Indiana Establishing Standard Operating Procedures to Achieve Statewide Interoperability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 5 Transfer of Training
Advertisements

Planning Reports and Proposals
Alabama Primary Health Care Association
NERC Policies Introduction
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Managing Compliance Related to Human Subjects Research Review Joseph Sherwin, Ph.D. Office of Regulatory Affairs University of Pennsylvania Fourth Annual.
Task Group Chairman and Technical Contact Responsibilities ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Scott Orthey and Steve Mawn 1.
Knowledge Dietary Managers Association 1 DMA Certification Exam Blueprint and Curriculum Development.
1 Managing the Surge Disaster Volunteer Management Training.
Aviation Security Training Module 4 Design and Conduct Exercise II 1.
SOA for EGovernment 1 Emergency Services Enterprise Framework: A Service-Oriented Approach Sukumar Dwarkanath COMCARE Michael Daconta Oberon Associates.
ActionDescription 1Decisions about planning and managing the coast are governed by general legal instruments. 2Sectoral stakeholders meet on an ad hoc.
Module N° 7 – Introduction to SMS
Patient Movement in the Midst of a Disaster
Communicating over the Network
IAEA Training in Emergency Preparedness and Response Module L-051 General Concepts of Exercises to Test Preparedness Lecture.
Gaining Senior Leadership Support for Continuity of Operations
Site Safety Plans PFN ME 35B.
1 Implementing Internet Web Sites in Counseling and Career Development James P. Sampson, Jr. Florida State University Copyright 2003 by James P. Sampson,
1 SESSION 5- RECORDING AND REPORTING IN GRADES R-12 Computer Applications Technology Information Technology.
1 Kentuckys Public Safety Awareness Initiative Program Coordination and Partnerships August 23, 2005.
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
1 Preparing Texas Today... Division of Emergency Management Texas Department of Public Safety...for Tomorrows Challenges First Responder Preparedness.
National Emergency Communications Plan Demonstrating Goal 2 By 2011, 75 percent of non-UASI jurisdictions are able to demonstrate response-level emergency.
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 6 and 7.
Effective Contract Management Planning
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
Preparation Process and Exercise Manual
Session 2: Introduction to the Quality Criteria. Session Overview Your facilitator, ___________________. [Add details of facilitators background, including.
Module 14 Major Incident Management Module 14 Major Incident Management incident Problems in major and complex incident management Major incident management.
1 INAC First Nation Education Policy Framework Regional Dialogues Coordinated by AFN and INAC Education Policy Framework - Joint Steering Committee (EPF-JSC)
Piedmont Regional Voice over IP Pilot Project Law Enforcement Information Management Conference Greensboro, N. C. May 21-24, 2007 Major Dean Hairston,
Checking & Corrective Action
Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting your organization’s logo –“View”
IS-700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
1. The ITU Radiocommunication Sector (ITU-R) will remain the unique and universal convergence and regulatory centre for worldwide radiocommunication matters.
Visual 5.1 General Staff Functions Unit 5: General Staff Functions.
NIMS Resource Management IS-700.A – January 2009 Visual 5.1 NIMS Resource Management Unit 5.
Functional Areas & Positions
NIMS Resource Management IS-703.A – August 2010 Visual 3.1 Resource Management Planning Unit 3:
IAEA Training in Emergency Preparedness and Response Development of Simulation Exercise Work Session (Drill) Module WS-012.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process
Visual 3.1 Delegation of Authority & Management by Objectives Unit 3: Delegation of Authority & Management by Objectives.
© Paradigm Publishing Inc Chapter 10 Information Systems.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
NIMS Resource Management IS-700.A – January 2009 Visual 5.1 NIMS Command and Management Unit 5.
We will start momentarily…
Georgia Interoperability Network
IS 700.a NIMS An Introduction. The NIMS Mandate HSPD-5 requires all Federal departments and agencies to: Adopt and use NIMS in incident management programs.
Unit 8: Tests, Training, and Exercises Unit Introduction and Overview Unit objectives:  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises. 
NIMS Communications and Information Management IS-0700.A – October 2014 Visual 4.1 NIMS Communications and Information Management Unit 4.
IS-0700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
NIMS Preparedness IS-700.A – January 2009 Visual 3.1 NIMS Communications and Information Management Unit 3.
Wisconsin’s INTER PERABILITY Initiative Seamless Public Safety Radio Communications Tactical Interoperable Communication Plan TICP March 3, 2011.
What Is It And How Will We Measure It?
National Incident Management System (NIMS) Jim Reardon Michigan State Police Emergency Management Division
National Incident Management System. Homeland Security Presidential Directive – 5 Directed the development of the National Incident Management System.
Idaho Statewide Interoperability Executive Council.
Unit 5:Elements of A Viable COOP Capability (cont.)  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises (TT&E)  Explain the importance of a.
TICP Preparation & CASM Data Entry Projects Overview Interoperable Communications Conference September 28, 2010 DRAFT v1.0.
New River Valley Emergency Communications Regional Authority
NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Department of Homeland Security Executive Office of Public Safety.
1 Federal Emergency Management Agency Charlie Hoffman Disaster Operations Directorate Chief, DEC Programs Disaster Emergency Communications National Public.
National Emergency Communications Plan Update National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Winter Committee Meeting February 16, 2015 Ron Hewitt.
National Emergency Communications Plan Goal 2
2017 Health care Preparedness and Response Draft Capabilities
Communications Interoperability
Interoperable Communications Technical Assistance Program
Presentation transcript:

Indiana Establishing Standard Operating Procedures to Achieve Statewide Interoperability

Standard Operating Procedures Indiana Standard Operating Procedures Developing and Managing Interoperable Communications SOPs

Purpose and Outcomes Purpose To provide an overview of a process for developing regional SOPs To provide an example of SOP structure Outcomes Gain perspective on how to identify the need for, establish, and/or revise structured standard operating procedures in your region Develop a shared understanding of the need for and value of collaboration among agencies and disciplines across the State

Interoperability Continuum

Indiana SCIP 3 Current Statewide Assessment MODERATE PROGRESS Standard Operating Procedures – The state of Indiana has well-established policies for statewide system use while locally developed SOPs for interoperable communications scenarios are established for use by regional consortia. Universal access and knowledge of these SOPs, however, is limited. The state will continue to work to develop and share Standard Operating procedures that foster interoperability and improve training and exercises for public safety officials throughout the state.

Indiana SCIP 4.2 County Communications Plans In conjunction with the CASM data population, Indiana is requiring each county to submit a County Communications Plan. The counties will use their plans to: Provide system users with an understanding of how to effectively communicate via county Public Safety Systems. Explain operability and how it is achieved on the system. Explain how the four criteria of interoperability are achieved on the system. Inter-County Agency communication. Task Force intra communication. Mutual Aid Communication. Training and Exercise. Demonstrate NIMS compliance.

Indiana SCIP 5.3 SOP Initiatives Established policy regarding operation and use of the statewide interoperable communications system. The North Central and Southeast regional working groups are establishing interoperable communications standard operating procedures. The SCIP Executive Committee recommends that regional user groups, as well as the statewide user group, continue to address Standard Operating Procedure issues during their regularly scheduled meetings. The state Department of Homeland Security is requiring all counties to submit a County Communications Plan, which will contain details regarding inter-agency communication within counties; task force intra communication; and mutual aid communication.

Indiana SCIP 5.3.1 Establish an online repository for SOPs While Standard Operating Procedures and policies exist statewide, there is no single place for first responders to access this information. Indiana will use the CASM tool as well as the new content management state web system to gather and provide access to these SOPs..

Why are SOPs Needed? Clear and effective SOPs are essential in the development and deployment of any solution. SOPs are formal written guidelines or instructions for incident response. SOPs typically have both operational and technical components and enable emergency responders to act in a coordinated fashion across disciplines in the event of an emergency.

SOP Development Process Gap or need identified Stakeholders and/or Proponents ID’d Working Group formed Draft prepared Consensus verified SOP Issued Training

How Can You Identify Needs? Day-to-day operational experience Exercise after-action reports Real world events debriefings Existing and newly deployed communications resources Inventory existing SOPs

SOP Format and Content Example 1 Example 2 Introduction Purpose Scope Procedures Communications Alternatives Training Requirements Testing Requirements Responsibility Purpose/Objectives Technical Background Operational Context Recommended Protocol/Standard Recommended Protocol/Procedure Management

Writing Guide for Standard Operating Procedures Using the Tool

Introduction Describes the recognized need for procedures Provides reasons why it is important to establish such procedures. Lists agencies that will share the procedures Can also specify the capability or resource in which the procedures are being established.

Purpose/Objectives Clarifies the principal objective of the capability or resource that is the subject of the SOP Briefly describes the purpose of the SOPs with respect to the capability or resource May include information as to authority, use, responsibility, etc.

Purpose/Objectives Questions to Consider Why is this SOP being created? What will this SOP accomplish? How will this SOP be used? Who will use this SOP? When will this SOP be activated? What are the specific responsibilities of each party? What interoperability resources are available? What are the commonly used frequency bands for interoperabilitiy in the area that this policy and procedure covers? Is the Shared Channel intended for use as a high-level coordination channel or a tactical channel?

Purpose/Objectives –Sample Language Establish standard operating procedures for the use of a shared channel. The intent of this protocol is to establish an orderly, workable radio network for the use of operational and command and control personnel in the event of a major response, ranging from an intra-discipline, intra-jurisdictional incident or event, to an inter-discipline, inter-jurisdictional incident or event in the (insert designated area here). The communication capability, provided by the shared channel will be between {enter entity or agency here} and {enter entity or agency here} using the {name of radio resource} shared channel {name of radio resource}. The objective is to have a SOP in place for pre-established radio resources in support of incident driven interoperable communications.

Scope Lists the agencies and jurisdictions that will participate in the procedures May describe their relationship Provide details on the end users for whom the new capability is being provided: Level of command Level of government Voice and/or data, etc.

Scope: Sample Language The system infrastructure is comprised of a consortium of sites, wireless and wire line links, and servers which provide the uniform region-wide radio coverage for public safety and public service users. The systems goal is to provide coverage throughout the region, to public safety users so that they can provide essential government services and have wide area radio interoperability. The consortium operates under a set of by-laws developed by the users. Each agency and its users will subscribe to this guide as the defined methods in order to achieve operational efficiency of the system. The By-laws are reviewed and amended as necessary and the current version is incorporated into this document in . See Appendix B for the By-laws and a list of participating agencies. This manual was developed in order to provide methods and protocols for use of the system, subscriber equipment, and delineating various operational matters. It will be an evolving document in order to address needs that arise from an ever-developing technology. The technical staff members that work under the Technical Committee will vigilantly monitor the systems performance and make recommendations to the governing board as to necessary adjustments to the system to maintain optimum performance.

Scope: Questions to consider Which agencies are to be included in this SOP? What level of authority will be included in this SOP (command or tactical level)? When will this resource be used? For critical incidents? Planned events? Day-today? At the discretion of the mayor?

Procedures Procedures (e.g. channel patching) Communications structure Channel patching and monitoring Activation, transfer, and discontinuation Separation of the interoperability channel due to interference

Communications Structure A graphical depiction of the agencies involved in the communications structure. Maps out the flow of information and helps set the foundation for procedures. A depiction of command levels and roles within agencies clarifies the relationship among users

Channel Patching and Monitoring Specific to a shared channel capability. Describes how the new capability is achieved and the specifics of that capability Can also serve to identify benefits and alternatives of the capability as well as the specific procedures around aspects of use.

Activation, Transfer, and Discontinuation Rules of Use Operational Procedure and Guidelines for Limited and Full Activation Radio Channel Activation Authority Establishing and Transferring Lead Dispatch Radio Command Control Notification Process for Establishing Command Control Discontinuation of the Interoperability Channel

Separation of the Interoperability Channel Due to Interference Set out the procedures to follow when there is interference with channel frequency Identifies parties to be notified Describes actions to be taken

Communications Alternatives Telephone Conference Bridges Cellular/Push-to-Talk Commercial Wireless Technology Computerized Emergency Notification System Internet/E-mail Satellite Phones Cache of Portable Radios on Various Bands Mobile Capabilities with Conventional Channels Dispatch/Radio Communications Center to Dispatch/Radio Communications Center Messaging Runner System

Training Requirements Who must receive training? How often? Who is responsible for development and oversight? What are the minimum requirements for satisfactory passing training on the SOP

Testing Requirements Describe the procedures for testing the requirements of a capability or equipment. Schedule Articulate expectations.

Responsibility Who or what body will ensure that all SOPs are followed? Who or what body will ensure the SOP is periodically reviewed and revised when appropriate? Procedure for distribution of Updates to appropriate agencies/jurisdictions Consequences for none compliance, if any.

Thanks