Quality of care from the patient’s perspective Background and introduction of the CAHPS® questionnaires into the Dutch health and social insurance system.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Wealth Fund Webinar February 5, 2013
Advertisements

Adult Social Care & Health - Whats Housing Got to Do With It? Neil Revely Executive Director of People Services, Sunderland City Council Chair, Association.
Training to care for people with dementia Dementia Training Partner logo here Training support Skills development Competency Assessment Scholarships Education.
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
2003 Alabama Health Care Insurance and Access Survey Montgomery, AL May 2, 2003 Ashley Alvord, MPH Alabama Department of Public Health Children’s Health.
Supporting Carers in General Practice & role of RCGP GP Champions for carers Dr Sachin Gupta GP, Welwyn Garden City RCGP GP Champion for Carers, East of.
Maine Quality Forum Advisory Council February 8, 2012 Public Reporting of Patient Experience Survey Data.
Measuring the Patients’ Experience with Care Disclosure Project Discussion Forum July 12, 2007 Dale Shaller, MPA Shaller Consulting Managing Director,
The HCAHPS and Competency Connection HealthStream, Inc. The HCAHPS and Competency Connection HealthStream, Inc.
1 Patient – Doctor Communications Shlomo Mizrahi Rutgers University.
Department of Health and Human Services Measuring Clinical Lab Ordering Quality: Theory and Practice Steven M. Asch MD MPH VA, RAND, UCLA April 29, 2005.
Determinants of Patient Satisfaction in Home Health HCAI 5220 & HCAI 5221 Silvana Vela Fall 2012 Trinity University.
Clinical Leadership Skills Acquisition in Nurse Residents
The CAHPS Health Literacy Item Set Beverly Weidmer, RAND Corporation AHRQ 2009 Annual Conference Research to Reform: Achieving Health System Change Bethesda,
Proposed Cross-center Project Survey of Federally Qualified Health Centers Vicky Taylor & Vicki Young.
1 Measuring Patients’ Experience of Hospital Care Angela Coulter Picker Institute Europe
Update on CAHPS ® Surveys AHRQ ANNUAL MEETING Lunch and Learn Session #46 SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 Judith Sangl, ScD AHRQ CAHPS Project Officer.
CAHPS Overview Clinician & Group Surveys: Practical Options for Implementation and Use AHRQ ANNUAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 18, 2011 Christine Crofton, PhD CAHPS.
TRENDS AND CONSUMERISM IN HEALTH CARE Important Attributes Of Quality Health Care: Consumer Perspectives.
Psychometric Properties of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey September 11, 2012.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Advancing Excellence in Health Care Developing CAHPS® for People with Mobility Impairments June.
Resident Centred Care Through Service Excellence Introduction to the Resident Centred Care and Service Excellence Project.
Health Systems – Access to Care and Cultural Competency Tonetta Y. Scott, DrPH, MPH Florida Department of Health Office of Minority Health.
Consumer Perception of Culturally Competent Outpatient Services & Hospital Use Carol Carstens, PhD, LISW-S Meeting of the Ohio Community Support Planning.
Perspectives on the Age Wave: Key Issues, Solutions, and Opportunities Robyn Golden, LCSW Director of Older Adult Programs Rush University Medical Center.
Current Hiring Practices in Healthcare Presented by: Kristen Medlin, PHR Administrative Director of Human Resources Aiken Regional Medical Centers.
DIRIGO HEALTH AGENCY’S MAINE QUALITY FORUM Statewide Patient Experience Survey August 2012 Patient Experience Matters.
CAHPS® Survey to Evaluate the Patient’s Experience with the Medical Home Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Department of Medicine RAND Health Program November 18,
Nursing Excellence Conference April 19,2013
Differences in Patient Reports and Ratings of Ambulatory Health Care by Race/Ethnicity Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. June 13, :45-11:45 (EPN 6021)
Four Corners Community Behavioral Health Center Presented by Aralias Research Aralias Research Ryan Jensen, Marcus Waite, and Nick Bell.
Evaluating a Research Report
1 The Patient Perspective: Satisfaction Survey Presented at: Disease Management Colloquium June 22, 2005 Shulamit Bernard, RN, PhD.
Quality Through the Eyes of the Patient: State-of-the-Art Concepts Paul D. Cleary, Ph.D. April 10, 2001 Quality Through the Eyes of the Patient: State-of-the-Art.
RANDRAND CAHPS® Relevance of CAHPS® for Workers’ Compensation Medical Care Donna Farley Senior Health Policy Analyst, RAND Workers’ Compensation Colloquium.
Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene WB&A Market Research Executive Summary THE 2003 MARYLAND MEDICAID MANAGED CARE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY.
Use of CAHPS® Database by Researchers: Findings Related to Differences by Race and Ethnicity Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. RAND.
Attitudes and Perspectives on Ophthalmology Resident Training: The APORT Study Series Matthew J. Welch, M.D. and James F. McDonnell, M.D. Department of.
The Patient-Centered Medical Home & Health 2.0 AHRQ Annual Conference September 15, 2009 Michael S. Barr, MD, MBA, FACP Vice President, Practice Advocacy.
Overview of CAHPS ® and the National CAHPS ® Database Assessing Patients’ Experiences with Care: Using CAHPS ® as a Standardized Quality Metric Dale Shaller,
T. Brzostek 1, L. Przewoźniak 1, P.Brzyski 1, M. Kózka 1, K.Gajda 1, M.Cisek 1, L. Aiken 2, W. Sermeus 3 1.Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow,
Pediatric Healthcare Center of The Future Down the Rabbit Hole Of Healthcare September 4, 2007 Gerri Lamb, PhD, RN Emory School of Nursing.
CAHPS Clinician & Group Survey 2.0 Update Ron D. Hays RAND, Santa Monica, CA UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of the terms AND and DNR on decisional conflict in surrogate decision-makers. Decisional.
Quality of care from the patients perspective; the CQI rehabilitation centres Herman Sixma / NIVEL ESCIF De Rijp - 19 May 2011.
Assessing Patient-Centered Medical Homes from the Patient Perspective: Developing the CAHPS ® Clinician & Group PCMH Survey Patricia Gallagher, PhD Center.
Assessing Patient Satisfaction Ron D. Hays UCLA Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research RAND Health Program AUA Foundation Summer.
Patient Reports about Health IT Developing & Field Testing Survey Questions for Outpatient Settings Keith McInnes Boston University School of Public Health.
CAHPS PATIENT EXPERIENCE SURVEYS AHRQ ANNUAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 2012 Christine Crofton, PhD CAHPS Project Officer.
HCAHPS: How Pharmacists can Impact Patient Experience Meghan E. Tolan, PharmD, MBA Candidate PGY2 Health System Pharmacy Administration Resident The Johns.
Optimization of psychotropic drug prescription in nursing home patients with dementia: the PROPER study (PRescription Optimization of Psychotropic drugs.
Rediscovering the Art of Healing Connection by Creating the Tree of Life Poster Teri Britt Pipe, PhD, RN Kenneth Mishark, MD Reverend Patrick Hansen, MA,
Evaluating Client Satisfaction in Psychiatric Group Homes: A Participatory Stakeholder Approach Myra Piat, Ph.D. Douglas Hospital & McGill University 6875.
Striving Towards Excellence in Comprehensive Care: What do Children Need? July 10, 2007 Christopher A. Kus, M.D., M.P.H.
D. HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT Health policy and management is a multidisciplinary field of inquiry and practice concerned with the delivery, quality.
Assessing Patient-Centered Medical Homes from the Patient’s Perspective: Developing the CAHPS ® PCMH Survey Patricia (Trish) Gallagher, PhD Center for.
Introduction to research
Primary Care in The Netherlands: General Practitioners in the Lead Jako Burgers, MD, PhD Dutch College of General Practitioners Common Wealth Fund Webinar.
2 Introduction to Medical and Health Careers © Copyright, SC AHEC, 2008.
Performance Improvement: What Leaders Need to Know to Succeed March 15, 2016 Dana Richardson, RN, MHA
A Professional Development Series from the CDC’s Division of Population Health School Health Branch Professional Development 101: The Basics – Part 2.
Hildegalda P. Mushi and Dr Sudai, Boniphace Marwa Presented on 5th National Quality Improvement Forum on Health and Social Welfare 28 th August 2015, Hyatt.
Chapter 10 (3.8) Marketing Research.  What is Marketing Research? Marketing research is the systematic design, collection, analysis, and reporting of.
Learning from patients’ experience Angela Coulter Picker Institute Europe Angela Coulter Picker Institute Europe
Geographic Variation in Healthcare and Promotion of High-Value Care Margaret E. O’Kane November 10, 2010.
T Relationships do matter: Understanding how nurse-physician relationships can impact patient care outcomes Sandra L. Siedlecki PhD RN CNS.
Chapter 7: Client Satisfaction
UCSF Fresno Family and Community Medicine Dept.
Julia Searl Rusert, M.S.W., Ph.D. David Martin, M.A.
Patient-reported Outcome Measures
Presentation transcript:

Quality of care from the patient’s perspective Background and introduction of the CAHPS® questionnaires into the Dutch health and social insurance system Diana Delnoij (NIVEL) Herman Sixma (NIVEL)

Structure of the presentation Introduction + developments in society Developments in QoC research; perspectives + ‘state-of-the-art’ Past, present and future of the CAHPS- approach Concluding remarks + discussion

Developments macro level technological developments rising expectations + expenditures in the health care sector health care reforms tendency toward democratization

Developments meso level professionalization of health care services rise of organizational structures burocratization of services development of category-specific patient organizations

Developments micro level changes in doctor-patient relationship consequences ‘ageing society’ changes the family structures the ‘professional’ patient

Developments in society: a summary Macro level : - from ‘leadership’ to ‘stewardship’ Meso level : - from ‘supply’ to ‘demand centered’ Micro level : - from ‘patient’ to ‘active participant’

insurer consumer provider insurance market purchasing market provider market The new health care ‘market’

Part 2 : Quality of care (QoC) from the patient’s perspective; history and developments

“ The key to successful doctor-patient partnerships is recognize that patients are experts too ….. The new emphasis is on shared information, shared evaluation, shared decision making, and shared responsibilities..…” (Angela Coulter, BMJ 1999; 319: )

Different QoC perspectives health insurers > cost efficiency providers > guidelines + protocols patients > satisfaction + QoC ratings government > legal framework

Four generations QoC research P atient satisfaction studies (see Linder- Pelz, 1982 a.o.) Service Quality models (Parasuraman et al, 1985, 1988) Extended SERVQUAL models (CAHPS, QUOTE, Picker Instruments a.o.) Future: Performance indicator models

Main characteristics ‘state-of- the-art’ QoC questionnaires patients involvement qualitative + quantitative methods shift from ‘satisfaction’ to ‘reports’ QoC = multi-dimensional concept applicable in QA and QI studies

“ Questions asking for reports tend to reflect better the quality of care and ar more interpretable and actionable for quality improvement purposes than ratings of satisfaction or excellence..…” (Paul Cleary & Susan Edgman-Levitan, JAMA 1997, 278 (19): )

Examples of some ‘state-of- the-art’ QoC questionnaires Responsiveness measures WHO Instruments Picker-Europe (UK) Family of QUOTE instruments (NL) CAHPS Instruments (USA)

What is CAHPS? Consumer Assessment of Health Plan Survey Questionnaires containing items on patients’: experiences with health care providers experiences with their insurance company general rating of health care and health plan Commissioned by: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHQR). Developed by: Harvard Medical School, the RAND corporation, and the American Institutes for Research

Introduction of CAHPS in the Netherlands Initiative: Agis (regional public health insurer) Translation and validation of three questionnaires: 1.CAHPS Adult Commercial Questionnaire 2.Hospital CAHPS 3.Diabetes questionnaire

CAHPS instruments (example 1) Please answer the questions in this survey about this stay at [FACILITYNAME]. Do not include any other hospital stay in your answers. YOUR CARE FROM NURSES 1.During this hospital stay, how often did nurses treat you with courtesy and respect? 1  Never 2  Sometimes 3  Usually 4  Always 19.Before giving you the medicine, did hospital staff describe possible side effects in a way you could understand? 1  Yes 2  No

CAHPS instruments (example 2) 5. Using any number from 0 to 10 where 0 is the worst possible care and 10 is the best possible care, what number would you give the care you got from all the nurses who treated you? 0  0 Worst possible nursing care 1  1 2  2 3  3 4  4 5  5 6  6 7  7 8  8 9  9 10  10 Best possible nursing care

Translating the CAHPS Adult Commercial Questionnaire Translation: forward - backward by 2 x 2 translators Tailored to the Dutch health care system: Absence of nurse practitioners or physician assistants distinction between ER in hospital and out-of- hours services of GPs Adaptation to social-cultural values in NL: Question about educational system Use of ethnicity instead of race

Fielding the CAHPS Adult Commercial Questionnaire Representative sample of 1,000 Agis clients who were insured 6 months prior to sample selection In November 2003, 977 insured received a mailed questionnaire; 545 responded (56%) Respondents are significantly older than non-respondents Respondents are also older than the general Dutch population and in worse health

Validating the CAHPS Adult Commercial Questionnaire 1.Check consistency of the data  o.k. 2.Check frequencies and missing values  o.k. 3.Check factor structure and reliability  o.k. 4.Compare results with other Dutch studies and with the American National CAHPS Benchmarking Database 2003:  This presentation

Comparison of Dutch data (NL) with American benchmark data (USA): access to care

Comparison of Dutch data (NL) with American benchmark data (USA): patient-centered care

Comparison of Dutch data (NL) with American benchmark data (USA): general rating

Translation into consumer information: % consumers who always experience that:

Conclusion Dutch respondents are able to fill out the questionnaire Results are internally consistent and reliable Patients’ evaluation of the Dutch and American primary process is strikingly comparable More research is needed on the external validity in the Dutch context

Major uncertainties Will insurers really engage in strategic purchasing? If so, is CAHPS-information useful for them? Will consumers choose rationally between different insurers? If so, is CAHPS-information useful for them?

Looking at the future: results of a national study on quality of home care from the clients perspective;

MDB – model (home care NL)

Conceptual model for client survey Communication Artificial aids Professional competence Continuity Accessibility Courtesy Process Structure Quality of home care Autonomy

Data collection QuestionnairesNumber% Gross random survey56, could not be delivered2, do not receive home care Net random survey52, Gross nr. of respondents25, declined to participate nothing filled in Net nr. of respondents24,

Process quality on scale

Structure quality, 1 – 10 scale

QoC ratings 106 home care organizations

Overall QoC scores, broken down by size of organization

Main conclusions (1) Patient views on QoC should be an important topic for policy makers + health care providers + health insurers + patients themselves Standardization and internationalization of QoC measuring instruments, based on the CAHPS approach offers new possibilities for QA, QI and to derive information to facilitate patient choice

Main conclusions (2) Follow-up research on validity, reliability, ‘sensitivity to change’ and discriminating power of new measuring instruments (such as the CAHPS-NL instruments) is still necessary Mesuring QoC from the patients’ perspective should be a part of an integrated approach (TQM, MDB, BSC)

Contact details Herman J. Sixma, PhD NIVEL P.O. Box BN Utrecht The Netherlands Tel.: Fax.: