Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) Cross-Track Infrared Microwave Sounding Suite (CrIMSS) Environmental Data Record Validation Status Nicholas R. Nalli,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 1. FY09 GOES-R3 Project Proposal Title Page Title: Trace Gas and Aerosol Emissions from GOES-R ABI Project Type: GOES-R algorithm development project.
Advertisements

JPSS and GOES-R SST Sasha Ignatov
© The Aerospace Corporation 2014 Observation Impact on WRF Model Forecast Accuracy over Southwest Asia Michael D. McAtee Environmental Satellite Systems.
Characterization of ATMS Bias Using GPSRO Observations Lin Lin 1,2, Fuzhong Weng 2 and Xiaolei Zou 3 1 Earth Resources Technology, Inc.
VIIRS LST Uncertainty Estimation And Quality Assessment of Suomi NPP VIIRS Land Surface Temperature Product 1 CICS, University of Maryland, College Park;
Status of the NOAA Unique CrIS/ATMS Processing System (NUCAPS) Antonia Gambacorta, Walter Wolf, Thomas King, Nick Nalli, Eric Maddy, Xiaozhen Xiong, Flavio.
1 Status of ARM Best Estimate Product CrIS EDR Cal/Val Telecon 7-May-2013 L. Borg, D. Tobin, R. Knuteson, N. R. Nalli with support from our ARM partners.
NGAS CrIS SDR Cal/Val Activity and Highlights Oct 23, 2012 Lihong Wang, Chunming Wang, Denise Hagan and Degui Gu.
60 0 Latitude Longitude The COSMIC Data Analysis and Archival Center- CDAAC ( io.cosmic.ucar.edu/cdaac/products.html)
Requirement: (1) Reduce uncertainty in climate projections through timely information on the forcing and feedbacks contributing to changes in the Earth’s.
Aquarius/SAC-D Mission Validation Working Group Summary Gary Lagerloef 6 th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010.
Recent Progress on High Impact Weather Forecast with GOES ‐ R and Advanced IR Soundings Jun Li 1, Jinlong Li 1, Jing Zheng 1, Tim Schmit 2, and Hui Liu.
Bomin Sun 1,2, A. Reale 2, and M. Divakarla 1,2 (1) I.M. Systems Group, Inc., Rockville, MD (2) NOAA NESDIS Center for Satellite Applications and Research.
Profiling Clouds with Satellite Imager Data and Potential Applications William L. Smith Jr. 1, Douglas A. Spangenberg 2, Cecilia Fleeger 2, Patrick Minnis.
Introduction Land surface temperature (LST) measurement is important for understanding climate change, modeling the hydrological and biogeochemical cycles,
Recent activities on utilization of microwave imager data in the JMA NWP system - Preparation for AMSR2 data assimilation - Masahiro Kazumori Japan Meteorological.
The CrIS Instrument on Suomi-NPP Joel Susskind NASA GSFC Sounder Research Team (SRT) Suomi-NPP Workshop June 21, 2012 Washington, D.C. National Aeronautics.
1 Tropical cyclone (TC) trajectory and storm precipitation forecast improvement using SFOV AIRS soundings Jun Tim Schmit &, Hui Liu #, Jinlong Li.
Justification for CrIMSS EDR Provisional Maturity Presented: Jan. 17, 2013 (updated Jan. 18 th, 2013) Christopher Barnet, CrIMSS EDR Validation and Algorithm.
VALIDATION OF SUOMI NPP/VIIRS OPERATIONAL AEROSOL PRODUCTS THROUGH MULTI-SENSOR INTERCOMPARISONS Huang, J. I. Laszlo, S. Kondragunta,
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 STAR and NPOESS Presented.
Orbit Characteristics and View Angle Effects on the Global Cloud Field
6.4 N2/N6E Project Review 06 Oct 2011 Project: Preparing Tactical Ocean Optical Products for Future Polar- Orbiting Sensors
Intercomparisons of AIRS and NAST retrievals with Dropsondes During P- TOST (Pacific Thorpex Observational System Test) NASA ER-2 NOAA G-IV Dropsonde.
NPP VIIRS Aerosol Products: Overview, early cal/val results, and data assimilation results from NAVDAS-AOD Edward Hyer Naval Research Laboratory JCSDA.
CrIS Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to NPOESS Program restrictions. ITT INDUSTRIES AER BOMEM BALL DRS EDR Algorithms for.
Sounder EDR Cal/Val Hierarchy Nicholas R. Nalli, 1,2 C. D. Barnet, 1 T. Reale, 1 D. Tobin, 3 A. Gambacorta, 1,2 E. S. Maddy, 1,4 E. Joseph, 5 V. R. Morris,
1 Center for S a t ellite A pplications and R esearch (STAR) Applicability of GOES-R AWG Cloud Algorithms for JPSS/VIIRS AMS Annual Meeting Future Operational.
Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) Cross-Track Infrared Microwave Sounding Suite (CrIMSS) Environmental Data Record Validation Status Nicholas R. Nalli,
Hurricane Intensity Estimation from GOES-R Hyperspectral Environmental Suite Eye Sounding Fourth GOES-R Users’ Conference Mark DeMaria NESDIS/ORA-STAR,
1 AISC Workshop May 16-18, 2006 Lesson Learned from CCSP 1.1: Temperature Trends in the Atmosphere Lesson Learned from CCSP 1.1 Temperature Trends in the.
IGARSS 2011, July 24-29, Vancouver, Canada 1 A PRINCIPAL COMPONENT-BASED RADIATIVE TRANSFER MODEL AND ITS APPLICATION TO HYPERSPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING Xu.
Diane E. Wickland NPP Program Scientist NPP Science: HQ Perspective on VIIRS May 18, 2011.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Infrared Temperature and.
1 Scott Zaccheo AER, Inc ASCENDS End-to-End System Performance Assessment: Analysis of Atmospheric State Vector Variability.
1 Using water vapor measurements from hyperspectral advanced IR sounder (AIRS) for tropical cyclone forecast Jun Hui Liu #, Jinlong and Tim.
Advanced Sounder Capabilities- Airborne Demonstration with NAST-I W.L. Smith, D.K. Zhou, and A.M. Larar NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia.
Hyperspectral Infrared Alone Cloudy Sounding Algorithm Development Objective and Summary To prepare for the synergistic use of data from the high-temporal.
Testing LW fingerprinting with simulated spectra using MERRA Seiji Kato 1, Fred G. Rose 2, Xu Liu 1, Martin Mlynczak 1, and Bruce A. Wielicki 1 1 NASA.
AIRS Radiance and Geophysical Products: Methodology and Validation Mitch Goldberg, Larry McMillin NOAA/NESDIS Walter Wolf, Lihang Zhou, Yanni Qu and M.
Intercomparison of OMI NO 2 and HCHO air mass factor calculations: recommendations and best practices A. Lorente, S. Döerner, A. Hilboll, H. Yu and K.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS AIRS Profile Assimilation - Case Study results Shih-Hung Chou, Brad Zavodsky Gary Jedlovec,
VIIRS Product Evaluation at the Ocean PEATE Frederick S. Patt Gene C. Feldman IGARSS 2010 July 27, 2010.
Inter-calibration of Operational IR Sounders using CLARREO Bob Holz, Dave Tobin, Fred Nagle, Bob Knuteson, Fred Best, Hank Revercomb Space Science and.
Suomi NPP SDR Product Review CrIMSS EDR Team Christopher Barnet CrIMSS EDR Lead Oct. 23, 2012.
Request for CrIMSS EDR Beta Maturity Christopher Barnet, CrIMSS EDR Validation and Algorithm Lead Richard Cember, CrIMSS EDR JAM Inputs from the CrIMSS.
Early Results from AIRS and Risk Reduction Benefits for other Advanced Infrared Sounders Mitchell D. Goldberg NOAA/NESDIS Center for Satellite Applications.
NGAS ATMS Cal/Val Activities and Findings Degui Gu, Alex Foo and Chunming Wang Jan 13, 2012.
Review of the 2012 Suomi NPP Applications Workshop: Outcomes, Results, Progress Forrest Melton November 18, 2014 Suomi NPP Applications.
1 Overview of Hyper-spectral Infrared Activities in STAR Chris Barnet JCSDA Infrared Sounding Working Group Jan. 30, 2009
The NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Long Term Strategy of Hyper Spectral Fundamental Climate Data Records and Environmental Climate Variables Antonia Gambacorta, Chris.
N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N NPP DATA ACCESS Mitch Goldberg JPSS Program Scientist June 21, 2012.
Integrating Uncertainty in Atmospheric Profile Validation Tony Reale NOAA Xavier Calbet AEMET ITSC-20 Lake Geneva, Wisconsin Oct 27 to Nov 3,
High impact weather nowcasting and short-range forecasting using advanced IR soundings Jun Li Cooperative Institute for Meteorological.
PRELIMINARY VALIDATION OF IAPP MOISTURE RETRIEVALS USING DOE ARM MEASUREMENTS Wayne Feltz, Thomas Achtor, Jun Li and Harold Woolf Cooperative Institute.
Suomi NPP Sounding EDR Validation and Evaluation Zhenglong Li #, Jun Li #, Yue Li #, Timothy J. and Christopher D. # Cooperative Institute.
NOAA, May 2014 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS NOAA Activities toward Transitioning Mature R&D Missions to an Operational Status.
Evaluation and Improvement of the NPP CrIMSS Rain Flag Wenze Yang 1, Ralph Ferraro 2, Chris Barnet 2, and Murty Divakarla 2 1. UMD/ESSIC/CICS, College.
NOAA, version 1.0, 7 June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS El Nino Rapid Response Presented to CGMS-44, Working Group 2, agenda.
1 Validated Stage 1 Science Maturity Review for Soundings Presented by Quanhua (Mark) Liu September 3, 2014.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR}
Comparisons with GRUAN Sondes
Participating SDR Team Members Cross-track Infrared Sounder
Tony Reale ATOVS Sounding Products (ITSVC-12)
Hyperspectral IR Clear/Cloudy
NPOESS Airborne Sounder Testbed (NAST)
NOAA-20 and Suomi NPP ATMS On-orbit Performance
Ninghai Sun1, Lihang Zhou2, Mitch Goldberg3
Progress with GRUAN observations in comparisons with
Progress with GRUAN observations in comparisons with
Presentation transcript:

Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) Cross-Track Infrared Microwave Sounding Suite (CrIMSS) Environmental Data Record Validation Status Nicholas R. Nalli, 1,2 Christopher D. Barnet, 1 Murty Divakarla, 1,2 Degui Gu, 3 Xu Liu, 5 Susan Kizer, 5 Lihang Zhou, 1,4 Antonia Gambacorta, 1,6 Mike Wilson, 1,2 Tony Reale, 1 Dave Tobin, 7 et al. 1 NOAA/NESDIS Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR), Camp Springs, MD, USA 2 I.M. Systems Group, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA 3 Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems (NGAS), Redondo Beach, CA, USA 4 Algorithms and Data Products Program, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR, Silver Spring, MD, USA 5 NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA 6 Riverside Technology, Inc., Silver Spring, MD, USA 7 CIMSS, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA 2012 IGARSS Meeting Munich, Germany 24 July 2012

Et al. … X. Xiong, G. Guo, E. S. Maddy, M. D. Goldberg (NOAA/NESDIS/STAR) R. Knuteson, H. Revercomb (UW/CIMSS) E. Joseph, V. Morris (Howard Univ./NCAS) D. Wolfe (NOAA/ESRL) A. Mollner (The Aerospace Corporation) Bill Blackwell (MIT Lincoln Laboratory) B. Sun, F. Tilley, M. Pettey (NOAA/NESDIS/STAR NPROVS developers) L. Strow (UMBC) J. Susskind (NASA/GSFC) 23-Jul-12Nalli, Barnet, et al. - IGARSS 20122

23-Jul-12Nalli, Barnet, et al. - IGARSS Outline CrIMSS (CrIS/ATMS) EDR Product Overview – AVTP, AVMP (KPPs), AVPP, O 3 (IP) EDR Cal/Val Program – Overview – Intensive Cal/Val (ICV) Status Highlights 3

PRODUCT OVERVIEW CrIMSS EDR 23-Jul-12Nalli, Barnet, et al. - IGARSS 20124

Atmospheric Vertical Temperature, Moisture and Pressure Profile (AVTP, AVMP, AVPP) Environmental Data Records (EDRs) AVTP, AVMP, AVPP are Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) for lower troposphere – Used for initialization of NWP models, forecasting / nowcasting weather, severe weather, cloud info and winds, basic science, etc. NGAS Algorithm: Optimal Estimation (OE) method, no front-end regression – AVTP, AVMP, AVPP, O 3 -IP, surface skin temperature and emissivity retrieved simultaneously – Non-precipitating scenes – Code implementations  IDPS operational product (42/22 layer)  “Offline EDR” (NASA/LaRC and STAR) used for testing, validation, optimization (100 layer)  NGAS science code (100 layer) NOAA Unique CrIS/ATMS Processing System (NUCAPS): AIRS approach, multi-step iterative method, front- end regression – Operational product in Feb Jul-12Nalli, Barnet, et al. - IGARSS CrIMSS AVTP EDR (Offline) – Focus Day (15 May 2012) CrIMSS AVMP EDR (Offline) – Focus Day (15 May 2012)

JPSS Specification Performance Requirements 23-Jul-12Nalli, Barnet, et al. - IGARSS Atmospheric Vertical Temperature Profile (AVTP) Measurement Uncertainty – Layer Average Temperature Error PARAMETERTHRESHOLD AVTP Clear, surface to 300 mb1.6 K / 1-km layer AVTP Clear, 300 to 30 mb1.5 K / 3-km layer AVTP Clear, 30 mb to 1 mb1.5 K / 5-km layer AVTP Clear, 1 mb to 0.5 mb3.5 K / 5-km layer AVTP Cloudy, surface to 700 mb2.5 K / 1-km layer AVTP Cloudy, 700 mb to 300 mb1.5 K / 1-km layer AVTP Cloudy, 300 mb to 30 mb1.5 K / 3-km layer AVTP Cloudy, 30 mb to 1 mb1.5 K / 5-km layer AVTP Cloudy, 1 mb to 0.5 mb3.5 K/ 5-km layer Atmospheric Vertical Moisture Profile (AVMP) Measurement Uncertainty – 2-km Layer Average Mixing Ratio % Err or PARAMETERTHRESHOLD AVMP Clear, surface to 600 mbGreater of 20% or 0.2 g/kg / 2-km layer AVMP Clear, 600 to 300 mbGreater of 35% or 0.1 g/kg / 2-km layer AVMP Clear, 300 to 100 mbGreater of 35% or 0.1 g/kg / 2-km layer AVMP Cloudy, surface to 600 mbGreater of 20% of 0.2 g/kg / 2-km layer AVMP Cloudy, 600 mb to 400 mbGreater of 40% or 0.1 g/kg / 2-km layer AVMP Cloudy, 400 mb to 100 mbGreater of 40% or 0.1 g/kg / 2-km layer Bold = KPP

CAL/VAL PROGRAM: OVERVIEW CrIMSS EDR 23-Jul-12Nalli, Barnet, et al. - IGARSS 20127

23-Jul-12Nalli, Barnet, et al. - IGARSS NPP CrIMSS EDR Cal/Val Plan: Ensure the EDR products comply with the requirements of the sponsoring agencies and have met global performance specifications. – Incorporated the NGAS and former IPO plans Draws on validation experience from AIRS/AMSU and IASI/AMSU/MHS. – Leverage Team of Subject Matter Experts (SME) for heritage knowledge, experience – Leverage existing capabilities  Use proven datasets for global validation (ECMWF, NCEP/GFS, RAOBs, etc)  Assess against heritage sensors and algorithms o NUCAPS o AIRS and IASI processing and validation systems o ATOVS (HIRS/AMSU) legacy products to demonstrate the value of hyperspectral o Tool: NOAA Products Validation System (NPROVS) (Reale et al. 2012)  Intensive field campaign cal/val experience – Roll-up ensemble assessments to evaluate that EDRs have met global spec  Validation methods characterize the performance of the EDRs in various ensembles  Stratify specs according to various bins o day/night and latitude bands (i.e., polar, midlatitude, tropical) o land/ocean/ regional, altitude, surface characteristics CrIMSS Cal/Val Overview

23-Jul-12Nalli, Barnet, et al. - IGARSS Team Members – Roles & Responsibilities Cal/ValNameOrganizationFunding AgencyTask NOAA Team Members LeadChris BarnetNOAA/NESDIS/STARNJOLead CrIMSS EDR Team AVTP/AVMPChangyong CaoNOAA/NESDIS/STARNJOCoordination w/ GSICS AVTP/AVMPMitch GoldbergJPSSNJO & NOAA-PSDIJPSS Program Scientist AVTP/AVMPAnthony RealeNOAA/NESDIS/STARNJONPROVS AVTP/AVMPFuzhong WengNOAA/NESDIS/STARNOAA-PSDIMiRS CrIS SDRYong HanNOAA/NESDIS/STARNJOLead CrIS SDR ATMS SDRTsan MoNOAA/NESDIS/STARNJOLead ATMS SDR NOAA-External Team Members AVTP/AVMPBill BlackwellMITNJOMicrowave products AVTP/AVMPAllan LararNASA/LaRCNJOEDR Validation AVTP/AVMPXu LiuNASA/LaRCNJOIASI proxy, EDR validation AVTP/AVMPHank RevercombSSECNJOSDR, PEATE AVTP/AVMPDave TobinSSECNJOARM-RAOBS AVTP/AVMPLarrabee StrowUMBCNJOOSS validation AVTP/AVMPJoel SusskindNASA/GSFCNJOAIRS proxy CrIMSS SDRSteven BeckAerospace Corp.externalRAOB, LIDAR CrIMSS SDRSteven EnglishUKMETexternalUKMET analysis CrIMSS SDRWilliam BellECMWFexternalECMWF analysis AVTP/AVMPSteve FriedmanNASA/JPLNASASounder PEATE AVTP/AVMP CrIS SDR Denise Hagan Degui Gu NGASNG PrimeEDR Validation / SDR coordination 9

23-Jul-12Nalli, Barnet, et al. - IGARSS Cal/Val Plan Phases Pre-Launch – Demonstrate launch-readiness – Concluded  Early Orbit Checkout (EOC) – L + 90 days, as sensors are activated – Concluded  Intensive Cal/Val (ICV) – Stable SDR out to L + 24 months – Validation of EDRs against multiple correlative datasets – Underway Long-Term Monitoring (LTM) – From end of ICV (L + 24 months) to the end of operational lifetime – Characterization of all EDR products and long-term demonstration of performance

23-Jul-12Nalli, Barnet, et al. - IGARSS EDR Validation Hierarchy: ICV–LTM Phases Model comparisons (e.g., ECMWF and NCEP/GFS) Satellite EDR intercomparisons (e.g., NUCAPS, AIRS/IASI, ATOVS, COSMIC) Operational RAOBs – Useful for global zonal representation and long-term characterization. – Statistical significance after couple months’ accumulation. Dedicated RAOBs – Detailed performance specification; regional characterization – ARM sites; sites of opportunity; ideally GCOS Reference Upper Air Network (GRUAN) Intensive Field Campaigns (e.g., Tobin et al. 2006, Nalli et al. 2006, JGR, 111; Taylor et al. 2008, BAMS, 89; Blackwell et al. 2001, TGARS, 39) – Dedicated RAOBs – Ideally project-coordinated aircraft campaign using NAST-I, -M and/or S-HIS – Coordinate/leverage with other missions (e.g., HS3) – Scientific campaigns of opportunity  Low cost, low risk; synergism; engages science community  NOAA Aerosols and Ocean Science Expeditions (AEROSE) (Nalli et al. 2011, BAMS, 92(6)) – Advantages  Can provide independent correlative data not assimilated into NWP models  Detailed performance specification; state specification; SDR cal/val; regional characterization

NPP EDR Product Maturity Levels 23-Jul-12Nalli, Barnet, et al. - IGARSS

CAL/VAL PROGRAM: ICV STATUS HIGHLIGHTS CrIMSS EDR 23-Jul-12Nalli, Barnet, et al. - IGARSS

Beta maturity evaluation – Global assessments obtained using matched ECMWF fields  Focus Days o 4 planned per year o 1 st : 11 Nov 2011; 2 nd : Feb 2012 o 3 rd : 15 May 2012 » CrIS/ATMS SDR at beta maturity » Good overlap with Aqua, SNOs  See poster MOP.P.8 (Divakarla et al.) Global operational RAOB-NPP matchups are being accumulated for a statistical in situ sample Dedicated RAOBs are being coordinated at several representative sites Request made for EDR beta maturity 23-Jul-12Nalli, Barnet, et al. - IGARSS Suomi NPP EDR Cal/Val Milestones DateMilestone 28 Oct 2011Suomi NPP Launch 08 Nov 2011ATMS First Light 17 Nov 2011NPP reaches mission orbit 21 Nov 2011VIIRS First Light Dec 2011 – Jan 2012ATMS Tuning 18 Jan 2012CrIS First Light Feb 2012Beta ATMS SDR Feb–Jun 2012CrIS Tuning Apr 2012Beta CrIS SDR Apr–May 2012Segue into ICV phase 31 Jul 2012Beta Maturity EDR Validation Report Nov 2012Provisional Maturity EDR Apr 2013Stage 1 Validated EDR Suomi NPP CrIMSS EDR Maturity AlgorithmBetaProvisionalVal 1Val 2Val 3 AVTP AVMP AVPP L + 9m Jul 2012 L + 12m Oct 2012 L + 18m Apr 2013 L + 24m Oct 2013 L + 36m Oct 2014 ICV Activities

Beta Maturity Evaluation AVTP Versus ECMWF (15-May-12 Focus Day, n = 2318) 23-Jul-12Nalli, Barnet, et al. - IGARSS IDPS yield is low, and performance suboptimal, due to use of prelaunch LUT noise estimates, MW/IR radiance bias corrections, and emissivity climatology. – MW-only yield (red lines) is 63.9%, IR+MW yield (blue) is 4.6%. – Offline code with optimization (not implemented in IDPS at this time) improves both yield (39.2% MW+IR 48.9%) and performance (dashed lines).

Beta Maturity Evaluation AVMP Versus ECMWF (15-May-12 Focus Day, n = 2313) 23-Jul-12Nalli, Barnet, et al. - IGARSS IDPS yield is low, and performance suboptimal, due to use of prelaunch LUT noise estimates, MW/IR radiance bias corrections, and emissivity climatology. – MW-only yield (red lines) is 64.0%, IR+MW yield (blue) is 4.7%. – Offline code with optimization (not implemented in IDPS at this time) improves both yield (39.2% MW+IR 48.9%) and performance (dashed lines).

NUCAPS / AIRS v5.9 Comparison 15 May 2012 Focus Day Red = NUCAPS (vs. ECMWF) Blue = AIRS v5.9 (vs. ECMWF) Divided according to tropical, midlatitude and polar zones NUCAPS EDRs are comparable to AIRS, but not fully optimized 23-Jul-12Nalli, Barnet, et al. - IGARSS

ICV 2012 Coordinated Dedicated RAOB Campaign 23-Jul-12Nalli, Barnet, et al. - IGARSS ARM Sites (n = 450) – Tropical Western Pacific (TWP, island) (90) – Southern Great Plains (SGP) (180) – North Slope Alaska (NSA) (180) – Jul–Sep 2012 – JPSS funded Kauai, Hawaii (PMRF) Site (n = 20+) – Tropical Central Pacific (island) – May 2012 (20), Sep 2012 (?) – Collocated lidar – Collaborator: The Aerospace Corp. Beltsville, MD (BCCSO) Site (n = 10+) – Urban midlatitude – Jun–Sep 2012 – Collaborator: HU/NCAS NOAA AEROSE Cruise (n ≈ 60) – Tropical Atlantic (ship) – September 2012 – Possible HS3 Campaign AC overflight – JPSS funded – Collaborators: HU/NCAS, NOAA/ESRL

Beta Maturity Evaluation Dedicated RAOB* (15-May-12 Focus Day) 23-Jul-12Nalli, Barnet, et al. - IGARSS *1 of 20 dedicated RAOBs launched by The Aerospace Corp from Kauai, Hawaii in May 2012.

23-Jul-12Nalli, Barnet, et al. - IGARSS Summary The status of the Suomi NPP CrIMSS EDR Cal/Val Program for atmospheric sounding EDRs was overviewed in this presentation. The validation program is to ensure the data products comply with the requirements of the sponsoring agencies (i.e., meet spec). Intensive Cal/Val (ICV) efforts are currently underway – Beta EDR maturity evaluation  Global assessments obtained using matched ECMWF fields o Offline AVTP product performance is close to meeting spec at this time o For more details, see poster MOP.P.8 (Divakarla et al.)  Request for beta maturity has been made – Provisional EDR maturity evaluation  Global RAOB matchups are being acquired for statistical global ensemble  Dedicated RAOB campaign has been coordinated for 2012 leveraging collaborators to attain several launch sites, including tropical open ocean, midlatitude land, urban, and polar regions