U.S. High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan U.S. EPA, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics December 12, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Licences for Europe Introductory meeting, 4 February WG 3 - Audiovisual sector and cultural heritage institutions.
Advertisements

Responsible Care and its relation to Global Product Strategy.
1 Petroleum Substances: Special Considerations for Interpreting HPV Data Characterizing Chemicals in Commerce: Using Data on High Production Volume (HPV)
Challenges and opportunities for effective implementation of TSCA Joel A. Tickner, ScD School of Health and Environment, UMASS Lowell US EPA National Pollution.
1 High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan Chief, Existing Chemicals Branch, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention.
1 Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS): U.S. Update.
 Chemical manufacturers & importers must classify each chemical produced or imported. They must: Determine the appropriate hazard classes & associated.
1 High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program – Future Directions Jim Willis Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and.
P2 Framework Models Overview Jan P2 Framework Models Overview Bill Waugh U.S. EPA
Priority-setting for the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program: Pesticide Active Ingredients Penelope A. Fenner-Crisp Office of Pesticide Programs U.S.
Endocrine Screening – Phase 1 TSCA 8(e) and FIFRA 6(a)(2) Requirements A. Michael Kaplan, Ph.D. December 13, 2010 A. Michael Kaplan & Associates, LLC
EPA Tier I Screening Process and
Presented by: Jake Sanderson Environment Canada Examining the Linkages between International HPV Programs and Canada December 11-14, 2006 HPV Conference.
How Health Care Purchasing is Addressing Problematic Chemicals Lara Sutherland Health Care Without Harm Characterizing Chemicals in Commerce Austin, Texas.
Chemical Screening Programs Ted Smith Dale Phenicie.
Office of Food Additive Safety Information for Industry: Steps to Implementation of Electronic Submissions.
Evolution of ICCVAM ◊National Toxicology Program Develop and validate improved test methods ◊NIH Revitalization Act: P.L Develop and.
Toxicology Perspectives on Aviation Turbine Fuel from Alternative Feedstocks November 3, L Street, NW Washington, DC
The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Interagency Testing Committee (ITC)
EPA’s Existing Chemicals Programs and Initiatives Presented to the North and South Carolina Chapter American Industrial Hygiene Association Charles Auer,
US EPA’s Chemical Management Wendy Cleland-Hamnett, Acting Director Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
Chemical Screening Tool for Exposures and Environmental Releases
SAICM: A Business and Industry Perspective Paul Sykes, ICCA CSD-18 Learning Centre, May
Characterizing Chemical in Commerce: Using Data on High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals December 12, 2006 L. Twerdok, Ph.D, DABT NPPTAC Member Report.
Status of the WET Program William Telliard Director, Analytical Methods USEPA Office of Science & Technology Office of Water.
September 25, 2012 THE GLOBAL PRODUCT STRATEGY AND HOW IT FITS IN RESPONSIBLE CARE Christina Franz Senior Director, ACC.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security Chemicals of Interest Anti-terrorism Standard.
EPA’s Work Related to P2 and the Great Lakes Great Lakes Regional Pollution Prevention Round Table Summer Conference August 2005.
SCHC, 9/27/2005 US Implementation of the Globally Harmonized System The GHS Journey Continues…
1 Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program Update July 30, 2008 Jim Alwood Chemical Control Division Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
1 International Harmonization Efforts on Petroleum Substances Characterizing Chemicals in Commerce: Using Data on High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals.
United States Chemicals Management Petroleum Sector Approach Jennifer Galvin, PhD, DABT, CIH Sound Management of Chemicals Working Group – Stakeholder.
ICH V1 An FDA Update Min Chen, M.S., RPh Office of Drug Safety Center for Drug Evaluation and Research FDA January 21, 2003.
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts Lowell.
U.S. High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency October 25, 2005 Region 2 Emerging Chemicals Workshop.
Chad B. Sandusky, Ph.D. Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, Washington DC, USA STRATEGIES TO REDUCE ANIMAL TESTING IN US EPA’S HIGH PRODUCTION.
Barbara Cunningham Office of Pollution Prevention & Toxics 1.
1 Selected Current and Suggested Ideas on Uses of HPV Challenge Data Nhan Nguyen US EPA Characterizing Chemicals in Commerce: Using Data on High Production.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 John Vandenberg Associate Director for Health National Center for Environmental Assessment.
Identifying Tools to Rapidly Characterize & Prioritize Chemicals in Commerce for Prevention Joel A. Tickner, ScD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production.
Phasing Out PFOS and PBDEs: Voluntary and Regulatory Steps Kenneth Moss Chemical Control Division Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, EPA HQ October.
Views on Success and Future Directions Steven Russell Senior Director, American Chemistry Council EPA HPV Data Users Conference December 13, 2006.
1 Chemical Assessment and Management Program Tala Henry, ChAMP Coordinator Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
(Copyright is reserved)1 Outline of the Japan HPV Challenge Program (A joint program among the private and the public sectors for collecting and releasing.
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE1 US HPV Challenge and Beyond Presentation to EPA HPV Data Users Conference Austin, TX December 2006 Richard A. Denison, Ph.D.
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
Development of a Common Effects Methodology for OW and OPP EPA Development Team Office of Pesticide Programs Office of Water Office of Research and Development.
Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Space Transportation Human Space Flight Occupant Safety Telecon Telecon #3 – Types of Requirements and Guidance.
December 2006Characterizing Chemicals in Commerce 1 Using the EPA HPVIS to Form Chemical Categories for Hazard Assessment Sandra Reiss Murphy, PhD Arkema.
Chlorinated Paraffins
September 22, 2011 Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics1.
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Diffusion Film
McKim Conference on Predictive Toxicology
Smart Schools Bond Act Investment Plan Submission Information and Review Process Presentation to Regional Partners Hosted By: Capital Region BOCES October.
1 Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program Environmental Summit May 20, 2008 Jim Alwood Chemical Control Division Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
Environmental Protection Agency 1 The High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS) Demonstration and Status National Environmental Partnership Summit.
Barcelona April, 2008 Overview of the QSAR Application Toolbox Gilman Veith International QSAR Foundation Duluth, Minnesota.
Prioritization Process and Development of the Hazard Characterization Documents Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics U.S. Environmental Protection.
Characterizing Chemicals in Commerce: Reflections and Wrap-Up Steven Russell American Chemistry Council December 14, 2006.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
Special Meeting on Procedures for Information Exchange November 7, 2007 Geneva Session 1 Anne Meininger United States USA WTO TBT Enquiry Point.
Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics Development of the High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS) December 12, 2006 Characterizing Chemicals.
Cefic template to convert REACH dossier
General Concepts in QSAR for Using the QSAR Application Toolbox
Communication: Safety Summary
The administrative agencies
Categorization of the Canadian Domestic Substances List
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Overview & Updates
Strategies for Integrated Human and Ecological Assessment
Presentation transcript:

U.S. High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan U.S. EPA, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics December 12, 2006

2 Topics Covered Why the HPV Challenge Program Was Needed? HPV Challenge Program Goals and Approach HPV Challenge Program Design Features HPV Challenge Commitments Orphan Chemicals How Has EPA Contributed to the HPV Challenge Program? Regulatory Component Next Steps

3 Why Was the HPV Challenge Program Needed? Three Separate Studies – Toxic Ignorance 1997 (Environmental Defense, or ED – formerly EDF) – Data Availability Study 1998 (EPA) – Data Availability Study 1998 (American Chemistry Council, or ACC – formerly CMA)

4 Why Was the HPV Challenge Program Needed? ●43% of the U.S. HPV chemicals had no publicly available studies for any of the 6 basic endpoint groups ●Only 7% of the U.S. HPV chemicals had a full set of publicly available studies for the 6 basic endpoint groups

5 HPV Challenge Program Launches The HPV Challenge Program began in 1998 as a collaborative effort between EPA, the American Chemistry Council (ACC), the American Petroleum Institute (API), and Environmental Defense (ED). Goal of the program: – Make basic health and environmental effects data for HPV chemicals available to the public by the end of 2005

6 HPV Challenge Program Design Features Voluntary program for companies to make basic hazard data on their HPV chemicals publicly available by 2005 Public involvement at every step Incorporate animal welfare considerations and encourage use of SAR/category approaches Modeled after OECD HPV SIDS SIDS: An agreed upon basic set of heath and environmental hazard and environmental fate information

7 Screening Information Data Set (SIDS) – Physicochemical Properties: melting & boiling pts., vapor pressure, water solubility, partition coeff. – Environmental Fate: photodegradation, stability in water, biodegradation, transport (model) – Environmental Effects: acute toxicity in fish, aquatic invertebrates, and aquatic plants – Health Effects: acute and subchronic toxicity, genetic toxicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity HPV Challenge Program Design Features

8 HPV Challenge Program Goals and Approach Companies asked to volunteer (“commit”) to sponsor one or more HPV chemicals Commitment consists of identifying the sponsors and chemicals, and indicating the year the test plan and existing information will be made publicly available

9 HPV Challenge Program Goals and Approach Participation includes developing robust summaries of scientifically adequate existing studies and a Test Plan describing what sponsors plan to do if adequate data are not available for a given endpoint FR Notice issued December 26, 2000 (65 FR 81686)

10 Categories/SAR ●“a group of chemicals whose properties are likely to be similar or follow a pattern as a result of structural similarity” ●“These structural similarities may create a predictable pattern in any or all of the following parameters: physicochemical properties, environmental fate, environmental effects, and/or human health effects.”

11 Categories and SAR ●Why Use Categories and SAR Approaches? – Faster and more efficient than chemical by chemical approach – provides means to “extend existing data” – Results in reduced costs and animal usage

12 HPV Challenge Program Success ●373 companies and 104 consortia have pledged to voluntarily provide data for approximately ●1,400 chemicals included in the U.S. Challenge Program

13 HPV Challenge Program Success ●An additional approximately 800 chemicals are sponsored in the International Council of Chemical Associations (ICCA) HPV Initiative ●Total Commitments = approximately 2,200 chemicals

14 ● Published Interim Report in December 2004 ● Report Highlights ● Final Status Report to Be Developed

15 Orphans Over 260 chemicals remain as “unsponsored” or orphan chemicals

16 Availability of guidance documents such as: – Data Adequacy – Developing Robust Summaries – Developing Categories All guidance documents can be located at: Posting of data and soliciting comments Providing a publicly available database – High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS) How Has EPA Contributed to the HPV Challenge Program?

17 Regulatory Component HPV Chemicals not sponsored in the Voluntary Component are subject to the Regulatory Component of the program Issued TSCA Section 4 Final Test Rule Issued TSCA Section 8 Rules

18 HPV Challenge Test Plans and Robust Summaries As of December 1, 2006, 404 Test Plans and Robust Summaries have been submitted covering 1,404 total chemicals – 124 Test Plans are for categories – 280 Test Plans are for individual chemicals – Submissions have been received for 1,351 (97%) out of 1,387 chemicals that were sponsored directly in the HPV Challenge Program

19 Next Steps Continue to refine HPVIS Screening of completed data sets Prepare “Tier 2” hazard assessments Develop information products that will suit a broader audience Continue to address “orphan” chemicals Develop approach to deal with post HPV Challenge data needs/actions Develop final report on HPV Challenge Program

20 For More Information Visit the HPV Challenge Website: orwww.epa.gov/hpv Contact: Diane Sheridan, Chief Existing Chemicals Branch Phone: (202)