for Gate Valve opening) < 30 mbar Closures of Bypass Valve to measure the remaining differential pressure

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 12 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Card 12: Nasmyth Tube Fans activation worked as expected: fans were running for 5 minutes fans are sucking the air out of the Nasmyth Tube  cold air flows in fans cooled the air inside the Nasmyth Tube down to cavity air temperature short increase of cavity temperature due to air exchange fans should remain ON during science flights to keep thermal background low end of Nasmyth Tube (Gate Valve) half way inside Nasmyth Tube cavity air temperature +2˚C -7˚C -2˚C +16˚C

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 13 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Card 14: Fine Balancing Drives activation Drive Speed 2 mm/sec functional check and EMI check out only re-balancing of the TA must be performed with closed door

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 14 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Autopilot in Manual Mode: Card 18, 19: Autopilot Characterization (Heading Changes) heading error (degrees) roll angle (degrees) roll rate (degrees/sec) manual mode requires a minimum of 7 degrees of roll angle to initiate a heading change new heading is not established until the roll angle is less than 3 degrees max deviation in heading is 0.70 deg, standard deviation is 0.26

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 15 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Card 18, 19: Autopilot Characterization (Heading Changes) Autopilot in Command Mode: heading error (degrees) roll angle (degrees) roll rate (degrees/sec) before the AIU (Autopilot Interface Unit) is completed, science missions will be flown in command mode headings are close to the magnitudes expected for AIU requirements max deviation in heading is 0.28 deg, standard deviation is 0.11

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 16 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Card 20: EMI / Radio Interference Performed as expected Imagers did not pick up any interference from the Radios Cavity Imagers (FFI and WFI): colder CCD sensors show the lower darkframe noise FFI dark field image

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 17 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Card 20: EMI / Radio Interference a single FFI frame (1000 ms) mean darkframe noise of 1070 counts looks just like a ground-based darkframe faint vertical streaks are usual thermal noise (added during the slow readout) RMS is typically only 16 counts shot noise would be about 11 counts  that is very good Fine Field Imager (FFI): difference of two consecutive FFI frames mean value of 0.0 (as it should) RMS = 8 counts  didn't see any EMI effects (bright spots or streaks) in these difference images EMI check

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 18 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Card 20: EMI / Radio Interference Focal Plane Imager (FPI): single FPI frame mean darkframe noise 1230 counts RMS = 47 counts evidently warmer as expected  first impression is the images are very clean and quiet difference of two FPI images mean = 0 counts RMS = 11 counts EMI check

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 19 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Card 21: Simulated Science Observations Legs SOFIA left the R-2508 complex to the south, crossed LAX airspace in >41 kft and turned around at Santa Catalina Island: - Flight Path up to Card 20 - Simulated Science Legs - Turn in between - Descent/Approach KPMD

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 20 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Card 21: Simulated Science Observations Legs Coarse and Fine Drive movement LOS Rewinds Heading Change 1st leg 2nd leg

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 21 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Card 21: Simulated Science Observations Legs Aircraft roll and Fine Drive movement (6 minutes of 2nd leg): Low frequency A/C roll is compensated by Coarse Drive (spherical sensors) 0.2 – 0.25 Hz (5 – 6 sec) FD takes care of the remaining differences. Only a small fraction is "leaking-through" into the pointing budget (fiber optical gyros) This was with TA in Coupled_Continuous Needs repeat in Coupled_Step and Coupled_Off for further analysis

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 22 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Card 21: Simulated Science Observations Legs Aircraft/Autopilot stability LOS Rewinds Heading Change 1st leg 2nd leg

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 23 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Card 21: Simulated Science Observations Legs Aircraft behavior during heading changes on science observation legs: for a 1 degree heading change as much as 2 degrees over shoot bank angles were 5-7 degrees for these small heading changes the autopilot takes out the heading overshoot in about 3 min Variation in aircraft pitch of +/- 0.9 deg not quite understood yet, but obviously correlated with air speed

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 24 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Flown two long 25+ min N-S legs in 43 kft Operated the TA in INERTIAL Stabilization during these legs Commanded LOS Rewinds (as needed) Coordinated small heading changes with the cockpit (as needed) Activated Flexible Body Compensation (FBC) on the 2 nd leg  no negative impact seen so far with closed door  need view to the stars to verify FBC performance with the imagers Card 21: Simulated Science Observations Legs

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 25 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Card 13: Inertial Stabilization via TAOC in 35kft Aircraft Roll Motion visible (ca. 0.2 Hz), see Ed Erickson Sep.06 EL (residual of CD coupled mode) XEL (compensation of heading oscillations) LOS ≈ “pointing stability“

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 26 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 27 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Card 13: Inertial Stabilization via TAOC in 35kft Slightly increased control deviation between 0.2 Hz and 4 Hz. Above 4Hz no difference visible. Could be due to differences in inertial disturbance or coupled mode. Max. difference ca arcsec, pointing budget allows for up to 0.04 arcsec same behavior seen during HIPO Line Ops Coupled_Continuous is only useable in very very smooth air Coupled_Step recommended for Short Science in 35 kft

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 28 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review RMS Control Deviatoncum. RMS ErrorPointing Budget Inertial Stabilization Loopincluded below0.09 arcsec 0-10 Hz0.31 arcsec0.16 arcsec* ) Hz0.001 arcsec0.25 arcsec* ) Hz arcsec0.09 arcsec* ) Hz arcsec0.04 arcsec* ) Hz0.003 arcsecnot specified Sum0.315 arcsec0.32 arcsec * ) Aircraft inertial loads only!! Cumulative RMS of Control Deviation is very close to the value estimated in the pointing budget, but: Almost exclusively concentrated between 0 and 10 Hz Pointing budget is specified for image motion, which includes flexible TA deformation. This not captured by the Gyros and hence not included in the control deviation. Dropouts in data recording on DCC due to overload may have disturbed the measured control deviation (dropouts every 5 sec  additional control deviation around 0.2 Hz) Telescope imbalance was large during this TA Functional Checkout  additional pointing error in the 0-12 Hz range Card 13: Inertial Stabilization via TAOC in 35 kft

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 29 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Card 21: Simulated Science Observations Legs increased cumulative error which can be attributed to data dropouts increased altitude of Card 21 (43 kft) compared to Card 13 (35 kft) hence a more stable environment leads to smaller control deviations the additional control deviation around 0.2 Hz can be attributed to data errors close to ES requirement, but also a few points for improvements identified ES requirement for overall Image Quality is 5.3 arcsec (D80%) in the optical

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 30 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Card 22: Secondary Mirror activation via TAOC Focus Center Mechanism (FCM) Cold Test: Coldest temperatures reached so far Cavity Air Temp: -28˚C FCM Actuator Temp: -6.5˚C Reached all end positions without any problems Weakened new threat TRT_102 Needs repeat with open door and lower temperatures

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 31 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Tilt Chop Mechanism (TCM) Test: waveform identical as on ground higher noise identified as the 300 Hz oscillation Lessons Learned:  Not everything that performs like expected on ground does so in flight Card 22: Secondary Mirror activation via TAOC New SMM controller (without low pass filter) optimized on ground is not robust enough to handle in flight closed door vibration levels. Low pass filter can be implemented easily as successfully demonstrated during HIPO Line Ops

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 32 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Temperatures in Cavity WFI FFI

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 33 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Temperatures in Cavity coldest cavity air temperature (green) seen was -28˚C PM temperature (yellow) after nearly 6 hours was only +3˚C air probes on WFI and FFI (green) correlate very well with spider legs (purple) FFI is located higher in the cavity and therefore warmer than WFI first bypass valve opening correlates with INF temperature drop (red dotted curve at the top) Nasmyth tube fan activation drops temperatures inside Nasmyth tube down to nearly cavity temperature (blue and red) at the end of the flight a few things took place in parallel: URD Seal inflation Descent started CECS Dryer switched to Dry-Mode Bonus question: What causes the drop of the Pressure Window temperatures during descent (red dotted curves at the right)?

SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Telescope Assembly (TA) 34 TA Activation Flight #2 “Quick Look” Data Review Summary of TA Activation Flight #2 Successful in flight demonstration: performance of repaired gyro unit (inertial stabilization) VIS caging, uncaging and x-centering at different altitudes x-centering: 9:10 min to 4:30 min (100 psi to 50 psi) caging: 3:20 min to 2:20 min (200 psi to 140 psi) VIS auto center mode handles cabin pressure changes air consumption ~70 psi per hour coupled mode: coarse and fine drive together in inertial_stab First time in flight activation: Filter Fan Unit Nasmyth Tube Fans Gate Valve opend and closed Fine Balancing Drives Characterized TA stability in inertial stabilization mode Characterized Secondary Mirror chopping operation cold soak Characterized WFI and FFI: cold, and in flight noise level