3-Tier Reading Model West Virginia Department of Education Division of Student and Instructional Services Office of Instructional Services Catherine A.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How the Sonday System Product Line is Being Used
Advertisements

Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process
RtI Response to Intervention
AIM for Literacy Solutions to Advance Adolescent Literacy in West Virginia Presented by Rebecca Derenge Terry Reale, WVDE Office of Instruction
West Virginia Department of Education. July 1, 2011 timeline for middle school implementation West Virginia Department of Education.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Instructional Decision Making
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
RTI 101 Mia Hyde Tennessee Department of Education Coordinator of Reading Content & Resources.
What is RTI? RTI is a general education initiative aimed at improving student performance through the use of effective scientific research-based instructional.
A NEW MODEL OF TIERED INTERVENTION REQUIRED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT AS OF JULY 1, PRESENTED BY JESS GRAYUM Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Knox County Schools Transition to RTI2
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention This ppt is an adaptation of a specific PISD Training on RTI, The Educational Testing and.
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
Using Core, Supplemental, and Intervention Reading Programs to Meet the Needs of All Learners Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D. Oregon Reading First Center COSA.
North East School Division An Introduction to Response to Intervention (RTI)2009.
Response to Intervention: Getting Started Traci Seils Literacy/Dyslexia/MRT
General Universal Level Targeted Level Intensive Level Bonus
Response to Intervention: The new Road to Ensuring Student Success January, 2011 PISD.
RtI Response to Intervention April 2, 2008 Board Presentation.
0 1 2 Required Elements: Universal Screening Tier I Tier II and Tier III Progress Monitoring District and School RTI² Teams Fidelity of Implementation.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
RTI Response to Intervention. What are RTI systems? Definition (NCRTI, 2010) RTI programs integrate assessment systems and student interventions Are multi-tiered.
The Three-Tier Model for Reading Intervention Tier III Tier II Tier I.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What Is a Multi-level Prevention System?
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Georgia’s Pyramid. Pyramid Vocabulary  Formative Assessment  Universal Screening  Intervention  Progress Monitoring.
1 Differentiated Instruction Massachusetts Reading First Plan and John Silber Early Literacy Initiative Advanced Seminar Dorothy S. Strickland, Ph. D.
Response to Intervention A quick review to guide the work of NH’s RtI Task Force Sandy Plocharczyk Raina Chick Co Chairs, NH RtI Task Force October 24,
Pearson Copyright Tier Reading Model 3/26/08.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
RtI in Georgia: Student Achievement Pyramid of Intervention
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction An Overview of the Intervention Policy and Process.
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction An Overview of the Intervention Policy and Process.
Effective Grade Level Teams Minnesota RtI Center Conference March 26, 2009 Kerry Bollman St Croix River Education District.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention.
Cindy Edwards, Administrative Supervisor Response to Intervention, Dyslexia/504 August 2, 2011 A Multi-Tiered Prevention System.
The Role of the Teacher. Basically, the state believes that teachers, along with the school district, are responsible for students that fail. If a student.
Tier III of the Three Tier Reading Model.  Tier I – Core Classroom Instruction  Tier II – Intervention  Tier III – Intensive Intervention (The person.
Literacy Framework: What Does It Look Like at Shawnee Heights? Tamara Konrade ESSDACK Educational Services and Staff Development Association of Central.
RTI: Response to Intervention An Invitation to Begin… Rutgers Conference January 2015 Janet Higgins Reading Specialist East Amwell Township School Rutgers.
Medford Public School District Math Intervention Program Elementary Level K-4.
Scientifically Researched-Based Interventions (SRBI)
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
© 2013 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency Using Collaborative Instructional Log information to develop an Individual Transition Plan Pamela.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Tier I Tier II All Students Participate Effective for 80% - 85% 15% Whole Group AND Small Group! Additional Small Group Differentiated Instruction Delivered.
Extensive Reading Interventions in Grades K - 3: From Research to Practice Scammacca, Vaughn, Roberts, Wanzek, & Torgesen (2007)
RTI: Big Ideas (Secondary Level) RESOURCES. Data-based instructional decision making model for MTSS Is this an individual student problem or a larger.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION. What is it? A method of academic intervention used in the United States designed to provide early, effective assistance to children.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Response to Intervention
Response to Intervention (RtI) What is a Teacher’s Role?
WVDE Title I Fall Conference Whole Group Session
RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Struggling.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION
Identifying and Implementing
Orozco EOY School-Wide Data
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

3-Tier Reading Model West Virginia Department of Education Division of Student and Instructional Services Office of Instructional Services Catherine A. Thompson

Tier I: Core classroom reading instruction that all students receive, assessment of student progress three times per year, and ongoing professional development.Tier I: Core classroom reading instruction that all students receive, assessment of student progress three times per year, and ongoing professional development. Tier II: Intervention (additional reading instruction) and frequent progress monitoring (e.g., every 2 weeks) that struggling readers receive.Tier II: Intervention (additional reading instruction) and frequent progress monitoring (e.g., every 2 weeks) that struggling readers receive. Tier III: More intensive intervention and frequent progress monitoring (e.g., every 2 weeks) that students with extreme reading difficulties receive after not making adequate progress in Tiers I and II.Tier III: More intensive intervention and frequent progress monitoring (e.g., every 2 weeks) that students with extreme reading difficulties receive after not making adequate progress in Tiers I and II.

3-Tier Reading Model Core classroom instruction for all students Intervention – 20-30% of students Intensive intervention – 5-10% of students (may include special education students)

The 3-Tier Reading Model is a scientific, research-based prevention model that: Provides an instructional framework for delivering assessment-driven, differentiated instruction to all students, including students at risk for and students with reading difficulties.Provides an instructional framework for delivering assessment-driven, differentiated instruction to all students, including students at risk for and students with reading difficulties. Focuses on reading instruction that uses scientific research-based core, supplemental and intervention reading programs.Focuses on reading instruction that uses scientific research-based core, supplemental and intervention reading programs. Identifies struggling students and provides the support (additional instruction/intervention) they need.Identifies struggling students and provides the support (additional instruction/intervention) they need.

What are the roles of assessment in the 3-Tier Reading Model? In Tier I, Reading Model goes beyond the administration of assessmentsIn Tier I, Reading Model goes beyond the administration of assessments Assessments given three times per year are used to guide instructional decision-making so schools can:Assessments given three times per year are used to guide instructional decision-making so schools can: Identify students making adequate progress (toward grade-level benchmarks or objectives);Identify students making adequate progress (toward grade-level benchmarks or objectives); Identify students who need differentiated instruction and/or intervention.Identify students who need differentiated instruction and/or intervention.

What are the roles of assessment in the 3-Tier Reading Model? In Tiers II and III, more frequent progress monitoring (every 2 weeks) is used to track student progress and inform additional reading instruction.In Tiers II and III, more frequent progress monitoring (every 2 weeks) is used to track student progress and inform additional reading instruction.

Is… Is not… Using assessment data to plan instruction and group students.Using assessment data to plan instruction and group students. Teaching targeted small groups.Teaching targeted small groups. Using flexible grouping.Using flexible grouping. Matching instructional materials to student ability.Matching instructional materials to student ability. Tailoring instruction to address student needs.Tailoring instruction to address student needs. Using only whole class instruction. Using small groups that never change. Using the same reading text with all students. Using the same independent seatwork assignments for the entire class.

Who provides instruction in each tier? Classroom teachers provide Tier I core classroom reading instruction for all students. Many schools also utilize Title I and Special Education teachers in this instruction.Classroom teachers provide Tier I core classroom reading instruction for all students. Many schools also utilize Title I and Special Education teachers in this instruction. Each school determines who teaches which students:Each school determines who teaches which students: In Tier II (classroom teacher, specialized reading teacher, special education teacher)In Tier II (classroom teacher, specialized reading teacher, special education teacher) In Tier III (specialized reading teacher, special education teacher)In Tier III (specialized reading teacher, special education teacher)

What grouping formats are recommended for each tier? Tier I – A variety of grouping formats (individual, pairs, small groups and whole group)Tier I – A variety of grouping formats (individual, pairs, small groups and whole group) Tier II – Small groups of three to five students with similar needs.Tier II – Small groups of three to five students with similar needs. Tier III – Small groups of three students or fewer, based on student needs.Tier III – Small groups of three students or fewer, based on student needs.

Tier I Reading Instruction Minimum of 90 minutes of daily instructionMinimum of 90 minutes of daily instruction Assessments three times a yearAssessments three times a year Instruction and materials based on scientific researchInstruction and materials based on scientific research

Tier II Intervention 30 minutes of daily additional reading instruction30 minutes of daily additional reading instruction Typically lasts for weeks (1 or 2 rounds)Typically lasts for weeks (1 or 2 rounds) Progress monitoring assessment every 2 weeksProgress monitoring assessment every 2 weeks SBRR materials and SBRI*SBRR materials and SBRI* *Scientifically-Based Reading Instruction

Tier III Daily Intensive Intervention Students receive the 90-minute Tier I instruction and 30+ minutes (between minutes is suggested).Students receive the 90-minute Tier I instruction and 30+ minutes (between minutes is suggested) weeks, but may be several rounds10-14 weeks, but may be several rounds Progress monitoring every 2 weeksProgress monitoring every 2 weeks SBRR/SBRISBRR/SBRI

Implementing the 3-Tier Reading Model 1.Focus on improving the core classroom reading instruction (Tier I) that all students receive. 2.Provide high-quality intervention (Tier II) for struggling readers. 3.Participate in ongoing professional development to enhance classroom implementation of SBRI. 4.Each school determines the relationship of Tier III instruction and other additional instruction that addresses specifically identified instructional needs that are also addressed through special education and/or programs.

Suggested References Denton, C. A., & Mathes, P. G. (2003). Intervention for struggling readers: Possibilities and challenges. In B. R. Foorman (Ed.) Preventing and Remediating Reading Difficulties: Bringing Science to Scale. Baltimore: York Press.Denton, C. A., & Mathes, P. G. (2003). Intervention for struggling readers: Possibilities and challenges. In B. R. Foorman (Ed.) Preventing and Remediating Reading Difficulties: Bringing Science to Scale. Baltimore: York Press. Foorman, B. R. & Torgesen, J. (2001). Critical elements of classroom and small-group instuction promote reading success in all children. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16.Foorman, B. R. & Torgesen, J. (2001). Critical elements of classroom and small-group instuction promote reading success in all children. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16. Torgesen, J. K. (2001). The prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, 40.Torgesen, J. K. (2001). The prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, 40. Torgesen, J. K. (2004). Lessons learned from research on interventions for students who have difficulty learning to read. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The Voice of Evidence in Reading Research. Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks.Torgesen, J. K. (2004). Lessons learned from research on interventions for students who have difficulty learning to read. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The Voice of Evidence in Reading Research. Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks. Vaughn, S., & Linan-Thompson, S. (2003). Group size and time allotted to intervention: Effects for students with reading difficulties. In B. R. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and Remediating Reading Difficulties: Bringing Science to Scale. Baltimore: York Press.Vaughn, S., & Linan-Thompson, S. (2003). Group size and time allotted to intervention: Effects for students with reading difficulties. In B. R. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and Remediating Reading Difficulties: Bringing Science to Scale. Baltimore: York Press.

For More Information: Beverly KingeryBeverly Kingery Catherine A. ThompsonCatherine A. Thompson