IDEA 2004 Implementation. Overview of Implementation Process Purpose of the Guidance Memo Sets Forth What Districts Must Do as of July 1, 2005 No Policy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Guidelines for IDEA Implementation Developed and Presented through Collaborative Efforts RIDE – Office of Special Populations Rhode Island Technical.
Advertisements

Procedural Safeguards
Updates in IDEA NCLB is the symbol of the paradigm shift to a new mission of universal high achievement From: All children will have universal access.
BIE SPECIAL EDUCATION ACADEMY PRESENTERS: JUDY WILEY AND NARCY KAWON I ntroduction to Procedural Safeguards Bureau of Indian Education.
Families as Partners Training
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
IDEIA Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004.
Discipline Under the IDEA Tulsa Public Schools Special Education and Student Services Presenter: Cheryl Henry August, 2011.
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
MN CIMP 2012 COMPLIANCE FOR PARTS OF THE IEP. Compliance Self-Check.
1 The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004) Implementation Training Spring/Summer 2005.
What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
Yes No Is the student 18 years old or older? ? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart.
Procedural Safeguards Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Discipline of Students with Disabilities under IDEA 2004 October 2007.
1 PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS. 2 Texas Education Agency provides Notice of Procedural Safeguards Rights of Parents of Students with Disabilities Download this.
Legal and Ethical Issues
Surrogate Parent Training Presenter: Title: District: Date: Presented by:
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
Disciplining Students with Disabilities Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
SPECIAL EDUCATION: Practical Tips About IEPs and Expulsion Hearings
1 Behavior, Discipline and Students with Disabilities IDEA 2004 Provisions.
NC Policies Governing Services for Children with Disabilities – Administrator Updates Iredell-Statesville Schools March 2009.
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
DISCIPLINE & DUE PROCESS 2007 Changes to NYS’ Special Education Laws and Regulations.
PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT. 11/10/05 22 Parent Involvement2 A parent is… (300.30)  Natural or adoptive parent of a child  A foster parent  A guardian but.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
The SOPM Standard Operating Procedures Manual Highlights.
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 Las Cruces Public Schools Technical Assistance Training Department of Learning, Teaching and Research.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Behavior, Discipline and Students with Disabilities
Text, Chapter 11, Pages and Indiana’s Procedural Safeguards MEAGHAN WHEDON, KATIE SMITH, & RACHEL COHEN Procedural Safeguards Part 1.
IDEA 2004 Procedural Safeguards: Legal Rights and Options Mississippi Association of School Superintendent Spring, Mississippi Department of Education.
1 Supplemental Regulations to 34 CFR Part 300 Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with.
INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION IMPROVEMENT ACT: SELECTED HIGHLIGHTS OF THE 2004 REAUTHORIZATION US Department of Education Office of Special Education.
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
2012 Change Documents ARD Process Guide & Notice of Procedural Safeguards.
Procedural Safeguards. Purpose Guarantee parents both an opportunity for meaningful input into all decisions affecting their child’s education and the.
Discipline Part 201. The same disciplinary procedures that apply to all students apply to students with disabilities. However, there are additional requirements.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act 2004.
Enrollment Determination Colorado Charter School Institute BOOT CAMP September 1, 2015.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004) For Families and Advocates Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Other Related Processes and Concepts Module – Revised July, 2010.
1 McKinney-Vento and Special Education  Overview  Revocation of Consent  FAQ’s  Resources.
Revoking Consent for Special Education Services COSA Fall Special Education Conference October 2009 Rae Ann Ray Office of Student Learning & Partnerships.
DISCIPLINE OF STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES DISCIPLINE OF STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES By Jason H. Ballum Reed Smith LLP 901 E. Byrd Street Suite 1700 Richmond,
The New IDEA: Major Changes Presentation to the Charter Schools Summit November 7, 2006 Nancy Reder, Esq. Deputy Executive Director NASDSE.
Required Services, Procedures, and Data Presented by Scott Hall 2009 Special Education Fall Conference Suspension & Expulsion.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 IDEA 2004 Part B Regulations: Critical Issues Margaret.
1 IDEA REAUTHORIZATION PRESENTATION OF COMPLAINT A district must have a procedure that gives any party the opportunity to present a complaint.
A Fresh IDEA:A Discussion of the New 2004 IDEA Regulations and Article IX Lynn R. Zubov, Ph.D NC CAN Coordinator Winston-Salem State University NC CEC.
SURROGATE PARENT Information for Local District Administration.
The New IDEA in Special Education
2/23/06 SURROGATE PARENT TRAINING Laurie VanderPloeg Kent ISD.
West Virginia Department of Education Introducing ……. Policy 2419: Regulations for the Education of Students with Exceptionalities.
I ntroduction to Procedural Safeguards Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Individualized Education Programs Evaluations and Reevaluations.
Required Services and Procedures for Students with Disabilities Presented by Scott Hall and Ty Manieri 2010 Oregon Special Education Fall Conference Eugene,
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Discipline.
Procedural Safeguards
Understanding the Section 504 Process
Understanding the Section 504 Process
A Guide to Understanding Rights and Responsibilities
? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart
Presentation transcript:

IDEA 2004 Implementation

Overview of Implementation Process Purpose of the Guidance Memo Sets Forth What Districts Must Do as of July 1, 2005 No Policy Determinations If NJ Rules are Superceded, the New Provisions are Set Forth in the Memo If NJ Rules are Not Superceded, They are Generally Not Part of the Memo

Overview (continued) Key Provisions Where NJ Rules are Not Superceded are Discussed in the Memo to Avoid Confusion. These Include: Amendment of IEP Excusal from Meetings Objectives and Benchmarks Transition

Overview (continued) Rulemaking Process: Analyzing Input First Discussion and Pre-Proposal in October Completion Date June 2006 Policy Determinations Will be Made Here All Parts of the Regulations are Being Reviewed 2 Comment Periods Plus Input From Variety of Sources (Districts, Organizations, Parents and Parent Advocacy Groups)

Overview (continued) Categories of Provisions Of IDEA 2004 For Rulemaking Purposes Areas Where State Rules Conflict With IDEA 2004 Rules Must Be Changed Areas Where State Rules Exceed or Provide Additional Protections/Services Rules Can Be Retained or Amended Areas Where There is No Federal Provision Can Amend as Deemed Appropriate e.g. Programs and Instruction

Overview (continued) The Department Has Requested Input With Respect to All Areas In IDEA 2004 Including: Excusal From Meetings Amendment of IEPs Without A Meeting Short-Term Objectives/Benchmarks Paperwork Reduction Pilot 3 Year IEP Pilot Regulatory Barriers to Inclusive Education

Overview (continued) Notice of Proposed Rule Making from USDOE Published June 21, 2005 Proposed Changes Only Cannot Rely on or Follow Them Now Indicates How USDOE MIGHT Interpret Certain Parts of IDEA in Final Rules in December Can be Found at: EPARTMENT.cfm EPARTMENT.cfm Comments On the Proposed Regulations are Due September 6, 2005

Highly Qualified Teacher Requirements Effective December 3, 2004 Requirements For Special Education Teachers Full State Certification No Licensure Requirements Waived on Emergency, Temporary or Provisional Basis

Highly Qualified Teacher Requirements (Continued) Teaching To Alternate Standards All Students Participating in APA Highly Qualified Requirements Elementary Level Instruction – Meet HQ Requirements for an Elementary Teacher If Instruction is Above the Elementary Level – Appropriate to the Level of Instruction Being Provided Teaching Multiple Subjects For Veteran Teachers, Must Demonstrate Competence In ALL Core Academic Subjects in Which the Teacher is Teaching For New Teachers, Must Demonstrate Competence in Math, Language or Science, and Has 2 Years From the Hire Date to Demonstrate Competence in All Other Areas in Which they are Instructing

Peer Reviewed Research Special Education and Supplementary Aids and Services Must be Based, to the Extent Appropriate, on Peer- Reviewed Research

Assistive Technology Medically Implanted Devices Are Excluded by IDEA 2004

Mandatory Medication of Students Districts are Prohibited from Mandating that Students Obtain a Prescription Districts can Consult and Share Observations Regarding: Performance Behavior Need for an Evaluation

Surrogate Parents and Wards of the State No Consent for Initial Evaluation for a Ward of the State if the Parent Cannot be Found Must Appoint a Surrogate Surrogate Parent Requirements: Reasonable Efforts to Appoint in 30 Days A Judge May Appoint a Surrogate Parent Unaccompanied Homeless Youth Must Have Surrogate Parent Appointed

Excusal From IEP Meetings When a Parent Agrees in Writing, IDEA 2004 Permits Excusal of Team Members in Two Situations When the Team Members Area is Not Being Discussed Mandatory Provision in IDEA 2004 Goes Into Effect July 1, 2005 When the Team Members Area is Being Discussed Permissive Area in IDEA 2004 NJ Regulations Exceed IDEA 2004 DOES NOT Go Into Effect Unless New Jersey Regulations Are Amended

Academic Achievement and Functional Performance Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance Statement Replaced PLEP for IEPs Developed on or After July 1, 2005 Also Must Include Measurable Annual Academic and Functional Goals in IEPs Developed on or after July 1, 2005

Benchmarks or Short-Term Objectives IDEA 2004 Permits Elimination of Benchmarks or Short-Term Objectives as a Requirement for IEPs, Except for Those for Students Participating in the APA New Jersey Regulations Exceed IDEA 2004 Benchmarks and Short-Term Objectives Are Still Required in All IEPs, Unless New Jersey Regulations are Amended

Amendment of IEP Without Meeting IDEA 2004 Permits Amendment of IEPs Without a Meeting if the Parent Consents New Jersey Regulations Exceed IDEA 2004 in this Area and Do Not Permit Amendment of IEPs Without a Meeting No Amendment of IEPs in New Jersey Unless Our Regulations Are Amended

Students Transitioning From Part C At the Request of the Parent, the District Must Invite the Part C Services Coordinator to the Initial IEP Meeting

Transfer Students Current Regulations: A Student Must Receive a Consistent Program Until the District: Adopts the Current IEP or Develops a New IEP IDEA 2004: A Student Must Receive a Comparable Program Until: For an In-State Transfer: The District Adopts the Students Current IEP or Develop a New IEP For an Out-of-State Transfer: The District Must Develop a New IEP The New Requirements are Effective for Transfers on or After July 1, 2005 Also, Must Promptly Seek Records for Transfer Students

Transition IDEA 2004 Raised the Age to 16 New Jersey Exceeds IDEA 2004 and Requires Transition at Age 14 For IEPs for Students Age 16 or Older: Set Forth Appropriate Measurable Post- Secondary Goals Related to Training, Education, Employment, Life Skills For IEPs for Students Age 14 or Younger, Follow Standard in NJ Rules

Graduation or Exceeding Age of Eligibility IDEA 2004 Requires a Written Summary of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance Also Must Provide Recommendations in Meeting the Students Post- Secondary Goals

Assessment in Appropriate Language or Form Instead of Native Language, Assess in Language or Form Most Likely to Yield Accurate Information Already Part of the NJ Definition of Native Language. (IEP Team Determines Students Language) IDEA 2004 Clarifies That A Students Language is the Language or Form Most Likely to Provide Accurate Information

Specific Learning Disability Can Still Use Severe Discrepancy IDEA 2004 Allows Districts to Choose to Use a Response to Scientifically Based Interventions (RTI) Methodology

Consent Provisions in IDEA 2004 IDEA 2004 Clarifies that a District May NOT go to Due Process to Compel Consent for Implementation of a Students Initial IEP No Denial of FAPE No Violation of Child-Find

Reevaluations IDEA 2004 Not More Than 1 Time Per Year UNLESS Parent and District Agree 3 Year Evaluation Can Be Waived by the District and Parent

Equitable Participation Services District Where School Is Located Required to Provide the Services According to IDEA 2004 Implementing All Requirements Now Except: Notified USDOE That the District of Residence Will Provide Services for the School Year So Needed Data Can Be Acquired Data Will Be Collected in the December 1 Count Other New Requirements Are In Place Now Consultation With Private Schools Located Within District Appeals to State and USDOE

Dispute Resolution Separate Guidance Significant Changes to the Due Process System: 2 Year Period to File 90 Days to Appeal Answers and Notice (10 Days) Objection to Notice (15 Days, 5 to Decide) Amendment (Agreement or ALJ)

Dispute Resolution (Continued) Resolution Session 30 Days (Schedule within 15) Mandatory unless Agree to Mediation or Both Parties Waive it Resolution Session Discussions Not Confidential Legally Binding Agreement 3 Days to Void Agreement Enforceable in Court No Due Process to Contest Whether Teacher is HQ Attorney Fees for Districts (Frivolous, Harass, Delay) Still Have Emergency Relief Expedited Hearing in 20 School Days, Decision in 10

Discipline Effective July 2005 Unique Circumstances A district Can Consider Unique Circumstances When Deciding Whether to Impose Discipline for Violating a Code of Conduct Manifestation Determination Caused By, Or Was in Direct and Substantial Relationship to the Students Disability, or Direct Result of Failure to Implement IEP

Discipline (Continued) When Conduct is a Manifestation Must Conduct Functional Behavioral Assessment Develop or Review Behavior Intervention Plan Special Circumstances: Can Remove a Student to an Interim Alternative Educational Setting (IAES) for 45 School Days for offenses involving: Drugs Weapons Serious Bodily Injury (Definition Was Added Also) School Days: Any Day Students Attend School

Discipline (Continued) Authority of Hearing Officer Can Place in Interim Alternative Educational Setting for Not More Than 45 School Days for dangerousness Can Seek Additional 45 Days Placement During Appeals IAES Until the Case is Decided or the Period of the Ordered Removal, Whichever Occurs First

Discipline (Continued) Basis of Knowledge Parent Expressed Concern in Writing Parent Requested an Evaluation Teacher or LEA Staff Expressed Specific Concerns