Plan Formulation for Deep Draft Harbors Navigation Measures.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRADABLE PERMITS IN WATERWAY TRANSPORT JIM FAWCETT ECONOMIST GALVESTON DISTRICT.
Advertisements

Navigation Economic Technologies Symposium 9-10 May 2003 Generic Characteristics of Corps Waterway Models.
DREDGING YOUR DOCKS 2013 Supported by: USACE Galveston District U. S. Coast Guard Sabine Neches Navigation District.
Planned Expansion of the Panama Canal a brief discussion of the potential effects Western Dredging Association, Eastern & Gulf Chapters 2007 Fall Meeting,
Miami Harbor, FL Navigation Study Step 3: Formulation of Alternative Plans.
TAMPA HARBOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS, Big Bend Channel Alafia River Channel Port Sutton Channel TAMPA HARBOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS, Big Bend Channel Alafia.
MARITIME TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT
A Report to Congress Addressing “the Critical Need for Additional Port and Inland Waterway Modernization to Accommodate Post- Panamax Vessels”
Topic 19 Shoreline Engineering
CANADIAN COAST GUARD AUXILIARY - PACIFIC PASSAGE PLANNING CANADIAN COAST GUARD AUXILIARY - PACIFIC February 2012.
CLIMATE CHANGE: ITS IMPACT TO THE PORT
Environmental Sustainability in the Extractive Industry: The Case for Climate Change Mitigation Dr Uwem E. Ite.
Dredging, Disposal Management and Impacts on Lake Sediments US Army Corps of Engineers.
Economic Analysis in Transportation Systems Tapan K. Datta, Ph.D, P.E. CE 7640: Fall 2002.
Due to Congestion Presented By: Alexander Knapp.
Solutions for Flaring & Venting CNG Marine Transportation
1 Engineering Economic Decisions Lecture No.1 Professor C. S. Park Fundamentals of Engineering Economics Copyright © 2005.
Coastal & Port Engineering Considerations of the Jacksonville Harbor Deepening Study Kevin Bodge, Ph.D., P.E. Port & Coastal Engineer Senior Vice President.
PORT EVERGLADES. 3.7 MILLION CRUISE GUESTS 6 MILLION TONS OF CARGO AND 924,000 CONTAINERS The total value of economic activity at Port Everglades in FY.
CHARLESTONMOBILE WILMINGTON SAVANNAH JACKSONVILLE US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® NC Water Resources Congress Christine Brayman Deputy For.
1 Economic Analysis Water Resources Planning ( EA-WRP ) Deep-Draft Waterborne Navigation Analysis An Overview.
Logistics Aspects & Multi-Modal Transportation 29 November 2004 Presented by Peter O. Lehman, Esq. Director, Planning & Business Development South Carolina.
NED COSTS And Other Bewilderments Of COE Planning And Other Bewilderments Of COE Planning.
Port Financial Management Challenges Financing Freight Transportation Improvements St. Louis, Missouri April 29 to May 2, 2001 Financing Freight Transportation.
THE 1 ST EASTERN AND SOUTHERN AFRICA PORTS ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERS WORKING CONFERENCE PORT SUSTAINABILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGES (A South African.
A New Tool for Estimating and Simulating Economic Impacts of Dredging Activity New, Increased and Reduced Dredging Drs. Yue Cui and Ed Mahoney, Michigan.
Savannah Harbor Expansion Project
Infrastructure Vulnerability Profile. Are you considering hazard and climate risks in your infrastructure planning, siting, and improvement decisions?
Chatham County’s Local Issues and Drivers Chatham County Roadmap for Adapting to Coastal Risk Workshop Savannah, Georgia March 9-11, 2010.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Charleston District Charleston Harbor Post 45 Deepening Feasibility Study Barbara Melvin Senior Vice President.
The Change from Big GIS to Small GIS Andrew U. Frank Institute of Geoinformation Technical University Vienna - Austria
Port Everglades Master / Vision Plan Status Broward County Board of County Commissioners May 4 th, 2010.
NAD/SAD REGIONAL DREDGING MEETING/WEDA Jacksonville Harbor and Other Developments U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS COASTAL NAVIGATION BRANCH 10 October 2007.
Dredging Engineering: Building & Maintaining Underwater Highways
TF F T S W WNA LR 1 Planning Associates Program Curriculum ( 2011 ) Deep-Draft Waterborne Navigation Economic Analysis – An Overview May 2011 (Charleston,
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® 2012 Alabama Water Resources Conference Orange Beach, Alabama September 6, 2012 Beneficial Use Opportunities.
Opening of the Panama Canal in 2016 Its Anticipated Impact on Global Soy and Grain Transportation Ken Eriksen Senior Vice September.
Multipurpose Planning Module M1: Multi-purpose Plan Formulation – Policies and Constraints BU ILDING STRONG SM.
Harbors Module NH1: Authorities and Policies. NH1 - 2 BU ILDING STRONG SM Student Learning Objectives Student will be able to:  Describe the Federal.
SECTION IV: GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF STEPS TAKEN OR ENVISAGED BY NON-ANNEX I PARTY TO IMPLEMENT THE CONVENTION Workshop on the Use of the Guidelines for.
The Clean Water Act © Dr. B. C. Paul (Jan. 2000).
Building Strong! May Deep Draft Navigation Cost Sharing Jeremy LaDart Office of Water Project Review HQUSACE.
Harbors Module NH2: Problem Identification, Inventory and Forecast, and Determination of Objectives and Constraints.
Recreational Impacts of Coastal Restoration Projects CNREP Presentation Joseph Berlin May 28, 2010.
Building Strong! May Deep Draft Navigation Module 2011 Planning Associates Class Jeremy LaDart Office of Water Project Review HQUSACE Mission Overview.
BUILDING STRONG ® Mississippi River Ship Channel Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA Propeller Club for Port of New Orleans 24 September 2015.
Middle Harbor Redevelopment Project WEDA Conference November 5, 2009.
Los Angeles District Los Angeles District 86 th CERB 3-4 June 2009 Los Angeles District Activities and Data Utilization Arthur T. Shak, SPL Navigation.
Port of Long Beach 76 Foot Main Channel Dredging Project Doug Thiessen, Port of Long Beach (POLB),Al Moro, Chief Harbor Engineer, POLB Emily Ueda, Program.
Worldwide Small Port Survey and Analysis. Why? Initially, to determine the optimum TSV characteristics  Limited area  Data collection confined to TSV.
Harbors Module NH3: Formulation – Measures, Strategies and Plans.
Mark R. Pointon Operations/Navigation COP U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Mark R. Pointon Operations/Navigation COP U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Presentation.
David Moser USACE Chief Economist
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mississippi Coastal Improvements Program (MsCIP) “Comprehensive Barrier Island Restoration Plan” PIANC 2012.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge) Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens’ Advisory.
The categories for ILC budget planning are: R&D – work done in laboratories to develop and verify subsystem components. This supports the cost reduction.
GIS Modeling & Analysis. GIS, new science? GIS is a science that is as old as intelligence. Every living thing operates on the sense of understanding.
International conference "Greening Motorway of the Sea" April 2005 in Stockholm “Environmental aspects of Klaipeda seaport development strategy”
Ecology and environment, inc. ecology and environment, inc. International Specialists in the Environment Georganna B. Collins, International.
UPPER NEWPORT BAY ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECT NEWPORT BEACH CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION FEBRUARY 14, 2006.
Konstantinos Alexopoulos Transport Division UNECE
Level Two Supply Chain Management
GBANS - Steps 4, 5 & 6 NOTE TO INSTRUCTOR: Offer to the team to display this slide for the team’s presentation.
Continuing Authorities Program
Transportation and Traffic Engineering Ch 1 Introduction 10/10/2017
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
FRISBEE: Freight Transport Model in Europe and Russia
Mile Point Restriction
Breaches.
INTRODUCTION TO PORT DESIGN
Presentation transcript:

Plan Formulation for Deep Draft Harbors Navigation Measures

Identifying Management Measures  Structural measures  Nonstructural measures Exercise: Let’s Brainstorm a list

Structural Measures  Channel deepening and widening  Berthing areas  Turning basins  Anchorages  Breakwaters  Jetties  Disposal areas  Methods e.g phased construction

Structural Measures (Harbor deepening/ widening)

Structural Measures (Turning Basins)

Structural Measures (Anchorages)

Structural Measures (Breakwater, confined disposal site)

Structural Measures (Jetties)

Structural Measures (Small boat harbor associated with deep draft)

Dredged Material Disposal  Open Gulf/Ocean  Confined Disposal Facilities  Beach Disposal/Nourishment  Beneficial Uses

Confined Disposal Facilities

Structural Measures (Dredging & Beach Nourishment)

Poplar Island, MD

EM Hydraulic Design of Deep Draft Navigation Projects  Depth Allowances  Channel Width  Ship Simulator

Depth Allowances

Nonstructural Measures  Use of tide  Light loading  Underkeel clearance restrictions  Lightering  Transshipment facilities  Pipelines  Conveyors  Traffic management

Formulate Alternatives  Combining measures – examples  Channel deepening with anchorages  Channel deepening with phased widening  Traffic management with anchorages  Channel deepening with beneficial uses of dredged material  Synergies – look for opportunities to serve other needs

Evaluation of Alternatives  Forecast With Project Condition for Each Alternative Plan Verify technical/engineering feasibility Evaluate environmental impacts Perform economic analysis of costs and benefits  Compare Each With Project Condition to the Without Project Condition  Characterize the Beneficial and Adverse Effects  Compare Beneficial and Adverse Effects to Evaluation Criteria  Account for uncertainty through sensitivity analysis

Risk-Informed Decision Making and 6-Step Planning Process

Specific Areas That Might Be Addressed in a Risk Analysis  Uncertainty in commodity forecast  Variation in fleet composition  Sensitivity of transportation costs to fuel price fluctuations, or other factors  Climate change impacts on sea levels (See EC ) such as dockside infrastructure, draft and sediment changes, and possibly demand changes  Southeast Asia’s growing and shifting economy  Movements towards less foreign oil dependence

NED Costs  Construction costs  General Navigation Facilities  Project features – breakwaters, jetties, etc.  Dredging and disposal  Real estate  Mitigation  Local Service Facilities  Operation and maintenance costs  Interest during construction  Associated costs

Associated Costs – What Are They and Who Pays  Frequently overlooked because  Often not paid by non-Federal partner  Incurred by project users  Associated with the general navigation feature to achieve the estimated benefits  Represent costs not otherwise accounted for  Variable costs of doing business  May not be self-liquidating  Related to project throughput

NED Benefits – Basically Savings in Transportation Unit Costs  Cost Reduction Benefit (same origin-destination and same mode).  Reductions in costs incurred from trip delays  Increased loads in existing ships  Reduction in costs because larger or longer tows  Reduction in costs because of using larger ships  Change in mode benefits  Shift of origin-destination benefits  Induced movement benefit (if you build it, will they come?)  Reduction in vessel damages