Central Indiana Suburban Transportation & Mobility Study (CISTMS) Central Indiana Suburban Transportation & Mobility Study (CISTMS) Sponsored by INDOT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Update on Bicyclist & Pedestrian Data Collection and Modeling Efforts Transportation Research Board January 2010 Charlie Denney, Associate Michael Jones,
Advertisements

A PERSPECTIVE ON APPLICATION OF A PAIR OF PLANNING AND MICRO SIMULATION MODELS: EXPERIENCE FROM I-405 CORRIDOR STUDY PROGRAM Murli K. Adury Youssef Dehghani.
Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
Beltline Highway ITS – Ramp Metering Project ODOT Planners Meeting April 25, 2012.
Public Involvement Open Houses Develop Problem Statement Review plans, policies, regulations, and standards Identify and assess Alternate Mobility.
1 Innovative Tools October 27, 2011 Chi Mai. 2 Presentation Overview VISSIM Corridors VISSIM Protocol Hours of Congestion.
Project Description and Needs Lincoln Way Widening Addition of a center-turn lane and safety improvements to the grade and horizontal alignment. Needs.
SCATTER workshop, Milan, 24 October 2003 Testing selected solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
Appraising sub-regional and local growth strategies in the Nottingham-Leicester- Derby Area, UK. Policy applications of a new model of transport and land.
Missoula Planning Summit Milestone 14 August, 2008 Missoula, Montana.
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Paula J. Trigg, County Engineer Public Works and Transportation Committee April 2, 2014 OVERVIEW | SOURCE OF PROJECTS PROPOSED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT.
UATS Director’s Workshop Agenda April 30, 2001  Introduction (12:30 – 12:35)  Development Review and Mitigation (12:35 – 2:10) Break (2:10 – 2:15) 
City of Omak Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project Prepared by Highlands Associates Photos by FlyBy Photos.
Highways and Sprawl in North Carolina David T. Hartgen Professor of Transportation Studies UNC Charlotte A Report for the John.
US 1 CORRIDOR STUDY AND PROJECT PRIORITIZATION PROCESS Augusta, GA November 29, 2012 Jeff Carroll CDM Smith Georgia Association of MPOs Annual Conference.
Welcome to El Dorado Hills. Goals of Presentation Summarize growth, traffic, and road network state affecting planning in EDH - Especially where not easily.
The SoCoMMS Model Paul Read Dan Jones. The Presentation Outline of the Study The Modelling Framework Accessibility Model.
What is the Model??? A Primer on Transportation Demand Forecasting Models Shawn Turner Theo Petritsch Keith Lovan Lisa Aultman-Hall.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
Wasatch Choice for 2040 Envision Tomorrow Plus Scenario Evaluation Tool (land use) MAG, WFRC, Envision Utah are beta testing.
Using the Land Use in Central Indiana (LUCI) Models in Transportation Planning John R. Ottensmann Center for Urban Policy and the Environment Indiana University.
Transportation Planning Analysis UnitPNREC 2006 Transportation Modeling in Oregon: Overview of ODOT Statewide Integrated Model Pacific Northwest Regional.
Lec 20, Ch.11: Transportation Planning Process (objectives)
Luci2 Urban Simulation Model John R. Ottensmann Center for Urban Policy and the Environment Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.
Transportation Development Division Oregon Integrated Land Use and Transportation Models Part 1: Statewide Model Part 2: MetroScope Part 3: Land Use Scenario.
GreenSTEP Statewide Transportation Greenhouse Gas Model Cutting Carbs Conference December 3, 2008 Brian Gregor ODOT Transportation Planning Analysis Unit.
REGIONAL FORUM FOR BEVERLY, DANVERS AND SALEM DECEMBER 8, 2010 North Shore Regional Strategic Planning Project.
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Meeting Agenda Stakeholder Participation Panel July 14, 2003 Welcome/Introductions Study Overview Tasks/Products/Schedule Traffic Patterns Break Key Project.
Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Transportation Policy Board Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
Forecasting Travel Time Index using a Travel Demand Model to Measure Plan Performance Thomas Williams, AICP Texas A&M Transportation Institute 2015 TRB.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Alachua County Future Traffic Circulation Corridors Map Project July 10 th, 2007.
Connectivity & Mobility
TRANSPORT The Cambridge Futures response to the Draft Structure Plan Dr Tony Hargreaves, Cambridge Futures.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
Highway Functional Classification Chapter 16 Dr. TALEB M. AL-ROUSAN.
California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.
RPS Modeling Results Presentation to RPS Policy Committee Brian Gregor Transportation Planning Analysis Unit June 6,
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
Transportation and Transit Committee 4 December 2002 Albion Road Corridor Study.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB 11 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
Introduction Session 01 Matakuliah: S0753 – Teknik Jalan Raya Tahun: 2009.
Forecasting and Evaluating Network Growth David Levinson Norah Montes de Oca Feng Xie.
Comparative Analysis of Traffic and Revenue Risks Associated with Priced Facilities 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Problem 1: Determination of Facility Types for Analysis.
8/7/02 Dane County Vandewalle & Associates Strand Associates William O’Connor Roadway Concept Select Link Traffic Modeling August 7, 2002.
The Fargo/Moorhead Area Interstate Operations Study Opportunities and Planned Activities Presentation for the Mn/DOT Travel Demand Modeling Coordinating.
Putting the LBRS and other GIS data to Work for Traffic Flow Modeling in Erie County Sam Granato, Ohio DOT Carrie Whitaker, Erie County 2015 Ohio GIS Conference.
INCORPORATING INCOME INTO TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING Brent Spence Bridge Case Study October 13, 2015.
1 Improvement of Public Transport in Surabaya Multidisciplinary MSc Project Faculty Civil Engineering and Geosciences TU Delft.
The Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Initial Results of CLRP/CLRP+ Analysis with Round 6.4 Growth Forecasts and Five Alternative Land Use Scenarios.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 9 January 19, 2016.
Chapter 9 Capacity and Level of Service for Highway Segments
December 17, 2010 Developing Transit Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.
Defining Alternative Scenarios MTC Planning Committee and ABAG Administrative Committee May 13, 2011.
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 6 October 6, 2015.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 1: How to Determine Which Resources Should be Considered in a SCEA How to identify what.
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
APPLICATIONS OF STATEWIDE TRAVEL FORECASTING MODEL
Grey County Transportation Master Plan
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Acton Extension Update
Presentation transcript:

Central Indiana Suburban Transportation & Mobility Study (CISTMS) Central Indiana Suburban Transportation & Mobility Study (CISTMS) Sponsored by INDOT in conjunction with the Indianapolis MPO Prepared by: HNTB Corporation Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Parsons Brinckerhoff Sponsored by INDOT in conjunction with the Indianapolis MPO Prepared by: HNTB Corporation Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Parsons Brinckerhoff

Study Area North South West East

Study Purpose Evaluate existing and forecasted travel needs for crosstown (non-radial) corridors Identify key issues and problems pertaining to suburban mobility on those corridors Determine how needs can best be addressed from a planning and policy perspective Develop Project Implementation Timeline –10-25 years Evaluate existing and forecasted travel needs for crosstown (non-radial) corridors Identify key issues and problems pertaining to suburban mobility on those corridors Determine how needs can best be addressed from a planning and policy perspective Develop Project Implementation Timeline –10-25 years

Study Activities Model & evaluate corridor needs (4 corridors) Evaluate potential benefits of outer belt for I-465 and other corridor facilities Define land use/transportation relationships Model & evaluate North-South Statewide Mobility Corridor (E) and I-69 routing through Marion County Identify short- & long-term recommendations for each study corridor Model & evaluate corridor needs (4 corridors) Evaluate potential benefits of outer belt for I-465 and other corridor facilities Define land use/transportation relationships Model & evaluate North-South Statewide Mobility Corridor (E) and I-69 routing through Marion County Identify short- & long-term recommendations for each study corridor

North-South Statewide Mobility Corridor (E)

CISTMS Work Flow CISTMS Work Flow

Central Indiana Suburban Transportation & Mobility Study (CISTMS) Central Indiana Suburban Transportation & Mobility Study (CISTMS) BASE CONDITIONS REPORT Prepared by: HNTB Corporation Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Parsons Brinckerhoff BASE CONDITIONS REPORT Prepared by: HNTB Corporation Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Parsons Brinckerhoff

Base Conditions Report CONTENT: Overview of Study Area Overview of each Study Corridor Existing Conditions Data Recommended Low-Cost Actions to Address Current Problems CONTENT: Overview of Study Area Overview of each Study Corridor Existing Conditions Data Recommended Low-Cost Actions to Address Current Problems

Base Conditions Report OVERVIEW OF STUDY AREA: County, City and Town Census Data Population and Employment Trend Data Brief Transportation System Overview 1990 & 2000 Commuting Patterns OVERVIEW OF STUDY AREA: County, City and Town Census Data Population and Employment Trend Data Brief Transportation System Overview 1990 & 2000 Commuting Patterns

1990 & 2000 Commuting Patterns Commuting Patterns To Marion County (2000) 150,000 trips per day From Marion County (2000) 50,000 trips per day

Base Conditions Report CORRIDOR REVIEWS: Overview of Parallel Arterials State and Local Plans Physical & Operational Reviews (State Highways -- INDOT Inventories) Strategies to Maximize Existing Efficiency CORRIDOR REVIEWS: Overview of Parallel Arterials State and Local Plans Physical & Operational Reviews (State Highways -- INDOT Inventories) Strategies to Maximize Existing Efficiency

Base Conditions Report PHYSICAL REVIEWS: Lanes, Surface Width, Shoulder Width Percent No-Passing Access Points per Mile Right of Way Width Urban – Rural Category PHYSICAL REVIEWS: Lanes, Surface Width, Shoulder Width Percent No-Passing Access Points per Mile Right of Way Width Urban – Rural Category

Base Conditions Report OPERATIONAL REVIEWS: Daily and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Speed Limit & Average Travel Speed Percent Time Spent Following Level of Service (A through F) OPERATIONAL REVIEWS: Daily and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Speed Limit & Average Travel Speed Percent Time Spent Following Level of Service (A through F)

Base Conditions Report Strategies to Maximize Existing Efficiency : Access Management Actions Traffic Engineering Improvements Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Strategies to Maximize Existing Efficiency : Access Management Actions Traffic Engineering Improvements Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Transportation Demand Management (TDM)

Central Indiana Suburban Transportation & Mobility Study (CISTMS) Central Indiana Suburban Transportation & Mobility Study (CISTMS) TRAVEL SIMULATION MODEL Prepared by: HNTB Corporation Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Parsons Brinckerhoff TRAVEL SIMULATION MODEL Prepared by: HNTB Corporation Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Parsons Brinckerhoff

Travel Simulation Model Indianapolis MPO Regional Travel Simulation Model INDOT Statewide Travel Simulation Model Indianapolis MPO Regional Travel Simulation Model INDOT Statewide Travel Simulation Model

Travel Simulation Model 2025 Network Updates for CISTMS: INDOT Long Range Plan Projects Included Indianapolis MPO Regional Plan Projects Included I-69 from Evansville to Indianapolis Included (FEIS Alt 3C) 2025 Network Updates for CISTMS: INDOT Long Range Plan Projects Included Indianapolis MPO Regional Plan Projects Included I-69 from Evansville to Indianapolis Included (FEIS Alt 3C)

Travel Simulation Model Bookend Alternatives: Yr 2025 Current Plan (Minimum Change) Current 2025 Plan with only minor safety and operational improvements within study corridors – auxiliary lanes, intersection changes, spot improvements Yr 2025 Outer Belt (Maximum Change) Current 2025 Plan, plus upgrade or build new roadways at interstate standards within each corridor; link them to provide a continuous circumferential route Bookend Alternatives: Yr 2025 Current Plan (Minimum Change) Current 2025 Plan with only minor safety and operational improvements within study corridors – auxiliary lanes, intersection changes, spot improvements Yr 2025 Outer Belt (Maximum Change) Current 2025 Plan, plus upgrade or build new roadways at interstate standards within each corridor; link them to provide a continuous circumferential route

Travel Simulation Model Bookend Alternatives: A range of options is being evaluated in CISTMS. The bookend alternatives are intended to represent the outer limits of that range. Neither the Current Plan nor the Outer Belt option is currently proposed. Different options may be recommended for different corridors. Bookend Alternatives: A range of options is being evaluated in CISTMS. The bookend alternatives are intended to represent the outer limits of that range. Neither the Current Plan nor the Outer Belt option is currently proposed. Different options may be recommended for different corridors.

Travel Simulation Model Model Runs (To Date) for CISTMS: Yr 2000 base (testing and calibration) Yr 2025 Current Plan (Minimum Change) Yr 2025 Outer Belt (Maximum Change) Model Runs (To Date) for CISTMS: Yr 2000 base (testing and calibration) Yr 2025 Current Plan (Minimum Change) Yr 2025 Outer Belt (Maximum Change)

2025 Forecast Current Plan Network Veh-mi travel – 71.1 Mil Ave trip length – 9.9 mi. LOS E or worse – 876 mi Forecast Current Plan Network Veh-mi travel – 71.1 Mil Ave trip length – 9.9 mi. LOS E or worse – 876 mi.

2025 Forecast Outer Belt Network Veh-mi travel – 72.4 Mil Ave trip length – 10.1 mi. LOS E or worse – 746 mi Forecast Outer Belt Network Veh-mi travel – 72.4 Mil Ave trip length – 10.1 mi. LOS E or worse – 746 mi.

2025 Outer Belt - Traffic Increases I-69N – I-70 74,000 veh/day I-69S – I-70 48,000 veh/day I-70W – US 40 44,000 veh/day 2025 Outer Belt - Traffic Increases I-69N – I-70 74,000 veh/day I-69S – I-70 48,000 veh/day I-70W – US 40 44,000 veh/day

2025 Outer Belt - Traffic Reductions I-69 NE 28,000 veh/day I-69 SW 23,000 veh/day I-465 NW 18,000 veh/day I-465 NE 13,000 veh/day 2025 Outer Belt - Traffic Reductions I-69 NE 28,000 veh/day I-69 SW 23,000 veh/day I-465 NW 18,000 veh/day I-465 NE 13,000 veh/day

Central Indiana Suburban Transportation & Mobility Study (CISTMS) Central Indiana Suburban Transportation & Mobility Study (CISTMS) LAND USE MODEL Prepared by: HNTB Corporation Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Parsons Brinckerhoff LAND USE MODEL Prepared by: HNTB Corporation Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Parsons Brinckerhoff

LUCI: Land Use in Central Indiana Model to predict future patterns of urban development for the Central Indiana region Purpose not to produce best forecast but alternative scenarios Scenarios reflect policy choices, including restrictions on development, utility expansion Scenarios reflect alternative assumptions for future development, including population growth, density and accessibility preferences

LUCI/T Model Created for CISTMS land use analysis Restricted to nine-county area (from original 44 counties) Uses travel time* rather than distance for employment accessibility Uses traffic analysis zone employment data* *From regional travel simulation model

Urban Development 2000 Existing (Base Condition) 2025 Current Plan (Minimum Change) 550 sq.mi. urban848 sq.mi. urban

2025 Urban Development Current Plan (Minimum Change) Outer Belt (Maximum Change) 848 sq.mi. urban 2,521 pop./sq.mi. 849 sq.mi. urban 2,520 pop./sq.mi.

Possible Reasons for Small Differences The existing base of county to county commuting trips is limited. Urban development Fringe does not reach outer belt alignment (even in 2040). Households have better employment access at edge of urban fringe than from outer belt. Major travel time benefits between locations along outer belt, not to and from existing activity centers.

Central Indiana Suburban Transportation & Mobility Study (CISTMS) Central Indiana Suburban Transportation & Mobility Study (CISTMS) PEER CITY ANALYSIS Prepared by: HNTB Corporation Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Parsons Brinckerhoff PEER CITY ANALYSIS Prepared by: HNTB Corporation Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Parsons Brinckerhoff

Peer City Analysis Literature Review – Beltways and Land Use Land use impacts relate to beltway function Employment location more important than road (beltway) location Land use affected by commuting time budget Development influenced by proximity of beltway to urban edge Many factors besides transportation determine patterns of growth and sprawl Literature Review – Beltways and Land Use Land use impacts relate to beltway function Employment location more important than road (beltway) location Land use affected by commuting time budget Development influenced by proximity of beltway to urban edge Many factors besides transportation determine patterns of growth and sprawl

Peer City Analysis Selected Peer CitiesPopulation Houston, TX4,670,000 Boston, MA3,407,000 Charlotte, NC1,499,000 Nashville, TN1,231,000 Indianapolis MSA population is 1.6 million Selected Peer CitiesPopulation Houston, TX4,670,000 Boston, MA3,407,000 Charlotte, NC1,499,000 Nashville, TN1,231,000 Indianapolis MSA population is 1.6 million

Peer City Analysis Conclusions – Urban Sprawl & Beltways 1.Urban growth, economic expansion and the trend of decentralized development prompts urban sprawl concerns nationwide 2.Research is inconclusive regarding direct relationship of outer belts with urban sprawl 3.Beltways (and all freeways) impact the location of development, but its character and intensity is influenced by land use planning and zoning Conclusions – Urban Sprawl & Beltways 1.Urban growth, economic expansion and the trend of decentralized development prompts urban sprawl concerns nationwide 2.Research is inconclusive regarding direct relationship of outer belts with urban sprawl 3.Beltways (and all freeways) impact the location of development, but its character and intensity is influenced by land use planning and zoning

Peer City Analysis Conclusions – Urban Sprawl and Planning 1.Land Use Planning and early zoning is key to orderly growth and development 2.Local planning is key since land use policies are determined locally 3.Inter-jurisdictional participation is a necessity Transportation objectives are regional, but land use impacts are local. Conclusions – Urban Sprawl and Planning 1.Land Use Planning and early zoning is key to orderly growth and development 2.Local planning is key since land use policies are determined locally 3.Inter-jurisdictional participation is a necessity Transportation objectives are regional, but land use impacts are local.

Central Indiana Suburban Transportation & Mobility Study (CISTMS) Central Indiana Suburban Transportation & Mobility Study (CISTMS) NEXT STEPS Prepared by: HNTB Corporation Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Parsons Brinckerhoff NEXT STEPS Prepared by: HNTB Corporation Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Parsons Brinckerhoff

CISTMS Work Flow CISTMS Work Flow

CISTMS – Next Steps Evaluate Future Corridor Needs Review Planning Relationships With Local Roadways Evaluate Statewide Mobility Corridor (East) Examine Impact Of I-69 Travel Through Indianapolis Develop Corridor Recommendations Produce and Present Final Report