The Revised CSOs Denise White, WVDE. 21 st Century Learning Mission To grow the seeds of greatness in every child, teaching them to achieve to their fullest.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Susan R. Easterbrooks Georgia State University
Advertisements

The 21st Century Context for
Rich Classroom Assessment through Implementation of Project Based Learning Denise White WVDE Office of Instruction.
1 Instructional Strategies for 21 st Century Content Standards and Objectives Designed for NAEP sampled schools October 7 and 8, 2008.
Deconstructing 21st Century CSOs
WVDE Online SB-IEP A System for Analyzing and Prioritizing Instruction for Students with Exceptionalities.
Using Acuity to Guide Instruction Sandra Foster Office of Assessment and Accountability Leatha Williams Office of School Improvement.
Developing 21 st Century Teachers and Administrators Who Can Lead 21 st Century Schools Chief Instructional Leaders October 16, st Century Curriculum.
Depths of Knowledge and Reading
Title I School Improvement Where have we been? Where are we going? Presented by Jan Stanley, State Title I Director April 2009.
Standards Based Instruction Presented by: Jan Stanley and Erin Sullivan March 2009.
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
TEKS : Write multiple brief responses to teacher-provided, open-ended questions to make connections within and across genres (e.g., literary-literary,
Aligning Depth of Knowledge with the TEKS and the STAAR
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
STRATEGIC GOAL SETTING. Features of IEP Goals Observable and measurableConnected to assessment dataRelated specifically to needs identified in present.
Please print the three Cognitive Rigor Matrices full page. Thanks!
Things We Think About What is it that we want to assess? –What are the benchmarks and standards for my grade level? What a tools are we required to use.
Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series
Principles of High Quality Assessment
1 The Development of Language Arts Apr By Dannikia Davis Heather Howard Kim Krachinsky
+ 21 st Century Skills and Academic Standards Kimberly Hetrick Berry Creek Middle School Eagle County School District.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS with RIGOR-RELVANCE Overview and Exemplars Li Center Mini.
START Prompts & Project Based Learning Lesson Modification for August.
Lesson Planning. Teachers Need Lesson Plans So that they know that they are teaching the curriculum standards required by the county and state So that.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Building a Culture of Literacy in the 21 st Century 5-8 Classroom Title I School Improvement Technical Assistance Workshop June 18, 2009 Roger Bennett,
Literacy Initiative Public Schools of Robeson County.
Building Effective Assessments. Agenda  Brief overview of Assess2Know content development  Assessment building pre-planning  Cognitive factors  Building.
Learning Targets PLC March 14, What is a Learning Target? Discuss this question with a shoulder partner. Be prepared to share your thoughts!
The Revised CSOs Lou Maynus, WVDE. 21 st Century Learning Mission To grow the seeds of greatness in every child, teaching them to achieve to their fullest.
Welcome to the Data Warehouse HOME HELP COGNITIVE LEVELS Assessments COGNITIVE LEVELS.
The Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Matrix
Urban Institute – Session 2 The mediocre teacher tells The good teacher explains The superior teacher demonstrates The great teacher inspires ~ William.
Standards Development Process College and career readiness standards developed in summer 2009 Based on the college and career readiness standards, K-12.
Why We Got Involved… Bellwood-Antis Middle School PSSA Data 2003.
May 6, 2014 Facilitated by Jennifer Gondek Instructional Specialist for Inclusive Education, TST BOCES.
Depth of Knowledge and Cognitive Demand QualityCore Professional Development Day 1, 2–1.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Developing 21 st Century Leaders Who Can Lead 21 st Century Schools 21 st Century Curriculum.
Writing Objectives Including Bloom’s Taxanomy. Three Primary Components of an Objective Condition –What they’re given Behavior –What they do Criteria.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Bloom’s Taxonomy. What is it??? Bloom’s Taxonomy is a chart of ideas Named after the creator, Benjamin Bloom A Taxonomy is an arrangement of ideas or.
Implementing the Common Core State Standards The Role of the School Counselor.
COUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS (CCSSO) & NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES (NGA CENTER) JUNE 2010.
Assessment. Levels of Learning Bloom Argue Anderson and Krathwohl (2001)
Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8.
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
© 2015 The College Board The Redesigned SAT/PSAT Key Changes.
By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.
St. Louis Area Curriculum Coordinator’s Association.
Mrs. Clarke -math Mrs. Harouche-reading Mrs. Triolo-reading Reading & Math AIS.
CREATING AN ACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT Using Inquiry and Primary Sources.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge as it Relates to Unpacking the WV CSOs Adapted from the Office of Instruction’s Presentations posted on Teach st.
RECIPROCAL TEACHING: IN AN ESL CLASSROOM Melissa Dye EDBE /11/2014.
Depth of Knowledge: Elementary ELA Smarter Balanced Professional Development for Washington High-need Schools University of Washington Tacoma Belinda Louie,
NAEP READING FOR 2009 Michael L. Kamil Stanford University.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge. Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norm Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align standards with.
An Introduction to the Colorado Assessment Standards Reading - Writing - Communicating.
Reading literacy. Definition of reading literacy: “Reading literacy is understanding, using and reflecting on written texts, in order to achieve one’s.
Assessment.
Middle School English Language Arts Learning Targets: I can…
Assessment.
Creating an Active Learning environment
Know Your Reading Strategies
Section VI: Comprehension
Norman L Webb.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Our goal is to be thinking at a higher level.
Presentation transcript:

The Revised CSOs Denise White, WVDE

21 st Century Learning Mission To grow the seeds of greatness in every child, teaching them to achieve to their fullest potential so that they may be globally intelligent and resilient in our 21 st Century world. Dr. Steven Paine

Policy Policy Definition of Curriculum The content standards, objectives and performance descriptors for all required and elective content areas and 21 st century learning skills and technology tools at each programmatic level

How Did We Get The CSOs? Teachers selected National Standards reviewed o IRA/NCTE Standards o College Board Standards o Principles and Standards for School Mathematics o Curriculum Focal Points – NCTM o American Diploma Projects Achieve K-12 Benchmarks

How Did We Get The CSOs? Assessment Reviews o National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) o ACT o SAT o TIM S S o PISA National Reviews o Dr. Norm Webb o Dr. William Schmidt o Partnership for 21 st Century Skills

Policy – 21 st Century Reading and English Language Arts st Century Mathematics Effective July 1, 2008

The Rigor/Relevance Framework A Acquisition B Application C Assimilation D Adaptation KNOWLEDGEKNOWLEDGE TAXONOMYTAXONOMY Evaluation Synthesis Analysis Application Understanding Awareness APPLICATION MODEL KnowledgeApply in discipline Apply across disciplines Apply to real world predictable situations Apply to real- world unpredictable situations

Three Ways to Improve Student Learning Raise the level of rigor in the content standards and objectives Increase the skill and knowledge of teachers in teaching the content Engage students in active learning designed around the standards for content, learning skills and technology tools.

So whats different about these Content Standards and Objectives?

Depth of Knowledge Level 1 – Recall, recognition. Skill, a behavior or sequence of behaviors learned through practice and easily performed Level 2 – Application of skills, concepts; conceptual understanding; procedural understanding Level 3 – More sophisticated reasoning and analysis; students required to solve problems, draw conclusions given data, arguments, situations and other information; construct mental models translating among different representations; justifying from evidence; summarizing a body of text Level 4 – Extended thinking; requires integration of knowledge from multiple sources and ability to represent knowledge in a variety of ways; usually requires work over a period of time

RELA CSO Comparison – Grade 4 Previous Policy RLA summarize the authors purpose (e.g., to persuade; to inform; to determine a specific viewpoint). Revised Policy RLA.O determine authors purposes in literary and informational texts and use supporting material to justify authors intent: –To persuade –To entertain –To inform –To determine a specific viewpoint

RELA CSO Comparison Previous Policy RLA.O recognize connections among ideas in literary and informational text (e.g. text to self, text-to- text, text to world connection) and recognize that global awareness promotes understanding, tolerance, and acceptance of ethnic, cultural, religious and personal differences. Revised Policy RLA relate literary theme to global situations.

RELA CSO Comparison Previous PolicyRevised Policy RLA.O use literary and informational texts to summarize, determine story elements, determine cause and effect, compare and contrast, paraphrase, infer, predict, sequence, draw conclusions, describe characters, and provide main idea and support details. RLA use comprehension skills to understand a story (e.g., story elements; sequence; expository works; drawing conclusions; compare/contrast; predict; summarize; infer; paraphrase; main idea; story topic).

RELA CSO Comparison Previous PolicyRevised Policy RLA.O differentiate and apply comprehension strategies in literary and informational texts to draw conclusions predict use context clues summarize judge text critically RLA use comprehension skills (e.g., draw conclusions; predict; use context clues; summarize)

Essential Question: What is it we want all students to learn?

UNPACKING THE CSOS What basic knowledge will my students need to master this objective? What reasoning skills will students need? What performances/skills must students have if they master the objective? What products must students produce with mastery?

LEARNING TARGETS Knowledge Reasoning Performance/Skills Products

KNOWLEDGE TARGETS Mastery of substantive subject content where mastery includes both knowing and understanding it.

KNOWLEDGE EXAMPLES Identify sight words Identify similes and metaphors Know defining characteristics of various literary genres

REASONING TARGETS The ability to use knowledge and understanding to figure things out and to solve problems.

REASONING EXAMPLES Make a prediction based on evidence. Examine data/results and propose a meaningful interpretation. Distinguish between fact and opinion. Evaluate information from a variety of resources.

PERFORMANCE/SKILL TARGETS The development of proficiency in doing something where the process is most important.

PERFORMANCE/SKILL EXAMPLES Read aloud with fluency and expression. Practice appropriate sight words and content vocabulary Use self-correction strategies.

PRODUCT TARGETS The development of proficiency in creating something where the final product is most important.

PRODUCT EXAMPLES Produce a grammatically correct sentence. Develop a proper paragraph form in a written composition. Compose a written composition using the five-step writing process.

RLA.O determine the authors purpose in literary and informational texts and use supporting material to justify authors intent: to persuade to entertain to inform to determine a specific viewpoint KNOWLEDGE: Know what authors purpose is Know the difference in literary and informational texts Know the characteristics of writing designed to persuade Know the characteristics of writing designed to entertain Know the characteristics of writing designed to inform Know the characteristics of writing designed to designed to express a specific viewpoint

REASONING: Decide on the authors purpose in a literary text Decide on the authors purpose in an informational text Determine if the author is trying to persuade, entertain, inform, or express a specific viewpoint RLA.O determine the authors purpose in literary and informational texts and use supporting material to justify authors intent: to persuade to entertain to inform to determine a specific viewpoint

Performance: Use supporting material to justify authors intent RLA.O determine the authors purpose in literary and informational texts and use supporting material to justify authors intent: to persuade to entertain to inform to determine a specific viewpoint

Product: None specified RLA.O determine the authors purpose in literary and informational texts and use supporting material to justify authors intent: to persuade to entertain to inform to determine a specific viewpoint

YOUR TURN! Work with a partner. Use the sheet that has been placed on your table. Identify the different learning targets of the Objective using the guiding questions. Discuss as a table group.

Interactive CSOs

The Rigor/Relevance Framework A Acquisition B Application C Assimilation D Adaptation KNOWLEDGEKNOWLEDGE TAXONOMYTAXONOMY Evaluation Synthesis Analysis Application Understanding Awareness APPLICATION MODEL KnowledgeApply in discipline Apply across disciplines Apply to real world predictable situations Apply to real- world unpredictable situations

Questions?