Issues for Council Discussion April 24, 2008. Critical Habitat Changes made to Chapter II, IV and V in response to comments received, and experience gained.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning Commission April 14, 2010
Advertisements

Pinellas by Design: A Blueprint for Updating the Countywide Plan Pinellas Planning Council May 18, 2011.
How to Write Goals, Objectives and Policies EAR-Based Amendment Forum Presented by the Pinellas Planning Council September 14, 2006.
BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS ADOPTION HEARING Item 2 Water Board Meeting of April 9, 2014 Chuck Curtis and Robert Larsen Lahontan Water Board.
THE DIVERSITY OF INTERESTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE A CHALLENGE FOR THE RULE OF LAW By Professor D E Fisher.
Southeast Alaska Land Entitlement Finalization and Jobs Protection Act S. 340 and H.R. 740 Presentation for the Citizens’ Advisory Commission on Federal.
Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.
Dr Chris Boomer Development Plans Manager (DoE Northern Ireland)
Environmental Review: NEPA, TEPA and Tribes. NEPA – good and bad for Tribes Tribes can use as tool to slow, examine, participate in process and urge changes.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources Briefing on Proposed Amendments to Endangered Species Regulations.
Town of Lyndon Zoning Bylaw Changes Town Planning Commission Public Informational Meeting 09December09.
Community GPU Forums California Native Plant Society, Monterey Bay Chapter Carmel Valley Association Citizens for Responsible Growth Coalition to Protect.
Your Water – Your Future Protecting and Preserving Ground Water via the Highlands RMP Ground Water Summit 2008 The Ground Water Protection Committee Presented.
Citrus County Planning Division Evaluation and Appraisal Report Citrus County Comprehensive Plan.
Wetlands Mitigation Policy Sudbury Wetlands Administration Bylaw April 27, 2015.
Noel H. Kaplan, Senior Environmental Planner
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, :30 PM.
Community Development Department Neoga Lakes – Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Master Planned Development (MPD) Rezoning Application.
Issues for Council Discussion June 12, Forest Resource Management and Sustainability Program Changes Program updated to support GPOs Program updated.
Zoning Revisions Update May UNO Division of Planning Project Team: Wendel Dufour,Director, Division of Planning Tim Jackson, AICPSenior Research.
Ohio Balanced Growth Program Best Local Land Use Practices Development Incentives Kirby Date, AICP, Cleveland State University.
Housing Element Update Workshop The City of Fillmore is Currently Updating its Housing Element  State law mandates the Housing Element be included.
E151U: Housing and Urban Development Policy Housing Planning.
Summit #1 San Juan County Shoreline Master Program Update March 1 st, 2 nd, and 3 rd
USAID Environmental Procedures. EA Training Course Tellus Institute 2 USAID Procedures Overview  USAID environmental review requirements are:  A specific.
Affordable Housing Initiatives: Building Your Own Local Toolbox Mara S. Register Community Development Director City of Valdosta, Georgia.
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT MAJOR COMMUNITY ISSUES RELATED TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Board of County Commissioners/ Local Planning Agency Joint Meeting.
Flintstone-Oldtown Planning Region Comprehensive Plan Kick-Off Meeting June 23, 2010 Insert pictures.
City of Palm Coast Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) City Council Meeting Presentation December 7, 2010.
Consistency Determination: City of Seaside Local Coastal Program FORA Board Meeting March 15, 2013 Agenda No: 8a.
CHAPTER 1 FOUNDATION. 1.1 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) “An act to establish a national policy for the environment, to provide for the establishment.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
1 Prepared by Les Knapp, Associate Director, MACo and Amanda Stakem Conn, Principal Counsel to MDP* for the Maryland State Bar Association,
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Planning and Community Development Department Housing Element City Council February 03, 2014.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Slide 1April 8, 2015, Financial Assistance Council Meeting.
Planning under the Growth Management Act
Community Development Department Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Development of Regional Impact Settlement Agreements & Remedial Amendments.
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN Prince George’s County MNCPP-C Draft: December, 2004.
Cave and Karst Management Through Land Use Planning James Goodbar Sr. Cave Specialist Bureau of Land Management Cody, Wyoming May 12-16, 2014 Aaron Stockton.
PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY Cindy Damons 28 May 2008 The role of municipalities in managing and giving effect to.
1 Completing the CEQA Checklist Terry Rivasplata.
N orth C entral W isconsin R egional P lanning C ommission 210 McClellan Street, Suite 210 Wausau, WI (715)
August 1 st Draft of Offshore Aquaculture Amendment Gulf Council Meeting August 11-15, 2008 Key Largo, FL Tab J, No. 6.
Community Wildfire Protection Planning: HFRA and Beyond.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Flow Standard Amendment to New York’s Water Quality Standards Regulations Scott J. Stoner Chief, Standards.
Regional Planning CCRPC Board Training March 21, 2012.
Planning Commission Study Session: Preferred Plan July 23, 2015.
Highlights  Describe Our Missoula Growth Policy Project  Relationship to Rattlesnake Neighborhood Plan  Next Steps.
Airdrie Land Use Bylaw Presentation to City Council May 2, 2016.
GBLWMP-SLUP Integration Meeting February 4-5, 2010 Sahtu Land Use Planning Board.
City of Burlingame Housing Element Update Community Workshop # 2 | May 20, 2014.
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 4 – POPULATION & HOUSING ELEMENTS 1/30/2014.
Planning & Community Development Department General Plan Implementation Strategy City Council February 29, 2016.
Regulatory Improvement Workplan: Policy Package 3 Planning Commission Recommendation to City Council July 28, 2004.
OPEN SPACE/ CONSERVATION
Growth Management Amendments Land Use & Transportation
Environmental Critical Areas Regulations
Overview of the WTO SPS Agreement and the role of
Social impacts and coastal louisiana
One Perspective on an effort to improve the implementation of the Endangered Species Act David Bernhardt.
Updating the Article 6 guide Outline of envisaged changes
Presentation transcript:

Issues for Council Discussion April 24, 2008

Critical Habitat Changes made to Chapter II, IV and V in response to comments received, and experience gained through WQMP review. Changes are to clarify, add concepts and address technical issues. Chapter II Analysis of the Highlands Region Changes for consistency with intro to Chapter IV Changes for consistency with intro to Chapter IV Clarify delineation of Critical Habitat Wildlife Clarify delineation of Critical Habitat Wildlife

Critical Habitat GPOs: Introduction Clarify that definition of Significant Natural Areas includes habitat for documented occurrences of threatened and endangered plant species. Clarify that definition of Significant Natural Areas includes habitat for documented occurrences of threatened and endangered plant species. Clarify that Critical Habitat Conservation and Management Plans will be used for development review and restoration activities. Clarify that Critical Habitat Conservation and Management Plans will be used for development review and restoration activities. Clarify that a goal for municipalities is to develop and implement a Critical Habitat Conservation and Management Plan that achieve RMP goals and may be refined using local scientific knowledge and planning goals, where they do not conflict with protection standards and criteria for Critical Habitat. Clarify that a goal for municipalities is to develop and implement a Critical Habitat Conservation and Management Plan that achieve RMP goals and may be refined using local scientific knowledge and planning goals, where they do not conflict with protection standards and criteria for Critical Habitat. Clarify that when a Critical Habitat Conservation and Management Plan has not been approved by Council, site- by-site development applications in municipalities will be required to strictly adhere to RMP policies and objectives. Clarify that when a Critical Habitat Conservation and Management Plan has not been approved by Council, site- by-site development applications in municipalities will be required to strictly adhere to RMP policies and objectives.

Critical Habitat GPOs (contd) Clarify policies to state that the Council will develop a Critical Habitat Conservation and Management Plan Guidance Document to implement the program for habitat conservation and management. Clarify policies to state that the Council will develop a Critical Habitat Conservation and Management Plan Guidance Document to implement the program for habitat conservation and management. Clarify policies to ensure that all developments employ the following sequence of low impact best management practices, if any disturbance is allowed (e.g., waiver): Clarify policies to ensure that all developments employ the following sequence of low impact best management practices, if any disturbance is allowed (e.g., waiver): 1. Avoid the disturbance of Critical Habitat; 2. Minimize impacts to Critical Habitat; and 3. Mitigate all adverse modification to Critical Habitat so that there is no net loss of habitat value. Clarify that habitat value is defined as quantity (e.g. acreage), quality (e.g. core vs. edge forest), type (e.g. scrub-shrub), and function (e.g. breeding habitat). The mitigation requirement of no net loss of habitat value ensures that all four elements are accounted for and included in mitigation design. Clarify that habitat value is defined as quantity (e.g. acreage), quality (e.g. core vs. edge forest), type (e.g. scrub-shrub), and function (e.g. breeding habitat). The mitigation requirement of no net loss of habitat value ensures that all four elements are accounted for and included in mitigation design. Clarify policies to require periodic monitoring of conservation easements on Critical Habitat to protect habitat from changes in land use. Clarify policies to require periodic monitoring of conservation easements on Critical Habitat to protect habitat from changes in land use.

Critical Habitat Program: All edited GPOs incorporated into Program All edited GPOs incorporated into Program Clarify that Program will be implemented through a Critical Habitat Conservation and Management Plan that will of provide standards for protection, conservation and management of Critical Habitat. Clarify that Program will be implemented through a Critical Habitat Conservation and Management Plan that will of provide standards for protection, conservation and management of Critical Habitat. Clarify that Critical Habitat Conservation and Management Plans will be used for development review and restoration activities. Clarify that Critical Habitat Conservation and Management Plans will be used for development review and restoration activities. Clarify that Highlands Council will develop Critical Habitat Conservation and Management Plan Guidance to be used by municipalities to develop and implement Council-approved Critical Habitat Conservation and Management Plans. Clarify that Highlands Council will develop Critical Habitat Conservation and Management Plan Guidance to be used by municipalities to develop and implement Council-approved Critical Habitat Conservation and Management Plans. Clarify Guidance will include requirements to avoid Critical Habitat unless allowed by a waiver based on the Highlands Act or for projects that are in conformance with Council-approved Critical Habitat Conservation and Management Plan. Clarify Guidance will include requirements to avoid Critical Habitat unless allowed by a waiver based on the Highlands Act or for projects that are in conformance with Council-approved Critical Habitat Conservation and Management Plan.

Critical Habitat Program (contd) Clarify where a development project is proposed, conforming municipalities will require implementation of standards in Council-approved Critical Habitat Conservation and Management Plan as a condition of local approval. Clarify where a development project is proposed, conforming municipalities will require implementation of standards in Council-approved Critical Habitat Conservation and Management Plan as a condition of local approval. Clarify where a Critical Habitat Conservation and Management Plan has not been approved by Council, site-by-site development applications in municipalities will be required to adhere to the RMP goals, policies and objectives. Clarify where a Critical Habitat Conservation and Management Plan has not been approved by Council, site-by-site development applications in municipalities will be required to adhere to the RMP goals, policies and objectives. Clarify to ensure that all developments employ the following sequence of low impact best management practices, if any disturbance is allowed (e.g., waiver): Clarify to ensure that all developments employ the following sequence of low impact best management practices, if any disturbance is allowed (e.g., waiver): 1. Avoid the disturbance of Critical Habitat; 2. Minimize impacts to Critical Habitat; and 3. Mitigate all adverse modification to Critical Habitat so that there is no net loss of habitat value. Clarify mitigation requirement for no net loss of Critical Habitat. Clarify mitigation requirement for no net loss of Critical Habitat.

Lakes Management GPOs Changes Policies clarified to address the distinction between Lake Community Sub-zones and undeveloped Lake Management Areas. Allows different Tier standards with more stringent standards in the undeveloped areas. Policies clarified to address the distinction between Lake Community Sub-zones and undeveloped Lake Management Areas. Allows different Tier standards with more stringent standards in the undeveloped areas. Clarifies that the Council will coordinate with lake commissions and associations. Clarifies that the Council will coordinate with lake commissions and associations. The importance of maintaining the historic and cultural resources of lake communities is highlighted. The importance of maintaining the historic and cultural resources of lake communities is highlighted. Clarification is provided regarding failing septic systems in lake communities and the need for updated treatment, to avoid harmful secondary impacts through selection of the most appropriate remedial approaches. Clarification is provided regarding failing septic systems in lake communities and the need for updated treatment, to avoid harmful secondary impacts through selection of the most appropriate remedial approaches.

Steep Slope GPOs Amended narrative to more fully describe the critical issues. Clarified the definition of steep slope categories. Added language specifying that the Highlands Act exceptions for linear development in some steep slopes applies. Deleted language regarding waivers – will insert cross-reference to new consolidated waiver language in RMP

Regional Master Plan Updates In response to comments, the RMP Updates Program In response to comments, the RMP Updates Program is separated from the Adjustments Program to provide clarity. Added new Objectives to address facilitating and coordinating the exchange of factual information and the housing of same. Added new Objectives to address facilitating and coordinating the exchange of factual information and the housing of same. RMP Updates to data layers are available for all Highlands RMP Updates to data layers are available for all Highlands municipalities but processing priority for Plan Conformance. Standardized digital submission requirements. Standardized digital submission requirements. All RMP Updates will be documented and publicly available. All RMP Updates will be documented and publicly available.

Housing and Community Facilities GPO Changes The goal of market-rate and affordablehousing sufficient to meet the needs of the Highlands Region has been updated to specify "within the context of economic, social, and environmental considerations and constraints (6O). The goal of market-rate and affordable housing sufficient to meet the needs of the Highlands Region has been updated to specify "within the context of economic, social, and environmental considerations and constraints (6O). Clarification has been provided regarding preferred locations and development approaches for housing initiatives (6O2, 6O3, and 6O4). Clarification has been provided regarding preferred locations and development approaches for housing initiatives (6O2, 6O3, and 6O4). Community facilities policy discussion has been clarified and centralized in the Housing and Community Facilities Program (6O5 and 6O6). Community facilities policy discussion has been clarified and centralized in the Housing and Community Facilities Program (6O5 and 6O6).

Housing and Community Facilities GPO Changes Affordable housing policies: Affordable housing policies: Conforming municipalities are required to implement the New Jersey Supreme Courts Mount Laurel doctrine that every municipality in a growth area has a constitutional obligation to provide through its land use regulations, sound land use, and long range planning, a realistic opportunity for a fair share of its region's present and prospective needs for housing for low and moderate income families. Conforming municipalities are required to implement the New Jersey Supreme Courts Mount Laurel doctrine that every municipality in a growth area has a constitutional obligation to provide through its land use regulations, sound land use, and long range planning, a realistic opportunity for a fair share of its region's present and prospective needs for housing for low and moderate income families. To meet this obligation, conforming municipalities are encouraged to participate in COAHs Substantive Certification process. To meet this obligation, conforming municipalities are encouraged to participate in COAHs Substantive Certification process. (6O7, 6O1, and 6O1b). Alternatively, the Fair Housing Act authorizes municipalities to seek a Court ordered declaratory judgment. Alternatively, the Fair Housing Act authorizes municipalities to seek a Court ordered declaratory judgment.

Housing and Community Facilities GPO Changes Affordable housing policies: Affordable housing policies: The Objective 6O7a is that all 88 municipalities in the Highlands Region will receive Substantive Certification from COAH. Presently, 73 of the 88 municipalities are under COAHs jurisdiction. Municipalities are required to adopt a housing element, fair share plan and implementing ordinance(s) to reflect current conditions and implications of the RMP (6O8). Preserve and monitor existing stocks of affordable housing (6O1c).

Housing and Community Facilities Program Changes Affordable housing program updated to reflect policy changes and to clarify how the RMP and related resource protection standards may affect municipal obligations. Affordable housing program updated to reflect policy changes and to clarify how the RMP and related resource protection standards may affect municipal obligations. Housing metrics added and/or reorganized, and discussion of indicators that support planning decisions and long term trend evaluation of housing: Housing metrics added and/or reorganized, and discussion of indicators that support planning decisions and long term trend evaluation of housing: Jobs-housing balance Jobs-housing balance Development activity metrics Development activity metrics General assistance for eligible projects program component added to discuss agency coordination, technical assistance, and Highlands planning grants and incentives for housing initiatives that support RMP policies. General assistance for eligible projects program component added to discuss agency coordination, technical assistance, and Highlands planning grants and incentives for housing initiatives that support RMP policies.

Water Quality Management Planning – standard of review Consistency determinations for WQMP amendments: 1) proposed use or expansion of wastewater or water supply infrastructure; and 1) proposed use or expansion of wastewater or water supply infrastructure; and 2) proposed septic density standards. 2) proposed septic density standards. Staff recommendation that the Council: 1) continue to apply the RMP to limit the use or expansion of wastewater or water supply infrastructure for non-conforming municipalities; and 1) continue to apply the RMP to limit the use or expansion of wastewater or water supply infrastructure for non-conforming municipalities; and 2) specify in the RMP that the septic density thresholds in the RMP will not be used for consistency determinations for non- conforming municipalities. However, where NJDEP requires adoption of municipal ordinances for resource protection, apply the RMP resource protection standards to those ordinances. All other relevant RMP requirements for ordinances would be provided as recommendations. 2) specify in the RMP that the septic density thresholds in the RMP will not be used for consistency determinations for non- conforming municipalities. However, where NJDEP requires adoption of municipal ordinances for resource protection, apply the RMP resource protection standards to those ordinances. All other relevant RMP requirements for ordinances would be provided as recommendations.