Rule utilitarianism Michael Lacewing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
More objections to Utilitarianism
Advertisements

Utilitarianism Maximize good.
Medical Ethics What’s it all about?.
The Power of Moral Theories
What is deontology?.
RECAP – TASK 1 What is utilitarianism? Who is Jeremy Bentham?
Philosophers on why be moral Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Liberty: negative and positive Michael Lacewing
Categorical Imperative
Show-Me 4-H’ers Character The Six Pillars of Character
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 11 Utilitarianism By David Kelsey.
Phil 160 Kant.
Kant’s Categorical Imperative and Euthanasia
The Ethics of Virtue Virtue ethics date back to Aristotle (325B.C.) in his Nichomachean Ethics. Aristotle’s central question: “What is the.
Conscience Michael Lacewing
Practical wisdom Michael Lacewing
Mill on conscience and justice
Mill’s proof of utilitarianism
ETHICS BOWL CONSEQUENTIALism.
Utilitarianism: happiness and preferences
Michael Lacewing Virtue Ethics Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Kant’s deontological ethics
Aristotle’s virtue ethics: three issues
Michael Lacewing Deception and lies Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Three theories of ethics Michael Lacewing
CSE3PE: Professional Environment Introduction to Ethical Theory.
Introduction to Ethical Theory I Last session: “our focus will be on normative medical ethics, i.e., how people should behave in medical situations” –
“A man without ethics is a wild beast loosed upon this world.”
Utilitarianism. Our Everyday Ethical Choices Consider the last ethical choice you had to make in the most general terms, what were you thinking about?
The Ethical Basis of Law and Business Management.
What is Utilitarianism?
Utilitarianism Michael Lacewing
Ethics A look at the reasons behind decisions about what is right and wrong. What is the right thing to do?
Thesis Question Is the part of the moral theory family Utilitarianism?
Consequentialism Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? What if it is a small amount of pain to prevent a.
Categorical and Practical Imperative
Ethical Theories Unit 9 Ethical Awareness. What Are Ethical Theories? - Explain what makes an action right or wrong - Have an overview of major ethical.
1. Make a rule that everyone in school should absolutely follow, without exception. 2. Make a rule that everyone in the world should absolutely follow.
Normative Ethical Theory: Utilitarianism and Kantian Deontology
AREA 1 GUIDING PRINCIPLES SECTION 3 Consequences (Utilitarian Ethics) Duty and Reason (Kantian Ethics)
© Michael Lacewing Kant’s Categorical Imperative Michael Lacewing
Morality in the Modern World
Utilitarian Theory of Ethics Utilitarian theory is a consequentialist approach to judging moral behavior. Consequentialist hold that –consequences count.
Ethics A look at the reasons behind decisions about what is right and wrong. What is the right thing to do?
Objections to Kant’s ethics Michael Lacewing
Utilitarianism Utilitarians focus on the consequences of actions.
Utilitarianism: objections Michael Lacewing
Kant and Kantian Ethics: Is it possible for “reason” to supply the absolute principles of morality?
HEDONISM “Eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we die.”
Utilitarianism. John Stuart Mill ( ), English philosopher A form of consequentialism An act is judged to be moral or immoral according to its.
What is the opposite of Utilitarianism? We are still addressing the question of HOW we should be moral.
Consequentialism v. Deontology. Ticking Bomb Scenario.
Ethical theories and approaches in Business
Is torture wrong? If so, why?
Normative Virtue Ethics
Michael Lacewing Rule utilitarianism Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Michael Lacewing Stealing Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Lecture 02: A Brief Summary
Kant’s Categorical Imperative
Kant: the good will, duty and the Categorical Imperative
Michael Lacewing Virtue Ethics Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Kant’s Categorical Imperative
ETHICS BOWL CONSEQUENTIALism.
Kant and Kantian Ethics:
Happiness, pleasure and preferences
Act utilitarianism, partiality and integrity
Utilitarianism 2.0.
Lecture 02: A Brief Summary
Medical Ethics -frameworks
Professional Ethics (GEN301/PHI200) UNIT 2: NORMATIVE THEORIES OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS Handout # 2 CLO # 2 Explain the rationale behind adoption of normative.
Presentation transcript:

Rule utilitarianism Michael Lacewing

Hedonist act utilitarianism Act consequentialism: Actions are morally right or wrong depending on their consequences and nothing else. An act is right if it maximizes what is good. Value theory: The only thing that is good is happiness. Equality: Everyone’s happiness counts more than anyone else’s.

Rule utilitarianism An action is right when it complies with those rules which, if everybody followed them, would lead to the greatest happiness (compared to any other set of rules) –It is not the consequences of the individual act that matter, but the consequences of everyone following the rules that govern the actions –Actions are right when they follow a rule that maximizes happiness overall – even when the action itself doesn’t maximize happiness in this particular situation

Advantages We don’t have to work out the consequences of each act in turn –We can create the rules once, together Some types of act are ruled out –E.g. the rule forbidding torture of children will clearly cause more happiness if everyone followed it than the rule allowing torture of children

Advantages A rule that allows partiality to our family and friends will create more happiness than a rule that requires us to be impartial all the time. I am only required to act in a way that, if everyone acted like that, would promote the greatest happiness.

Objection ‘Rule-fetishism’: Why follow a rule when, on this occasion, breaking the rule will create more happiness? –E.g. I know not everyone will give to charity, so shouldn’t I give more? –E.g. I know that lying here will create more happiness than telling the truth –The point of the rules is to create the most happiness – but they won’t always Back to act utilitarianism

Replies Amend the rule –Life is too complicated – the rule will become impossibly long Using act utilitarianism to decide how to act will break down our trust that people behave morally –If people keep breaking the rules, that will create less happiness in the long run

Objection Morality can’t be summed up by rules Reply: include the rule ‘When no other rules apply, do that action that maximizes happiness’ Other objections to utilitarianism, not rules –Is happiness the only value? –What is the moral value of motives and character traits? –What is the value of friendship?