9/14/06- S. DyeNOW 20061 A Deep Ocean Anti-Neutrino Observatory An Introduction to the Science Potential of Hanohano Presented by Steve Dye University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MINOS+ Starts April 2013 for three years April
Advertisements

Geoneutrinos Mark Chen Queen’s University
1 Geo-Neutrinos : a new probe of Earth’s interior What is the amount of U, Th and 40 K in the Earth? What is the amount of U, Th and 40 K in the Earth?
6/6/2003Jonathan Link, Columbia U. NuFact03 Future Measurement of sin 2 2  13 at Nuclear Reactors Jonathan Link Columbia University June 6, 2003 ′03.
A Deep Ocean Anti-Neutrino Observatory
Geoneutrinos and heat production in the Earth
Experimental Status of Geo-reactor Search with KamLAND Detector
New Ideas in Long Range Reactor Monitoring with Neutrinos John G. Learned and Stephen T. Dye Dept. of Physics and Astronomy University of Hawaii.
20 January 2005Steve Dye, HPU1 Neutrino Geophysics in Hawaii Presentation by Steve Dye Associate Professor of Physics Hawaii Pacific University January.
November 19, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz Physics of Atmospheric Neutrinos: Perspectives for the Future Topical Workshop on Physics at Henderson DUSEL Fort.
Neutrino Physics - Lecture 6 Steve Elliott LANL Staff Member UNM Adjunct Professor ,
Experimental Status of Geo-reactor Search with KamLAND Detector
Reactor & Accelerator Thanks to Bob McKeown for many of the slides.
Results and Future of the KamLAND Experiment
29 May 2007Aspen1 An Introduction to the Science, Technology and Status Steve Dye, John Learned, Bill McDonough, John Mahoney University of Hawaii at Manoa.
S. Dye /15/05 Neutrino Geophysics Workshop 1 Hawaii Anti-Neutrino Observatory For the Hanohano collaboration: Steve Dye University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Geoneutrino Overview 1.Review of Geoneutrino Physics (with KamLAND)
Exploring the Geo-reactor Hypothesis with Neutrinos Jelena Maričić KamLAND Collaboration March 24 th 2007 DOANOW Workshop University of Hawai’i.
Taking a picture of the Earth’s Interior with Geoneutrinos Honolulu, HI 12/15/2005 Kathrin A. Hochmuth MPI für Physik München.
Measuring  13 with Reactors Stuart Freedman University of California at Berkeley SLAC Seminar September 29, 2003.
Low-energy neutrino physics with KamLAND Tadao Mitsui (Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku U.) for the KamLAND collaboration Now2010, Grand Hotel.
Hanohano Mikhail Batygov, University of Hawaii, October 4, 2007, Hamamatsu, Japan, NNN’07.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
Antineutrino, geoneutrinos and heat production in the Earth
Jun Cao Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment 3rd International Conference on Flavor Physics, Oct. 3-8, 2005 National.
Geoneutrino collaborators: - John Learned : University of Hawaii - Steve Dye: Hawaii Pacific University Geophysics tells us where we are at today Geochemistry.
1 LENA Low Energy Neutrino Astronomy NOW 2010, September 6, 2010 Lothar Oberauer, TUM, Physik-Department.
Pieter Mumm and Karsten Heeger January 10, 2012 Search for Sterile Neutrinos with Reactor Antineutrinos An Opportunity for NIST?
Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
Geo-neutrino Working Group Goals and Progress 10 December CIDER Workshop.
KamLAND : Studying Neutrinos from Reactor Atsuto Suzuki KamLAND Collaboration KEK : High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
Using Reactor Anti-Neutrinos to Measure sin 2 2θ 13 Jonathan Link Columbia University Fermilab Long Range Planning Committee, Neutrino Session November.
1 A roadmap for geo-neutrinos: theory and experiment Ferrara University & INFN Gianni Fiorentini arXiv:
Karsten M. Heeger US Reactor  13 Meeting, March 15, 2004 Comparison of Reactor Sites and  13 Experiments Karsten Heeger LBNL.
1 Geo-Neutrinos : a new probe of Earth’s interior What is the amount of U, Th and 40 K in the Earth? What is the amount of U, Th and 40 K in the Earth?
νeνe νeνe νeνe νeνe νeνe νeνe Distance (L/E) Probability ν e 1.0 ~1800 meters 3 MeV) Reactor Oscillation Experiment Basics Unoscillated flux observed.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
Present and future detectors for Geo-neutrinos: Borexino and LENA Applied Antineutrino Physics Workshop APC, Paris, Dec L. Oberauer, TU München.
Kr2Det: TWO - DETECTOR REACTOR NEUTRINO OSCILLATION EXPERIMENT AT KRASNOYARSK UNDERGROUND SITE L. Mikaelyan for KURCHATOV INSTITUTE NEUTRINO GROUP.
L. Oberauer, Paris, June 2004   Measurements at Reactors Neutrino 2004 CdF, Paris, June chasing the missing mixing angle.
Geo-neutrino: Experiments Jelena Maricic Drexel University Neutrino Champagne – LowNu2009 October 20, 2009 BNO.
Karsten Heeger, LBNL TAUP03, September 7, 2003 Reactor Neutrino Measurement of  13 Karsten M. Heeger Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Results for the Neutrino Mixing Angle  13 from RENO International School of Nuclear Physics, 35 th Course Neutrino Physics: Present and Future, Erice/Sicily,
Geoneutrinos, JinPing and the Earth Bill McDonough, *Scott Wipperfurth *Yu Huang and + Ondřej Šrámek Geology, U Maryland Fabio Mantovani and *Virginia.
Why measure Geoneutrinos: the Earth's Heat Budget
Neutrinos from the sun, earth and SN’s: a brief excursion Aldo IFAE 2006 Pavia April 19 th.
The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment R. D. McKeown Caltech On Behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration CIPANP 2009.
Antineutrino Physics in KamLAND Atsuto Suzuki High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) 1. KamLAND Experiment 2. Reactor Antineutrino Oscillation.
An Introduction to the Science Potential of Hanohano Presented by John G. Learned University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Low Q (10 ppb U) Med. Q (20 ppb U) High Q (30 ppb U) 14±8 TNU Bellini et al 2013 Mantle flux: need for Hanohano 13 TW 3-8 TW Depleted MORB Mantle 6-10.
Karsten Heeger Beijing, January 18, 2003 Design Considerations for a  13 Reactor Neutrino Experiment with Multiple Detectors Karsten M. Heeger Lawrence.
Geoneutrinos: applications, future directions and defining the Earth’s engine Bill McDonough, *Yu Huang + Ondřej Šrámek and Roberta Rudnick Geology, U.
Double Chooz Near Detector Guillaume MENTION CEA Saclay, DAPNIA/SPP Workshop AAP 2007 Friday, December 14 th, 2007
Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment On behalf of the DayaBay collaboration Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Joseph ykHor YuenKeung,
Measuring  13 with Reactors Stuart Freedman HEPAP July 24, 2003 Bethesda Reactor Detector 1Detector 2 d2d2 d1d1.
  Measurement with Double Chooz IDM chasing the missing mixing angle e  x.
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
Reference Earth model: heat-producing elements & geoneutrino flux *Yu Huang, Roberta Rudnick, and Bill McDonough Geology, U Maryland *Slava Chubakov, Fabio.
Solar Neutrino Results from SNO
Perspectives for geoneutrinos after KamLAND results based on work with L. Carmignani, G. Fiorentini, T. Lasserre, M. Lissia, B. Ricci, S. Schoenert, R.
Geoneutrinos and the composition of the Earth Bill McDonough, Yu Huang and Ondřej Šrámek Geology, U Maryland Steve Dye, Natural Science, Hawaii Pacific.
Present and future of Geo-neutrinos Bill McDonough Geology, U Maryland.
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
Results on  13 Neutrino Oscillations from Reactor Experiments Soo-Bong Kim (KNRC, Seoul National University) “INPC 2013, Firenze, June 2-7, 2013”
Double Chooz Experiment Status Jelena Maricic, Drexel University (for the Double Chooz Collaboration) September, 27 th, SNAC11.
Geoneutrinos Next step of geoneutrino research Leonid Bezrukov Valery Sinev INR, Moscow 2014.
Can we image it with geonus? What’s hidden in the mantle?
Current Results from Reactor Neutrino Experiments
Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment
Presentation transcript:

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW A Deep Ocean Anti-Neutrino Observatory An Introduction to the Science Potential of Hanohano Presented by Steve Dye University of Hawaii at Manoa Hawaii Pacific University

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW Outline Neutrino Geophysics –U/Th mantle flux –Th/U ratio –Geo-reactor search Neutrino Oscillation Physics –Mixing angles θ 12 and θ 13 –Mass squared difference Δm 2 31 –Mass hierarchy

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW Hawaii Anti-Neutrino Observatory † Location flexibility –Far from continental crust and reactors for neutrino geophysics- Hawaii –Offshore of reactor for neutrino oscillation physics- California, Taiwan Technological issues being addressed –Scintillating oil studies: P = 450 atm., T = 0°C –Implosion studies at sea –Engineering studies of detector structure, deployment † hanohano- Hawaiian for distinguished *

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW Hanohano- 10x “KamLAND” in ocean Construct in shipyard, fill/test in port, tow to site, and submerge to ~4 km

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW Preliminary reference Earth model Knowledge of Earth interior from seismology Dziewonski and Anderson, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 25 (1981)

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW Bulk silicate Earth model Knowledge of Earth composition largely model dependent. “Standard Model” based on 3 meteorite samples. McDonough and Sun, Chemical Geology 120 (1995)

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW Terrestrial heat flow: TW Hofmeister and Criss, Tectonophysics 395 (2005) Pollack, Hurter, and Johnson, Reviews of Geophysics 31(3) (1993) Present controversy over hydrothermal flow

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW Geo-neutrinos- parent spectrum thorium chain uranium chain Threshold for Reines and Cowan coincidence technique prompt delayed No direction or K neutrinos yet

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW Predicted geo-neutrino signal F. Mantovani et al., Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) BorexinoSNO+KamLAND Hanohano Simulated event source distribution Signal mostly from <500 km Crust dominates on continents Mantle dominates in ocean

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW Geo-ν + background spectra Cosmic ray muons alpha source Radioactive materials fast neutrons spallation products Target Volume μ±μ± μ±μ± Background manageable

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW Hanohano: mantle measurement 15 years of SNO+ 48 years of Borexino 1 year of Hanohano

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW Hanohano: mantle measurement Mantle (ev / 10 kT-y) Hanohano has ultimate sensitivity of <10%. Continental detectors cannot measure the mantle flux to better than 50%. Limiting factor 20% systematic uncertainty in U/Th content. 20% in 1 year

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW Earth Th/U ratio measurement Project crust type δR/R (1 yr exposure) Th/U (1 yr exposure) Years to 10% measurement KamLAND island arc ± 8390 Borexino continental 1.14 ± 4120 SNO+ continental ± Hanohano oceanic ± Statistical uncertainties only; includes reactors

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW Anti-neutrinos from the core? Geo-reactor hypothesis Herndon hypothesis- natural fission reactor in core of Earth P = 1-10 TW Controversial but not ruled out Herndon, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 93 (1996) 646. Hollenbach and Herndon, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 98 (2001)

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW Geo-reactor search Project crust type Power limit 99% CL (TW) 5σ discovery power (TW) KamLAND island arc 2251 Borexino continental 1243 SNO+ continental 922 Hanohano oceanic year run time- statistical uncertainties only Power upper limit Geo-reactor power (TW) ~few TW needed to drive geomagnetic field

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW ν mixing: Reactor neutrinos P ee = 1-{cos 4 (θ 13 )sin 2 (2θ 12 )sin 2 (Δm 2 21 L/4E) + cos 2 (θ 12 )sin 2 (2θ 13 )sin 2 (Δm 2 31 L/4E) + sin 2 (θ 12 )sin 2 (2θ 13 )sin 2 (Δm 2 32 L/4E)} Each amplitude cycles with own frequency ½-cycle measurements –mixing angles, mass-squared differences Multi-cycle measurements –Mixing angles, mass-squared differences –Potential for mass hierarchy

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW Reactor ν mixing parameters: present knowledge KamLAND combined analysis: tan 2 (θ 12 ) = 0.40( / – 0.07) Δm 2 21 =(7.9 ± 0.7) × eV 2 Araki et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) CHOOZ limit: sin 2 (2θ 13 ) ≤ 0.20 Apollonio et al., Eur. Phys. J. C27 (2003) SuperK and K2K: Δm 2 31 =(2.5 ± 0.5) × eV 2 Ashie et al., Phys. Rev. D64 (2005) Aliu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005)

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW ν e flux measurement uncertainty Flux from distant, extended source like Earth or sun is fully mixed P(ν e → ν e ) = 1-0.5{cos 4 (θ 13 )sin 2 (2θ 12 ) + sin 2 (2θ 13 )} = ( /-0.091) Lower value for maximum angles Upper value for minimum angles Φ source = Φ detector /P(ν e → ν e ) Uncertainty is +15%/-6%

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW Suggested ½-cycle θ 12 measurement Reactor experiment- ν e point source P(ν e → ν e ) ≈ 1-sin 2 (2θ 12 )sin 2 (Δm 2 21 L/4E) 60 GW·kT·y exposure at km –~4% systematic error from near detector –sin 2 (θ 12 ) measured with ~2% uncertainty Bandyopadhyay et al., Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) Minakata et al., hep-ph/ Bandyopadhyay et al., hep-ph/

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW Proposed ½-cycle θ 13 measurements Reactor experiment- ν e point source P(ν e → ν e ) ≈ 1-sin 2 (2θ 13 )sin 2 (Δm 2 31 L/4E) Double Chooz, Daya Bay, Reno- measure θ 13 with “identical” near/far detector pair –sin 2 (2θ 13 ) ≤ in few years –Solar and matter insensitive –Challenging systematics Mikaelyan and Sinev, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 62 (1999) Anderson et al., hep-ex/

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW Reactor antineutrino spectra- 50 km 1,2 oscillations with sin 2 (2θ 12 )=0.82 and Δm 2 21 =7.9x10 -5 eV 2 1,3 oscillations with sin 2 (2θ 13 )=0.10 and Δm 2 31 =2.5x10 -3 eV 2 no oscillation oscillations no oscillation oscillations Neutrino energy (MeV) L/E (km/MeV) Distance/energy, L/E Energy, E Plots by jgl

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW Fourier Transform on L/E to Δm 2 Fourier Power, Log Scale Spectrum w/ θ 13 =0 Δm 2 /eV 2 Preliminary- 10 kt-y exposure at 50 km range sin 2 (2θ 13 )≥0.05 Δm 2 31 = eV 2 to % level Learned, Pakvasa, Svoboda, SD preprint in preparation Δm 2 32 < Δm 2 31 normal hierarchy Δm 2 (x10 -2 eV 2 ) Peak due to nonzero θ 13 Includes energy smearing- 3.5%/√E Plots by jgl

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW Neutrino mass hierarchy- reactor neutrinos m3m3 m3m3 m2m2 m1m1 m1m1 m2m2 normalinverted |Δm 2 31 | > |Δm 2 32 ||Δm 2 31 | < |Δm 2 32 | mass Δm 2 32 ≈ (1.00 ± 0.03) Δm 2 31 Petcov and Piai, Phys. Lett. B533 (2001) Exposure and energy resolution are critical for this determination are currently under study

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW Hanohano- candidate reactor sites San Onofre- ~6 GW th Maanshan- ~5 GW th

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW Hanohano- 10 kT-y exposure Neutrino Geophysics- near Hawaii –Mantle flux U/Th geo-neutrinos to ~25% –Measure Th/U ratio to ~20% –Rule out geo-reactor of P > 0.3 TW Neutrino Oscillation Physics- ~60 km by reactor –Measure sin 2 (θ 12 ) to few % w/ standard ½-cycle –Measure sin 2 (2θ 13 ) down to ~ 0.05 w/ multi-cycle –Δm 2 31 at percent level w/ multi-cycle –potential for mass hierarchy if θ 13 >0 without near detector; insensitive to background, systematics; complimentary to Minos, Nova

9/14/06- S. DyeNOW Conclusion Hanohano –10 kT deep ocean anti-neutrino observatory –Movable for multi-disciplinary science Neutrino geophysics Neutrino oscillation physics – Under development at Hawaii; continuing funding from U.S. Department of Defense –1 st collaboration meeting 3/07 Interested?