Federal NCLB Regulations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
___________________________ NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program North Carolina Alternate Assessment Academic Inventory.
Advertisements

Students with Disabilities in New AYP Targets Reading % 28.4% Math % 11.4% Reading % 30.8% Math % 15.8%
AYP Changes for 2007 K-20 Videoconference June 11, 2007 Presented by: JoLynn Berge OSPI Federal Policy Coordinator.
Student Performance Overview of State Performance Plan Indicators 3 – State Assessment Performance, 7 – Early Childhood Outcomes.
Title III Update Planning for Success In
A Guided Tour of the 1% Exception Process From Documentation to Approval.
State-wide Assessment Update for What Does TNs Alternate Assessment Program Look Like Now? Alternate Assessment General Assessment Alternate.
Presented By: Joseph Fisher, Assistant Commissioner, Division of Special Education Branson Townsend, Executive Director, Division of Accountability, Teaching.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress Report July 22, 2009.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2005 Status Report Research, Assessment & Accountability November 2, 2005 Oakland Unified School District.
1 School Grades and Adequate Yearly Progress 2004 and Beyond.
1 School Grades and Adequate Yearly Progress Changes 2005 and Beyond.
AYP Plan Performance Reporting Division Texas Education Agency TETN Accountability Update November 14, 2006.
1 Federal Accountability System Update Texas Assessment Conference December 4, 2007 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division.
AYP Update Performance Reporting Division Texas Education Agency ESC Title I Meeting September 18, 2006.
AYP Federal Cap and Exceptions ESC Title I/Texas Assessment Conference AYP Presentation TEA Division of Performance Reporting December 11, 2006.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
USDE Decisions on 2006 Amendments to the Texas AYP Handbook.
Federal Accountability/ AYP Update Special Education TETN January 6, 2010 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division.
2006 Preliminary AYP Release. Overview 1. State Summary Results 2. Update of Preliminary AYP Data 3. Schedule for Appeals and Final Release 4. Overview.
Performance Reporting Division Texas Education Agency TI ESC Meeting September 18, AYP Update.
Federal Accountability AYP Update Accountability TETN April 23, 2009 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division.
MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
Standards-based Individualized Education Program Module Six: Determining the Most Appropriate Assessment Option Standards-based IEP State-Directed Project.
Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding E.S.E.A. (Elementary And Secondary Education Act)
The Answer Document. Grade 5 Grade 8 Grade 11 MC Form and Prompt Number Sections J and K.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Title I and Title III: Partnership for Academic Achievement Virginia Department of Education.
1 School District of Escambia County Class Size Presentation August 2010.
Annual Title I Program Overview at Williston Sherry Veasey, Principal September, 2011 Parent/Teacher Meeting.
Deana Holinka, MA, CRC, Administrative Coordinator,
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Track Performance Division of Performance Accountability.
Preparing for Cycle III School and District Accountability Ratings and AYP Determinations Information Sessions August 26 & 27, 2004 Juliane Dow, Associate.
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Focus Schools Conference Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. September 17-18, 2012.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
GAP Kids or Gray-area Kids ? Defining who they are under No Child Left Behind (NCLB)? Why this group of students exists? What are the consequences of being.
ALTERNATE PERFORMANCE BASED ASSESSMENT The Rubric for End of Course Assessments
Data Source: Virginia School Report Cards / Date: Data as of September 2012.
September, 2010 Accomack County Public Schools. DEFINITION OF AN LEP STUDENT  An LEP student is one: Who was not born in the U.S. or whose native language.
ALTERNATE/ALTERNATIVE ASSESSMENTS VGLA AND VMAST UPDATES VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST Regional Administrators Update Training.
N O C HILD L EFT B EHIND Testing Requirements of NCLB test annually in reading and mathematics in grades 3-8 test at least once in reading and mathematics.
How to Interpret and Use Standards of Learning (SOL) and ACCESS for ELLs® Data to Make Instructional Decisions for English Learners.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
Spring 2015 Smarter Balanced (SBA) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) update September
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
1 Strategic Plan Baseline Data September 2004 Prince William County School Board October 6, 2004.
The 1% Rule: Alternate Assessment Participation November 20, 2007.
Adequate Yearly Progress Kansas State Department of Education 2007 Fall Assessment Conference Judi Miller,
Department of Research and Planning November 14, 2011.
Fall 2010 Mathematics Standards of Learning Assessment Update - 1 -
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Accreditation and AMO I.ACCREDITATION (Virginia’s Accountability System) – ACCREDITATION is Virginia’s Accountability System – No membership groups, no.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Special Populations Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski.
Data Source: Virginia School Report Cards Date: Data as of September 2009 Note: The Virginia Assessment Program includes.
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
Standards of Learning 2007 All Students Action Achievement Accountability ■■ Fairfax County Public Schools Department of Accountability Comparisons: Fairfax.
Ohio’s Alternate Assessments for Students with Disabilities Thomas Lather Office for Exceptional Children (614)
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Division of Student Assessment and School Improvement New Special Education Directors Academy: December 2015 State Assessment Overview and Alternate Assessments.
American Institutes for Research
State Assessment Overview and Alternate Assessments
CAASPP Results Kern County.
Chapter 8 (key issues for Special Education)
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Presentation transcript:

Federal NCLB Regulations Understanding the 1% Cap for the Virginia Alternate Assessment Program (VAAP) Federal NCLB Regulations

What is the VAAP? Three types of SOL assessments for students with disabilities: Regular SOL w/out accommodations VGLA (Virginia Grade Level Assessment) VAAP (Virginia Alternate Assessment Program)

What is the 1% Cap NCLB regulations limit the number of alternate assessment that may be counted toward AYP to 1% of the students enrolled in tested grades Tested grades are 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 11

Where is the 1% cap applied? 1% applies at the state level 1% applies at the division level 1% does not apply at the school or classroom level

1% History in Virginia since 2001 Virginia has always exceeded the 1% cap Through 2006-2007 the federal government granted Virginia a waiver Fall 2007 the federal government notified VDOE that it will no longer grant the waiver

What are the consequences for ACPS? All students exceeding the 1% cap will have their performance status reassigned from passing to failing for AYP calculations The number of reassigned scores will be determined by dividing the number of VAAP proficient scores by the number of students in the tested grades Reassigned scores apply to English and math

What is 1% calculation for ACPS? ACPS had 1,560 students enrolled in tested grades as of 09/30/2007 1% of 1560 is 15.6 or 16 16 VAAP assessments can be counted toward division-wide AYP pass rates

ACPS numbers… 37 VAAP students in tested grades Only 16 English and 16 math VAAP will count toward division-wide AYP 21 English and 21 math assessments will have to be reassigned as failing/non-participation for the division

What does reassigned mean? Scores reassigned for AYP calculations only Does not affect the student or the IEP Does not affect the student’s graduation Parent’s get notification of the original score as usual Reassignments are done after scoring and test audits are complete

What are the local ramifications? Knowing that 22 students will be reassigned from passing to failing for division-wide AYP calculations means that ACPS will not likely make AYP Individual schools can still make AYP provided that all benchmarks are met.

What about next year? Criteria for VAAP participation is being changed per VDOE regulations IQ scores of 50 and below Moderate to profound mental retardation Adaptive behavior score of 50 or below

How do the new regulations apply to this years students? Currently, 37 ACPS students are being assessed by VAAP 8 of the 37 qualify for VAAP using the new DOE standards ACPS will not likely be above the 1% cap in 2008-2009

Questions?