Overview of the Plain Talk Data Collection System Sarabeth Shreffler, MPH, CHES Program Officer, Plain Talk Program Public/Private Ventures.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University ®
Advertisements

To Halton Youth Service 
Worth the Wait North Ridge Middle School Parent Information Night
The Continuous Quality Improvement Process Empowering staff to develop local level solutions.
Communicating and Addressing Adolescent HIV/STD & Unintended Pregnancies in the 21st Century Rick Deem Data Management Coordinator Office of Healthy Schools.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Qualitative Methods to Assess Community Issues.
COMMUNITY RESOURCE MAPPING Train the Trainer MAST - NH December 15, 2006 Facilitated by: Kelli Crane.
Questionnaire Report for Grades 6 to12 Eanes Independent Schools.
Outreach Evaluation Series: Community Assessment Susan Barnes and Alan Carr National Network of Libraries of Medicine Outreach Evaluation Resource Center.
Focus Groups for the Health Workforce Retention Study.
Workshop/Breakout Title Workshop/Breakout Speaker(s) Demonstrating, Replicating and Expanding Evidence-based Social Programs Geri Summerville, Public/Private.
Informed Consent and HIPAA Tim Noe Coordinating Center.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
1 © 2009 University of Wisconsin-Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Collecting Data This is STEP 3 of the five steps.
CAPP Evaluation: Implementing Evidence Based Programs in NYS Jane Powers ACT for Youth Center of Excellence 2011 A presentation for Comprehensive Adolescent.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Presented by Margaret Shandorf
1 Milwaukee Alliance for Sexual Health (MASH) Community Mobilization Initiative Addressing Disparities in STDs and Unintended Pregnancies Community Voices.
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
Abstinence Only Vs. Comprehensive Sexuality Education PART II: What is the difference?
T HE P OWER OF K NOWING … I NVINCIBLE Y OUTH P ROJECT “Go Viral to Improve Health” Oregon Institute of Technology Oregon Health and Science University.
Using Qualitative Data to Contextualize Chlamydia and Birth Rates Joyce Lisbin EdD, Anna Groskin MHS, Rhonda Kropp RN MPH, Virginia Loo ABD, Julie Lifshay.
FORMATIVE EVALUATION Intermediate Injury Prevention Course August 23-26, 2011, Billings, MT.
1 Qualitative Evaluation Terms Coding/categorization The process of condensing qualitative data through the identification of common themes. Data Matrix.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-1.
Overview of Conference Goals and Objectives. Board of Directors Executive Director Registration Facilities & Equipment Security Leadership Institute Parents.
National College Health Assessment Survey Spring 2013 Santa Rosa Junior College Susan Quinn, MSN, FNP Director, Student Health Services.
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Health promotion and health education programs. Assumptions of Health Promotion Relationship between Health education& Promotion Definition of Program.
Adolescent Sexual Health Work Group (ASHWG)
Activities Outcomes – Impact Short Term Medium Term Long Term Problem statement: New York City teen pregnancy rates are higher than the national average,
Fostering School Connectedness Action Planning National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Division of Adolescent and School Health.
JCAHO UPDATE June The Bureau of Primary Health Care is continuing to encourage Community Health Centers to be JCAHO accredited. JCAHO’s new focus.
Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators.
Planned Parenthood Columbia Willamette A Leader in Reproductive and Sexual Health Services in Oregon and Southwest Washington since 1963.
Health for Life Dunblane Cluster Schools Sexual Health and Relationships Education “A practitioner’s reflection on the successes and challenges of implementing.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Introduction & Step 1 Presenter:. Training Overview Introduction Participation requirements FET Tool Orientation Distribution of username & passwords.
Qualitative Methods to Assess Community Issues. What are qualitative methods of assessment? Qualitative methods of assessment are those whose results.
Overview of Evaluation Designs. Learning objectives By the end of this presentation, you will be able to: Explain evaluation design Describe the differences.
Session 4 Engagement, Continuous Improvement, and Accountability CLAS Training [ADD DATE] [ADD PRESENTER NAME] [ADD ORGANIZATION NAME]
Introduction & Step 1 Presenter: Updated 6/21/2013.
HIV Prevention Programs That Work Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training Community Planning Training 1-2.
Opening Activity  Welcome!  Sit at a table that represents an area on which you would like to talk with others about  As you sit at your table, waiting.
Methods for the evaluation of the Abstinence and Faithfulness among Youth (ABY) interventions in South Africa Dr Geoff Setswe, Dr Mark Ottenweller & Roger.
The National Connection for Local Public Health Plain Talk in Local Health Departments Tasha Toby, MPH National Association of County and City Health Officials.
Brianna Loeck Principles of Health Behavior - MPH 515 Kimberly Brodie August 22, 2013 Educate Prevent Sexually Transmitted Diseases & Teen Pregnancy.
Exploring Evidence.
CA COUNTY PEER QUALITY CASE REVIEW (Insert Review Week Dates)
Plain Talk Lorelei Walters Program Officer Plain Talk Replication Public/Private Ventures Replication and Expansion Services.
Implement annual campus climate survey to: Gain further insight into student’s perceptions of campus safety Collect common data points Measure long-term.
Understanding your Community Needs and Resource Assessments Primary Prevention Institute 2015.
Community Assessment Training 1- Community Assessment Training 1-1.
Health Promotion Competencies
Program Evaluation Principles and Applications PAS 2010.
Making it Count! Program Evaluation For Youth-Led Initiatives.
1 Department of Medical Assistance Services December 1, 2015 Gerald Craver, PhD Mathew Behrens, MPA Sarah Broughton, MSW.
Project Overview In the school year (SY), the School District of Philadelphia (SDP) was awarded a grant from the Centers for Disease Control.
Development Team Day 5a October Aim To explore approaches to evaluating the impact of the curriculum on pupil learning.
Training of Process Facilitators 1- Training of Process Facilitators 5-1.
Stage 1 Integrated learning Coffee Shop. LEARNING REQUIREMENTS The learning requirements summarise the knowledge, skills, and understanding that students.
SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH STARTING WHERE HEALTH STARTS TO BRING IMPROVEMENT.
Safeguarding and confidentiality within health and social care volunteering.
Promoting Science-based Approaches to Preventing Teen Pregnancy, STDs and HIV Policy, Partnerships, and Creativity Brigid Riley, MPH American Public Health.
Table 1. Home Health Party Results
Monitoring and Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

Overview of the Plain Talk Data Collection System Sarabeth Shreffler, MPH, CHES Program Officer, Plain Talk Program Public/Private Ventures

The Purpose of Data Collection  To answer 2 Questions:  Is the program working as intended?  Why is this the case?  To improve and refine the program  To serve as a decision-making tool for planners, policy makers, and program funders

Goals of Plain Talk  1) To create a consensus among parents and adults about the need to protect sexually active youth through encouraging early and consistent use of contraceptives;  2) To give parents and other community adults the information and skills they need to communicate more effectively with adolescents about responsible sexual behavior; and  3) To improve adolescent access to quality, age- appropriate and readily available reproductive health care, including contraception.

Plain Talk Formula for Success Education + Communication + Access to Contraceptives = Fewer unwanted pregnancies and STDs

Plain Talk Staff Confidentiality  Site Directors, program coordinators, Walkers & Talkers, and volunteers must all sign a Confidentiality agreement in which they pledge to not discuss private information of any and all Plain Talk participants and staff members.  Purpose is to help ensure confidentiality and safety of participants which in turn helps establish trust between participants and staff.

Plain Talk Participant Consent  Informed consent of each Plain Talk participant is necessary before taking part in ANY type of data collection process.  This includes anything from Community Mapping surveys and Home Health Parties to having photographs of them taken.

Plain Talk Data Collection  Both process and outcome data is being collected continuously over the 3 year program cycle.  Planning Stage  Community Mapping Stage  Home Health Party and Walkers & Talkers Stage

Planning Stage  Data Collection Tools:  Community Demographics Form  Selection of neighborhoods and random sampling strategy is set

Community Demographics Form  Purpose:  To establish a baseline profile of the Plain Talk Community  Key Points of Measurement:  Socio-economic status  Adolescent sexual health status  (pregnancy rates, live birth rates, STD rates)

Community Mapping Stage  Data Collection Tools:  Volunteer/Walker & Talker Intake Form  Adult Survey  Adolescent Survey  Service Site Survey  Physician surveys  Inventory of Sources for Non-Prescription Contraceptives Survey

Volunteer and Walkers & Talkers Intake Form  Purpose:  To establish a baseline profile for each person who is a volunteer for the Plain Talk program  Key Points of Measurement:  Demographic information  Reading, writing, and speaking skills

Adult Survey  Purpose:  To better understand the thoughts and opinions of adults in the community  Key Points of Measurement:  How adults feel about adolescent sexual health and sexuality in their community  Whether they feel comfortable talking to teens about sex  If they know where teens can go to get information about sex

Adolescent Survey  Purpose:  To better understand the thoughts and opinions of adolescents in the community  Key Points of Measurement:  How teens feel about sex  Whom they feel comfortable talking to about sex  Where they go to get information about sex

Physician Survey and Service Site Survey  Purpose:  To learn about health care services offered to the community as well as the access to contraceptives  Key Points of Measurement:  Health care services offered  Demographics of patients  Physician’s and health care staff’s thoughts and opinions regarding adolescent sexual health

Inventory of Sources for Non- Prescription Contraceptives Survey  Purpose:  To better understand where contraceptives are made available in the community  Key Points of Measurement:  Available contraceptives  Prices of contraceptives  Helpfulness of clerks and/or staff

Home Health Party and Walkers & Talkers Stage  Data Collection Tools:  Volunteer/Walker & Talker Update Form  Home Health Party Forms  Community Forum Reports  Pre/Post Tests  Interviews, focus groups, staff observations, photos

Volunteer and Walkers & Talkers Update Form  Purpose:  To update and keep current the profile of the volunteer/Walker & Talker  Key Points of Measurement:  Attendance  Level of involvement/Participation  Training progression

Home Health Party Form  Purpose:  To establish a baseline profile for each Home Health Party  Key Points of Measurement:  Location of Home Health Party  Topics covered  Demographics of participants

Community Forum Report  Purpose:  To disseminate results of the Community Mapping and/or present special sexual health topics to larger Plain Talk community gatherings.  Key Points of Measurement:  Location of Community Forum  Topics covered during forum  Demographics of participants

Pre/Post Tests for Data Collection  Pregnancy Prevention Pre/Post Test  STDs and HIV/AIDS Pre/Post Test  Purpose:  To assess the breadth of sexual health material each participant learned from the Home Health Parties

Plain Talk Participant and Staff Qualitative Feedback  Staff online journals to record observations of the Plain Talk implementation process  Interviews with staff  Focus groups

Online Journals  The purpose of the online journal is to record the implementation and maintenance of the Plain Talk program in each community. Sites are to record:  Experiences, observations, and interactions during Plain Talk community events and the distribution of survey results.  Experiences, observations, and interactions during volunteers/Walkers & Talkers' surveying of the Plain Talk community.  Experiences, observations, and interactions during Home Health parties.  Observations, experiences, and feedback from the Plain Talk program site staff.  Any other observations, interactions, or experiences involving the community response (i.e. openness to Plain Talk, willingness to participate, interest in survey results, etc.).

Focus Groups  The purpose of focus groups are to evaluate:  Adults who have participated in Plain Talk  Adolescents who have participated in Plain Talk  Adults and/or teens who have participated in Home Health Parties  Video and/or audio tapes will be used to record exactly what is said in the focus group as well as examine facial expressions, body language, and group dynamics so that all major discussion points offered by the participants will be recorded.  However, prior to analyzing, using, and sharing any focus group information with any other researchers, the focus group transcription will be stripped of any personal information (such as name, birth date, and address)

Other Ideas: Qualitative Data  Brawley, CA is using focus groups to gather additional information as well as help secure federal grant money.  St. Paul, MN is developing a “Plain Talk PLUS” to analyze different effects of participants attending additional Plain Talk sessions on topics such as peer pressure and dating violence.  New Orleans used an ethnographer during the Plain Talk demonstration phase  Naranjito, PR is currently using an ethnographer

Plain Talk website