Five -Year Strategic Title I School Plan. Session Objectives Review the five year components utilizing the rubric Organize actions steps to meet the requirements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Designing School Level Professional Development. Overview Assessing prior knowledge of professional development Defining professional development Designing.
Advertisements

EFFECTIVE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (TA)
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
Campus Improvement Plans
OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Section 2: Historical Perspective of Policy 2320 Dr. Donna Davis Deputy Director, OEPA.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Blueprint Your SIP (School Improvement Plan) A living, breathing, document.
Mentoring August 25, What is the difference between mentoring and coaching?
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Roles and Responsibilities of the Instructional Coach
Title I Needs Assessment/ Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 5, 2010.
Presenter: Gary Bates.  “If a certificated employee receives a rating of ineffective or improvement necessary, the evaluator and the certificated employee.
Session Materials  Wiki
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Goals of This Session Provide background for program review development Describe document make-up.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
The LEA Planning Cycle Application
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Strategic Planning A Tool for “Charting our Future” Strategic Planning Team May 24-25, 2012.
Strategic Planning and AdvancEd Accreditation In partnership with Quality New Mexico Taos NMSBA Leadership Conference July 13, 2012.
Geelong High School Performance Development & Review Process in 2014.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Principals Meeting CFN 604 Greg Bowen, Network Leader October 16, :00am to 11:30am.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Ensuring Success For Each Student AdvancED District Accreditation Process Five-Year External Review March 13 – 16, 2016 Produced by Mr. Tony Pickett, Assistant.
OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Policy 2320: A Process for Improving Education: Performance- Based Accreditation System RESA 6 – October, 2014 Office.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Stage 3 Plan: Develop School Improvement Plan.
The Importance of Professional Learning in Systems Reform AdvancED Performance Accreditation Bev Mortimer Concordia Superintendent
A TAP Story: A. A. Nelson Elementary School Jacqueline Smith, Principal A.A. Nelson Elementary School TAP Leadership Team Teddy Broussard, State TAP Director.
Teacher’s PDP for the School Year October, 2012.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
A Productive Partnership
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building the Capacity of Principals to Lead the Improvement of Instruction A Presentation by the Charlotte.
Results Based Professional Learning Communities
NC State Improvement Project
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Differentiated Supports in Special Education
Revisit Differentiation and Reflection Standard
Professional Development to Support Student Achievement
Who We Are For more than 20 years, we have believed the key to preparing student for a successful future is providing rigorous and relevant instruction.
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Revisit Differentiation and Reflection Standard Prepare for Submission
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Implementing Race to the Top
February 21-22, 2018.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE Board of Education May 2018
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
Christy Jones Professional Learning Program Specialist
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

Five -Year Strategic Title I School Plan

Session Objectives Review the five year components utilizing the rubric Organize actions steps to meet the requirements of NCLB Plan sustained professional development to support the implementation of the strategies Complete the Title I section of the plan

The school administrators have a tremendous influence on how the plan will be viewed by others. It is the attitude of the leadership that impacts the success of the process.

Strategic Plan The power of this tool is derived from three things… The process of developing the plan The contents of the plan The process of implementation

Core Components of the Plan Five Year Components Membership Core beliefs Mission Data Analysis Goals and Objectives High yield practices/strategies Annual Updates Work plan Federal compliances Technology Budget OEPA Printing

Strategic Planning Committee Membership

Evaluate Core Beliefs Using the rubric section for core beliefs, evaluate the core beliefs developed by the school staff.

Evaluate Mission Statement Using the rubric section for the mission statement, evaluate the mission developed by the school staff.

Data Analysis Four types of data to be examined: External Trends Student Achievement Data Other Student Outcome Data Data about Culture/Conditions

Lets Summarize the Utilization of Data Student Achievement Data Goals and Objectives External Trend DataStrategies Other Student Outcome Data Strategies Culture, Conditions, and Practices Strategies

Evaluate Data Analysis Using the rubric section for the data, evaluate the data analysis completed by the school staff.

Evaluate Goal Statements Using the rubric section for goals and evidence, evaluate the goals developed by the school staff.

Question to Consider What is the relationship between goals and objectives?

Evaluate Objectives and Benchmarks Using the rubric section for objectives and benchmarks, evaluate the objectives and benchmarks developed to meet the goals.

High Yield Practices/Strategies HOW part of achieving the objectives Research based methods used to improve student achievement

Considerations when Choosing Strategies and Action Steps Emphasize strategies rather than programs Analyze resources needed Consider the timetable Determine who is responsible for implementation and monitoring Evaluate conditions that must change in order to implement the strategy/action steps Determine the new skills and knowledge that are necessary to implement - PD

Evaluate Current Strategies Strategy What is the selected strategy? Now Is it in place? Has it been implemented consistently and pervasively within the classrooms utilizing the strategy? Then What increases have been indicated in student achievement as a result of the implementation of the strategy?

Work Plan - Action Steps Designed to implement the strategies Sequential Interrelated processes

Evaluate Action Steps Using the rubric section for action steps, evaluate the action steps developed to meet the objectives.

Question to Consider Why is professional development essential to the successful implementation of the strategic plan?

What is professional development? Professional development is the process of improving staff skills and competencies needed to produce increased educational achievement for students by creating a new classroom culture.

Professional Development Review the action steps. Determine the professional development necessary to successfully implement the strategies. Design professional development over a period of time to build from an awareness to the institutionalization of the strategy.

Long Range Planning for Professional Development Robby Champion suggests that professional development be planned in a three to four year period which permits professional development to be differentiated and delivered in four levels: Awareness Developmental Transfer Institutionalization

Steps to Building a Sustained Professional Development Plan 1. Awareness (Beginning stage) Action research (review and sharing) Materials display University class Awareness level seminar Portable job aides View videos Book studies Reading professional materials Visit model programs Informal conversations State/LEA conferences Internet research Study groups 2. Developmental (Partial implementation) Academy Demonstration lessons Reflection logs Analyzing student work Developmental workshops Shadowing experiences Cadre of in house trainers Mentors Consultant National conferences Coaching from outside expert Observation and feedback from principal

Steps to Building a Sustained Professional Development Plan 3. Transfer (Full implementation) Collaborative planning and teaching Peer coaching/feedback Leading school committees Reflection logs Networks by electronics Newsletters 4. Institutionalization (Maintenance) Giving presentations / professional development Job exchanges National Board certification Portfolios Self-assessment Writing for publication

Title I Updates Upon choosing the Title I program (Schoolwide or Targeted Assistance) of the school, the on-line version of the plan will automatically move to specific requirements for that particular program.

Budget Using the entire amount of funding available for a school, determine an annual budget.

Evaluate Budget Using the rubric section for the budget, evaluate the budget to reflect the alignment of resources necessary to accomplish goals and objectives.

Presentation of the Plan The final draft should be presented to the staff, other stakeholders, and central office staff for final revisions and modifications.

What technical assistance is still needed to help your school teams complete their strategic plan?