ALICE Commissioning Part II : Injector Yuri Saveliev Seminar on 14-15/07/2008 Gun to Booster Booster to FCUP-01 The rest of the Injector.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.
Advertisements

#3224 Sat 17 th November Restored an “AP” set-up with some measurement of Twiss. – The idea was to take some BPM data with a known twiss set-up to see.
EMMA Magnet Design Ben Shepherd Magnetics and Radiation Sources Group ASTeC STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
J. Rudolph, Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin EuCARD 2nd ANNUAL MEETING Slice emittance measurements at the ELBE superconducting RF photoinjector.
Diagnostics and commissioning on ERLP Yuri Saveliev ASTeC CONFORM Project: EMMA Design Review Workshop February 2007, Daresbury Laboratory.
Commissioning August & September. 2 Agenda 11:20 Coffee 11:30 Introduction Sue S 11:35 Controls (an overview) Brian M 10:55 Controls & Data Acquisition.
ALICE : Superconductive Energy Recovery Linac (ERL)
ILC RF phase stability requirements and how can we demonstrate them Sergei Nagaitsev Oct 24, 2007.
Probe beam distortion in TBTS due to high gradient RF acceleration (first part: observations) CTF3/TBTS Logbook 17 May 2013 Wilfrid Farabolini – Alexej.
ALICE : Superconductive Energy Recovery Linac (ERL) “Quick course” for new machine operators Part 3: Experimental and Operational Procedures Y. Saveliev.
Possible new EMMA injectors bdm. Motivation ALICE due to shut down soon Alternate EMMA injection (assuming EMMA project continues which it should …) Several.
Paul Emma LCLS FAC April 16, Initial Experience with Injector Commissioning P. Emma, et al. Facilities Advisory Committee.
P. Emma, SLACLCLS Commissioning – Sep. 22, 2004 Linac Commissioning P. Emma LCLS Commissioning Workshop, SLAC Sep , 2004 LCLS.
P. Emma, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P. Emma LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector Commissioning September Injector Commissioning Plans C.Limborg-Deprey Gun exit measurements.
Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector October Injector Physics C.Limborg-Deprey Diagnostics and Commissioning GTL measurements.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Bruno Muratori STFC, Daresbury Laboratory Commissioning EMMA 02/07/09 PRISM workshop – Imperial College.
Modelling of the ALICE Injector Julian McKenzie ASTeC STFC Daresbury Laboratory IOP Particle Accelerators and Beams Group Status and Challenges of Simulation.
Injector Setup/Mini-phase  Description of injector setup  sources of drift  Mini-phase procedure for injector  Checking the rest of the machine. Stephen.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
~ gun3.9 GHz cavity Bunch compressor 3 ILC cryomodules 45 deg. spectro injector main linac user area disp. area transport line Overview of.
ASTRA Injector Setup 2012 Julian McKenzie 17/02/2012.
#3191, 14 Oct 2012 Cabling installed to allow fast BPM electronics on injector BPMs System is flexible enough to allow different INJ-BPMs to be used (not.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
3243 Fri 23 Nov Summary INJ-BPM-01: took 1 shot of data, just a reference to compare with previous recent shifts – Did not see a strong dominant 100 kHz.
FLASH II. The results from FLASH II tests Sven Ackermann FEL seminar Hamburg, April 23 th, 2013.
EMMA Extraction / Diagnostic line Bruno Muratori STFC, Daresbury Laboratory 01/09/08.
Optics considerations for ERL test facilities Bruno Muratori ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory (M. Bowler, C. Gerth, F. Hannon, H. Owen, B. Shepherd, S. Smith,
BPMs period General BPM Tasks/Projects New single bunch BPM electronics on ALICE AR1 + ST2 They had been tested already last year by Alex and Ian.
Bruno Muratori (for the EMMA team) STFC, Daresbury Laboratory EMMA commissioning 02/09/08.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
March-May 2012 AP Projects 1.Beam substructure. 2.Bunch length/energy spread in pre- compressed bunch using RF techniques with 325 kV gun voltage 3.TOA.
T. Limberg Position of the 3rd Harmonic System. Injector (with first Bunch Compression Stage) 2 European XFEL MAC May 2010 T. Limberg.
Christopher Gerth DL/RAL Joint Workshop 28-29/4/04 Modelling of the ERLP injector system Christopher Gerth ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
Post-LH Diagnostic Line for LCLS-II P. Emma, M. Woodley, Y. Nosochkov, Feb. 26, 2014 Steal beam at Hz with y -kicker after LH (  y = 15 mm) Bend.
Status of the Simulations on Photo Injector Optimization for Low Charges Yauhen Kot BD Meeting,
First Electrons at the Fermilab superconducting test accelerator Elvin Harms Asian Linear Collider Workshop 2015, Tsukuba 24 April 2015.
Accelerating structure prototypes for 2011 (proposal) A.Grudiev 6/07/11.
Construction, Commissioning, and Operation of Injector Test Facility (ITF) for the PAL-XFEL November 12, 2013 S. J. Park, J. H. Hong, C. K. Min, I. Y.
Experience with Novosibirsk FEL Getmanov Yaroslav Budker INP, Russia Dec. 2012, Berlin, Germany Unwanted Beam Workshop.
LCLS-II Injector layout design and study Feng Zhou 8/19/2015.
XFEL Beam Dynamics Meeting Bolko Beutner, DESY First results of micro-bunching and COTR experiments at FLASH Bolko Beutner, Winfried Decking,
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
B. Marchetti R. Assmann, U. Dorda, J. Grebenyuk, Y. Nie, J. Zhu Acknowledgements: C. Behrens, R. Brinkmann, K. Flöttmann, M. Hüning,
Beam Commissioning Adam Bartnik.
Feng Zhou LCLS-II AP meeting 02/23/2017
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Emittance Dilution and Preservation in the ILC RTML
Slice Parameter Measurements at the SwissFEL Injector Test Facility
Have a chance to operate your own beam at CERN
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Longitudinal Diagnostics for start-up
Beam Optics Set-Up at SLAC End Station A
Thermal emittance measurement Gun Spectrometer
SuperB e+/e- main linac and diagnostics studies
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Injector Commissioning C
Linac/BC1 Commissioning P
VELA TDC: Bunch Length and Longitudinal Phasespace Measurements Update
Injector Experimental Results John Schmerge, SSRL/SLAC April 24, 2002
Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P
First results of micro-bunching and COTR experiments at FLASH
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
LCLS Injector Commissioning P
Diagnostics overview Beam profile monitors Cherenkov radiators Summary
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Experience with photoinjector at ATF
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

ALICE Commissioning Part II : Injector Yuri Saveliev Seminar on 14-15/07/2008 Gun to Booster Booster to FCUP-01 The rest of the Injector

GUN – to - BOOSTER setting

Gun to Booster Slit Vertical Aims: 1. Setting Voltage, bunch charge, PRF, Train Length 2. Setting correct beam size: ~7-9mm FWHM at YAG Centre the beam at the entrance to booster with beam ~parallel to axis 4. Buncher coarse setting - set zero-crossing phase (but we will not know yet if it is bunching or debunching phase) - set prescribed buncher RF power (but keep buncher OFF if the phase is not known) Notes: a) we can and should use BPMs in the Injector !!! b) because of limited number of diagnostics, we must rely on gun beamline settings determined earlier during gun commissioning and the model (e.g. a new SOL-01 scan at nominal Q is required).

Setting SOL-01 and SOL-02 SOL-01 scan at “commissioning” Q (=80pC ?) note: the position of the waist is OK but not absolute values Model: B1=330G (I=3.88A) on YAG-01: FWHM expected ~7-9mm 80pC) “rule-of-thumb” : Find B1 at which the beam size on YAG -01 is minimal and subtract ~10% Actual SOL-02 setting is very much open question model: B2=220G (I=2.6A) waist position is not a good model/reality match SOL-02 optimisation is a subject for an injector fine tuning

Steering 1) Steer the beam to the centre of the BPM-01 use HVCOR-01 only (HVCOR-06 still set to zero) 2) Steer the beam to the centre of the YAG-01 using HVCOR-06 only 3) Steer the beam to the centre of BPM-02 (HVCOR-02 only) 4) Steer the beam to the centre of the SOL-02 (HVCOR-06 only) vary SOL-02 & observe no beam motion on BPM-02 5) Re-center the beam on BPM-02 using HVCOR-02 only Check steering & beam size at buncher position vary buncher phase / gradient and observe no motion on YAG-01 and BPM-02 increase TrainLength to ~50-100us and vary SOL-01, HVCOR-01, HVCOR-06 and watch for pressure rise

If T=350keV, and ΔT=10keV, we may expect Δφ~10 o that should be noticeable PROCEDURE: Setting zero-crossing phase in buncher Beam acquires (or looses) energy if not at zero-crossing Compare BPM and reference 1.3GHz signals Set phase such that BPM signal phase do not move with buncher RF ON or OFF NOTE: we would not know (yet) if the phase is zero or 180 o Hence leave it for later to set with the use of booster. E ~ 60keV

Gun Beamline Setting : Summary Set the “commissioning” Q not straightforward (no current sensor in sight !!!) use QE scan results for estimates : SOL-01 scan required to set SOL-01 correctly for a given Q Cross -calibrate BPM-01 and YAG-01 (skip if Lifetime low) Set SOL-01 and SOL-02 Steer the beam to the entrance of the booster Set the buncher zero-crossing phase but bunching or de-bunching ? – not known yet

Booster – to – FCUP01

ERLP diagnostics: Booster to Linac Twiss parameters Emittance Slit here Energy spread/spectrum Absolute energy Buncher gradient / phase setting Bunch charge Setting achromatic condition (Q01-Q05) Twiss parameters Energy spread Setting achromatic condition (Q10, Q12)

Q-01Q-03Q-02 Q-04 YAG-02 YAG-03

ERLP Linac

Coarse cresting of the booster cavities Based on the fact that the beam loading will affect the LLRF signals Example: 10pC, 8MeV  P RF ~ 6.5kW Principle: the cavity is crested if RF power demand is maximal reflected power is minimal Exact procedure to be developed by the RF group Alternative Coarse cresting of the booster cavities At  =0 and  the beam should disappear from the screen or the BPM downstream of the booster. The correct phase is in the middle between the two. (A bit dodgy because of phase slippage etc, but worth trying)

Fine cresting of the booster cavities With the use of “DIP-01 / YAG-05” energy spectrometer When the cavity is near on crest : Δx is a minimal change in the beam image horizontal position that can be detected. Assuming D~1m and Δx~0.5mm, the cavities could be crested with the accuracy of Δφ=±2°. We need either a V-slit in YAG-03 or minimise  at YAG-05 : Principle: vary cavity phases ; set those providing MAX beam energy also, the image width should be minimal on YAG-05 (MIN energy spread) Note: that is how ASTRA interprets “crest”

Booster cavities : setting correct phases Cavity 1 = +10 o Cavity 2 = -10 o CAVITY 1 Phase shifter CAVITY 2 Phase shifter ~10keV ~100keV ~ 20keV Total bunch length 10%) ~ 20ps  ~ 10 o  E ~ 30keV To set +10 o : shift the phase such that the delay to cavity is DECREASED by 10 0 Energy spectrum may help to set Cavity 2 but not Cavity 1 (any other ideas ?) Hence: must know the way how the phase shifters change the delay time Console phase shifters need calibration in terms of the signs of delays !!!

Setting beam on axis of the booster Use RF focusing properties in the linac: beam centroid steers if not on axis of the cavity. Principle: vary Cavity 1 and Cavity2 phases by +/- 30 o and observe no beam motion on YAG or BPM (focusing / defocusing only !) This method may not be that effective for Cavity 2 because f ~  3 How ? vary HVCOR-02 and observe beam motion while varying phases note  x at a given  - getting smaller ? repeat until you get fed up with this

Buncher : correct zero-crossing phase bunching debunching After booster, the energy spread is dominated by a) bunch length b) booster phase “Bunching” phase must be set. [keV, ps] (8 MeV, near on crest) If we set the booster at 80 o, we expect  E~300keV with buncher OFF and  E ~ 70keV with optimal buncher setting Easy to find correct  =0 phase and set “optimal” buncher gradient (“optimal” gradient should be set when booster cavities are set to nominal phases Optimal buncher gradient = minimal energy spread after booster (i.e minimal bunch length)

Bunch charge - FCUP-01 Emittance (Quad scan)- exact procedure to be developed Emittance (slit)- straightforward (slit in YAG-02 and YAG-03) Twiss parameters, beam size and profile - exact procedure to be developed Energy spread and profile- DIP-01 / YAG-05 Mean beam energy - DIP-01 / YAG-05 (dispersion at YAG-05)- vary booster gradient Bunch length- zero-crossing method Measurements after setting booster straight Perhaps, we should forget the bunch length measurements until we achieve an energy recovery (time consuming task)

On beam energy measurements: effect of offsets and angles Our E-measurement layout is quite similar to that at (old) TTF Manual X1 X2 X1X2dE/E 05mm0.7% -5mm5mm1.2% 5mm5mm0.2% Perhaps, even without trying too hard, we can get better than 0.5% accuracy in energy measurements The same applies to DIP-01 (ARC1) ….

Bunch length measurement: theory Use zero-crossing method. cavity 1cavity 2 E2E2 (wide image) (narrow image) (C 1 >C 0 ) (C 1 <C 0 ) E 2 – cavity 2 is exactly on crest

Bunch length measurement With existing design (i.e. model) – not trivial Assume (from the model): After Cavity 1: 4  z =7mm; E 0 =4.0MeV; D=1m; (dE/dz) 1 =25MeV/m; 4  E = 160keV Assume also quite modest E 2 = 1.0MeV C 1 = 6.0  4  x = 41mm (!!) C 0 = 6.8  4  x = 46mm (!!)  x (wide image) =90mm (!!!!!!)  x (narrow image) =5mm YAG-05 : 30mm diameter Reduction in D x to ~0.25m needed (adjust quad Q-05) New Injector design is expected to produce much lower total energy spread after the booster – hence we’ll be fine !

Injector setup : Summary Booster-to-FCUP-01 Thread the beam through booster (coarse) Crest both cavities (coarse) - using LLRF signals - use lower Q (10-20pC) initially Optimise SOL-02 setting beam size and divergence (YAG-02) emittance Set the beam on axis of the booster Thread the beam to FCUP-01 (coarse) Set correct Q and buncher zero-crossing phase and gradient Crest booster cavities (fine) and set correct phases Check electron energy and adjust cavities gradients if needed re-adjustment of everything starting with SOL-01 may be needed Set Q-01 to Q-04 Measure baseline beam parameters emittance, energy spread, but not bunch length at the moment Calibrate BPM-01 and BPM-02 against Q (procedure to develop by RF group)

The rest of the Injector

Q-01Linac

Dispersion cancellation (Injector, DIP-01 / DIP-02) Principle: vary booster gradient by 1-3%  observe no beam motion on BPM-04 if it moves – adjust Q-05 ensure beam centring in Q-05 (it is needed to ensure accuracy but …) Note: D x =0.01m   x~0.3mm at  E/E=3%

Dispersion cancellation (Injector, dog-leg)

Main points on setting the injector dog-leg Make dispersion D x = 0 at Q-11 if Q-10 and Q-12 are identical and symmetric and of correct setting, this should be achieved automatically If the beam is at an angle when emerging from DIP-03: this does not affect the quads settings If the beam is offset after DIP-03: quads should be adjusted slightly, e.g. offset = 2mm  ~0.3% in quads field adjustment Setting the ERLP injector dog-leg needs a bit more elaborate procedure

Q-10 Q-11 Q-12BPM-05 BPM-01 (ST1) E0E0 EE Q-10: too strong Setting Q-10 (to get D x =0 at Q-11) and Q-12 (to cancel dispersion) Centre the beam at Q-11 (if not done, the beam will move even if D = 0) Change the booster gradient by 1-3% and fix it there Wobble Q-11 and observe BPM-05 and BPM-01 (ST1) if beam moves – adjust Q-10 and try again now set Q-12 in a regular way … Vary booster gradient 1-3% and observe BPM-01 (ST1) adjust Q-12 until beam does not move on BPM-01

Useful formulae: quads related x0x0 L f dx Example: centring in quads l=0.15m; k=8m -2 ; 35MeV; L=5m; dg/g=0.1 if dx=0.1mm (screen or BPM resolution) then: minimal x 0 to catch = 0.2mm

Injector: measurements Twiss parameters, beam size and profile at the entrance to linac expected  ~3-5m and  ~0 beam size ~ 3-5mm FWHM and round Skip other measurements until energy recovery is achieved Emittance measurement at the entrance to linac Energy spread and profile at the entrance to linac Check R 56 in the Injector line use time-of-arrival detection system on BPM-01 (ST1) Note : OTR-01 (ST1) has a hole of 15mm diameter at the centre hence you need to steer the beam off-centre to be able to see it !!

The rest of the Injector : Summary Set DIP-01 and DIP-2 (dispersion suppression) Thread beam through dog-leg section (coarse) Set dog-leg section (fine); dispersion suppression Match the beam to main linac perhaps beam size and position only Beam measurements probably, need none at the energy recovery stage