CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ron Bass, J.D., AICP, Senior Regulatory Specialist Jones & Stokes Common NEPA Mistakes and How to Avoid Them January 17, 2008 Oregon Department of Transportation.
Advertisements

Identify Problems, Planning Objectives and Constraints.
SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
36 CFR 218.  Moves projects documented in an Environmental Assessment (EA)/Decision Notice (DN) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/Record of Decision.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing Fiscal Estimate.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
Environmental Impact Statement Process Development Services Department Carol Helland, Land Use Director/SEPA Official (DSD) David Pyle, Senior Land Use.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Deciding How To Apply NEPA Environmental Assessments Findings of No Significant Impact Environmental Impact Statements.
Negotiating the NEPA Maze: It Really Is Rocket Science Start.
Draft RMP/EIS. Objectives Write a draft land use plan and EIS. Issue a draft land use plan and EIS for public review.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
Standards experts. Accreditation solutions. Andrea Spencer Coordinator, WTO/NAFTA Enquiry Point (Canada) TBT Special Meeting on Procedures for Information.
CHAPTER 2 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS AND PROCESSING.
What If I Must Go Beyond a Preliminary Assessment? (the example of a USAID EA under Reg. 216) [DATE][SPEAKERS NAMES]
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
I Larry Heil, FHWA October 15, 2003 Environmental Streamlining.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
What If I Have to Go Beyond an IEE?. EA Training Course Tellus Institute 2 Environmental Assessments (EAs) & Programmatic Environmental Assessments (PEAs)
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
Energy, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Development Presented by Cat Shrier, Ph.D., P.G. Water Resources Planner (403)
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The Pre-Filing Process IRWA/AI January 13-14, 2009 IRWA/AI.
Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.
1.What is the standard relicensing process in the U.S. and what is the ALP (Alternative Licensing Process) ? 2.How did we convince FERC to agree to an.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Streamlining NEPA for Reusable Launch Vehicles Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation May 2004.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES FIRST THINGS FIRST Invitation of a mission Information meeting self-assessment.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Environmental Assessment in British Columbia Forum of Federations Conference September 14, 2009.
1 Identify Preferred Alternative and Finalize Plan Planning Steps 7 & 8.
FERC Office of Energy Projects 1 Richard Hoffmann, Director Division of Gas – Environment & Engineering Office of Energy Projects Policies Affecting.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVES. --- “The driving impetus for conducting environmental impact studies is to comparatively present the effects of proposed alternatives.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
1 Waste Discharge Authorization Application - British Columbia WG6 Application Process WG Document Review presented by Helga Harlander October x, 2008.
West Virginia Department of Education Introducing ……. Policy 2419: Regulations for the Education of Students with Exceptionalities.
Tribal Voices a tale of 3 mines GSA National Conference November 2015 Kendra Zamzow, PhD, CSP2 Ann Maest, PhD, Buka Environmental.
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation NEPA&CEQ.
LBNE Environmental Assessment NEPA Informational Meeting May 23, 2013 Rod Walton, LBNE NEPA Manager.
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
1 1 CEQA Scoping Naomi Feger Planning TMDL Section Leader Region 2.
Director’s Order 12 contains information concerning review of other agency proposals.
Special Meeting on Procedures for Information Exchange November 7, 2007 Geneva Session 1 Anne Meininger United States USA WTO TBT Enquiry Point.
Animal Raising Claims in the Labeling of Meat and Poultry Products October 14, 2008 United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
1 1 The Project Description: Framing the CEQA Analysis Terry Rivasplata.
Siting Updates and the CEQ Meeting March 18, 2013 Linda Davis Western Governors’ Association.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
What If I Have to Go Beyond an IEE?. EA Training Course 2 Environmental Assessments (EAs) & Programmatic Environmental Assessments (PEAs) How Do I Prepare.
“The people’s forests” Public Participation in National Forest Planning Susan Jane Brown, Staff Attorney Western Environmental Law Center The National.
Stakeholder consultations
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Environmental Planning in the Army Corps of Engineers
Reporting in the EIA process
Unit 6 NEPA.
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
IS YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT PREPARED
Environmental Requirements and planning grants
Presentation transcript:

CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION

Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process used to determine the range… the “scope”… of issues to be addressed - the most visible addition to the NEPA process - important to derive the issues and concerns that will be the focus of the effort of study

Scoping, cont - one of the first steps carried out in an environmental impact analysis - in addition to other functions it is a cooperation building activity that solicits input from federal, state and local government agencies as well a the general public and concerned private organizations

3.1 Purpose of Scoping - Scoping is used to: (1) define the proposed action (2) request cooperating agencies / solicit input (3) identify what is important / unimportant (4) establish time limits on study (5) determine staff requirements of study team (6) collect background information (7) identify required permits (8) identify other regulatory requirements (9) determine the range of alternatives - The scoping process should match the goals of the project … simple/informal/functional-to-formal/etc

3.2 Defining the Proposed Action - scoping refers both to the level of action being considered and the level of study / assessment to be carried out - Carried out early in the analysis process, scoping requires knowledge --- only effective if agencies and the public being asked to comment are given sufficient levels of knowledge on project/activity issues of:

… potentially affected parties … need behind the project / activity … primary lists of alternatives and environmental issues … a clear description of what is being proposed An EA / FONSI does not absolutely require a scoping procedure… most agencies find it beneficial and will do it

An EIS requires the scoping process … cannot be initiated until publication of the Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement in the Federal Register Previously I have not said much about Notice of Intent

Notice of Intent - notification that an EIS will be prepared and considered - Published in the Federal Register and the timing for all other documents pursuant to the EIS follows this publication (date)

The Notice: (1) describes the proposed action and possible alternatives (2) describes the agency’s proposed scoping procedure – including any proposals for scoping meetings (3) states the name / address of person within the lead agency available to answer questions about the proposed project / activity and the EIS … called the point of contact (POC)

As part of the scoping process the lead agency should: (1) invite the participation of affected Federal, State and Local agencies and other interested parties (indigenous groups, special interest groups, etc) … specifically those who are likely not to be in agreement with the proposed action --- the scoping letter will give information description identity preliminary list of alternatives preliminary list of identify issues and concerns proposed study time

the scoping letter will ask for information special concerns of the agency / group required permits suggestions for alternative relevant information and data POC Aside: Native Americans are specifically named in NEPA regulations as bodies to be consulted on relevant issues

(2) Determine the scope (“range of”) and significant issues to be analyzed in depth in the EIS - to determine scope of environmental impact statements, agencies consider: type of actions (3) types of alternatives (3) types of impacts (3)

Types of actions (1) connected actions [closely related actions] (2) cumulative actions (3) similar actions

Types of alternatives (1) no action alternatives (2) other reasonable courses of action (3) mitigation measures Types of impacts (1) direct (2) indirect (3) cumulative

(3) Identify and eliminate issues which are not significant or which have been covered by prior environmental review (4) Allocate, as appropriate, assignments for preparation of the EIS among the lead and cooperating agencies (5) Indicate other EA or EIS documents related to the proposed action, but which are not part of it (6) Identify other environmental review of analysis being carried out (7) Indicate timing for EIS preparation and agency decision making

As part of the scoping process, the lead agency may: (1) set page limits on environmental documents (2) set time limits (3) adopt procedures, combine EA process with scoping process (4) hold an early scoping meeting(s) in conjunction with other planning activities related to a specific action or specific site