DEFENSE PERSPECTIVE Bill Bowman SCHROETER GOLDMARK & BENDER 810 Third Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 622-8000.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SEARCH AND SEIZURE The 4 th. Disclaimer Mr Koepping is NOT an attorney. This discussion is for the purpose of explaining general constitutional principles.
Advertisements

Chapter 16 Arrest, Interrogation, and Identification.
Search and Arrest CLN4U.
Miranda Rights 5th Amendment
Plain View Doctrine 1.Item is positioned easily in an officer’s sight. 2.Officer is legally in a position to notice. 3.The discovery of the item is inadvertent.
Right Against Self-Incrimination ACG 6935/4939. Based in the 5th Amendment Can only be applied if defendant’s statement is testimonial. (not blood samples,
Law enforcement officers conduct searches every day in an effort to find evidence that can be seized and used in court to prosecute people who have violated.
1 Chapter 14 Obtaining Physical and Other Evidence.
Legal Aspects of Criminal Investigation: Arrest, Search and Seizure
Winning, until proven guilty …. Searches and Seizures The Fourth Amendment protects from unreasonable searches and seizures Searches must be conducted.
The 4th & 5th Amendments Search & Seizure Search & Seizure Rights Against Self Incrimination Rights Against Self Incrimination.
Disclosing and Suppressing Evidence
1 Chapter 12 Obtaining Statements and Confessions for use as Evidence Obtaining Statements and Confessions for use as Evidence.
Chapter 2 The criminal investigation process. In this chapter, you will look at the role of police and the courts in the criminal investigation process.
Doug Aaron Manchester, Tennessee.  Criminal defendants in State court are more than 20 times more likely to plead guilty than to go to trial.  In Federal.
Introduction to Constitutional Law Unit 4. CJ140-02A – Introduction to Constitutional Law Unit 4: The Fourth Amendment CJ140-02A– Class 4 Part 1.
Criminal Justice Today CHAPTER Criminal Justice Today, 13th Edition Frank Schmalleger Copyright © 2015, © 2013 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
American Criminal Justice: The Process
Criminal Procedure Week 2. U.S. CONSTITUTION PURPOSE WHICH GOVERNMENT IT REGULATES Bill of Rights.
Chapter 2 Legal Aspects of Investigation © 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. LEARNING OBJECTIVES Explain the historical evolution.
Search and seizure. Purposes of a search Fruits of the crime (e.g., stolen property) Instrumentalities of the crime (e.g., a gun, burglary tools) Circumstantial.
Plain View Doctrine  Allows a police officer to seize evidence found in “plain view” during a search without a warrant. Also, when officers are carrying.
Pre-Trial Procedures Search and Seizure.  The law seeks to balance individual’s right to privacy and need for police to conduct a thorough investigation.
Law & Justice Chapter 12 Criminal Investigations.
The Bill of Rights The First Fundamental Changes of the Constitution.
Rights of the Accused Search & Seizure Search & Seizure Right Against Self Incrimination Right Against Self Incrimination Right to Counsel Right to Counsel.
Amendments in Action Search and Seizure. The 4 th Amendment “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against.
Fourth Amendment: Search and Seizure
 What is the exclusionary rule  Explain stop and frisk  What is the plain view doctrine  What did Miranda v Arizona require police to do  What happens.
1 Chapter 14 Obtaining Physical and other Evidence Obtaining Physical and other Evidence.
Criminal Justice-- Investigations Chapter 12—Due Process Rights of Suspects under 4 th & 5 th Amendments.
Procedural Criminal Law What are the constitutional rights of the accused?
Criminal Law: Criminal Law: LEGAL GUIDELINES. Amendments: Review 4th Amendment—Protects against illegal searches and seizures. 4th Amendment—Protects.
LS100 Eight Skills Prof. Jane McElligott.  A Miranda Warning is a statement police must read to a suspect prior to interrogation of the suspect once.
 Most cases are handled by state courts  Arrest: When a person suspected of a crime is taken into custody Arrest warrant v. probable cause  A judge.
Police and the Constitution: The Rules of Law Enforcement.
Understanding the Criminal Justice System Chapter 6: Police and the Constitution.
“ Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Criminal Evidence Chapter Six: Warrantless Arrests and Searches This multimedia product and its contents are protected.
Criminal Justice Process: The Investigation Mrs. Gurzler.
The Criminal Justice Process
Chapter 10 The Criminal Process. A.k.a. Procedural criminal law Two most essential elements of Canadian Criminal Process are: - Truth - Justice.
Arrest and Detention. Questioning the Accused Police can not force a suspect to answer questions Police can not force a suspect to answer questions Section.
Arrest and Detention LAW 120. Arrest and Detention  Once the police have collected evidence they will begin to question suspects  Depending on the evidence,
Rights & the Constitution. Fourth Amendment Intended to limit overzealous behavior by the police Search and seizure Probable Cause –Standard for legal.
 The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,
The Investigation.  Right to remain silent  Right to an attorney  No interrogation should take place before they read  Are a result of the US Supreme.
Chapter 05: Temporary Detentions LawTech Custom Publishing, Inc. Copyright 2010.
Slide 1 III. Criminal Procedure and the Constitution A.Analyze and Define Criminal Procedure B.Analyze the provisions of the 4 th and 5 th Amendments pertaining.
 Online Miranda quiz Online Miranda quiz. The constitutional implications of custodial interrogation.
The Bill of Rights and the Criminal Trial Process.
Overview Introduction to the Legal System Legal Resources Interactions with Police Search and Seizure Miranda Rights/Right to an Attorney Conclusions/Questions.
Criminal Justice Process: The Investigation The criminal justice process includes everything that happens to a person from the moment of arrest, through.
© 2015 Cengage Learning Chapter 7 CTE S&B:17.04/17.07 Police and the Constitution: The Rules of Law Enforcement Chapter 7 CTE S&B:17.04/17.07 Police and.
Criminal Investigation: Laws of Arrest, Search and Seizure Chapter 12 Law and Government.
Land Mark Supreme Court Cases Assignment
CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS: THE INVESTIGATION Chapter 12.
CJ I / Critical Thinking 3/13/16 Why do you think it is important that law enforcement agencies have limited authority? What do you think are the key benefits.
Is there a state action? (i.e. search by police, not private party) Is the search conducted by a state or federal actor? 4 th amendment doesn’t apply to.
Unit 4 Seminar. Tell me what the Miranda warning is and what it means to you.
Supreme Court briefs.
Amendments in Action Search and Seizure.
Chapter 8 Police and Constitutional Law
Crime Scene Processing 5th & 6th Amendments
American Criminal Justice: The Process
Amendments in Action Search and Seizure.
Search and Seizure Concepts
Pre-Trial Procedures Search and Seizure.
THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS: THE INVESTIGATIVE PHASE
Authority to Detain and Arrest; Use of Force
STREET LAW: Miranda rights
Presentation transcript:

DEFENSE PERSPECTIVE Bill Bowman SCHROETER GOLDMARK & BENDER 810 Third Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, Washington (206)

Most Common Reasons Cases Dismissed/Evidence Suppressed

Can rely on information from third party if “sufficient indicia of reliability”: Can rely on information from third party if “sufficient indicia of reliability”: Informant is reliable; or Informant is reliable; or Sufficient factual basis; AND Corroboration SOLUTION: Ask Dispatch for as much information as possible Be patient – Good things will come Be patient – Good things will come Most Common Reasons Cases Dismissed/Evidence Suppressed: #1 Unidentified/Identified Third Party Informant

Initial Seizure – Reasonable Suspicion Investigative Detention – Confirm or Dispel Suspicion Arrest – Probable Cause CrRJL 3.1 – Right to Lawyer Shall Accrue As Soon as Feasible After Arrest Arrest As Soon As Feasible Means Immediately As Soon As Feasible Means Immediately SOLUTION: Advise of Right to Counsel At Time Suspicion Confirmed Most Common Reasons Cases Dismissed/Evidence Suppressed: #2 Exceeding Scope of Terry/CrRLJ 3.1 Violation

Police may search a car incident to arrest only if: Police may search a car incident to arrest only if: The defendant is within reaching distances of the passenger compartment at the time of the search; or Iit’s reasonable to believe that the car contains evidence of a crime. Arizona v. Gant No Inevitable Discovery Doctrine in Washington SOLUTION: Only conduct search in exigent circumstances Mandatory Impound Law Mandatory Impound Law Most Common Reasons Cases Dismissed/Evidence Suppressed: #3 Search Incident to Arrest

When defendant invokes right to counsel, not subject to further interrogation unless: When defendant invokes right to counsel, not subject to further interrogation unless: He initiates further questioning himself; or He initiates further questioning himself; or Counsel has been made available to him Edwards v. Arizona Made available means actually present (telephone not enough) Made available means actually present (telephone not enough) Minnick v. Mississippi Minnick v. Mississippi Different than Invocation of Right to Remain Silent SOLUTION: Once invoke right to counsel – Stop Interrogation Most Common Reasons Cases Dismissed/Evidence Suppressed: # 4 Right to Counsel Violation

CREDIBILITY Most Common Reason A Case Is Lost At Trial

CREDIBILITY Testimony Demeanor is Everything

CREDIBILITY Fundamental Fairness Give Defendant Opportunity to Succeed Video: Proper Working Order; Consistent With Report; Captures ENTIRE contact

CREDIBILITY Competence Police Reports: Thorough and Complete AccurateTemplate

Recent Trends to Attack Credibility Disciplinary Records Facebook/Social Media

WHY DON”T DRE CASES GO TO TRIAL?

Nature of the Cases Using AND possessing drugs Using drugs AND alcohol WHY DON”T DRE CASES GO TO TRIAL?

NATURE OF DEFENDANTS Illegal Drugs Significant History Public Defender Prescription Drugs No History Private Counsel WHY DON”T DRE CASES GO TO TRIAL?

RELUCTANCE TO PROSECUTE Intimidated by DRE Evidence Blood Admissibility Issues Technical and Scientific Challenges Lack of Impairment Quantification WHY DON”T DRE CASES GO TO TRIAL?

QUESTIONS