COMENIUS PROJECT WORK ABOUT INDEX OF INCLUSIVE SCHOOLS WITH PUPILS (GLORIA FUERTES SCHOOL, SPAIN) 2013 December.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SUPPORT TO DEVELOPMENT OF ANTI-DISCRIMINATORY SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT FOR ROMA NATIONAL MINORITY CHILDREN Minority Rights Center, Belgrade, Serbia.
Advertisements

GATE Send-Out Program Wrentham Public Schools M. Belmonte / D. Hanewich Gate Teachers.
Case Studies – Australia Ross Attrill – International IDEA.
Rhianna R. Andrews, MSW, Whitney L. Benakis MSW, Anissa T. Cox, MED Association University Center of Disabilities, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
Summary of Results from Spring 2014 Presented: 11/5/14.
Teachers Self-evaluation of Inclusive Education in Czech Primary Schools Teachers Self-evaluation of Inclusive Education in Czech Primary Schools Research.
ALIGNING ACADEMIA CURRICULA TO INDUSTRY NEEDS: THE CASE OF ORGANIC FOOD PROCESSING COURSE Maite Cháfer 1, Chelo Gonzalez 1 1Universitat Politecnica de.
T EACHER L EADERSHIP SEMINAR S ESSION 1 By: Carrie Pilant Presented at Imogene Gideon Elementary Thursday, October 7, 2010.
ATTITUDES TO INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY A NATIONALLY REPRESENTATIVE SURVEY INCLUSION IRELAND AGM Presentation by Deirdre Carroll, CEO 12 April 2008.
Characteristics of on-line formation courses. Criteria for their pedagogical evaluation Catalina Martínez Mediano, Department of Research Methods and Diagnosis.
Survey on the new Early Learning and Care Assessment of Quality Improvements (ELCAQI) tool Toronto Coalition for Better Child Care.
ISSA Program Meeting ISSA Definition of Quality Pedagogy: Using Revised Standards as a Tool for Supporting Cooperation and Promoting Quality Vesna Zlatarović,
Strategies to grow stretch & challenge learners. What grows S&C learners? 1. Students who are self-confident, motivated and engaged learners 2. Students.
Prevalence of Out-of-Level Testing Martha Thurlow and Jane Minnema National Center on Educational Outcomes
Gender Issues in Studying CS - Balkan Perspective Mirjana Ivanović, Zoran Budimac, Zoran Putnik, Nikola Trkulja 10 th Workshop “Software Engineering Education.
COMENIUS PROJECT WORK ABOUT INDEX OF INCLUSIVE SCHOOLS (GLORIA FUERTES SCHOOL, SPAIN)
What do you want to work on today? Writing Listening Reading Speaking.
Obtaining reliable feedback from students about teaching
Effective School Learning Support Teams Supporting students with additional educational needs Beverley Milson, Leader, Learning Assistance.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Member Survey of Process: Ratings of Satisfaction.
Inclusion: Special Educational Needs Introductory Core Course Foundation training for teaching assistants Day 1.
Template provided by: “posters4research.com” A Study to Investigate the Relationship between Peer Opinions and Classroom Achievement of Students with Learning.
Alzheimer’s patients Caregivers Survey in Greece Dr Paraskevi Sakka Neuropsychiatrist Chairwoman, Athens Association of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related.
Evaluation and analysis of the application of interactive digital resources in a blended-learning methodology for a computer networks subject F.A. Candelas,
Assessing employability through reflective diaries on teamwork CEC 202 A Sense of Place School of English Second Year Approved Module.
NCCSAD Advisory Board1 Research Objective Two Alignment Methodologies Diane M. Browder, PhD Claudia Flowers, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
What do Graduate Learners Say about Instructor and Learner Discourse in their First Online Course? By Dr. Peter Kiriakidis, PhD Abstract This study was.
Are We making a Difference
How to develop research skills in students. The model of searching information. Carol Collier Kuhlthau How to develop research skills in students. The.
Tech-Connected Teacher (TC*Teacher)
Bridging cultures between teachers and parents Stimulating interaction between teachers and parents in a multicultural setting Natalia Eernstman Wageningen.
Selbsteinschätzung für Führungsteams als Diagnose Dr. Clemens Schmoll 1.
AFFECTIVE VARIABLES AND COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE PRACTICES OF ELEMENTARY STUDENTS Maria Bella R. Alvarez University of Mindanao Davao City, Philippines.
1 Ss. Colman-John Neumann Basketball Survey 2009/2010.
TWO PROPOSALS (1) Scaling up WASH from the Start with UNICEF (2) OMEP’s CRC Monitoring Initiative.
© New Zealand Ministry of Education copying restricted to use by New Zealand education sector. Page 1 Consider the Evidence Evidence-driven.
Civic and Citizenship Education in Times of Change: Curriculum and its Implementation Some Results of the IEA Studies Civic Education in Iraq: Study Tour.
A-ing You have two minutes to write a hypothesis about the difference between girls and boys You need to be able to test it by asking other pupils in your.
The Tellus Survey - an overview Alison Thompson: Analysis and Research Division DCSF Conference: The Use of Evidence in Policy Development and Delivery,
Guide to Membership Recruitment, Retention, Diversity and Inclusion.
Quality Reporting at SORS – Experiences and Future Perspectives Rudi Seljak, Tina Ostrež Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia.
Managing Organizational Change A Framework to Implement and Sustain Initiatives in a Public Agency Lisa Molinar M.A.
How did our school get involved? Iowa Sustaining Parent Involvement Network i S P I N.
COMENIUS PROJECT : STEPS IN OUR WAY TO INCLUSION Andorra, october 2012 Gloria Fuertes Public School of Special Education C/ Fuente Baja nº Andorra.
LANSING, MI APRIL 11, 2011 Title IIA(3) Technical Assistance #2.
Best Start Kindergarten Assessment
1 Claverley COE School Parent/Carer Questionnaire Results Summer Term - June 2014.
Carem Final Piloting Report Teacher: Triantafyllou Stefania.
Comenius Project “The adventures of a wheat seed” SUMMARY OF PROJECT EVALUATION’S RESULTS
OneVoice W Group Results 16 June 2014 Human Resources Employee Engagement.
Possible Barriers to Inclusion at Icknield School Physical limitations School building Location within Andover town Catchment area of two counties limits.
Parent Satisfaction Surveys What is the Parent Satisfaction Survey?  Each year schools from our district are selected to participate in the.
2015 SAA Board Survey. Raw Board Survey ResultsStrongly Agree AgreeDisagreeStrongly Disagree Don't Know Total Points Responses minus DKs Average Score.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency The IAEA Integrated Regulatory Review Service (IRRS) IRRS Missions : Analysis from a Radiation Safety.
Leading primary languages Thursday 14 October 2010 The Ofsted perspective (or Who’s in charge?) Derek Neil Derek Neil Education1.
ASSESSMENT DO THIS, NOT THAT! UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO ASSESSMENT DAY
LINCOLN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Parent Presentation Paul Martin.
Assessment for Learning (AfL) Effective Questioning.
Quantitative Data Collection Techniques In contrast to qualitative data quantitative data are numerical. Counted, calculated tallied and rated. Also ratings.
FALL 2006 DRUGS! HOW ARE WE DOING? AISD Intervention Program Bringing Parents, Community, and Schools together to build a safer and healthier future for.
By Ambreen Anis Nagori Course Facilitator Dr.Iffet Sultana M.Ed First Semester (Inclusive Education) Iqra University.
Croeso I Ysgol Dinas Brân! Welcome to Ysgol Dinas Brân!
The Results of Using Educational Games on Math Score for Preschool Children Pavinee Komanasin.
Research Project Our school is called Elworth Hall Primary school. We are located in Elworth, a small area within Sandbach. There are approximately.
Killean Primary School Survey on Pastoral Care Provision Sept. 09 – June 10.
TCAI: Lessons from first Endline TCAI Development Partners Feb 27, 2013.
Consultation: Your Say ….
Children with special educational needs (SEN) achievement and progress measuring and education: Jieznas gymnasium experience in Lithuania context.
St Peter’s CE Primary School
European Statistical System Network on Culture (ESSnet Culture)
Presentation transcript:

COMENIUS PROJECT WORK ABOUT INDEX OF INCLUSIVE SCHOOLS WITH PUPILS (GLORIA FUERTES SCHOOL, SPAIN) 2013 December

DIMENSION A: Creating inclusive cultures Section.1. Building community INDICATOR A.1.7. All local institutions are involved in school

WORK PROCESS IN CONNECTION WITH THE INDICATOR A.1.7 GENERAL OBJECTIVE “Know the grade of satisfaction of all parents and the children with more cognitive skills about the inclusive activities carried out between all pupils of the school and the activities developed with other institutions”

PROCEDURE 1.-Initial evaluation 2.-Development plan and implementation 3.-Final evaluation

ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF THE SURVEY TO STUDENTS SURVEYED STUDENTS: The number of pupils that have answered the survey are 33 boys and girls, which intellectual capacities allow them to understand and answer their opinions. The other 30 pupils of the school of the Primary Stage don´t do the survey, because their intellectual disabilities don´t allow them to do it. In order not to feel conditioned in their answers the survey was anonymous.

INDICATOR A.1.7. All local institutions are involved in school QUESTION 1

INDICATOR A.1.7. All local institutions are involved in school QUESTION 2

INDICATOR A.1.7. All local institutions are involved in school QUESTION 3

RESULTS A.1.7. The results show a very high degree of satisfaction in relation to inclusive activities with other boys and girls, as the three questions obtained over 76% has answered the maximum a lot. The remaining percentage is significant the rating of quite. From the results it is clear that what they like most is to conduct ( perform) activities with the other kids of the Primary Stage of the school, 85% rate a lot, 12% quite and 3% little. Improvement plan: when inclusive activities are planned to ask them to make proposals and collect those that are viable.

DIMENSION B: Producing inclusive policies Section B.1. Developing the school for all INDICATOR B.1.5. All new students are helped to settle into the school when they join first

WORK PROCESS IN CONNECTION WITH INDICATOR B.1.5 GENERAL OBJECTIVE “Know if to make friends at this school has been easy for pupils with more cognitive skills and if they help others to settle into the school”

INDICATOR B.1.5. All new students are helped to settle into the school when they join first The answers to the first question, 58% a lot, 36% quite and 6% a little indicate that although for more than a half has been very easy to make friends, other group have some difficulties and hard it. Thus the matter is to improve the strategies to make friends. QUESTION 1

INDICATOR B.1.5. All new students are helped to settle into the school when they join first Regarding question two, 63% helps a lot and 37% quite. Overall is a good score Assistance provided to other pupils to adapt to the center, can also be improved QUESTION 2

RESULTS B.1.5. Improvements plan: About the difficulty to make friends it would be to assess students who have more difficulties and to implement individual and group specific programs. Regarding help to others it would be necessary to suggest them specific tasks to provide help, because sometimes they want to help more but don´t know how to do it. CONCLUSION. In general we can conclude that pupils enjoy very much to develop activities with other pupils and overall, with the other kids of the school that have mos degree of disabilities. Students also feel very comfortable at the school and they are very motivated with the task we propose them. Finally it should be noted that for them is easy to make friends at the school.

DIMENSION A: Creating inclusive cultures Section A.1. Building community INDICATOR A.1.1. Everyone is made to feel welcome

WORK PROCESS IN CONNECTION WITH INDICATOR A.1.1. GENERAL OBJECTIVE “Know the welfare of the pupils at school and identify if the pupils with more cognitive skills find interesting and useful for them the activities we develop”

INDICATOR A.1.1. Everyone is made to feel welcome QUESTION 1

INDICATOR A.1.1. Everyone is made to feel welcome QUESTION 2

RESULTS A.1.1. The welfare level of students in the school is very high: 82% answering a lot and the remaining 12% scored enough. Likewise, the views on the usefulness and interest of the activities are also very good rating 81% a lot and 19% quite. We could conclude that the degree of student satisfaction is very high, both for their welfare at for the activities they develop.

THANK YOUVERY MUCH FOR LISTENING