Deep Data Dive & Action Planning: Increasing Capacity for Improvement May 2015 Center for Educational Effectiveness: Greg Lobdell Office of Student and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Advertisements

USING THE INDISTAR ® ACTION PLANNING TOOL October 8, 2012 Andy Kelly, Assistant Superintendent Travis Campbell, K-12 Director Megan Eliasson, Administrative.
USING NEEDS ASSESSMENTS & CREATING ACTION PLANS September 25, 2012 Greg Lobdell, Center for Educational Effectiveness Candace Gratama, The BERC Group Travis.
USING DATA REPORTS AND CONDUCTING NEEDS ASSESSMENTS & September 25, 2012 Greg Lobdell, Center for Educational Effectiveness Candace Gratama, The BERC Group.
Analyzing Student Work
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
PRIORITY AND FOCUS SCHOOLS: INCREASING CAPACITY FOR IMPROVEMENT USING THE INDISTAR ® ACTION-PLANNING TOOL June 11, 2014 OSPI’s Office of Student and School.
Module Two. 
WASHINGTON STATE TRANSFOMATION INTEGRATING SUPPORTS USING THE INDISTAR ® ACTION-PLANNING TOOL January 2015 OSPI’s Office of Student and School Success.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
MEDIAN STUDENT GROWTH ANALYSIS December 2014 Center for Educational Effectiveness: Greg Lobdell Office of Student and School Success, OSPI: Sue Cohn.
Priority and Focus Schools: INCREASING CAPACITY FOR IMPROVEMENT April 2015 OSPI’s Office of Student and School Success Travis Campbell, Director Paul Wieneke,
NC SSIP: Top 5 Things We’ve Learned Mid-South Meeting January 7-8, 2015.
CRAFTING S.M.A.R.T. GOALS September 2014 Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Travis Campbell, Director, K-12 Education Sue Cohn, School Improvement.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
School Performance Measure Calculations SY Office of Achievement and Accountability.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Cohort 5 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
Theories of Action: What are they, why are they important, and how are they created? January 2015 Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Travis Campbell,
Indistar Implementation Science Performance Management MAUREEN RICHEL AND SAM REDDING CENTER ON INNOVATIONS IN LEARNING.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
Kerri White, EdD Assistant State Superintendent Office of Educational Support Oklahoma State Department of Education A-F School Report Cards.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education July, 2011
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
EES-Student v3.0 (Student Engagement Edition) Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
NH Steps to Success Process A Workshop for NH Department of Education Staff Thursday, August 29, 2013 August 29, Using the Indistar Tool.
ANDREW PARR, WASHINGTON STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION GREG LOBDELL, CENTER FOR EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STUDENT ASSESSMENT JUNE 24,
Making Demonstrable Improvement: Request for Feedback (Updated) July 2015 Presented by: Ira Schwartz Assistant Commissioner of Accountability.
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
English Learner PLC Workshop Grossmont union high school district English Learner Programs September 23, 2009.
Instructional Coach Training September 30, 2010 AIMS: Generating Reports to Use with CFIP 1.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
EES Parent v2.1 Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY TM Parent Edition.
Navigating Indistar ® to Develop & Implement Your Student and School Success Action Plan Office of Student and School Success Paul Wieneke, Indistar® Program.
IDENTIFYING & PRIORITIZING PROBLEMS OF PRACTICE December 2014 Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Travis Campbell, Director Sue Cohn, School Improvement.
Cohort 5 Middle/Jr. High School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring,
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Guide to Test Interpretation Using DC CAS Score Reports to Guide Decisions and Planning District of Columbia Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. STAFF EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY v9.0.
1.Open your school’s CEE Achievement Index Summary – Section 5 2.Open your Action Planning Handbook: “Data Reflection Protocol – State Assessments” (Appendix.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
1.Open your school’s CEE English Language Learner Performance Analysis – Section 3 2.Open your Action Planning Handbook: Data Reflection Protocol – State.
Our Theory of Action and Multi-Tiered Framework are anchored in the Vision and Mission for the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Office of Student.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
KEEPING THE FOCUS ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Stephanie Benedict Academic Development Institute & Center on Innovations in Learning.
Confidential 1 Regional Achievement Center 3 Essex and Hudson Counties School Improvement Plan April 2013.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
“ Let us not be content to wait and see what will happen, but give us the determination to make the right things happen”- Horace Mann 2014 MCAS Overview.
District Response to Instruction and Intervention Reflection and Planning.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Please sit at the appropriate table with your IC/Principal.
Cycle of Continuous Improvement for
Office of Student and School Success
Title III AMAO Improvement Plan Webinar
School Performance Measure Calculations SY
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Student Success: Imagine the Possibilities
Presentation transcript:

Deep Data Dive & Action Planning: Increasing Capacity for Improvement May 2015 Center for Educational Effectiveness: Greg Lobdell Office of Student and School Success, OSPI: Sue Cohn

Tools to Support This Presentation

Section II & Appendix A – Action-Planning Process Appendix B – Data Reflection Tools Student and School Success Action-Planning Handbook: A Guide for School Teams

Appendix B: Data Collection & Analysis Tools

Guides the data analysis process Provided in Word format so you can customize / edit; make it work for you This CEE Data Package contains data relevant to every page in the protocol Data Analysis Protocol

1.Student Achievement Data 2.Educator / Organizational Effectiveness Data CEE Data Package and Services

Intended Audience: Superintendents, Principals, Leadership Teams, and Success Coaches  Welcome, Introductions, & Goals  Deep Data Dive Student Outcomes Organizational/Educator Capacity  Next Steps with Action Planning  Contact Information Agenda Bill Wagner / The Daily News Monticello “Success Night”

Participants can answer the following questions: What data are included in the Comprehensive Data Package? Where do I begin with the data? What are the next steps in the Action-Planning Process? Where do I go with questions and how do I access additional support? Goals

Community Agreements 1.Show up (choose to be present). 2.Pay attention (to heart and meaning). 3.Tell the truth (without blame or judgment). 4.Be open to outcome (not attached to outcome).

Before beginning the review of your data, please reflect on what you might see in data about your students’ performance. One or more of the following thought-starters may be helpful. – I assume… – I predict… – I wonder… – My questions/expectations are influenced by… See Appendix B.3 in the Action Planning Handbook, or, National School Reform Website at: Pause and Reflect #1

I. What data are included in the Comprehensive Data Package? Student Outcome Data Organization and Educator Capacity 11

“The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes, but in having new eyes.” -Marcel Proust

Anchoring Deep Data Dive in Action-Planning Cycle

3 Components: Student Achievement Data Package EES-Staff (Certificated and Classified) EES-Student CEE Binder

5 Achievement Analysis Modules (not all are applicable to every school)  Section 1: Proficiency Dashboard: Overall and subgroup views of percent of students meeting standard and percent by performance level.  Section 2: Student Growth Analysis: Overall views & subgroups  Section 3: English Language Acquisition Performance: WELPA, MSP for ELLs, and Former-ELL performance  Section 4: Graduation Rate Analysis: Overall and subgroup views of 4-year and 5-year graduation rates and drop-out rates  Section 5: Achievement Index Summary: Proficiency and Student growth in context of Achievement Index. Student Performance Data Dashboard (Achievement)

Achievement Section 5: The AI Summary report provides you with overall and subgroup views of both proficiency and student growth. If proficiency is the primary issue, then start on Section 1. If Student Growth is the primary issue, then begin with Section 2. If ELL, then go to Section 3. If SWD, please see both Section 1 (proficiency) and 2 (growth) for details. If Graduation Rates, then go to Section 4. EES-Staff and Student Data 2. Where do I begin with the data?

Section 5: Achievement Index Proficiency and Growth Analysis Composite Achievement Index vs. Trend of improvement in yearly Achievement Index values Shows break-points for bottom 5%, bottom 25%, median (50 th percentile), and top 25% Shows year-by-year details of Achievement Index values

Section 5. Details By Subject Area Detailed graphs for Median Student Growth Percentiles For 3 years Growth vs. Proficiency (at your level) Detailed graphs for Proficiency for 3 years This data provided for All-Students, Low Income, SWD, and ELL

Section 1. Proficiency “Dashboard”

Section 1. Proficiency Detail Proficiency Overall By Level Subgroup detail

Section 2. Student Growth Analysis Year by year Median Student Growth Data Details for Subgroups: Low-Income, SWD, ELL

Section 3. English Language Acquisition Performance WELPA (WLPT) results for every grade in your school (up to K-12) School, district, and state results Includes results by WELPA performance level

Section 3. English Language Acquisition Performance Also includes MSP performance for ELLs MSP Performance for FORMER-ELLs

Section 4. Graduation Rate Analysis Includes Adjusted 4-year and 5- Year Cohort Graduation Rates Data shown for All-students, Low-income, SWD, and ELL Cohort details: Starting, Move- in, Move-out, and Dropouts Year-by-year dropout data for All-students, Low-income, SWD, and ELL Sample HS

1. Select data source (“Achievement Index Summary” – Section 5). 2. Individually complete “Essential Questions” on Data Reflection Protocol. 3. Collaborate and determine next steps for analyzing additional data that will inform goal-setting. Pause and Reflect #2

Multiple Perspectives: Enables comparison and triangulation – Staff (includes separate results for Certificated and Classified staff) – Students Reports include – Main report (with 7 Principles and 9 Characteristics views) – Longitudinal comparison with earlier survey data where possible – Indistar Supplement Report for easy upload of data for Expected Indicators – PDF and PPT formats for easy access to pages or individual graphs Organizational and Educator Capacity: EES-Survey Data

Organizational and Educator Capacity – Behaviors and practices of high-performing schools – Readiness for Improvement and Organizational Trust – Cultural Responsiveness – District Support for Improvement Includes 7-Principles view of all items Items reference Indistar® Indicators Organizational and Educator Capacity: EES-Survey Data

Radar graphs Mean score graphs Item-detail graphs Three Primary Analysis Techniques

Interpreting : Item Detail Graphs

Item Detail Graphs Green is positive Ivory is opportunity Orange and red are negative Grey is no response

Interpreting Radar Graphs Shows Percent Positive Responses Comparisons are to schools at your level Closer to the Edge is “better”

Interpreting Mean Score Graphs

“I” vs. “My Colleagues” Gaps

Use to complete last two sets of entries on Data Analysis Protocol (“Response” and “Barriers/Obstacles”) Analysis Steps: – Study Readiness for Improvement (EES-Staff pages 6-8). – Study Summary Section (EES-Staff pages 12 and 13) – Study Detailed results. Note: Indistar® Indicator references are embedded within items. This defines the current reality of your school and forms the baseline from which to set your S.M.A.R.T. Goals. – This baseline also defines “from where” you monitor progress as your team defines progress monitoring steps in your plan. Using Your Educational Effectiveness Data

Each page of the protocol asks these two prompts. EES-Staff and EES-Student survey results provide data on “monitoring teaching and learning” For Barriers / Obstacles: See the EES-Staff Readiness to Benefit section, particularly the “problem solving” and “conflict resolution ” sections Using EES Data with Your Data Analysis Protocol

The EES-Staff and Student data provide extensive data on attitudes, practices, and foundational issues of trust and social capital. Using EES Data: An Example EES-Staff: Struggling students receive intervention to acquire skills: 87% of our staff answered “Almost always True”, but with Students, “I get extra help from my teachers when I need it” only 29% answered “Almost Always True”. Why is there such a discrepancy? From EES-Staff: There is a willingness to address conflict”, only 31% of staff indicated this was Almost or Often True. Staff “Willingness to be held accountable for student learning” was only 38% Almost or Often True. These must be barriers.

3. What are the next steps?

1.Review data with Leadership Team & Complete Data Reflection Protocols a.Section 2 & Appendix A – Assess Stage b.Appendix B – Data Analysis Tools 2.Conduct Data Carousel with Team/Staff 3.Continue with the steps described in Assess Stage (Section 2) in Handbook 4.Access “Trainings, Presentations and Webinars” on OSSS website at What are the next steps? Chinook Middle School

Example: Data Carousel Activity

How will you engage your Leadership Team in completing the Data Analysis Protocol for all data in CEE data package: – “Data Source” – “Essential Questions” – “Responses and “Barriers/Obstacles” What will you need to do to prepare your team for the dialogue and analysis? Pause and Reflect #3

Timeline Collect Data Engage in Data Analysis Assess Indicators using tools provided (Current Level of Development tool) Apply for iGrant funds (available July 1, 2015) May – Aug 2015 Aug– Oct 2015 ESD Action- Planning Workshops Create and/or Revise Student and School Success Action Plan Submit Plan to OSPI (Oct 30, 2015) Implement Plan Nov 2015 Coach Critique of Action Plans school year Implement Plan Progress Monitor Indicators and Tasks Revise Plan as necessary Address Coach Critique feedback Submit Plan for mid-year review (Feb 28, 2016) Submit Plan for annual review (May 30, 2016)

Student and School Success Action-Planning Handbook to guide your work ( oolSuccess/ActionPlanHandbook. aspx) oolSuccess/ActionPlanHandbook. aspx CEE Comprehensive Data Package – Survey reports – Achievement data Your Success Coach CEE 4. Where do I go for support?

Office of Student and School Success: (360) or Andy Kelly: Travis Campbell: Sue Cohn: Center for Educational Effectiveness – Greg Lobdell: (425) or Contact Information