Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Correction and Preprocessing Methods Veselin Dikov Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006 Moscow, Russia
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Outline ●Beam hardening ●Scattered radiation ●Ring artefacts ●References
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Beam hardening ●Monochromatic vs. Polychromatic X-ray source ●Absorption of low energy photons ●Additive detector ●Mean energy higher - beam hardening
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Thickness measurement ●Monochromatic ●Polychromatic for homogenous medium
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Thickness measurement ●“Non-linear” deviation of the polychromatic signal
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Beam hardening artefacts ●Cupping ●Simulated skull
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Beam hardening artefacts ●Streaks ●Hard (e.g. bone) tissues
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Correction Strategies ●Preprocessing On projection data ●Postprocessing On reconstructed data ●Dual-energy imaging Considered most elegant
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Preprocessing ●Select “appropriate” absorber ●Measured value A is corrected to A’ ●Assumes “homogeneous” medium ●Fails if bone present
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Postprocessing ●Iterative approach: first: preprocessing step second: threshold to identify hard structures third: forward-project the contribution of the hard structures into projection data ●Good results
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Dual-energy image ●Modeling of the attenuation coefficient ●Substitute in ●Gives
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia ●Two energies - two integral equations ●Reconstruct and Now can be reconstructed for any E ●Two scans? Dual-energy image
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Outline ●Beam hardening ●Scattered radiation ●Ring artefacts ●References
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Scattered radiation ●Scattered radiation ●Components of scatter Off-focus radiation (OFR) Scattered radiation in the patient Veiling glare
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Scatter measure ●SPR – Scatter-to-Primary-Ratio ●Broad beam model estimation for SPR
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Scatter artefacts – loss of contrast ●Loss of contrast Contrast without scatter Contrast with scatter
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Scatter artefacts – loss of sharpness ●Loss of sharpness Transmitted radiation - blurring kernel - 2D convolution
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Scatter artefacts – loss of sharpness ●Loss of sharpness Veiling glare contribution
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Scatter reduction methods ●Anti-scatter grids 4G vs. 3G Higher voltage ●Air gaps Magnifying effects Increased blurring ●Beam collimation Complicated systems reminder:
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Measurement of scatter ●Opaque disc techniques Scatter in the “shadow” Arrays of discs with decreasing size ●Aperture techniques Narrow beam “clean” of scatter Arrays of apertures ●Hybrid techniques ●One vs. Two scan techniques
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Correction schemes - Convolution Filtering ●Detected image ●Use as an estimation for ●Spatial vs. frequency domain filtering ●Analytical vs. empirical approaches for filtering schemes
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Correction schemes – Scatter sampling ●Sampling of the scatter measurement Opaque discs arrays Aperture grid ●Interpolation of the smooth surface -6 dB
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Correction schemes – Scatter sampling ●Interpolation schemes 2D least squares fitting Filtration with sinc and jinc 2D polynomial fitting 2D bicubic splines ●Sampling rate depends on surface frequencies
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Results
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Outline ●Beam hardening ●Scattered radiation ●Ring artefacts ●References
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Ring artefacts
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Ring Artefacts ●Reason ●4G vs. 3G ●Postprocessing correction only
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Correction scheme 1.ROI 2.I P 3.Artefact pattern 4.Artefact subtraction 5.P I
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia ROI ●Select ROI with morphological operations
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Find artefact pattern ●Scan for irregularities Use variance of signal or Use median of signal etc. ●Extract ring pattern
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia Results
Moscow-Bavarian Joint Advanced Student School March 2006, Moscow, Russia References ●T.Buzug, Einfürung in die Computertomographie, Springer-Verlag (2004) ●A.Kak and M.Slaney, Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging, IEEE Press (1988) ●K.P.Maher and J.F. Malone, Computerized scatter correction in diagnostic radiology, Contemporary Physics 38, (1997). ●J.Sijbers and A.Postnov, Reduction of ring artefacts in high resolution micro-CT reconstructions, Physics in Medicine and Biology Vol. 49 (07/2004) ●M.Zellerhoff et al, Low contrast 3D-reconstruction from C-arm data, Medical Imaging SPIE, (04/2004) Thank you for your attention!