Preventing events “…that could not only hurt someone, but hurt someone you know and … could have a dramatic consequence on all of us “ SO’K Mission Success.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Advertisements

Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.
Software Quality Assurance Plan
The New GMP Annex 11 and Chapter 4 Deadline for coming into operation: 30 June 2011.
CIP Cyber Security – Security Management Controls
Chapter 4 Quality Assurance in Context
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
More CMM Part Two : Details.
Transformations at GPO: An Update on the Government Printing Office's Future Digital System George Barnum Coalition for Networked Information December.
Enterprise Architecture. 2 Agenda What is Enterprise Architecture (EA)? Roles in EA? Why is EA Important? Tangible Benefits from EA? What Do We Need to.
Contractor Management and ISO 14001:2004
School of Computing, Dublin Institute of Technology.
Project Work and Administration
Chapter 3 The Structure of the CMM
Self Declaration Protocol EPA Regions 9 & 10 and The Federal Network for Sustainability 2005.
1 Configuration Management 101 ITS Professional Capacity Building Program T3 Webinar February 21, 2008.
DEFENSE PRIVACY & CIVIL LIBERTIES OFFICE Privacy Foundations Samuel P. Jenkins Director for Privacy Defense Privacy and Civil Liberties Office Identity.
By: Farzad Dadgari Soil and Environmental Specialist SWHISA.
CLEANROOM SOFTWARE ENGINEERING.
Cybersecurity: Engineering a Secure Information Technology Organization, 1st Edition Chapter 7 Software Supporting Processes and Software Reuse.
-Nikhil Bhatia 28 th October What is RUP? Central Elements of RUP Project Lifecycle Phases Six Engineering Disciplines Three Supporting Disciplines.
Quality Assurance Program National Enrichment Facility Warren Dorman September 19, National Energy and Environmental Conference.
Software Configuration Management (SCM)
Michael Dermody September 2010  Capability Maturity Model Integration ◦ Is a Trademark owned by the Software Engineering Institute (SEI) of Carnegie.
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 1 The Intergovernmental Data Quality Task Force (IDQTF) April 2004 Presented By: James.
The Challenges of Implementing Multi- platform IT Systems across the AO Function Nicola Cartwright Head of Awarding Systems and Services 1st4sport Qualifications.
SENG521 (Fall SENG 521 Software Reliability & Testing Software Product & process Improvement using ISO (Part 3d) Department.
Mandatory Technical Standards Engineering Management Board Goddard Space Flight Center July 10, 2003 Updated October 7, 2003 HQ/Code AE R. Weinstein.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
IT Requirements Management Balancing Needs and Expectations.
Surveillance Planning Team Initial Team Meeting January 9-10 NASA Headquarters Team Introduction Revision A Tom Whitmeyer - OSMA Jeff Cullen - Procurement.
Slide 1V&V 10/2002 Software Quality Assurance Dr. Linda H. Rosenberg Assistant Director For Information Sciences Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA
Project Life Cycle.
Georgia Institute of Technology CS 4320 Fall 2003.
JLab Software Assurance Program A Risk Based Approach to Software Management.
 PBMA-KMS deployed in March of 2001 is the first fully operational NASA-wide multi-functional Knowledge Management System  Knowledgebase 200+ Best Practices.
Copyright © The OWASP Foundation Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the OWASP License. The OWASP.
Protecting the Public, Astronauts and Pilots, the NASA Workforce, and High-Value Equipment and Property Mission Success Starts With Safety The NASA Safety.
Earned Value Management Update Nancy L. Spruill Director, Acquisition Resources and Analysis Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology.
Page 1 Systems Engineering Initiatives at NASA To GODDARD/SMA-D EDUCATION SERIES Gregory L. Robinson NASA Deputy Chief Engineer September 25, 2008.
OMB Memorandum M Implementation of the Government Charge Card Abuse Prevention Act of 2012 (Charge Card Act) September 2013.
ECOS Information Session Draft EPA Quality Documents February 13, 2013 Presented by EPA Quality Staff, Office of Environmental Information For meeting.
1 Technology Infusion of the Software Developer’s Assistant (SDA) into the MOD Software Development Process NASA/JSC/MOD/Brian O’Hagan 2008 Software Assurance.
Purpose: The purpose of CMM Integration is to provide guidance for improving your organization’s processes and your ability to manage the development,
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Management Systems Part I.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
Accreditation 101 Julie Bruno, Sierra College Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College, facilitator Susan Clifford, ACCJC,
ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP OVERVIEW OF ORDER Larry Stirling
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
PDS4 Project Report PDS MC F2F University of Maryland Dan Crichton March 27,
2016 MFRPS: Changes To Standard 10 Guy F. Delius, R. S. CSO Food and Drug Administration Office Of Partnerships Standards Implementation Staff February.
Introduction for the Implementation of Software Configuration Management I thought I knew it all !
Sample Fit-Gap Kick-off
BIL 424 NETWORK ARCHITECTURE AND SERVICE PROVIDING.
The ORR/RA and the Authorization Basis May 2005 Revision
Identify the Risk of Not Doing BA
Software Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V)
Applied Software Implementation & Testing
Raytheon Parts Management
Agency SFY IT Strategic Plans: Training
Engineering Processes
Structure–Feedback on Structure ED-2 and Task Force Proposals
Dr. Malcom Phelps Presentation by
Common Core State Standards: A Statewide Dialogue
Common Core State Standards: A Statewide Dialogue
Engineering Processes
Overview Activities from additional UP disciplines are needed to bring a system into being Implementation Testing Deployment Configuration and change management.
WHERE TO FIND IT – Accessing the Inventory
Presentation transcript:

Preventing events “…that could not only hurt someone, but hurt someone you know and … could have a dramatic consequence on all of us “ SO’K Mission Success Starts With Safety "Mission success stands on the foundation of our unwavering commitment to safety" Administrator Sean O'Keefe January 2003 Office of Safety and Mission Assurance Standards Status Engineering Standards Working Group Glenn Research Center 5 – 6 October 2004 Wil Harkins Office of Safety and Mission Assurance (1)

Mission Success Starts With Safety 2 Agenda Standards Updates and Changes Overall Requirements Documents Changes – NASA Internal Rules Review – OSMA Implementation of Rules Review and impact on OSMA Standards Safety and Mission Assurance Requirements Tracking System (SMARTS)

Mission Success Starts With Safety 3 Standards Updates and Changes NASA-Standard , Software Assurance – Released July 2004 – Replaces NASA-STD – This standard provides: Minimum required software assurance procedures for software life cycle The acquirer and provider requirements for software engineering activities Basic procedures for establishing, operating, and maintaining a software assurance program Specific requirements for overall software assurance and its disciplines of software quality, software reliability, software safety, software verification and validation, and independent verification and validation – Roll-out in conjunction with release of NPR 7150 Draft 1, Software Engineering Requirements planned for Fall 2004 – Establishing a compliance transition period through 2008 for this document.

Mission Success Starts With Safety 4 Standards Updates and Changes NASA-Guidebook , Software Safety Guidebook – Released March 2004 – Replaces NASA-GB – Companion document to NASA-Standard , Software Safety – This standard (guidebook) provides: An overview of general software safety and software engineering practices The means to scope and tailor the software safety and software engineering activities Analyses, methods and guidance for application during each phase of the software life cycle Development approaches, safety analyses, and testing methodologies that lead to improved safety in software

Mission Success Starts With Safety 5 Standards Updates and Changes NASA-Standard B, Software Safety – Released July 2004, Change 1 released July 2004 – This standard provides: Requirements to implement a systematic approach to software safety as an integral part of the overall system safety program, software development, and software assurance processes Descriptions of the activities necessary to ensure that safety is designed into software and maintained throughout the software and system lifecycle – Roll-out in conjunction with release of NPR 7150 Draft 1, Software Engineering Requirements planned for Fall 2004 – Establishing a compliance transition period through 2008 for this document.

Mission Success Starts With Safety 6 NASA Internal Rules Review Initiated December 2003 at HQ, extended to Centers July 2004 Covers all Internal Requirements Documents – Major emphasis has been on Directives – Standards also included within scope “All” Agency Directives have been updated to contain only requirements, no guidance

Mission Success Starts With Safety 7 NASA Internal Rules Review Internal Rules Review Team working to establish an “overarching” requirements NPD – Establish basic requirements for all internal requirements documents (Directives, Standards, Plans, Manuals, Work Instructions, Agreements) All NASA internal requirements documents must: (1) Support the fulfillment of NASA’s vision, mission, or external mandates. (2) Be developed and controlled by a documented process. (3) Be clearly labeled as a requirement. (4) Be made available to the people who use them. (5) Be verified for compliance. (6) Be current. – Establish precedence among document types

Mission Success Starts With Safety 8 OSMA Implementation of Rules Review and impact on OSMA Standards NASA Administrator through Internal Rules Review has mandated that guidance cannot appear in Directives – As OSMA updates directives expect that some “old” guidance material will now migrate to NASA Standards (Guidebooks) Internal Rules Review is considering requirements that would eliminate system requirements from Directives – As OSMA updates directives, we will probably move system requirements out of directives into standards. As part of restructuring OSMA directives, we will probably attempt to remove roles and responsibilities from NASA- Standards and incorporate these into appropriate directives. OSMA is tracking individual directives requirements using SMARTS – will be adding individual NASA-Standards requirements to SMARTS as well

Mission Success Starts With Safety 9 SMARTS is being implemented to make it easier to understand, track, and implement NASA’s SMA requirements. SMARTS is an internet-based information system designed to: – Collect all SMA requirements at the Agency and Center levels and from appropriate sources external to NASA – Provide a means to filter, collect, search, and sort requirements across document types into “personalized virtual” documents to meet specific needs Whole documents/Partial Documents Requirements lists Compliance Verification Documentation – Support the data associated with the verification of compliance to SMA requirements – Trace links to SMA requirements to improve effectiveness and limit duplication of requirements What is the Safety and Mission Assurance Requirements Tracking System (SMARTS)?

Mission Success Starts With Safety documents: – 18 NPDs – 14 NPRs – OSMA Functional Leadership Plan – 3 NASA-STDs – 4 Presidential Decision Directives – 1 Executive Order – NASA FAR Supplement SMA sections – 29 CFR What is Currently in SMARTS?

Mission Success Starts With Safety 11 How much of the document is in SMARTS (at a minimum)? – SMA Owned documents: The entire requirements sections of the document, preface, core chapters and appendix titles. Requirements contained in appendices are also included. – Non-SMA owned NASA documents contain: SMA portions of core document and SMA appendix titles. – Non-NASA documents: SMA portions and unclassified excerpts. All paragraph text is stored exactly as stored in NODIS (or other master library) except: – ‘Tags’ have been added to the beginning of subsection paragraphs so that requirements read as a whole thought. For example, ‘tags’ like: “The ____ shall –” have been added to bulleted lists so the data is more readable than the standalone bullet. – Some documents captured early in the process use “AA/SMA” and “EAA” abbreviations when the master document may have the text spelled out. – SMARTS Requirement ID Numbers may appear within SMARTS before they appear in the Master Library (NODIS, etc). What is Currently in SMARTS?

Mission Success Starts With Safety 12 What Functionality is currently in SMARTS? Filter, Search, Sort on SMA Requirements to develop ‘virtual’ SMA requirements documents. Create Requirement Lists Printout: – Whole or parts of single documents, – ‘Virtual’ documents, and requirements lists – Compliance Verification Responsibility Matrices and Audit Assessment Reports (which can be ‘tailored’ with sorts/searches)

Mission Success Starts With Safety 13 Sample Actor Report

Mission Success Starts With Safety 14 Sample Compliance Verification Report