Comparability iGrants Form Package 361. Comparability o Is the comparison of state and local staff in Title I, Part A schools with those in non-Title.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB Title I Comparability Paul Williams Principal Consultant ISBE September 2011.
Advertisements

Title I, Part A/LAP Spring Workshop
Time and Effort Reporting Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) 3/1/2014.
May Welcome and Introductions Training Overview Evolution from CSRS to CEDARS (Fri) Submission and Editing Process (Tues) Course Catalog, Student.
Title I, Part A/Learning Assistance Program (LAP) Webinar June 13, 2012 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction 1.
November The first two processes occurred during Review Week. After the Review Week, top scoring programs were reviewed by a small group for conceptual.
USING THE INDISTAR ® ACTION PLANNING TOOL October 8, 2012 Andy Kelly, Assistant Superintendent Travis Campbell, K-12 Director Megan Eliasson, Administrative.
INITIAL ACTION PLANNING PROCESS August 22, 2012 Andy Kelly, Assistant Superintendent, OSPI Bill Mason, Director of Operations, OSPI Office of Student and.
Topics Schedule of Grant Submission Budget Revisions Title I, Part A Set Asides (Earmarks) Application Revisions Carryover iGrant Revisions Combining.
Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction CAA Options WASL/Grades Comparison Screen Shots to assist you with the use of the WASL/Grades Comparison.
November No requirement to make recommendations Higher level review of alignment with Cross- cutting and Big Ideas from Revised Science Standards.
ESD Olympia , Washington August 8, 2011
1 FY 2007–08 F196 Summary of Changes Pam Peppers Supervisor, School District/ESD Financial Reporting (360) The F-196 pages.
Presented By WVDE Federal Programs Staff July 15, 2009 Title III Monitoring and Fiscal Updates.
Title IA Comparability Monday, November_____, 2010 Webinar Session Jackie Godbout Maine Department of Education
COMPARABILITY Monday, January 29, 2012 Webinar Session Jackie Godbout Maine Department of Education
ARRA Title I and Other Waivers Overview of this Presentation Description of Available ARRA Waivers Description of the Carry-over Waiver Application Process.
New Title I/NCLB Directors Workshop NCLB Winter Conference January 16, 2007 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Margaret MacKinnon, Title.
Targeted Assistance & Schoolwide Programs NCLB Technical Assistance Audio April 18, :30 PM April 19, :30 AM Alaska Department of Education.
Title I Site Eligibility Ranking & Serving Schools NCLB Technical Assistance Audio March 28, :30 PM March 29, :30 AM Alaska Department of.
Michigan Electronic Grants System Plus
ADDED FLEXIBILITY FOR DISTRICTS TIME AND EFFORT. ED GRANTED FLEXIBILITY IN TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING The Department of Education (ED) has taken steps.
Running Start in the High School Setting Spring 2014 Running Start Coordinator’s Meeting April 18, 2014 Becky McLean Supervisor, Enrollment Reporting and.
Title I, Part A District Budget Planning The “Small” Stuff Julie McGuire, MEd Federal Funds Coordinator Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD.
WASBO, May 2006OSPI1 Alternative Learning Experiences - Overview of Amended Rules - Martin Mueller,OSPI,
Special Education Federal Child Count Reporting November 2013.
April 25, Annual Conference.  SHB 6552 – Funding Implications  Other Funding Increases  SHB 2207 – Federal Forest Revenues  LAP Prior Year.
Enrollment Reporting School Year Changes WASBO ABC Committee Meeting October 26, 2011 Becky McLean OSPI - School Apportionment and Financial Services.
1 Title I Comparability Requirement Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
UPDATE National Forum on Education statistics JULY 27 and 28, 2010 Annual Mandatory Collection of Elementary and Secondary Education Data through EDFacts.
Instructions for School Year 1  Please listen and follow directions closely. Errors in reporting could result in a school not receiving any.
PI-SAGE-ENT Reporting Instructions Contents Click a topic below to proceed to that section or continue through the presentation Overview Flexibility.
WASHINGTON STATE TRANSFOMATION INTEGRATING SUPPORTS USING THE INDISTAR ® ACTION-PLANNING TOOL January 2015 OSPI’s Office of Student and School Success.
Office of Student and School Success Travis Campbell, Director Paul Wieneke, Indistar Program Specialist OSPI Title I Division Nate Marciochi, Program.
Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Title I, Part A/Learning Assistance Program Webinar, February 17, 2015.
1 TITLE I COMPARABILITY – Determinations & Reporting Thomas Chin October 5, 2010.
Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Title I, Part A/Learning Assistance Program Webinar, February 17, 2015.
COMPARABILITY November 5, :00 p.m. Webinar Session Jackie Godbout Maine Department of Education This webinar will be recorded. Enter your.
Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Title I, Part A/Learning Assistance Program Webinar, February 17, 2015.
Alternative Learning Experience Workgroup As you arrive, use a sticky note to write one question/comment or concern you have about ALE.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
AYP Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) NCESD Title I/LAP Co-Op Work Session August 26, 2014 Jody Hess, OSPI Title I:
Maintenance of Effort, Comparability, and Supplement/Supplant PAFPC April 2011.
Demonstrating Comparability School Year October 2014October 2014.
COMPARABILITY Monday, November 19, 2012 Webinar Session Jackie Godbout Maine Department of Education This webinar will be recorded. Mute your.
Title I, Part A Fiscal Requirements for Comparability FY Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Title I, IIA, VI, & X December 2012.
Tell your story using numbers and words Susan Andre, Title I Coordinator East Baton Rouge Parish School System.
Tell your story using numbers and words Susan Andre, Title I Coordinator East Baton Rouge Parish School System.
Unexcused Absence and Truancy Reporting In previous years, the Unexcused Absence and Truancy report collected information from districts/schools.
TITLE I COMPARABILITY Determinations & Reporting Title I Technical Assistance Session School Improvement Grant Programs October 6, 2011.
Financial Reporting (Overview & EFIS Users). 2 General Reporting Requirements  Reporting requirements are outlined in the 2011/12 Child Care Business.
TITLE I, PART A ESEA ROLLOUT SPRING 2013 Version Title I, Part A Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Reviewing the Apportionment Report: Key Areas Presented by Denise Wolff, Director School Finance, ESD 113.
Title I, Part A COMPARABILITY. What is the purpose of Comparability? To ensure that participating Title I schools receive the same level of services from.
 This Presentation is designed to help you with enrollment reporting within the Education Data System (EDS). OSPI is working to create a step-by-step.
Title I, Part A 1.
Title I Comparability OFS Mission Accelerate student achievement through school improvement by working as partners to maximize the allowable use of supplementary.
Excess Cost Michigan Department of Education Office of Special Education.
Estimates Training Financial Analysis & Accountability Branch May 2012.
Michigan Electronic Grants System Plus
Title I A Comparability Report
Community Eligibility Provision
Title I, Part A End-of-Year (EOY) Report iGrants Form Package (FP) 244
Comparability Reporting through CDE’s Online Data System
Title I in the FY19 ESSA Consolidated Grant Application
CTE Administrative Internship Program January 18, 2008
Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Title I, Part A/Learning Assistance Program Webinar, February 17, 2015.
Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Title I, Part A/Learning Assistance Program Webinar, February 17, 2015.
Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Title I, Part A/Learning Assistance Program Webinar, February 17, 2015.
Title I, Part A End-of-Year (EOY) Report iGrants Form Package (FP) 244
Presentation transcript:

Comparability iGrants Form Package 361

Comparability o Is the comparison of state and local staff in Title I, Part A schools with those in non-Title I, Part A schools. o Will be indicated by a red comment, NOT COMPARABLE in Column 7 until ALL schools are entered. o Ratio for Title I, Part A schools must be no greater than 110 percent of the average of non-Title I, Part A schools. o Ratio must be between 90 percent and 110 percent of the average of schools when all schools in the grade span receive Title I, Part A funds. iGrants Form Package (FP) 361

Virtual or Online Schools Per the United States Department of Education, online schools receiving Title I, Part A funds must be treated like any other school for comparability. Some flexibility in method used.

iGrants FP 361 Page 1 Must be completed by ALL districts which receive Title I, Part A funds List each grade span Indicate number of Title I, Part A schools Indicate number of non-Title I, Part A schools Enter enrollment ONLY when several schools of varying sizes, generally only for large districts IMPORTANT -Save after each grade span addition

Larger or Smaller? Use of larger or smaller o Will only apply to larger districts o Must have several schools in the grade span o Largest school must be at least twice as large as the smallest

Grade Span A school is NOT necessarily a separate physical building All school numbers should be represented on the comparability report Must agree to information reported on Title I, Part A application Report all schools under grade span, even if less than 100 students Those under 100 students will also be shown on the bottom of Page 1

iGrants FP 361 Schools with enrollment of less than 100 students- o Include in the number of schools for applicable grade span in top section of Page 1 In addition- o List in the bottom part of Page 1 Will not be included on the individual grade span pages

iGrants FP 361 Pages 2-14 Complete for EACH grade span where- o More than one school o At least one school receives Title I, Part A funds Each grade span will have EITHER an even number OR an odd number page, never both

Remember Enrollment is determined by HEADCOUNT Do not include preschool Staff is determined by Full Time Equivalent ( FTE )

iGrants FP 361 Either- Compare Title I, Part A schools in the grade span to non-Title I, Part A schools in that grade span OR If all schools in the grade span receive Title I, Part A funds, compare them to each other IMPORTANT: Mark all pages not needed as Not Applicable

iGrants FP 361 Two choices o Staff to student ratio (most common) Columns 2 and 3 Column 4 calculates automatically o Staff salary to student ratio Does NOT include differential for years of experience Columns 2 and 5 Column 6 calculates automatically

Staff To Include State and locally funded instructional staff- o Be consistent for all schools in the district Activity 27-Certificated Staff (preferred) Activity 27-Certificated and Classified Staff Include other allowable Activity 20s May exclude State Learning Assistance Program, State Transitional Bilingual and State SPED staff

Not Comparable If a school is not comparable, adjustments must be made o Increase staff (most common) o Move students Send describing how comparability will be met Then resubmit showing comparability has been met-usually next month

Resources OSPI Bulletin Department of Education Non Regulatory Guidance, Title I Fiscal Issues, Revised February 2008

Title I, Part A Staff Gayle Pauley, Director o (360) Program Supervisors o (360) o (360) o (360) o (360) o (360) o (360) Administrative Assistants o (360) o (360) o (360)

???? ? QUESTIONS? ?