Materials  Wiki 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

PORTFOLIO.
Regional Implementation Grant: 5 Districts in ESD 189 Cooperating.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
WELCOME – RIG 2 - Session 1 September, 2012 OESD 114 RIG 2 - Session 1.
Decision Making Process It is essential that teams have a clearly defined process for making decisions before and during the course of their work. It should.
ESD 112 Professional Growth Cycle
LCFF & LCAP PTO Presentation April, 2014 TEAM Charter School.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared to each.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
HANCOCK CENTRAL SCHOOL INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM SEPTEMBER 14, 2012.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Teacher Certification Next Steps……. How certification works within your current practice Student Growth Criterion 3: Recognizing individual student learning.
© 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Teacher/Principal Evaluation Overview (Digging a bit deeper) April 19, 2011 Dana Anderson, ESD 113 Teaching and Learning.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Session Materials  Wiki 
Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Legislative Update Michaela Miller TPEP Program Manager OSPI TPEP RIG Update March 15th, 2012 Jim Koval TPEP Program.
Session Materials  Wiki 
SCHOOL ADVISORY COUNCIL TRAINING  A group intended to represent the broad school community and those persons closest to the students who will.
June 4,  Why are we spending time discussing elements of effective group work ?  Effective and collaborative group work requires an intentional.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation A new frontier….
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
November Regional Cohort Teacher and Principal Evaluation November 15, 2011.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
GARDEN CITY DISTRICT LEADERSHIP November 6, 2012.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
ISLLC Standard #2 Supporting Teacher Learning Name Workshop Facilitator.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Session Materials  Wiki
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Entry Task As you enter, please take a moment to place a blue dot on the continuum on the wall that represents your perception of the following: Consider.
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
Materials  Wiki 
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.
Washington State’s Professional Certification The Big Picture (reminder : ) Everett Public Schools Pre-Assessment Seminar
Materials  Wiki 
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Teacher Evaluation Committee November 29,
Materials  Wiki 
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:
District PLC Leadership Team Meeting July 31,
Gary Kipp, Executive Director Association of Washington School Principals Dr. Michael Starosky, Asst. Superintendent, Chief of Schools Seattle School District.
Student Growth 2.0 NCESD Fellows November 17 th,
Evaluation Updates.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Materials  Wiki 

Agreements  Be present. Stay focused on meeting/task, avoid distractions ( ), attend meetings, if absent, accept work of group. Support decisions of the group.  Participate actively. Ask/answer questions, share connections, listen, do you homework and be prepared.  Invite and welcome contributions of every member. If conflict occurs, address respectfully. Assume best intentions.  Work together as a community toward our common goal of student growth and improvement.  Start (12:15) and end (3:30) on time. 2

Outcomes 3 As a group, we will:  Priority: Work to reach consensus on instructional framework selection.  Draft a timeline for TPEP work and decision making.  Begin to map out an action plan, including a communications plan.

Agenda 4 Reconnect Working agreements Decision-making process: instructional framework Timeline/action plan Communications plan Next steps

TPEP Core Principles 1. The critical importance of teacher and leadership quality 2. The professional nature of teaching and leading a school 3. The complex relationship between the system for teacher and principal evaluation and district systems and negotiations 4. The belief in professional learning as an underpinning of the new evaluation system 5. The understanding that the career continuum must be addressed in the new evaluation system 6. The system must determine the balance of “inputs or acts” and “outputs or results” 5

Changes in Teacher & Principal Evaluation Criteria Current Teacher Evaluation Criteria New Teacher Evaluation Criteria 1.Instructional skill 2.Classroom management 3.Professional preparation and scholarship 4.Effort toward improvement when needed 5.Handling of student discipline and attendant problems 6.Interest in teaching pupils 7.Knowledge of subject matter 1.Centering instruction on high expectations for student achievement 2.Demonstrating effective teaching practices 3.Recognizing individual student learning needs and developing strategies to address those needs 4.Providing clear and intentional focus on subject matter content and curriculum 5.Fostering and managing a safe, positive learning environment 6.Using multiple student data elements to modify instruction and improve student learning 7.Communicating with parents and school community 8.Exhibiting collaborative and collegial practices focus on improving instructional practice and student learning Current Principal Evaluation Criteria New Principal Evaluation Criteria 1.Knowledge of, experience in, and training in recognizing good professional performance, capabilities and development 2.School administration and management 3.School finance 4.Professional preparation and scholarship 5.Effort toward improvement when needed 6.Interest in pupils, employees, patrons and subjects taught in school 7.Leadership 8.Ability and performance of evaluation of school personnel 1.Creating a school culture that promotes the ongoing improvement of learning and teaching for students and staff 2.Providing for school safety 3.Leads development, implementation and evaluation of a data-driven plan for increasing student achievement, including the use of multiple student data elements 4.Assisting instructional staff with alignment of curriculum, instruction and assessment with state and local district learning goals 5.Monitoring, assisting, and evaluating effective instruction and assessment practices 6.Managing both staff and fiscal resources to support student achievement and legal responsibilities 7.Partnering with the school community to promote student learning 8.Demonstrating commitment to closing the achievement gap 6

Instructional Framework Decision Making Process 8

Two Basic Models of Decision Making 1. Sufficient Consensus: a meeting of the minds where every member of the group is given the opportunity to participate in the discussion and decision. Everyone may not fully like the decision but everyone is willing to support it fully. 1. Majority Rule - Half plus one decides. This facilitates the easiest and quickest decision-making. However, it can also put team unity to the test. In the event the team cannot reach sufficient consensus, this is a way to make a final decision in order to meet an absolute deadline

Sufficient consensus means that: 1. All participants contribute. 1. Differences viewed as helpful rather than as a hindrance. 1. Anyone can paraphrase an issue. 1. Everyone has an opportunity to describe his/her feelings about an interest/issue. 1. Those who continue to disagree may indicate publicly that they are willing to go along for an experimental try for a prescribed period of time. 1. All share in the final decision.

Consensus does not mean: 1. A unanimous vote. 2. Everyone’s first choice. 3. That everyone agrees, rather that enough are in favor to get the decision carried out. 4. Avoiding conflict or overcoming resistance in the short run

Proposed Consensus Definition We have arrived at consensus when all points of view have been heard, and the will of the group is evident— even to those who oppose it. 12

Important: Silence is not agreement! 3.1.6

Ways to Indicate Sufficient Consensus  Thumb System - Up is yes, down is no and sideways is either an undecided or a sign that it meets the minimum requirement; however the team should continue the discussion and/or proceed with extreme caution in the event more than one person has voted sideways.  Fist to Five System - This is a system to indicate degrees of agreement or disagreement. A hand raised with all five fingers up indicates full agreement. A fist with no fingers raises indicates complete disagreement. Less than five fingers raised indicates various degrees of agreement. If the indication is mixed, continue the discussion

Hopes Group 1  That our system will be meaningful.  That our system will be positive and support growth.  That our system leads to student growth. Group 2  Growth is positive  Professional learning  Student-focused Group 3  Positive collaboration  Quality  Professional growth 15

Concerns Group 1  That our system cannot become bureaucratic.  Short timelines, sufficient training.  Growth component is dependent on the makeup of students. Group 2  Narrow focus  missed opportunities Group 3  Student growth  Time/training  Overwhelmed by unknown and detail 16

Essential Questions Which framework will be meaningful and support student growth? Which framework will positively support professional learning, growth and collaboration? Which framework best addresses our concerns about timelines and training? Which framework best addresses our concerns about the unknown and amount of detail? 17

Process 1. Individually highlight pros and cons on your notes for CEL framework. 1. Split into four groups and discuss your notes. 1. Create chart that captures the pros and cons for the framework. 1. Repeat process for Danielson and Marzano frameworks. 18

Essential Questions Which framework will be meaningful and support student growth? Which framework will positively support professional learning, growth and collaboration? Which framework best addresses our concerns about timelines and training? Which framework best addresses our concerns about the unknown and amount of detail? 19

Proposed Consensus Definition We have arrived at consensus when all points of view have been heard, and the will of the group is evident— even to those who oppose it. 20

Timelines and Action Plan 21

RIG Work

Communication Planning 23  Which stakeholders need to be engaged this month?  What information do they need?  How will that information be communicated?

Communicating our Values “Value” is at the root of the word “evaluation.” What we evaluate needs to come from what we value as a community. Student Learning Educator Growth

Agreements  Be present. Stay focused on meeting/task, avoid distractions ( ), attend meetings, if absent, accept work of group. Support decisions of the group.  Participate actively. Ask/answer questions, share connections, listen, do you homework and be prepared.  Invite and welcome contributions of every member. If conflict occurs, address respectfully. Assume best intentions.  Work together as a community toward our common goal of student growth and improvement.  Start (12:15) and end (3:30) on time. 25

Whip Around and Plus/Delta Debrief  One word summary of the day  Take a few minutes and create at least two sticky notes for the Plus/Delta Chart on your way out.  Plus: What was a real “plus” of today’s session? What went well and should be repeated?  Delta: Where is there room for improvement and change? 26