Integrity ∙ Excellence ∙ Respect. Overview What is it? Why do it? Benefits & Risks - Alaska DOT&PF Perspective Other States Discussion and Questions NEPA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of the Mountain Area Transportation Conformity Process.
Advertisements

National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA).
Ron Bass, J.D., AICP, Senior Regulatory Specialist Jones & Stokes Common NEPA Mistakes and How to Avoid Them January 17, 2008 Oregon Department of Transportation.
Opportunities Exist to Strengthen FHWAs Coordination Guidance and Oversight of the Tribal Transportation Program October 30, 2013.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
Environmental Review: NEPA, TEPA and Tribes. NEPA – good and bad for Tribes Tribes can use as tool to slow, examine, participate in process and urge changes.
MAP-21 Performance Management Framework August 8, 2013 Sherry Riklin Bob Tuccillo Angela Dluger The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
NEPA ASSUMPTION SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT DELIVERY PROGRAM.
North Dakota Association of County Engineers 2015 Annual Conference January 22, 2015 FHWA Update.
1 The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) Satvinder Sandhu & Frances Sakaguchi, FHWA.
Surface Transportation project delivery program
Nicholas Finch Local Programs Engineer Federal Highway Administration Preview of Federal-aid 101 Authorization Overview: Where we are! Where are we headed?
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS EMS AWARENES TRAINING AT NOAA MARINE OPERATIONS CENTER - PACIFC JIM SCHELL, ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE OFFICER.
Consultant Services Flexibilities. Consultant Services Initiative: Highlight existing flexibilities for contracting and using consultants to: Assist STAs.
BY DANNY BEER INTRO INTO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT.
Certification/Qualification Program. Certification Program What is it? Who is involved? What should be considered? Where can a Certification Program work.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
I n t e g r a t I n g C S S Practitioner Module 3 Module 3: CSS and Livability In Area Wide Planning.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
2005 AASHTO Value Engineering Conference Using VE in Design Build Presented by: Jerry R. Blanding Innovative Contracting Engineer FHWA – NRC July 21, 2005.
West Texas Legislative Summit ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Environmental Regulations Affecting Transportation Carlos Swonke Director, Environmental Affairs Division.
2015 FTIP/FSTIP Workshop Transportation Conformity Wade Hobbs FHWA CADO January 15, 2014.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
Overview of SAFETEA-LU Sections 6001, 6002, 3005, and 3006 TRB January 13, 2008 Shari Schaftlein FHWA Project Development & Environmental Review Washington,
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Virginia Association of Planning District Commissions October 4, 2012.
Completing the NEPA Process for CatEx Projects: Part 3 to CE Closeout.
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)  Draft year: 1970 to present day  No Amendment Years  National Legislation By: Ayli Tulberg, Period.
Footer Text A Tool for Environmental Scheduling, Accountability and Performance Measurement TxECOS.
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
Academic Senate for California Community Colleges ­– Leadership Institute 2008 Basics for Effective Senates Shaaron Vogel Wheeler North Academic Senate.
ALDOT Modal Programs Rail/Highway Safety Section.
SAFETEA-LU: Workshop on Planning and Environmental Issues AASHTO Center for Environmental Excellence October 17-19, 2005 Arlington, Virginia.
Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.
1 Accommodating Utilities in Highway Rights-of-Way Federal Agency Update IRWA/AI Conference Las Vegas, NV January 13, 2009.
Guide for Rural Local Officials Evaluating Your Input into the Statewide Transportation Planning Process Developed by the National Association of Development.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
Section 4(f)/6(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Local FHWA Panel Discussion Northwest Regional ROW Conference Federal Requirements & Project Delivery of Federal-Aid Program, Stewardship Agreement.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Federal Environmental Requirements for Local Agency Transportation Projects Tom Holstein, , Donna Meyer, ,
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation NEPA&CEQ.
LPA Program Federal-aid Issues for Local Agencies Mike Morrow – December 10, 2010.
Fixing American’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act and NEPA Section 1309 – Program for Eliminating Duplication of Environmental Reviews 23 USC 330 – CEQA/NEPA.
Statewide and Nonmetropolitan Planning Regional Transportation Planning Organizations (RTPOs) State Programs Meeting 8/7/13 John Sprowls Community Planner,
HANDOUT 2017 FSTIP Development Workshop Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Requirements Wade Hobbs Federal Highway Administration California.
Office of Major Project Development (OMPD) Overview November 2015.
The Right Things to Know about Right- of-Way April 8, 2016 Tammy M. Keeley Realty Officer FHWA – AL Divisi on.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
Building Business Transformation Capabilities Our perspective on the building blocks, structure and critical success factors to impact change Gillian.
Office of Regional Planning Training
Programmatic Agreements
Tribal Transportation Department Yurok Indian Reservation
The Rulemaking Process
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
NC RPO Meeting July 25, 2018.
By Jeff Burklo, Director
National Mechanisms for Reporting and Follow-up
Consultation (C) After approval of the EIS, FONSI, or CE designation, the applicant shall consult with the Administration prior to requesting any major.
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Section 4(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Ian Evans SSRL Safety Office
SPR-B Research Coordination Webinar
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
2013 Preconstruction Managers Meeting
NEPA Assignment Program Overview
Presentation transcript:

Integrity ∙ Excellence ∙ Respect

Overview What is it? Why do it? Benefits & Risks - Alaska DOT&PF Perspective Other States Discussion and Questions NEPA Assignment

Integrity ∙ Excellence ∙ Respect 23 USC 326 – Categorical Exclusion (CE) assignment  AK, UT, CA* 23 USC 327 – Full NEPA assignment (CE, EA, EIS)  CA, TX, OH(pending), UT (pending) NEPA Assignment – What is it?

Integrity ∙ Excellence ∙ Respect Formal assignment of FHWA, FTA, and/or FRA environmental responsibilities to the state DOT.  State DOT considered the “Federal Agency” for projects  Assumes liability for challenges in court Waiver of sovereign immunity  Executed via Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) NEPA Assignment – What is it?

Integrity ∙ Excellence ∙ Respect Scope of NEPA Assignment State DOT Application defines scope By law, Federal Agency retains the following:  Engineering decisions  Project level air quality conformity determinations* (CE assignment differs)  Government to government Tribal consultation  USDOT responsibilities for statewide and metropolitan planning  Projects that cross state lines NEPA Assignment – What is it?

Integrity ∙ Excellence ∙ Respect All environmental laws, regulations, and policies remain the same Faster project delivery comes from: Eliminating federal review and approval steps Allowing for environmental process innovation, experimentation NEPA Assignment – Why do it?

Integrity ∙ Excellence ∙ Respect Risks Liability – 11 th Amendment Waiver  Attorney’s fees are Federal-aid eligible per MAP- 21 Staff Expertise, internal QA/QC required  Dedicated staff or consultants for NEPA reviews  State DOT Program staff for program oversight Regular audits by Federal Agencies (at the beginning) NEPA Assignment – Why do it?

Integrity ∙ Excellence ∙ Respect Benefits Autonomy and control over environmental decision making  State ownership of decisions Faster environmental consultations, decisions  Direct consultation with Federal Agencies Innovation Time = $  OH estimated 20% time savings, ~$20m / year savings NEPA Assignment – Why do it?

Integrity ∙ Excellence ∙ Respect 326 CE assignment since 2009  Established organizational change, HQ environmental oversight  Innovations in procedures, forms, processes result in time savings  FHWA role changed, support for program 327 Full NEPA assignment – The time is right  CA,TX, OH paved the way  Application regulations, template MOU  Multi-state coordination, permanent law AK DOT&PF Perspective