Research ethics and responsible research at UniSA Presented By: Prof Ian Richards Dr Mark Hochman.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 SAFETY ORGANISATION. 2 Safety Organisation 3 Safety Organisation - Regulator.
Advertisements

Session No. 4 Implementing the State’s Safety Programme Implementing Service Providers SMS
Organizational Governance
CRI- Common Review Initiative Reducing Lender Review Redundancy.
The Compliance & Risk Functions In Credit Unions What Supervisors need to know? Michael Mullen ILCU Learning Advisor.
Responsible Conduct of Research Rod Kelln Dean, Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research University of Regina.
Graduate Research Degree Orientation 2013 Decision Making and Governance.
Conservation District Supervisor Accreditation Module 6: Responsibilities and Duties of A Supervisor.
Human Research Ethics - what are they and where can we get some?
International Federation of Accountants International Education Standards for Professional Accountants Mark Allison, Executive Director Institute of Chartered.
Professor Ian Richards University of South Australia.
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
WHAT IS A RESEARCH ETHICS BOARD?
Due Process – ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOVs Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt October, 2009.
The Responsible Conduct of Research at UTAS Office of Research Services.
1 LBNL Enterprise Computing (EC) January 2003 LBNL Enterprise Computing.
University Council Shared Leadership for Integrated Planning and Consultative Decision-Making.
Purpose of the Standards
Audit Committees in Local Government FinPro Professional Development Seminar Linda MacRae Local Solutions Pty Ltd 25 October
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
Research Ethics A guide to principles and procedures
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
1 CHCOHS312A Follow safety procedures for direct care work.
Peer Information Security Policies: A Sampling Summer 2015.
Corporate Governance in Financial Institutions OCDE/IAIS/ASSAL Conference on Insurance Regulation & Supervision in Latin America Punta Cana, Dominican.
Trinity College Dublin Second Annual Disability Service Symposium The Development and Implementation Plans for UCC Fitness to Practice Policy June 26 th.
Changing the dynamics of scholarly communication Fides Datu Lawton Director (Library Resources Unit) UTS:Library SCONUL visit 8 september 2005.
By: 1. Kenneth A. Kim John R. Nofsinger And 2. A. C. Fernando.
Human Research Ethics and Obtaining Ethics Approval
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Farida Lada October 16, 2013
Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Meeting March 3, 2010 Overview of the DOE Office of Science Graduate Fellowship Program Julie Carruthers, Ph.D.
Academic Assessment Task Force Report August 15, 2013 Lori Escallier, Co-Chair Keith Sheppard, Co-Chair Chuck Taber, Co-Chair.
RCR Requirements for NSF & NIH Michele Chin-Purcell, Director, RIOP Carol Foth, Manager, RCR/RIOP
Matching Grants. Address humanitarian conditions that benefit a community in need Direct Rotarian involvement Match at least two countries (host and international)
1 AUQA Performance Portfolio Chapter 3 International Activities.
Research Ethics and Research Conduct Karen Moorehead Human Research Ethics Officer Office for Research Photo: Australian HES 11/11/09 Office for Research.
Research Integrity The Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research Dr Peter Wigley Manager, Research Ethics and Integrity Flinders University.
Safety organization and training. The biosafety officer and biosafety committee A safety policy, A safety manual, and Supporting programmes for their.
General Principles for the Procurement of Goods and Services Asst. Prof. Muhammad Abu Sadah.
“What’s Ethics Got To Do With It” Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Gary Kent Head Governance Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
Schools Animal Ethics Committee (SAEC) Western Australia Julie Hitchens Category B  BSocSci Anthropology (Hons)(Curtin)  PGradDipOccHlthSfty (Curtin)
Guidance Training CFR §483.75(i) F501 Medical Director.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Due Process – ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOVs Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt October, 2009.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
1 International Education Standards for Professional Accountants Mark Allison, Executive Director Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland and Technical.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
8 th November 2007 Research: ethics and research governance Rossana Dowsett Research and Regional Development Division [Pre Award Support] University of.
Introduction to the Australian Privacy Principles & the OAIC’s regulatory approach Privacy Awareness Week 2016.
Supervised practice for medical radiation practice 8 October 2014 Webinar Helen Tierney Policy Officer Medical Radiation Practice Board of Australia 1.
National health support service for nurses and midwives Chris Robertson, Executive Director Strategy & Policy Tanya Vogt, Executive Officer, NMBA 15 December.
International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions (ISSAIs) Jennifer Thomson Director OPSPF & Chief Financial Management Officer World Bank.
Korea Responsible Care Council RESPONSIBLE CARE ® in KOREA March 2001 By KOREA RESPONSIBLE CARE COUNCIL.
Course title: RESEARCH PLANNING AND REPORT WRITING Lecture 1 Introduction to postgraduate research.
GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)
GRS Information Session
Presented by: Frank Nieboer
Responsible Conduct of Research at The University of Queensland
IIASA Governance Review
Quality Assurance and Enhancement at The University of Edinburgh
Safety Accountabilities
Postgraduate Research Student Supervision
Setting Actuarial Standards
HDR Supervisor Induction
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Research Integrity & RMIT
Roles and Responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

Research ethics and responsible research at UniSA Presented By: Prof Ian Richards Dr Mark Hochman

National Statement and the Code National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research 2007National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research The purpose of the National Statement is to promote ethical human research. Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research The purpose of the code is to guide institutions and researchers in responsible research practices and promote integrity in research. Mawson Institute Sansom Institute

National Statement The revised NS includes provision for institutions to establish different levels of ethical review for research with different levels of risk: o 'negligible risk' - no foreseeable risk of harm or discomfort and any foreseeable risk is no more than inconvenience. o 'low risk' - the only foreseeable risk is discomfort. o 'more than low risk' - the foreseeable risk is more than discomfort. Mawson Institute Hawke Research Institute for Sustainable Scieties

National Statement University Response: Established the National Statement Steering Committee responsible for: o overseeing the development of an ethical review structure providing for different levels of ethical review for research with different levels of risk; o managing the implementation of an online research ethics approval system; o ensuring that the University is positioned to meet the requirements of the National Statement; and o overseeing the changes to current Human Research Ethics Committee business processes. Mawson Institute

Ethical Review Applications which qualify as E1 will be reviewed by the Chair or Deputy Chair of HREC. Applications which qualify as E2 will be reviewed by a panel consisting of the Chair or Deputy Chair of HREC, an academic staff member with relevant qualifications and research experience and an external member of HREC. Applications which qualify as E3 must be reviewed by UniSA’s HREC. Course approvals - umbrella ethics approvals for courses in which a cohort of students undertake short duration research projects. Mawson Institute

Research Ethics Advisors (REAs) Provide a local level of advice and assistance to researchers; Conduct local seminars/ workshops on research ethics and research conduct. Provide a communication conduit between their local area and UniSA’s HREC Provide input to the formulation of new policies and procedures Facilitate greater communication between elements and the ethics committees. Be available to serve on the Panel for Expedited Review ( Level 2) for applications from their local grouping and to serve on HREC as required. Mawson Institute

Training Training program for REAs Program for Supervisors and HDR students Collaborative project. o An overview of ethics and integrity in research with humans o Ethical considerations for specific research methods and approaches o Applying for HREC approval Mawson Institute

Australian Code The Code replaces the Joint NHMRC/AVCC Statement and Guidelines on Research Practice (1997). Endorsed by the NHMRC, ARC and Universities Australia. The Code advocates and describes best practice in research for researchers and institutions, as well as setting out a framework for handling breaches of the Code. Mawson Institute

Australian Code The Code is in two parts: o Part A advocates and describes best practice for both institutions and researchers. o Part B provides a framework for handling breaches of the Code and research misconduct. Mawson Institute

Australian Code The Code specifies; o Responsibilities of institutions and o Responsibilities of researchers Main topics addressed: o Management of research data and primary materials o Supervision of research trainees o Publication and dissemination of research findings o Authorship o Peer review o Conflicts of interest o Collaborative research across institutions Mawson Institute

Australian Code What is “research”? o The Code defines “research” as original investigation undertaken to gain knowledge, understanding and insight. o It is broad: there is no simple, single way to define research for all disciplines. Mawson Institute

Publication of Research Findings Researchers have a responsibility to their colleagues and the wider community to disseminate a full account of their research as broadly as possible. The account should be complete, and, where applicable, include negative findings and results contrary to their hypotheses. Mawson Institute

Publication of Research Findings Researchers must, where feasible, also provide research participants with an appropriate summary of the research results. Researchers must take all reasonable steps to ensure that their findings are accurate and properly reported. If they become aware of misleading or inaccurate statements about their work, they must correct the record as soon as possible. Mawson Institute

Publication of Research Findings It is not acceptable to include the same research findings in several publications o except in rare circumstances eg review articles, anthologies, collections, or translations into another language. A publication must include information on all sources of financial and in-kind support for the research and any potential conflicts of interest. Researchers must acknowledge the host institution and funding sources of the research. Mawson Institute

New Governance Framework University Response: The Code requires that institutions provide an appropriate research governance framework through which research is assessed for 'quality, safety, privacy, risk management, financial management and accountabilities of those who play a part in research'. Establishment of Research Integrity, Accountability and Compliance Committee (RIACC). Mawson Institute

New Governance Framework What is RIACC and what does it do? An overarching committee reporting to Academic Board. Oversees research ethics, integrity and compliance issues and deal with those that require an institutional response. Responsible for overseeing incorporation of the National Statement and Australian Code requirements Mawson Institute

Governance Framework endorsed by Academic Board in March 2008

RIACC: Terms of Reference To promote the responsible conduct of research and ensure that the institution has in place policies and processes which meet the requirements of the Australian Code. To monitor institutional compliance with appropriate legislation and codes governing research ethics, integrity and safety. Mawson Institute Sansom Institute

RIACC: Terms of Reference To monitor the provision of training and education programs and other resources, to ensure University staff and students are aware of compliance and accountability requirements arising from adherence to national research ethics, integrity and safety legislation and codes. To approve annual research ethics and safety reports as required by legislation prior to submission to external regulatory bodies. Mawson Institute Institute for Telecommunications Research

RIACC: Membership Prof Caroline McMillen, Deputy VC, Research and Innovation (Inaugural Chair) Prof Ian Richards, Chair HREC and Chair NS Steering Committee Prof Mary Barton, Chair, Institutional Biosafety Committee and Animal Ethics Liaison Committee Dr Euan Smith, Chair, Chemical Hazards Sub-Committee Dr Mark Hochman, Director: Research and Innovation Services Prof Nanthi Bolan, Acting Dean of Graduate Studies Representative, Advisors on Research Integrity (to be appointed) Prof Patrick James, Representative of the Heads of School Assoc Prof Pat Buckley, Representative of the Deans of Research Mr Mark Gladigau, Acting Director, Human Resources Ms Vicki Allen, Ethics and Compliance Officer (Executive Officer) Mawson Institute

National Statement Implementation Timeline: Governance o New Governance framework approved March 2008 o RIACC held its first meeting 18 April 2008 o Change current policies and procedures to ensure compliance: End 2008 o Appointment of Research Ethics Advisors: September 2008 o Establishment of Reference Group of senior researchers: June/July Mawson Institute

National Statement Communication and Education o HDR workshops held in February 2008 o Monthly Research EDGE newsletter implemented o REA training and workshops: October 2008 o Supervisor training developed: End of 2008, and roll out Processes and Systems o Online Ethics Approval System: mid Mawson Institute