Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education Rebecca DeCamp.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State & Local Services. Department of Health & Human Services  20% of state’s budget Handle aging, child development, mental health and social services.
Advertisements

The Court System.
Segregation NO COLOREDS ALLOWED. Definition: seg·re·ga·tion n. 1. The rule or practice of separating people of different races, classes, or ethnic groups.
QOD 3/1 Why was the Brown v. Board of Education decision so monumental?
Chapter 8, Section 2 How Federal Courts Are Organized
Schools and Segregation For ELPS 200, Spring 2009.
The Judicial branch was established by Article III of the constitution. The function of the judicial branch is to interpret laws, apply them to court.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Chapter 12 School Desegregation This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following.
Defining Equal Protection in a Democratic Society.
HC #5 Consequences of the Civil Rights Movement Affirmative Action & Forced Busing.
 Oliver Brown was an African American railroad worker who had a daughter. She wanted to go to school but the school closest to them was for only white.
The JUDICIAL BRANCH The Court System in the United States.
Civil Rights Vocab Chapter 20. De Jure Segregation Segregation based on the law Practiced in the South (Jim Crow Laws)
Bell Quiz: Use pages Who assassinated Dr. King? 2. What happened in cities across America after King’s assassination? 3. How many people were.
Brown vs. The Board of Education
Brown Vs. Board of Education By: Damon Mckie. How it began!!!! African American parents began to challenge racial segregation in public education as early.
DO YOU KNOW? Do you know these terms associated with the civil rights and women’s rights movements?
Fighting Segregation In the mid-1900s, the civil rights movement began to make major progress in correcting the national problem of racial segregation.
CIVIL RIGHTS. Civil Rights  Slavery, Missouri Compromise  Dred Scott(1856)  Civil War  Post Civil War Amendments  Reconstruction, 1877 Compromise,
Chapter 21: Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law Section 2
By: Nita Tunga, Brigit Carrigan, Jenny Lane, and Brett Davis.
The Civil Rights Movement Page 916 Chapter
Reading #5: Consequences of the Civil Rights Movement - Affirmative Action & Forced Busing.
Background of the Case  Who’s Who?  William A O’Neill: Governor of CT (Defendant)  Milo Sheff (4 th grader) & 16 other children (Plaintiffs)  1989-Lawsuit.
Melissa Binns. Quote: Bradshaw, K. A. (n.d.). Charlotte, NC: Birthplace (and Place of Death) of Integration in Public Schools « North Carolina History.
1950s Race Relations in America and the Civil Rights Era
3 ways African Americans were kept from voting in the South…  1. Fees  2. Threats of Violence  3. Literacy Tests.
Admission & Desegregation Re-examining the Role of Race in the Enrollment of America’s Public Schools By Tracy Hall & Tim Milledge.
CIVIL RIGHTS AMERICA AND THE 1950’S AND 1960’S. Beginning of Civil Rights  Era post Civil War: US adopts segregation * Separate but “equal” treatment.
 It is the ultimate Court of Appeals for federal law  The Supreme Court does not have original jurisdiction  The Supreme Court has 4 jobs: › To choose.
Chapter 5 Review PowerPoint
Brown vs. Board of Education By Alex Labruzzo. What is Brown vs. Board of Education? In 1950 the Topeka NAACP, led by McKinley Burnett, set out to organize.
Brown V. Board of Education (1954)
School Law and the Public Schools: A Practical Guide for Educational Leaders, 5e © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 12 School.
Federal Court System. Federal Courts Creation of Federal Courts –No national court system under Articles of Confederation –Article III established Supreme.
Early Civil Rights Amendments and Court Cases. Reconstruction Era 13 th Amendment: Ended slavery 14 th Amendment: Extended citizenship to African-Americans,
Civics Chapter 12 Section 3 and 4 Mrs. Cox Paisley IB Year V.
Race and Segregation in American Schools EDTHP 115 Spring, 2003.
Civil Rights By T.J.M.. Education Equality (Not) During the 1950s and before, African American children and White children could not attend the same schools.
Types of Jurisdiction. Original Jurisdiction a court’s authority to hear and decide a matter before any other court can review the matter a court’s authority.
The Civil Rights Movement: A Photo File. Segregation Begins.
Timeline 1914: Kenneth Bancroft Clark was born on July 24 in the Panama Canal Zone, Panama. 2005: At the age of 90, Kenneth Clark died on May 1 in Hastings-on-Hudson,
Minority Movements: The Civil Rights Movement. Civil War: Results  13 th Amendment: 1865 – President Andrew Johnson  Abolished Slavery  14 th Amendment.
Montgomery, Alabama December 1, 1955 – December 20, 1956.
Intro to the Appellate Process When a party loses at trial they have the right to appeal the decision. An appeal is always about whether the law was correctly.
 July 26, 1948, President Harry Truman issued and Executive Order to Abolish Segregation in the Armed Services  It Was Implemented Over.
GOVT 2305, Module 5 Racial Segregation.
Court Systems.
Warm Up: Suffrage Amendments
Important N.C Facts and Review
Article III – The Judicial Branch
Race and Segregation in American Schools
Section 1 Chapter 14 Major Question, “ How did African Americans Challenge Segregation After WWII?”
The Movement Begins Pgs
Article III U.S. Constitution
October 12, 2017 Racial Segregation.
Supreme Court – how different from other branches?
Sacramento City Unified School District V. Rachel H U. S
Read pages 686 – 687 and the handout, “Nullifying the Separate but Equal Principle Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, 1954” answering … (1)
New Approaches to Civil Rights Ch. 21 Sec. 4 Pgs
By Page, Alex, Zander, and Dawson
Chapter 8, Section 2 How Federal Courts Are Organized
New Approaches to Civil Rights
Segregation in America
Reaching a Decision How do the various levels of the court system reach decisions? Why are appeals decisions handled differently than original jurisdiction.
The Judicial Branch Article 3.
Unit 3B – The Executive & Judicial Branches Day 6: Structure of Judiciary & Jurisdiction WARM UP: What experiences (if any) have you or your family had.
How the Federal Gov’t Works: The Judicial Branch
The Judicial Branch.
Oliver Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka
Presentation transcript:

Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education Rebecca DeCamp

Origins of Case “In the school year, the Charlotte- Mecklenburg school system had more than 84,000 students in 107 schools. Of these 84,000, 29% of them (24,000) were African-American. Nearly 60% of these children attended schools that were at least 99% African- American” It was clear that further integration was needed However, it was unclear as to what powers the school board had to do so

Origins of Case (cont.) Two court ordered plans were proposed ▫Board of Education plan ▫Finger Plan Both plans utilized bussing as a solution to de facto segregation

Bussing The practice of shipping students to other schools to create a racial balance Was previously used for many years in the south to implement segregation Was HIGHLY unpopular in terms of public opinion

District Court Ruling Judge McMillian ruled in favor of neither plan Instead, he ruled in favor of a plan that included elements of both previous plans McMillian’s plan, like the others before it, included and implemented bussing

Court of Appeals Ruling Voted to completely reverse the lower court’s ruling ▫3 voted to reverse ▫2 voted to preserve aspects of McMillian’s plan ▫1 voted for McMillian’s plan One judge disqualified himself due to prior involvement

The Supreme Court The Supreme Court granted certiorari to the plaintiffs, and eventually decided to implement McMillian’s plan McMillian’s plan has served as an outline for similar plans for other cities all over the country

Picture Citations content/uploads/2013/06/ELT jpg board-of-education-edson-cejudo/g-6krd53gpob1v8t4d42fsca0

Content Citations James E. Swann et al. v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education 402 US. 191 (1971). J. W. Montgomery III; “ Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education: Roadblocks to the Implementation of Brown,” 12 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 838 (1971); retrieved from rhttp://scho larship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol12/iss4/7; Internet; accessed 25 November 2014 ”Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education,” North Carolina History Project; available from y; Internet; accessed 25 November 2014 “Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education”; NCPedia; available from ncpedia,org/swann-v-charlotte- mecklenburg-board; accessed 25 November 2014