Educator Evaluation Pilot Thursday, May 26 Webinar 3:30 pm.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric (M-STAR)
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
April 15, Through the SIG program, the United States Education Department (USED) requires state educational agencies (SEAs) to use three tiers to.
Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 NJ State Board of Education, July 13, 2011.
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
School Leadership Team Fall Conference West Virginia Department of Education Division of Educator Quality and System Support Bridgeport Conference Center.
March 6-7, 2012 Waterfront Hotel - Morgantown, WV Federal Programs Spring Directors Conference Developing Federal Programs of Excellence.
NetWorth: Personal Finance Education in Your Classroom LINKing Up for a Students Future Oct. 1, 2009 Oct. 9, 2009 Oct. 15, 2009 Glade Springs Charleston.
Elementary/Middle School Alternative Education Pilot Grant Application Technical Assistance Conference Call :00 A.M. – 12:00 P.M.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Mililani Ike Elementary School Community Council October 14, 2004 The crosswalk from SCBM to SCC: Meeting #2.
What is District Wide Accreditation? Ensure Desired Results Improve Teaching & Learning Foster a Culture of Improvement A powerful systems approach to.
Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework October 2011.
Goals of Workshop District Education Technology Plan Goals 8 goals aligned to State/National Education Technology Plans Strategies to meet challenges.
Reinventing Education Act of 2004 School Community Councils.
P-16 Council Overall Goals Regional change agents for “Closing the Gaps” Engaging community stakeholders Parents K-12 teachers K-12 administrators College.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
Update on Teacher and Principal Evaluation Implementation of ARS
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation May 10, 2012.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal Requirements SB 290 ESEA Waiver Oregon Framework.
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
Teacher Evaluation & Developing Goals Glenn Maleyko, Executive Director, Ph.D Haigh Elementary September 8, 2014.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
School Counselor Evaluation Task Force February 23, 2011.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Report to the Board of Education October 15, 2007.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Growth, Not Gotcha: Evaluating and Supporting Beginning Teachers INTC 8 th Annual Induction and Mentoring Conference February 26, 2013 Liam Goldrick Director.
July 19-21, 2011 Stonewall Resort, Roanoke, West Virginia Educator Evaluation Pilot.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
West Virginia Educator Evaluation Pilot Participant Update Division of Educator Quality and System Support West Virginia Department of Education Webinar.
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.
APRIL 2, 2012 EDUCATOR PREPARATION POLICY & PRACTICE UPDATE.
Educator Evaluation RESA Training July and August 2012.
CCSSO Task Force Recommendations on Educator Preparation Idaho State Department of Education December 14, 2013 Webinar.
Educator Evaluation Summative Evaluation March 28 th, 2013.
Educator Evaluation RESA Training July and August 2012.
Federal Monitoring using the HQS data Collection Site Michelle Samples, Ed.D. & Clinton Burch February 20, 2013.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
August 5-12, 2011 EDUCATOR EVALUATION PILOT. Overview The “Big Picture” – Where are we headed? – Where have we been? – How will we get there? Previewing.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
The New Educator Evaluation System
The New Educator Evaluation System
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Five Required Elements
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Future of Public Health in Kansas: Local Pilot
Presentation transcript:

Educator Evaluation Pilot Thursday, May 26 Webinar 3:30 pm

Opportunities Provided by Pilot Participation Be early adopter for the revised system Engage in professional development related to the WV Professional Standards Work as part of a collaborative team to improve educator effectiveness Provide input to policy makers for shaping the evaluation process

Essential Questions Who are the pilot schools? What is the conceptual framework of the revised system? What are the expectations for the pilot schools? What are the policy parameters? What is the timeline for training and what financial support is available? What are the next steps? What questions remain?

Who are the pilot schools? School Improvement Grant 1003(g) – 2010 SIG 1 schools – 14 schools – 2011 SIG 2 schools – 6 schools Non-SIG schools – 5 schools – high school, middle school, elementary – broaden the demographic representation of pilot schools

What is the conceptual framework of the revised educator evaluation system?

Conceptual Framework WV Professional Teaching Standards, Leadership Standards, Counselor Standards Professional evaluation Structured feedback Encouragement and acknowledgement of continuous professional growth

Improvements Teacher Evaluation – decreases indicators from 55 to 16 – decreases # of classroom observations required for each evaluation Principal/Counselor Evaluation – 12 indicators, performance based Teacher/Principal/Counselor – Performance level descriptions – Performance rubrics for each element

New Elements Evidence based – Educator performance – Student performance

Educator Performance Evidence Does not mean creating a portfolio Does mean being able to showcase the work of the teacher Broad categories of evidence for each professional standard

Student Performance Evidence – Classroom Opportunity to demonstrate student learning using: – A goal-driven process, established by the teacher or a collaborative team of teachers – Existing/created assessments – Multiple measures to identify student learning

Student Performance Evidence – School Opportunity to demonstrate student learning using school-wide measures of growth, based on WESTEST 2 in the areas of: Math Reading/Language Arts School level growth report will be generated by WVDE SIG schools required to include school evidence Non-SIG schools recommended, but optional

Putting It All Together 5% 80% 15%

Evaluation Progressions Initial: 1 st - 3 rd year teachers Intermediate: 4 th & 5 th year Advanced: 6 th year or greater

Initial Progression Initial: 1 st - 3 rd – Four observations and evidence collections – Two student learning goals – One final evaluation

Intermediate Progression Intermediate: 4 th & 5 th year – Two observations and evidence collections – Two student learning goals – One final evaluation

Advanced Progression Advanced: 6 th year or greater – One self-evaluation – Two student learning goals – One final evaluation

What are the expectations for the pilot schools?

Expectations for the Pilot Schools Embrace the Opportunities: Be early adopter Engage in professional development Work as part of a collaborative team Provide input to policy makers Participate in the research study

Learning from the Pilot What is your role? – Teachers, mentors, and principals will need to be active participants and provide feedback to WVDE What information will need to be collected about the evaluation process? – Process – Outcomes What about confidentiality? – All data will be aggregated to the school level – All data collection will be confidential

Learning from the Pilot What will be the immediate outputs of the pilot study? – Findings will be published in the form of various reports, and made available to stakeholders. – Recommendations will be made for any revisions prior to statewide rollout. What will be the long term impact of the pilot study? – A better evaluation system, one that is more rigorous, equitable, and transparent.

What are the policy parameters associated with participation in the pilot?

Policy Authority Waiver Process – State Superintendent will submit waiver to the WVBE – Pilot-wide waiver for identified schools – State Boards action will provide authority to implement the pilot as evaluation of record Improvement Plan Exceptions – Waiver will specify all exceptions

What is the timeline for training? What financial support is available?

Teacher and Principal Evaluation Training Dates July – Stonewall Resort ALL Pilot schools leadership team members – Principals and all assistant principals of SIG 1 and SIG 2 schools and non SIG pilot schools – Title I Directors and/or Assistant Superintendents and school improvement specialists working with the SIG 1 and SIG 2 schools – Central office representative for non SIG pilot schools

Teacher Evaluation Training Dates August 8 – Stonewall Resort-Roanoke Participants: all teachers, administrators and SIG funded transformation specialists – Martinsburg North Middle – Doddridge Elementary – Romney Elementary – Hardy County school* – Ohio County school*

Teacher Evaluation Training Dates August 9 – Tamarack-Beckley Participants: all teachers, administrators and SIG funded transformation specialists – Mount View High School – Sandy River Middle School – Welch Elementary – Southside K-8

Teacher Evaluation Training Dates August 10 – Civic Center-Charleston Participants: all teachers, administrators and SIG funded transformation specialists – Hamlin Pre-k - 8 – West Hamlin Elementary – Guyan Valley Middle School – Marion County school* – Putnam County school*

Teacher Evaluation Training Dates August 11 – Civic Center-Charleston SIG 1 and SIG 2 schools Participants: all teachers, SIG funded transformation specialists and administrators – East Bank Middle – Cedar Grove Middle – Stonewall Jackson Middle – Riverside High School – Malden Elementary – Watts Elementary

Teacher Evaluation Training Dates August 12 – Civic Center-Charleston Participants: all teachers, administrators and SIG funded transformation specialists – Franklin Elementary – Geary K-8 – Spencer Elementary – Richwood High School – Wood County school*

Financial Support for Training WVDE – assumes costs for training locations and materials SIG schools – utilize SIG grant funds for costs associated with stipends and travel Non-SIG schools – receive separate grant funds for costs associated with stipends and travel

What are the Next Steps?

Renewal of SIG 1003(g) Grants Participation in the pilot teacher and principal evaluation is a requirement for renewal of the SIG 1003(g) grants.

Transformation Model Developing teacher and school leader effectiveness Use rigorous, transparent and equitable evaluation systems that take into account data on student growth School Improvement Grant (SIG 1 & SIG 2) Schools

SIG Assurance Statements Related to Developing Teacher and School Leader Effectiveness Participate in and provide input to the Educator Evaluation Task Forces regarding an evaluation model that takes into account data on student growth as part of a multiple observation-based assessment measure. Become an early adopter of a rigorous, transparent and equitable evaluation system that takes into account data on student growth as a significant part to educator performance evaluations.

Non SIG Schools Letter of Intent template provided by WVDE Staff Commitment demonstrated by 80% vote of faculty for school participation Signature from the superintendent, principal and faculty senate chair Letter due by June 9, 2011

Questions Regarding…… SIG requirements Jan Stanley Karen Davies Teacher evaluation Lori Wiggins Principal and counselor evaluation Michele Blatt Research study Nate Hixson