Significant Disproportionality and CEIS Special Education Directors Meeting September 2010 Dr. Lanai Jennings Coordinator, Office of Special Programs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Advertisements

ADDRESSING DISPROPORTIONALITY IN ALABAMA SCHOOLS
IDEA Final Report Process
Special Education Plan Annual Application for IDEA, Part B and Preschool and State Aid for Exceptional Children
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers U.S. Department of Education 1.
Disproportionality of Racial and Ethnic Groups in Special Education Technical Assistance Webinar October 2, 2009 Presented by: Martha Toomey, Director.
Disproportionality in Special Education
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds
Race-Ethnicity Proportionality Proportionality in the Special Education Population, by Race-Ethnicity, in Alaskan Public Schools Juenau, AK October 27.
Updates in IDEA NCLB is the symbol of the paradigm shift to a new mission of universal high achievement From: All children will have universal access.
Georgia Department of Education Division for Special Education Services Deborah Gay, Director.
ADDRESSING DISPROPORTIONALITY IN ALABAMA SCHOOLS Alabama Department of Education Division of Instructional Services Special Education Services Post Office.
Addressing the Disproportionate Representation of Racially and Ethnically Diverse Students in Special Education SPR&I Regional Training.
Angela Tanner-Dean Diana Chang OSEP October 14, 2010.
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
Significant Disproportionality: Information and Expectations Oregon Department of Education Dianna Carrizales & Sara Berscheit.
April 2009 Copyright © 2008 Mississippi Department of Education Instructional Programs and Services Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) April.
Disproportionality of Racial and Ethnic Groups in Special Education Significant Disproportionality and EIS versus Disproportionate Representation due to.
IDEA Reauthorization and Disproportionality Sammie Lambert, DECS KYCASE Summer Institute Lexington, Kentucky July 16, 2007.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” FY2012 Data Collections Conference Special Education.
Indicator 4A & 4B Rates of Suspension & Expulsion Revised Methodology Identification of Significant Discrepancy DE-PBS Cadre December 1, 2011.
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
Accountability for Results State Performance Plan improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities…
Disproportionality Solutions Summit: “Turning it Around” **** Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) U.S. Department of Education:
Welcome to the Regional SPR&I trainings Be sure to sign in Be sure to sign in You should have one school age OR EI/ECSE packet of handouts You.
Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS). 34 CFR § : An LEA may not use more than 15 percent of the amount the LEA receives under Part B of.
VCASE PRESENTATION Annual Plans, Maintenance of Effort (MOE) and Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) 1 October 7, 2013.
Monitoring Significant Disproportionality in Special Education Systems Performance Review & Improvement Fall Training 2011.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
Data Analysis & Disproportionality Nancy Fuhrman & Dani Scott Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Significant Disproportionality Symptoms, Remedies and Treatments.
Responding to Special Education Disproportionality Understanding your Data Presenters: Nancy Fuhrman & Dani Scott, DPI.
IDEA & Disproportionality Perry Williams, Ph.D. Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Diversity in Special Education. What is Diversity Diversity is about difference – students in special education vary in many ways, and those in regular.
State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.
Office of Special Education Significant Disproportionality Teri Johnson Chapman, Ed.S. Director Office of Special Education May 28, 2015.
R esponse t o I ntervention E arly I ntervening S ervices and.
Exceptional Children Division Special Programs and Data Section IDEA Part B Grant Fiscal Monitoring Presented by: Antonia Johnson, IDEA Part B Consultant.
The New IDEA: Major Changes Presentation to the Charter Schools Summit November 7, 2006 Nancy Reder, Esq. Deputy Executive Director NASDSE.
Jeopardy The LawDataFiscal CentsCEIS PlanExtras Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Final Jeopardy.
Utilizing Federal IDEA Special Education Funds Permissively to Serve At-Risk Students in General Education The Fiscal Mechanics of RTI and PBS.
D isproportionality O verrepresentation and Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
COORDINATED EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES CEIS 1.
Significant Discrepancy in Suspension and Expulsion Rates in West Virginia: Barriers to Implementation of Discipline Policy and Procedures November 15,
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
Equity in IDEA ___________________ NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING Michael Yudin Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Ruth.
Agenda 1:00 Introductions and ZOOM Webinar reminders 1:05 Topics: Statewide Field Test for Fiscal State Application for Title VI-B, RTI Resources, and.
State Advisory Panel & Interagency Coordinating Council Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)Significant Disproportionality & Overview of SAP/ICC Website.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
ADDRESSING DISPROPORTIONALITY IN ALABAMA SCHOOLS
Agenda Part I Recap of the Final Rule Part II Standard Methodology Part III Remedies Part IV Dates Part V Questions.
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
WELCOME What is on your table? Agenda for both days
Proposed Significant Disproportionality New Data Collection Presenters: Robert Trombley, Richelle Davis.
Discipline Identification and Reporting
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004
DISPROPORTIONALITY REGULATIONS
New Significant Disproportionality Regulations
CClick here to get started
Agenda Part I Significant Disproportionality Part II Equity in IDEA Final Rule Overview Part III Standard Methodology Part IV Data Reporting Part V Questions.
Data Update State of California
ADDRESSING DISPROPORTIONALITY IN ALABAMA SCHOOLS
Early Intervening Services
2019 OSEP Leadership Conference
Significant Disproportionality Fiscal Webinar
Significant Disproportionality Stakeholder Meeting
Significant Disproportionality
Significant Disproportionality
Presentation transcript:

Significant Disproportionality and CEIS Special Education Directors Meeting September 2010 Dr. Lanai Jennings Coordinator, Office of Special Programs

What is Significant Disproportionality States must annually collect and examine data to determine if Significant Disproportionality is occurring based on race or ethnicity. Authority: Section 618(d) of the IDEA and the implementing regulations in 34 CFR §

What is Significant Disproportionality Data analyses by race/ethnicity must include the following: identification of children as children with disabilities; identification of children as children with a particular disability; placement of children with disabilities in particular educational settings; and the incidence, duration, and type of disciplinary actions, including suspensions and expulsions.

What is Significant Disproportionality Statistical results stand alone A review to determine whether the significant disproportionality is the result of inappropriate identification is not applicable SEA must require any LEA identified as having significant disproportionality in any of the four above-mentioned analysis categories to reserve the maximum amount of funds for comprehensive Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS). 15% of IDEA funds

Defining Significant Disproportionality States have the authority to define for LEAs State determines criteria for what level of disproportionality is significant

How does WV define Significant Disproportionality 1.Cell size = 20 2.Relative Risk Ratios (RRR) must be greater than or equal to Placement and identification are examined 4.Discipline: type, duration, and incidence 5.Consecutive year provision

Additional OSP Business Rules No rounding occurs for the resultant RRR. – a RRR of does not trigger consequences for the district When fewer than 20 students in a single minority group are identified as having a disability, placement in an LRE, or assigned OSS, ISS, or total removals, the RRR is not required to be calculated – However, OSP may choose to do so to report to districts for tracking purposes.

SIGNIFICANT DISPROPORTIONALITY IS NOT SPP/APR INDICATORS 4B, 9, OR 10

Side-by-Side Comparison

Has Significant Disproportionality been identified in your district? OSP Significant Disproportionality and CEIS Resources

What happens when significant disproportionality is identified?

Require LEAs to use 15% of Part B funds for Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) …particularly, but not exclusively, for children in those groups significantly over identified. For Determinations of Significant Disproportionality States must:

What are Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS)? 09.pdf

CEIS Services provided through IDEA funding for at- risk students who do not receive special education services K-12 Direct academic or behavioral interventions Professional development

For D eterminations of Significant Disproportionality LEA must: Publicly report on the revision of policies, practices, and procedures

Reporting Requirements CEIS is a new 618 report Two required reporting mechanisms: 1.LEA Application CEIS program description Total number of students who received CEIS during the school year Total number of students who received CEIS in prior school years and who later qualified for special education and/or related services 2.WVEISweb Intervention Screens Identifies students by WVEIS number Specify only students who received CEIS during the prior school year

Click Yes here (Default setting is No)

Why is Significant Disproportionality Important? More likely to be assigned to segregated classrooms or placements More likely to be assigned long term suspensions Have limited access to inclusive and general educational environments Experience higher dropout rates and low academic performance Often exposed to substandard and less rigorous curricula May be missclassified or inappropriately labeled Minority students

Why is Significant Disproportionality Important? May receive services that do not meet their needs; and Are less likely than their white counterparts to return to general education classrooms. Minority students

Are more likely to become dropouts or receive a certificate of attendance and/or experience – High unemployment rates – Lack of preparation for the workforce – Difficulty in gaining access to postsecondary education Why is Significant Disproportionality Important? Minority students

Other factors that may contribute to Significant Disproportionality: Language Intrinsic deficits Child poverty & associated risk factors Assumptions about intelligence Wait-to-fail model Research to practice gap