USING NEEDS ASSESSMENTS & CREATING ACTION PLANS September 25, 2012 Greg Lobdell, Center for Educational Effectiveness Candace Gratama, The BERC Group Travis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

USING THE INDISTAR ® ACTION PLANNING TOOL October 8, 2012 Andy Kelly, Assistant Superintendent Travis Campbell, K-12 Director Megan Eliasson, Administrative.
USING DATA REPORTS AND CONDUCTING NEEDS ASSESSMENTS & September 25, 2012 Greg Lobdell, Center for Educational Effectiveness Candace Gratama, The BERC Group.
INITIAL ACTION PLANNING PROCESS August 22, 2012 Andy Kelly, Assistant Superintendent, OSPI Bill Mason, Director of Operations, OSPI Office of Student and.
Harrison County Schools Professional Learning Community (PLC) Implementation Plan.
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
PRIORITY AND FOCUS SCHOOLS: INCREASING CAPACITY FOR IMPROVEMENT USING THE INDISTAR ® ACTION-PLANNING TOOL June 11, 2014 OSPI’s Office of Student and School.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Program Improvement Year 3 Corrective Action.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Your Local School District District Team Orientation Date Time.
The Blueprint Your SIP (School Improvement Plan) A living, breathing, document.
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Office of Student and School Success Action Plan Reviews Essential Question: What defines a distinguished Student and School Success Action Plan? Learning.
Priority and Focus Schools: INCREASING CAPACITY FOR IMPROVEMENT April 2015 OSPI’s Office of Student and School Success Travis Campbell, Director Paul Wieneke,
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
CRAFTING S.M.A.R.T. GOALS September 2014 Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Travis Campbell, Director, K-12 Education Sue Cohn, School Improvement.
Theories of Action: What are they, why are they important, and how are they created? January 2015 Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Travis Campbell,
Indistar Implementation Science Performance Management MAUREEN RICHEL AND SAM REDDING CENTER ON INNOVATIONS IN LEARNING.
Iowa Support System for Schools and Districts in Need of Assistance Phase III: Design AEA 267 SINA Process Se.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
“NEXT STEPS” BIE FAMILY ENGAGEMENT Facilitated by: Updated 6/21/2013.
School Leadership Teams Collaborating for Effectiveness Begin to answer Questions #1-2 on the Handout: School Leadership Teams for Continuous Improvement.
Leading Change Through a Walk-Through Protocol
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Introduction & Step 1 Presenter:. Training Overview Introduction Participation requirements FET Tool Orientation Distribution of username & passwords.
Cohort 2 Focus School Technical Assistance Webinar Session 1 October 21, 2013 Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director Office of School Improvement.
Navigating Indistar ® to Develop & Implement Your Student and School Success Action Plan Office of Student and School Success Paul Wieneke, Indistar® Program.
Introduction & Step 1 Presenter: Updated 6/21/2013.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
IDENTIFYING & PRIORITIZING PROBLEMS OF PRACTICE December 2014 Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Travis Campbell, Director Sue Cohn, School Improvement.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
Title I Schoolwide Planning Comprehensive Needs Assessment Wednesday, October 24, 2012.
Guidance for Completing Interim Report I Evaluation Webinar Series 3 Dec 2013.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Title I Schoolwide Mid- Year Review Melissa Moe and Kris Rangel January 24, 2013.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
Ensuring Success For Each Student AdvancED District Accreditation Process Five-Year External Review March 13 – 16, 2016 Produced by Mr. Tony Pickett, Assistant.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Our Theory of Action and Multi-Tiered Framework are anchored in the Vision and Mission for the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Office of Student.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
KEEPING THE FOCUS ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Stephanie Benedict Academic Development Institute & Center on Innovations in Learning.
The Importance of Professional Learning in Systems Reform AdvancED Performance Accreditation Bev Mortimer Concordia Superintendent
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Hosted By: Janice Case NASSP Consultant Building Connections Among Principal, Counselor, and Students presented by Judith Richardson & Virginia Minshew.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Continuous School Improvement & ASSIST ACIP Dr. Melissa Shields, NBCT
Presentation transcript:

USING NEEDS ASSESSMENTS & CREATING ACTION PLANS September 25, 2012 Greg Lobdell, Center for Educational Effectiveness Candace Gratama, The BERC Group Travis Campbell, K12 Director, OSPI Sue Cohn, School Improvement Specialist, OSPI Office of Student and School Success

Audio is one-way only; all participants are in mute status. Please send questions to us via the Comments box. We will answer questions at our first available opportunity. WEBINAR ETIQUETTE REMINDER 2

Share protocols for using your Needs Assessment and other data Describe Initial Action Plan review and S.M.A.R.T. Strategies Outline next steps in the creating your Student and School Success Action Plan and available resources Respond to questions GOALS FOR WEBINAR 3

USING YOUR NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND OTHER DATA 4

Build an understanding of the Needs Assessment Process – Understand the organization of the report – Understand the data collected and triangulation process Understand- establishing the current reality Reflect- what do these data mean to me? Discuss of the preferred future Engage the stakeholders in creating the preferred future PRIORITY DEBRIEF OBJECTIVES

Staff should reflect on the data, using the following questions: What do these data mean to me/us? How can we use these data to inform our work? What can we do to improve our School? ENGAGE IN A REFLECTIVE DISCUSSION

Do not blame Keep discussion reflective – Instead of explaining data away, ask why the data shows this Facilitate a discussion to move the conversation forward Use the data to develop goals and strategies RULES FOR REFLECTIVE DISCUSSION

OVERALL PRIORITY PROCESS

Leadership Staff Leadership Team/School Improvement Team 3-STEP PROCESS FOR PRIORITY SCHOOL DEBRIEF

Understand the organization of the Needs Assessment summary Share and understand the implications of the findings unique to the leadership of the building. Understand triangulation of data to form the summary statements and recommendations. Strategize how the data will be shared with the staff (both in debrief and after) in order to maximize staff acceptance and use of the data findings. Understand the unique challenges within the building and strategize how to meet those challenges LEADERSHIP DEBRIEF

Understand the organization of the Needs Assessment Summary – Enable transparency of data components, findings, and recommendations Build awareness of each data element and how those elements triangulated to form the summary statements and recommendations. Allow for questions, concerns and dialogue with CEE representative, building and district leadership and fellow staff members. To begin the discussion and position for next steps. STAFF DEBRIEF

Building leadership, SIP Team, CEE, and OSPI Student and School Success Coach Discuss and support alignment with Indistar and the Student and School Success Principles and Indicators Define next steps, moving toward action planning RETURN VISIT FOR NEXT STEPS AND ACTION PLANNING

Review Needs Assessment Findings with All Stakeholders – Share results with the entire staff to ensure transparency and to develop trust around findings – Engage in a collaborative process to discuss current reality and preferred reality FOCUS SCHOOLS: REVIEW NEEDS ASSESSMENT FINDINGS

Options for reviewing findings 1.The BERC Group leads entire staff through a reflective process (two to three hours) 2.The BERC Group works with the leadership team to review findings and to develop their capacity to lead staff through process 3.School personnel lead staff through the reflective process THREE OPTIONS

Demographic Data Achievement Data Survey Results (Student, Student, Parent, and others) Classroom Instruction Data College and Career Readiness Data – High Schools (Course taking patterns and college attendance, persistence, gradation rates) STEP 1: REVIEW DATA

Distribute Student and School Success Rubric – Rubric is designed to identify strengths and weakness and is in alignment with best practices research – School personnel can see that there is a continuum and a path they can follow toward improvement. STEP 2: REVIEW QUALITATIVE SECTION

Break staff members into small groups to review the School and Classroom Practices Study – Within the small groups, each staff members read a few sections of the report quietly (15 minutes). Encourage the staff to make notes on the report and to identify data points that support the findings. – Discuss qualitative section, making connections across sections. STEP 2: REVIEW QUALITATIVE SECTION

Gather input from staff about preferred reality – Discuss and support alignment with Indistar and the Student and School Success Principle Indicators – Use the Indistar tool to build the plan around data, research, and evidence-based practices STEP 3: DISCUSS CURRENT REALITY AND PREFERRED REALITY

INITIAL ACTION PLAN REVIEW AND S.M.A.R.T. STRATEGIES 19

All Initial Action Plans were reviewed by Student and School Success Leaders and Coaches. Coaches assessed one strategy using a rubric focused on essential elements of an effective S.M.A.R.T. Strategy; coaches also provided additional feedback on remaining strategies. Principals and schools teams will use feedback on their Initial Action Plan when they craft their Student and School Success Action Plan. INITIAL ACTION PLAN REVIEW 20

1.What are the expected outcomes of implementing the strategy for students/sub-groups? 2.What are the expected outcomes of using this strategy for educator practice? 3.What professional development or technical assistance (PD/TA) is provided to support effective implementation of this strategy? 4.What resources are allocated to support effective implementation of this strategy? 5.What evidence will be utilized to determine the effectiveness of this strategy in achieving the desired outcomes? ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS

Specific Measurable Actionable/Attainable Realistic/Results-oriented Timely/Time-bound S.M.A.R.T. Strategies articulate both the evidence supporting the strategy and measurable outcomes for students and educators. S.M.A.R.T. STRATEGIES

STUDENT AND SCHOOL SUCCESS ACTION PLANNING PROCESS 25

ACTION PLANNING PROCESS Engages principals, teams, and other stakeholders in reflection around: Findings and recommendations from their Needs Assessment and feedback on Initial Action Plan Current realities based on locally-developed data (disaggregated student assessment, demographic, perceptual, and contextual data) Beliefs about students and learning and educator capacity to address opportunity gaps among students Changes required to strengthen leadership and instructional practice and boost student achievement Research and evidence-based strategies and approaches Systems-level supports and barriers to change 26

ACTION PLANNING & PROCESS Informed by current SIP and Initial Action Plan Aligns with the Student and School Success Principles Anchored in S.M.A.R.T. Strategies Created and submitted using OSPIs online action planning tool (Indistar ® ) Forms basis for on-going improvement work 27

Serves as both an action-planning tool and a tool to monitor progress Developed and supported through the Center on Innovation and Improvement (CII) Anchored in OSPIs Student and School Success Principles Aligns with OSPIs Nine Characteristics of High-Performing Schools Supports teams to craft their own strategies and action plans based on the unique needs of their school community INDISTAR

NEXT STEPS FOR CRAFTING STUDENT AND SCHOOL SUCCESS ACTION PLANS 31

1.Select Leadership Team to shepherd the process 2.Identify key stakeholders to include in process 3.Allocate sufficient time for Leadership Team and staff to engage in the process 4.Collect and sort data a.Current SIP and feedback on Initial Action Plan b.Findings and Recommendations from Needs Assessment c.Other data (demographic, achievement, perceptual, contextual) 32

5.Analyze data 6.Identify critical indicators to address using the Indistar tool 7.Research best practices for selected indicators 8.Craft your plan using the tool 9.Submit to OSPI for review and approval 10.Use the plan as the basis for on-going improvement work 33

AVAILABLE RESOURCES 34

35 To complete the Student and School Success Plan: Student and School Success Leadership Coach Regional Educational Service District (ESD) OSPI Office of Student and School Success To implement the Student and School Success Plan: Student and School Success Leadership Coach (Priority and Focus Schools) Instructional Coaches through the Office of Student and School Success (e.g., MBA, RBA, Gap Analysis) Other Divisions in OSPI Regional Educational Service District (ESD) iGrant funding Title I set-aside and other district funds

QUESTIONS? 36 For assistance, please contact Andy or (360)