Lena Simonsen the PROMISE conference Prague 2004 The sone 4 Project Lena Simonsen Avaldsnes skole.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mentoring New Educators
Advertisements

Self- and Peer-Assessment
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Responsibilities of the Supervisor While supervisory responsibilities may vary from one program area to another, the following duties are typical among.
Supporting continuous improvement in the replication process Getting to Grips with Replication Seminar 3: Monitoring, evaluation & continuous improvement.
What makes effective questioning? How can you use questioning to differentiate? Questioning.
Project Proposal.
Objectives Describe the benefits of performance appraisals List the steps to preparing for an appraisal Define the rule of “Intention and Attention” and.
Inclusive education in Serbia. Monitoring of inclusive education in Serbia Role of Civil Society.
Introducing PebblePad at University of Worcester Dr Rowland Gallop Elizabeth Symonds.
The IBCC Reflective Project
Session 7 Page 11 ECE361 Engineering Practice Brainstorming, Trades, Evaluation, and Conceptual Capture.
Creative Problem Solving 6.1 Novice Level Office of Gifted Education Virginia Beach City Public Schools.
SMART Goals and Educator Plan Development
Meeting Skills.
1 National Training Programme for New Governors 2005 Module 3 Ensuring accountability.
3/25/05Colorado Parent Information & Resource Center 1 Making Homework Manageable.
Unit 2: Managing the development of self and others Life Science and Chemical Science Professionals Higher Apprenticeships Unit 2 Managing the development.
Implementing Literature Circles. Literature Circles TopicDescription PurposeTo provide students with opportunities for authentic reading and literary.
Coaching and Providing Feedback for Improved Performance
Pedagogical Model Worklife Cooperation Plan
The sone 4 project Linda Velle Sjøen PROMISE Prague 2004.
Dr Elena Luchinskaya, Lancaster University/ Leeds Metropolitan University, UK.
Teachers Competences at Inclusive Primary Schools in the Czech Republic Teachers Competences at Inclusive Primary Schools in the Czech Republic Research.
Senior Lecturer Taru Tallgren
Improvement That Talks Back: Design, Monitor and Measure Continuous Improvement Efforts Dr. Stephan Knobloch Director of Research Loudoun County Public.
Kazakhstan Centres of Excellence Teacher Education Programme Assessment of teachers at Level Two.
Saturday, 19 September 2015 | Slide No. 1 Ideas Can Help :-) Helpful ideas lead to helpful innovations. Concept Name: Individual or Group Name:
AU- MAEL Dr. Dan Bertrand
PROMISE Kirsten M. Anttila et alii Prague 2004 A Comenius 2.1 project 2001 – 2004.
Pupil-centered approaches. Methods Independent learning Inquiry Discovery Problem solving Creativity Characteristics High pupil involvement Emphasis on.
Improving relevant standards. Aims and objectives Familiarize ourselves with best practice standards of teaching To think about how we can implement the.
User Inspired Design 2013 Jack Whalen Yiying Wu
Problem based learning (PBL) Amal Al Otaibi CP, MME.
Regional Seminar 2005 EVALUATING POLICY Are your policies working? How do you know? School Development Planning Initiative.
IMPORTANCE &SKILLS OF GIVING FEEDBACK Dr. A.K.Pathak ELMC,Lucknow.
Expansive learning actions and expressions of transformative agency - A Change Laboratory intervention in a academic Library.
1 Tuesday, the 28th of August: The Aalborg model 8.30 Opening of day two and questions 8.45 Problem based learning and/or Project Work Why use these new.
Foundations of Communication. Communication is the act of transmitting –Information communicated –A verbal or written message –A process by which information.
Indiana Student Achievement Institute InSAI Review & Revise STRATEGY SELECTION Document 5.3.
Effective Decision Making & Problem Solving
Problem-Based Learning in Research Education Md. Shahidul Islam, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Clinical Sciences and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
POPBL GUIDELINE BOOK FOR TEACHERS 1.Introduction to POPBL 2.Planning POPBL 3.Projects in POPBL 4.Applying POPBL in your course 5.E-learning Tools in POPBL.
Organizational Design, Diagnosis, and Development Session 14 The Management of Change.
Assessing the effectiveness of problem-based learning Trudy W. Banta, Karen E. Black, Kimberly A. Kline(2001).Assessment update,13(1),p Chun_
Appraisal Skills with Charan Sarai Practice Manager Adviser.
 When the persons who have responsibility and resources for addressing the problem are committed to resolving it  When the problem warrants the effort.
An Overview of the Communications Standard for School Mathematics? 1.
AT Consideration Overview of Issues & Solutions. P ROCEDURAL ISSUES … Consideration / Assessment / Evaluation Integration into IEP Implementation & Progress.
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENTS WITH MULTIPLE LEARNING DIFFICULTIES AND THE IMPACT UPON TEACHER TRAINING Ulla Alexandersson Lena Thorsson Sweden.
09/08/07 1 Vocational Skills Demonstration EUROOPAN YHTEISÖ Rakennerahastot OULUN LÄÄNINHALLITUS Source: Ammattiosaamisen näytöt käyttöön The Finnish.
Module 5: Questioning, Inquiry and Problem Based Learning Introduction and Module Overview Standards Knowledge and skills Assignments.
The Czech School Inspectorate Main responsibilities and Activities Prague,
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
TRAINERS AND TRAINING PROCESSES
NTNU’s quality system for education
MENTORING PROGRAM 2016.
Engineering Design Process
The Two Most Common Types of Contemporary Planning Techniques
Engineering Design Process
Designing an Intervention
Action Learning From Andrew Clarke
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Marzano Vocabulary Instruction Follow-Up
The Two Most Common Types of Contemporary Planning Techniques
Designing an Intervention
Coaching for Development
What Should RTI Look Like in a Department of Juvenile Justice School?
Presentation transcript:

Lena Simonsen the PROMISE conference Prague 2004 The sone 4 Project Lena Simonsen Avaldsnes skole

Lena Simonsen the PROMISE conference Prague 2004 The sone 4 project What we did  3 teachers attended a course by Signe Holm-Larsen. We then conveyed our new knowledge to our colleagues  We had a discussion in the staff – asking ourselves what we were good at and what are our challenges  All classes went through with one project or at least some elements of project work  We met other schools in the municipality also working with the method, and we exchanged experiences  We attended a spot course with Signe Holm-Larsen with focus on what was difficult

Lena Simonsen the PROMISE conference Prague 2004 Further work in team  Formulate a concise, concrete and measurable objective for the project.  Establish requirements and confines: –Time and space –Shall the group keep a logbook –Requirements to the product –Requirements to the presentation –What to emphasize in the evaluation –How to carry out the evaluation? Self-evaluation? Tutoring? Fill in forms? And so on..  Plan the motivation phase (book, film, acting and so on)  Decide how you want to implement brainstorming in the class before the teams/groups proceed with problem formulation, and subsequently the filling in of the planning document  Decide on how to combine the groups in the class  Organize and prepare potential/possible literature

Lena Simonsen the PROMISE conference Prague 2004 The sone 4 Project Focus Year 1  Awareness around the compositions of the groups. Gather experience How? Why? Evaluation  Form expression  Formulation of planning document - the teachers

Lena Simonsen the PROMISE conference Prague 2004 The sone 4 Project Focus Year 2  How to formulate the problem. How to help clarifying the central focus points and to make the formulation precise and solution oriented  How to get pupils from a descriptive to a more problem-solving approach to the assignment

Lena Simonsen the PROMISE conference Prague 2004 The sone 4 Project Focus Year 3  Coaching / how to be a good coach  Evaluation – how to do it and how to get time to do it.

Lena Simonsen the PROMISE conference Prague 2004 Problems encountered in working with the Project Method  How to formulate an approach to the problem, and avoid too much teacher guidance  How to get pupils from a descriptive to a more problem- solving approach to the assignment  How much is the teacher supposed to direct the pupils on the right track in accordance to the intentions and curriculum  How much shall we interfere?  How to create a feeling and mutual responsibility in the group, so one can avoid pupils whizzing around dodging their assignment?